Site Search:
 
Get TEFL Certified & Start Your Adventure Today!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

best students in the world?
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> General Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
wulfrun



Joined: 12 May 2008
Posts: 167

PostPosted: Fri Jun 06, 2008 12:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Henry_Cowell wrote:
wulfrun wrote:
... but still, my point stands.... this is pretty clear conceptual stuff.... it's backed up with hard studies....

let's just leave it if it's causing animosity.


I think that any "animosity" you perceive in others' responses is probably generated by the way you've phrased your remarks so emphatically and certainly. You don't cite any of those "hard studies" to back up what are only your own fairly limited and anecdotal experiences. Others are -- like you -- simply citing their own experiences. Cool


ok great, that's all we can do.

studies support the existence of general differences in cultural behaviour - that's all i was saying. found in any journal or book on cultural studies.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rusmeister



Joined: 15 Jun 2006
Posts: 867
Location: Russia

PostPosted: Fri Jun 06, 2008 1:49 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

MO39 wrote:
rusmeister wrote:


Russians are VERY interested, but good luck getting adults to do homework!


An ancedote about Russian students. I've only taught Russians in the US, immigrants living in Philadelphia back in the 1980s. As I remember, they were some of my best prepared students with lots of cultural sophistication, recent high school graduates and adults. Though this wasn't true of all of them (this is for Justin), as a group they did have a reputation for rampant cheating.

I well remember one Igor, a fortyish former geography teacher in the Soviet Union, who was attempting to cheat on a final exam by copying an essay he had previously prepared at home. When I caught him, his exam was confiscated and he was banished from the classroom! After he left, fuming and undoubtedly murmuring curses in Russian under his breath, one of the older female students thanked me for what I had done. She told me that the Russian students were well aware of the reputation they had for cheating and that she was glad one of her countrymen had been caught in the act. Perhaps she thought it would give the other students pause before trying such a stunt again, at least in my class. By the way, there was no way the Russians could accuse me being anti-Russian since I have a very Russian last name.


First, as an aside to Henry, I would say that studies are no guarantee of accuracy or in-depth knowledge. They can be helpful additions to personal experience, but are often run with some particular agenda (non-scientific) in mind. Our own experience can be valid and of greater value than studies, if it is extensive enough.

Now, back to our show. I'd like to offer a perspective from said experience (as a "russified" American) that would explain what you call "cheating". Yes, in the American system at its best, copying from others is dishonorable behavior that attempts to advance self without effort and to achieve honors not earned. However, in many traditional eastern systems, including Russia and even some aspects of education in the US, testing and exams, for example, are not honest checks of whether a person knows something but merely artificial barriers to limit advancement, to ensure only a certain number of people are awarded the honor. Things like clan or family attitudes, 'homeboys', if you will, encourage people to help each other get through such unfair barriers.
In the US, we have them, too. I took the Foreign Service Exam, got only a medium score despite my extensive overseas experience, but with questions like, "Who is the MC of Argentina's most popular game show?" (there really were questions of that nature), it is clear that the test is not really a test of fitness for foreign service, but merely a net to reduce the number of candidates who don't have special connections.

So these Russians (or whoever) come to an honest US classroom and do not understand the nature of the beast they are dealing with. It's easy to judge people from another culture if we don't understand the peculiarities of that culture. That's something that studies won't reveal; only extensive personal experience.

BTW, we should distinguish carefully between stereotypes as an oversimplification born of ignorance (what the word is generally used to mean), and actual characteristics of a people as a whole (excluding exceptions), things that do make that people unique. Such words are frequently used in rhetoric to draw emotional reactions and shut down a line of inquiry.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
wulfrun



Joined: 12 May 2008
Posts: 167

PostPosted: Fri Jun 06, 2008 2:01 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

cheating is endemic in china (at least, here in hebei and beijing, and have heard similar from elsewhere...). i read some english major graduation theses recently, and they were all copy and paste jobs from google - not even from good sources, ha ha. the supervisors know all about it, and it's accepted. homework is regularly cribbed from the net, and students sell answers to the national exams on the morning before they sit the paper.

the exam system's bluntness inspires cynicism in students and teachers alike.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Marcoregano



Joined: 19 May 2003
Posts: 872
Location: Hong Kong

PostPosted: Fri Jun 06, 2008 4:19 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Some posters seem to be confusing individual characteristics with group characteristics, and I feel the OP's original intent was to discuss the latter. In terms of individuality I don't think anyone could seriously argue that there are any major differences between nationalities - there will be a certain percentage of outgoing, talkative types and shy, reserved types, etc etc.

HOWEVER, when it comes to general group behaviour - especially in the classroom (isn't that what the OP is about?), generic traits in nationalities become apparent, for reasons such as the conditioning they received in their national education systems.

This perhaps explains why, as the OP has pointed out, an EFL classroom composed of Spanish students (adults or teenagers) is likely to be more lively than one comprised of Hongkongers or Chinese. Teaching in Spanish schools encourages students to speak up, whereas in HK and China speaking up is often seen as dissent, so is discouraged. These habits stick, even when they become adults. Spanish EFL students will expect to be given the chance to talk and will happily do so when asked. But in HK they think the teacher is supposed to stand in front of the class and talk on and on - and will feel uncomfortable if asked to speak up themselves.

Of course, the above are generalisations and anyone can dig up examples to contradict them - e.g. some areas of Spain might be more strict, and some parts of China or some progressive schools in HK might buck the trend, but generally these traits are real and apparent.


Last edited by Marcoregano on Fri Jun 06, 2008 4:25 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
wulfrun



Joined: 12 May 2008
Posts: 167

PostPosted: Fri Jun 06, 2008 4:22 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Marcoregano wrote:
one comprised of Hongkongers or Chinese.
whereas in HK and China


thanks for the clarification

and your "HK or Chinese"-talk is incendiary, ha ha
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Marcoregano



Joined: 19 May 2003
Posts: 872
Location: Hong Kong

PostPosted: Fri Jun 06, 2008 4:29 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

wulfrun wrote:
Marcoregano wrote:
one comprised of Hongkongers or Chinese.
whereas in HK and China


thanks for the clarification

and your "HK or Chinese"-talk is incendiary, ha ha


Heh heh! I shouldn't diverge from the OP having made such an effort to get it back on track, but yes. I've lived in HK for 9 years and although technically it is part of China...bla bla bla...the words 'chalk' and 'cheese' spring to mind...notwithstanding certain similarities in their education systems!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mike_2007



Joined: 24 Apr 2007
Posts: 349
Location: Bucharest, Romania

PostPosted: Fri Jun 06, 2008 4:58 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

THe 'cut and paste' thesis is the standard in Romania too. In fact, it's actually how they are expected to do it.

One of my students asked me to check over her final-year thesis. Within a few lines I had realised it wasn't her work. I Googled a few lines and indeed, the whole thing had be copied from various sources on the net. I pointed out to her that her professor would most likely do the same and give her a big fat zero. She assured me that this wasn't the case and to copy text from books/the net was the norm. She was right, of course, and got a 10/10 for her thesis.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Henry_Cowell



Joined: 27 May 2005
Posts: 3352
Location: Berkeley

PostPosted: Fri Jun 06, 2008 5:44 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

wulfrun wrote:
studies support the existence of general differences in cultural behaviour - that's all i was saying. found in any journal or book on cultural studies.

Well, duh. That's what "culture" is all about. Is that the only thing you can come up with?

But please cite any of these "hard studies" that back up your specific points about Chinese students in the classroom.

And I believe that "cultural studies" is not the field you want. Maybe anthropology? Sociology? They aren't the same as the contemporary field of "cultural studies."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
guty



Joined: 10 Apr 2003
Posts: 365
Location: on holiday

PostPosted: Fri Jun 06, 2008 9:14 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I found that the best way to get students to work in groups in Czech was to set tham an exam and leave the room.
Had I simply asked them to work together they would not have cooperated as readily.
Found something similar in the Gulf.
Didn't find it anywhere else.
Can't wait till somebody publishes some research comparing students in eastern europe and the gulf with those in other parts of the world. At least then I'll know whether my opinion is valid or not.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
wulfrun



Joined: 12 May 2008
Posts: 167

PostPosted: Fri Jun 06, 2008 10:01 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Henry_Cowell wrote:
wulfrun wrote:
studies support the existence of general differences in cultural behaviour - that's all i was saying. found in any journal or book on cultural studies.

Well, duh. That's what "culture" is all about. Is that the only thing you can come up with?

But please cite any of these "hard studies" that back up your specific points about Chinese students in the classroom.

And I believe that "cultural studies" is not the field you want. Maybe anthropology? Sociology? They aren't the same as the contemporary field of "cultural studies."


yes, cultural anthropology is more accurate, thanks.

yes, it is a "duh" point, but it's a point that was questioned earlier in the thread.

no, i dont have any research to back up my quick summary about east asians being superficially more obedient, respectful, adn quiet in the english class than spaniards and swedes, and i didnt mean to sound like i did. just have my personal experience, which i said was very limited. just want to hear people's input.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
wulfrun



Joined: 12 May 2008
Posts: 167

PostPosted: Fri Jun 06, 2008 10:37 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

thanks for all the replies, very interesting to read.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Marcoregano



Joined: 19 May 2003
Posts: 872
Location: Hong Kong

PostPosted: Fri Jun 06, 2008 11:29 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Henry_Cowell wrote:

And I believe that "cultural studies" is not the field you want. Maybe anthropology? Sociology? They aren't the same as the contemporary field of "cultural studies."


A man of authority and learning - just what the thread needs. Please enlighten us, Mr Cowell.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
And Your Bird Can Sing



Joined: 26 May 2008
Posts: 62
Location: Hong Kong

PostPosted: Sat Jun 07, 2008 5:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Henry_Cowell wrote:
But please cite any of these "hard studies" that back up your specific points about Chinese students in the classroom.

There are actually quite a few collections of hard studies that appear to back up the poster's specific points about Chinese students in the classroom. To cite but two, I would strongly recommend David A. Watkins & John B. Biggs (Eds.), 'The Chinese Learner: Cultural, Psychological and Contextual Influences', Comparative Education Research Centre (CERC) & Australian Council of Educational Research (ACER), 1996; and David A. Watkins & John B. Biggs (Eds.) 'Teaching the Chinese Learner: Psychological and Pedagogical Perspectives', Comparative Education Research Centre (CERC) & Australian Council of Educational Research (ACER), 2001.

http://www.hku.hk/cerc/Publications/Chinese_Learner.htm
http://www.hku.hk/cerc/Publications/Teaching_the_Chinese_Learner.htm
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Henry_Cowell



Joined: 27 May 2005
Posts: 3352
Location: Berkeley

PostPosted: Sat Jun 07, 2008 6:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Marcoregano wrote:
Please enlighten us, Mr Cowell.

Anthropology is the general study of human culture -- which is what "wulfrun" was talking about when he wrote about comparing different cultures.

Cultural Studies is a very specialized (and recent) field that combines anthropology, economics, political science, literary criticism, critical theory, film studies, and other fields. It is most frequently a study of popular culture in modern societies.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Henry_Cowell



Joined: 27 May 2005
Posts: 3352
Location: Berkeley

PostPosted: Sat Jun 07, 2008 6:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

And Your Bird Can Sing wrote:
http://www.hku.hk/cerc/Publications/Chinese_Learner.htm
http://www.hku.hk/cerc/Publications/Teaching_the_Chinese_Learner.htm

And what do the studies say exactly about Chinese learners in classrooms taught by foreigners?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> General Discussion All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Page 3 of 4

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

Teaching Jobs in China
Teaching Jobs in China