|
Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Are some topics too controversial? |
| Yes. |
|
47% |
[ 10 ] |
| Yes in some cases. |
|
28% |
[ 6 ] |
| Depends on how it is handled. |
|
23% |
[ 5 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 21 |
|
| Author |
Message |
rusmeister
Joined: 15 Jun 2006 Posts: 867 Location: Russia
|
Posted: Wed May 28, 2008 1:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
| gaijinalways wrote: |
Yes, I understood poster 5010, and I might be happy to share my views after they do the debate, but what my opinion is on this matter is not important. I'm looking for students to develop debating/argumentative styles, and be able to support their conclusions with evidence.
| Quote: |
| PS - it doesn't matter what you think about that issue; my point is that westerners think of their attitude as superior and don't really understand the culture (or philosophical base)they are dealing with. |
Whcih is why we're discussing the issues, rather than me just sharing blanket opinions that I hold. Did you ever think that the Russians also feel they are superior ? Both find it difficult to understand the other side's views as the value systems are different, hence their conclusions about the matter are different. |
With Russians, it's a complex inferiority/superiority complex. (So yes, I do.) But the problem I'm talking about is English teachers coming on as teachers to Russian students of English, not the reverse. It's the western view of superiority that would be pushed on Russians (generally the teacher has the ultimate control in the class. The students' only option is to 'vote with their feet' (if they can). |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
gaijinalways
Joined: 29 Nov 2005 Posts: 2279
|
Posted: Thu May 29, 2008 7:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
I hear you, but I'm not interested in pushing any agenda.
| Quote: |
| It's the western view of superiority that would be pushed on Russians (generally the teacher has the ultimate control in the class. The students' only option is to 'vote with their feet' (if they can). |
That's true in most classrooms, but we don't want to piss off our students, just get them thinking. That's why my favorite question is 'Why?' . Some students will ask me, "Why do you always ask why?" I always answer "Why not!?" |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
phantombedwetter
Joined: 29 Nov 2007 Posts: 154 Location: Pikey infested, euro, cess-pit (Krakow)
|
Posted: Thu May 29, 2008 8:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
| arioch36 wrote: |
Certainly here in China there are many topics that can not be debated, either because the students are told by the leaders not to, or it is useless.
China has 5,000 years of history
Taiwan is part of China
Tibet is part of China, and the Dali is evil, and the Tibet protestors are evil, want to destroy China and the Olympics, and the west (esp. CNN )wants this as well)
And throw in any other party teaching...only one answer allowable. A dissenting student very likely would be beat up by other students.
Don't know how many are aware, at Duke university a mainland Chinese girl was seen speaking in a friendly way to the Tibetans at her uni who were preotesting. The result ... massive number of people calling for her death, and the death of her family. Her details such as home address, work site of parents, etc were published on various forums, and the parents had to go into hiding.
No, many topics just can't be discussed in China for various reasons |
This is my personal favourite.
During my time in China I had hours of fun with this one.
The conversation goes something like this...
PBW "So why isn't Taiwan part of China?"
Brainwashed Chinese student "It is!!"
PBW "But it's not now, is it?"
Student "Let's go back to 1264..... blah blah.... Fu Man Chu.... blah blah Tang dynasty...yawn yawn....evil Japs....ad nauseum...."
PBW "But it's not now, is it?"
Student (And rest of class by this stage)"We will fight to our deaths for Taiwan...evil Americans...blah blah....yada yada....Ming dynasty....Great wall.....yawn yawn....bad breath"
PBW "The Taiwanese will blow all your little ships out of the water as soon as you leave the coast, the American supplied anti-missile systems will destroy your shore based missiles before you launch them."
"Oh, and the Taiwanese people don't want you".
Student "Yes, good point, now where's McDonald's?" |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jonniboy
Joined: 18 Jun 2006 Posts: 751 Location: Panama City, Panama
|
Posted: Thu May 29, 2008 10:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
Phantom, you really don't need to go all the way to China to find that. With Spanish students, Gibraltar is Spanish because it's physically attached to Spain. Ceuta and Melilla however aren't Moroccan even though they're physically attached to that country. Similarly the Falklands Islands are Argentinian as they're closer to that country than Britain but the Canary Islands are Spanish not Moroccan as geography doesn't matter in that case.
Students can be a funny bunch though I once did this activity with a group and it worked well http://www.doe.in.gov/ipla/hda/2001-0312.html but with another group it totally bombed as there was one student who refused even hypothetically to consider having to choose which people shouldn't survive and looked at me as though I was some kind of psychotic mass murderer. I've since amended the topic into a reality T.V. show style concept of choosing people to go to a desert island for the rest of their lives but it doesn't work as well. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
arioch36
Joined: 21 Jan 2003 Posts: 3589
|
Posted: Thu May 29, 2008 1:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| Phantom, you really don't need to go all the way to China to find that. With Spanish students, Gibraltar is Spanish because it's physically attached to Spain |
But you need to go to China to find the near-hysteria fervor.
When I said that classmates would beat up a student who questioned whether Taiwan was still part of China, I was literally being literal. The students would beat up this student.
But yeah, I agree, it can be anywhere |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rusmeister
Joined: 15 Jun 2006 Posts: 867 Location: Russia
|
Posted: Thu May 29, 2008 5:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| arioch36 wrote: |
| Quote: |
| Phantom, you really don't need to go all the way to China to find that. With Spanish students, Gibraltar is Spanish because it's physically attached to Spain |
But you need to go to China to find the near-hysteria fervor.
When I said that classmates would beat up a student who questioned whether Taiwan was still part of China, I was literally being literal. The students would beat up this student.
But yeah, I agree, it can be anywhere |
Just to hammer my point in, I don't doubt that they (the Chinese students) would, because they have been indoctrinated, just like western public school grads - the main difference is that the Chinese ideology is overt. Pluralism as an ideology is far more subtle. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
phantombedwetter
Joined: 29 Nov 2007 Posts: 154 Location: Pikey infested, euro, cess-pit (Krakow)
|
Posted: Thu May 29, 2008 7:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| rusmeister wrote: |
| arioch36 wrote: |
| Quote: |
| Phantom, you really don't need to go all the way to China to find that. With Spanish students, Gibraltar is Spanish because it's physically attached to Spain |
But you need to go to China to find the near-hysteria fervor.
When I said that classmates would beat up a student who questioned whether Taiwan was still part of China, I was literally being literal. The students would beat up this student.
But yeah, I agree, it can be anywhere |
Just to hammer my point in, I don't doubt that they (the Chinese students) would, because they have been indoctrinated, just like western public school grads - the main difference is that the Chinese ideology is overt. Pluralism as an ideology is far more subtle. |
How have western public school 'grads' been indoctrinated?
pray tell? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rusmeister
Joined: 15 Jun 2006 Posts: 867 Location: Russia
|
Posted: Fri May 30, 2008 1:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
| phantombedwetter wrote: |
| rusmeister wrote: |
| arioch36 wrote: |
| Quote: |
| Phantom, you really don't need to go all the way to China to find that. With Spanish students, Gibraltar is Spanish because it's physically attached to Spain |
But you need to go to China to find the near-hysteria fervor.
When I said that classmates would beat up a student who questioned whether Taiwan was still part of China, I was literally being literal. The students would beat up this student.
But yeah, I agree, it can be anywhere |
Just to hammer my point in, I don't doubt that they (the Chinese students) would, because they have been indoctrinated, just like western public school grads - the main difference is that the Chinese ideology is overt. Pluralism as an ideology is far more subtle. |
How have western public school 'grads' been indoctrinated?
pray tell? |
It requires a very long answer or none at all.
Are you up for a very long answer and don't mind doing a little reading/research?
Or, to take a cue from "The Matrix":
Take the blue pill and your life returns to normal. Everything is OK. Or...take the red pill and jump down the rabbit hole. Your choice, Mr. Anderson.
http://christianforums.com/showthread.php?t=6072877
The pov's are Christian (obviously, given the hosting site) - hope it's not a turn-off for you. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
arioch36
Joined: 21 Jan 2003 Posts: 3589
|
Posted: Fri May 30, 2008 5:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| Just to hammer my point in, I don't doubt that they (the Chinese students) would, because they have been indoctrinated, just like western public school grads - the main difference is that the Chinese ideology is overt. |
In large part I agree and disagree. At my public college, as a born-again believer, I had a wonderful experience, and friendships withdiverse groups of people .Grad schools, as a whole, are not very tolerant of opposing views. It is much more subtle, and not forceful, but all pervasive indoctrination...if you want to suceed.
High Scool as a whole is a distant memory. Mine was very neutral. No values strongly taught or un-taught. Chinese schools ... students are there from sunrise to well past sunset, 6 1/2 days a year, and have little chance to be exposed to other views such as we a re in the west, so the effect is much stronger. They simply have had minimal experience to anything other then the party line.
In the west, no matter what your school is like, you wil receive a much wider variety of experiences
You want to be successful in grad school, you need to get published. You want to get published? You better submit articles that the journal wants.
Right now most grad programs are controlled by "liberals". You want to argue that homosexuality is wrong? You want to argue why the Bible is good? You will be heaped with loads of scorn, likely failure, and perhaps censure.
Now to be fair, if you go to grad school at a Christian school (and ther are a fair number of such schools) you will also come up against such a stone wall. Graduate school is not a place for independent thought. It is a good place for a new angle on established beliefs, but not for new ideas
When I was in undergrad studies, I had three B.S. degrees, took a lot of course, and loved it. Asides from a couple of feminists in the women studires department, I could espouse any view I wanted, and as long as I had good reasoning I found tolerance, a willingness to listen and discuss. Profs were quite encouraging of divrgent views that were backed up with evidence and/or careful thought.For my pysch major, my favourite prof came to be a feminist (I am a born again type, or some similar label). She did not really care for believing in God. We talked about the bible, about feminist research, and we agreed on about 95% of our topics.
Come grad school, all was different. Yopu best tote the company line. Want a research grant? Say what they want to hear. etc. Much less tolerance of divergent opinions. Some prof with 10 years of teaching, no other job experience. All theory. I have 12 years plus experience. Didn't make for a good mix |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mcl sonya
Joined: 12 Dec 2007 Posts: 179 Location: Qingdao
|
Posted: Fri May 30, 2008 1:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I had a list of various debate topics (plastic surgery for non serious reasons, good or bad, etc.) and students were allowed to pick whatever they want. one of the debates was similar to yours, on whether or not being born in China makes you a Chinese person, for example if you're white or korean. It became a lively debate on nature vs. nurture.
I wouldn't ask about the bomb. that's awful. you know, like even if your mom was on an unstoppable murdering rampage, it would break your heart to say that she (along with countless innocents) should be killed in order to be stopped.
Apparently one debate they had at my school was on whether or not sex ed should be taught to uni students. I didn't even realize you could plausibly argue against such a thing except to say something like, it's against my religion. But a lot of students thought that it would be scandalous. Don't know how things are in Japan, but this could be a topic. I normally briefly present both sides of the topic the week before the debate, in order to give both sides something to think about. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kungfucowboy83
Joined: 25 Jan 2006 Posts: 479
|
Posted: Sat May 31, 2008 12:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
i have to say in china as long as you bring something up in a fairly neutral question no topic is off limits. it is just some are not debateable.
is taiwan a part of china? yes answer from the whole class, no differing opinion, no devils advocate allowed
is the dali lama bad? yes that traitor, again no differing opinion, no devils advocate allowed willing to argue against something they belive for the sake of argument
do you like japanese people, No.
you get the idea? you can bring the topic up all you want but debate? no way
maybe you could argue is the dali lama as evil as the devil or is he only as bad as osama bin laden or can we lower it to equal with jack the ripper? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rusmeister
Joined: 15 Jun 2006 Posts: 867 Location: Russia
|
Posted: Sat May 31, 2008 2:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
| mcl sonya wrote: |
Apparently one debate they had at my school was on whether or not sex ed should be taught to uni students. I didn't even realize you could plausibly argue against such a thing except to say something like, it's against my religion. But a lot of students thought that it would be scandalous. Don't know how things are in Japan, but this could be a topic. I normally briefly present both sides of the topic the week before the debate, in order to give both sides something to think about. |
This illustrates what I have been saying, Sonya. The very use of the personal pronoun "my", as in "against my religion", is western pluralist individualist thinking - that the individual decides what is truth for himself. To a people that believe in and teach universal truth, things that for us would be "against my religion" would be universally and obviously wrong for them - truth applied to everybody, not just your personal opinion. To put you in their shoes, imagine if a teacher were to suggest a debate on the merits and benefits of pedophilia, something westerners generally agree is not a matter of personal opinion, and not something of no import, open to theoretical discussion. That might help understand why and how you could get reactions of universal condemnation to something you see as harmless. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
gaijinalways
Joined: 29 Nov 2005 Posts: 2279
|
Posted: Sat May 31, 2008 6:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| This illustrates what I have been saying, Sonya. The very use of the personal pronoun "my", as in "against my religion", is western pluralist individualist thinking - that the individual decides what is truth for himself. To a people that believe in and teach universal truth, things that for us would be "against my religion" would be universally and obviously wrong for them - truth applied to everybody, not just your personal opinion. To put you in their shoes, imagine if a teacher were to suggest a debate on the merits and benefits of pedophilia, something westerners generally agree is not a matter of personal opinion, and not something of no import, open to theoretical discussion. That might help understand why and how you could get reactions of universal condemnation to something you see as harmless. |
Interesting way of making a point .
I
| Quote: |
| wouldn't ask about the bomb. that's awful. you know, like even if your mom was on an unstoppable murdering rampage, it would break your heart to say that she (along with countless innocents) should be killed in order to be stopped. |
Actually, that's not why I am bringing the topic up. We're looking at value systems and mindsets for foreigners and Japanese and trying to determine which is more likely to find living in Japan easier.
I want my students to only look at the arguments within the links shown earlier, not discuss if they think they are true or not. In other words, they should be able to summarize the main arguments (we're looking at some of the posts, not all) and say if the arguments are well defended, do the posters give evidence to support their decisions, etc.
| Quote: |
i have to say in china as long as you bring something up in a fairly neutral question no topic is off limits. it is just some are not debateable.
is taiwan a part of china? yes answer from the whole class, no differing opinion, no devils advocate allowed
|
Bringing up territorial disputes will always be a tough one. Certain beliefs tend to be widely held with certain cultures, so that students will have a difficult time considering other opinions. Doesn't mean it's impossible, just difficult. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mcl sonya
Joined: 12 Dec 2007 Posts: 179 Location: Qingdao
|
Posted: Mon Jun 02, 2008 6:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
no but you see, it was actually a topic of debate. it wasn't for my class, but for the school. they're introducing sex ed at some of the universities, and while many students were shocked and thought it was scandalous, in my class some were saying there's probably some merit to this idea, and that people who want to take this sort of class should have the option. it wasn't as if they know right or wrong only in terms of universal truths.
I sometimes think my students might be especially cool and open minded for Chinese students because I'm Taiwanese-American, and accepting my very presence requires some thinking outside the box. None of them has ever met someone like me before, who by all their standard ways of thinking is Chinese but who's also not, and who is also clearly American. But, especially in debate topics where it becomes clear that there is no one right or wrong answer, they often say things like, "There's more than one side to the truth, people are different, two sides to every coin, etc."
Occasionally I slip and I refer to Taiwan as a separate country. Generally people avoid this potentially awkward subject (though they are excited to say to others, "Guess where she's from?? You'll never guess. And her mom's Taiwanese!!"), and NO ONE asks me what I think about Taiwan and China. But, for example, yesterday someone asked me if my mom was also Chinese and I unthinkingly said she's Taiwanese. This can be interpreted as yes or no, and saw the look flit across the other person's face, but they never mentioned my mother again. When I was talking about Asian immigrants in the States I also referred to Taiwan in all of my classes, in particular to say it used to be a poor country and so my mom was one of the waves of Taiwanese students in the 70's. I've heard this said so often by so many people that I didn't even think about the "poor country" part. Only one student, out of my four hundred some students, stood up to say, "I JUST WANT TO SAY, Taiwan is a province of the motherland!" There was horrified silence from the other students as they looked at me and wondered what would happen next. I shrugged and continued, and it was as if nothing had happened. By the end of the class the girl that had stood up looked like she was worried she might've hurt my feelings, because she looked more smiling and attentive than ever and like gave me a really friendly good bye. No one ever brought up Taiwan again, and the class didn't hold it against me that I called it a country. Some weeks later after a trip to Taipei via HK I brought a clothes magazine to class from Taiwan, it was written entirely in beautiful English. The girls were all excited to see what the fashions are over there in the island. No hate there. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
arioch36
Joined: 21 Jan 2003 Posts: 3589
|
Posted: Mon Jun 02, 2008 1:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
We had a good discussion on the Chinese board several months ago (before MCL Sonya arrived)
Chinese are fervent that Hong Kong and Macau and Taiwan are all part of CHina. But in reality, they do not perceive it a part of China in every day life.Many example of this, such as, "we ship to all parts of China, as well as Taiwan, Hong Kong".
Or this is a Chinese movie, that is a Hong Kong movie. But, as far as debating... not a chance |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling. Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|