Site Search:
 
Get TEFL Certified & Start Your Adventure Today!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

English as a second language: learned or acquired?
Goto page Previous  1, 2
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> General Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
JZer



Joined: 16 Jan 2005
Posts: 3898
Location: Pittsburgh

PostPosted: Sun Apr 20, 2008 3:43 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

In regards to writing, language is learned. One must even learn how to write their first language. Writing is something that is not likely to be acquired like speaking or listening. Steven Pinker talks about that in The Language Instinct
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Kootvela



Joined: 22 Oct 2007
Posts: 513
Location: Lithuania

PostPosted: Sun Apr 20, 2008 1:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Not quoting anybody big, my personal idea is that you learn, that's why you acquire. You don't learn, you don't acquire.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
rusmeister



Joined: 15 Jun 2006
Posts: 867
Location: Russia

PostPosted: Sun Apr 20, 2008 3:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thank you, JZer and Kootvela! (Where's the 'bow' emoticon?)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
cmp45



Joined: 17 Aug 2004
Posts: 1475
Location: KSA

PostPosted: Tue Apr 22, 2008 9:16 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The distinction as I see it..."Acquiring" a second language is through your own efforts; where as "learning" a second language is usually through the help or assistance of a native speaker, teacher
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Marcoregano



Joined: 19 May 2003
Posts: 872
Location: Hong Kong

PostPosted: Tue Apr 22, 2008 9:38 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Perhaps the main problem here is that the two words have very similar meanings. Posters have different perceptions of what the words mean - so little wonder it is hard to find agreement. These definitions are from the same dictionary...

Learn: 1. to acquire knowledge of or skill in by study, instruction, or experience: to learn French; to learn to ski.
2. to become informed of or acquainted with; ascertain: to learn the truth.

Acquire: 1. to come into possession or ownership of; get as one's own: to acquire property.
2. to gain for oneself through one's actions or efforts: to acquire learning.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
fluffyhamster



Joined: 13 Mar 2005
Posts: 3292
Location: UK > China > Japan > UK again

PostPosted: Tue Apr 22, 2008 1:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

cmp45 wrote:
The distinction as I see it..."Acquiring" a second language is through your own efforts; where as "learning" a second language is usually through the help or assistance of a native speaker, teacher


Perhaps, but I've come to interpret A as requiring less short-term effort* (and something that a teacher can still assist with, by planning well, getting the level and flow right), whereas L can be done alone, from books (but then, good books are virtual teachers) and probably requires greater engagement if not effort.

*It must be quite an effort though to just depend on "picking up" (acquiring) the language without any formal study, with all the stresses and risks that that might entail in the "long(er) term" (i.e. long period of immersion and "study")!


Last edited by fluffyhamster on Tue Apr 22, 2008 2:51 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
John Hall



Joined: 16 Mar 2004
Posts: 452
Location: San Jose, Costa Rica

PostPosted: Tue Apr 22, 2008 2:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Justin Trullinger wrote:
The degree to which these two processes (conscious learning, and non-conscious development of an intrinsic system) are separable seems to me not to have one clear answer, but to vary between individuals and circumstances.


...and between languages, I would say. I lived in Japan for three and a half years, and neither learned nor acquired Japanese. However, after two years in Costa Rica without any courses in Spanish, I began acquiring the language. I wasn't even really trying! It just happened. I call that process "learning by osmosis."

Nevertheless, after seven years here in Costa Rica, although I can usually get my point across, I still cannot conjugate my verb tenses well. Those immense verb tense and conjugation tables that Spanish has seem to make it a language that requires conscious learning, or at least intentional memorization.

The beauty of English is its relative simplicity, at least in the area of verb tense and conjugation. IMHO, that makes it a much easier language to pick up by acquisition rather than by conscious learning.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
John Hall



Joined: 16 Mar 2004
Posts: 452
Location: San Jose, Costa Rica

PostPosted: Tue Apr 22, 2008 2:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think another point that should be taken into consideration is that although acquisition may seem rather effortless and natural, it is not as fast a process as conscious learning--whether the student is immersed in the new language or not.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Chancellor



Joined: 31 Oct 2005
Posts: 1337
Location: Ji'an, China - if you're willing to send me cigars, I accept donations :)

PostPosted: Tue Apr 22, 2008 3:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Marcoregano wrote:
Perhaps the main problem here is that the two words have very similar meanings. Posters have different perceptions of what the words mean - so little wonder it is hard to find agreement. These definitions are from the same dictionary...

Learn: 1. to acquire knowledge of or skill in by study, instruction, or experience: to learn French; to learn to ski.
2. to become informed of or acquainted with; ascertain: to learn the truth.

Acquire: 1. to come into possession or ownership of; get as one's own: to acquire property.
2. to gain for oneself through one's actions or efforts: to acquire learning.
In the context of this thread, though, acquiring language is something that is done "naturally" (to quote the first page of Chapter Two in the book identified in the original post) without formal instruction while learning language is done through formal instruction.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
keepwalking



Joined: 17 Feb 2005
Posts: 194
Location: Peru, at last

PostPosted: Wed May 07, 2008 9:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Learn it or acquire it? I think it depends on the age at which you start the process.

Most of us who are living abroad will know of little kids who arrive in our host country and chat away in the local country very quickly, whereas we struggle to remember words and have to consciously apply rules of grammar as we utter a whole sentence for the first time. That improves with practice but my friend's 4 year old still speaks Spanish with less effort than I do.

In Pinker's Language Instinct he talks about a cut off age for 1st language learning. There's an infamous case of a 13 year old girl (Genie) who was imprisoned by her father from babyhood and cut off from language exposure. When finally rescued and adopted by an eminent linguist, she never really progressed past the grammatical development of a 3 year old. She had a wide vocabulary but still strung a sentence together such as 'me want it'. She only occasionally formed anything more complex than the 3 word stage. The theory was that as she hadn't been exposed to language as her brain was forming, she never made the neural connections necessary to fully acquire a language.

Now if we apply that theory to 2nd language learning, and compare children to those slightly older 2nd language learners such as myself... perhaps the reason my friend's 4 year old babbles away without any problem is that his brain is still forming neural connections through exposure to language and thus his grey matter can adapt to a different language more easily. My brain gave up making those connections years ago and now when exposed to Spanish, still has to remind itself that adjectives go after nouns, not before. Years of exposure to English set a pattern between my ears - noun-adjective. My brain then filed away copious amounts of new nouns and adjectives, but always connected in that order. Then I arrived in South America and was surrounded by Spanish at which point smoke starting coming out my ears. I had to learn Spanish in a whole new way.

There's weight added to this by a study which looked at which part of the brain is actively involved in language acquisition. At aorund the time of puberty, our language centre of the brain moves from the creative bit to the mathmatical bit - bad news for me as I'm not sure that part of my brain ever developed! Thus as adults we learn a second language in a more methodical way. Sure, being exposed to the language hastens progress but without some book time I doubt I would have progressed in Spanish past counting and ordering food and drink.

Just a theory.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> General Discussion All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

Teaching Jobs in China
Teaching Jobs in China