|
Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Gab
Joined: 09 Apr 2008 Posts: 26 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Wed May 21, 2008 2:24 am Post subject: HELP! Grammar question |
|
|
Hi everyone, I was trying to explain the reasoning behind this sentence structure and was hoping someone could validate:
A) ''Our lives are closer and closer together''
vs.
B) ''Our lives are together closer and closer''
Sentence A is correct because in this sentence ''closer'' is a degree modifier, and must therefor be placed BEFORE the adjective.
...right? hahaha |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Gab
Joined: 09 Apr 2008 Posts: 26 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Wed May 21, 2008 12:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hmmm... I'm not sure if both structures are acceptable.
Imagine this:
A) The ball is very big.
vs.
B) The ball is big very.
That's the same structure I had before, but these words should make it clear that sentence B is NOT acceptable in standard English, which is what this student wants to learn. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
gaijinalways
Joined: 29 Nov 2005 Posts: 2279
|
Posted: Thu May 22, 2008 1:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
I think both sentences sound unnatural for a N. American.
Quote: |
) ''Our lives are closer and closer together''
vs.
B) ''Our lives are together closer and closer'' |
I would probably say,
"Our lives are growing closer and closer together."
Is sentence B unnatural? Sounds like nothing I would ever say ! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
rusmeister
Joined: 15 Jun 2006 Posts: 867 Location: Russia
|
Posted: Thu May 22, 2008 2:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
Nevertheless, there are rules and they can be taught (and learned) and enable meaningful communication. (One of my peeves at Dave's is people who try to say that rules are artificial)
For example, Jerry, when teaching adverbs of frequency you discover that always and never are mid-position only, usually, sometimes and often can be at the beginning, mid, or end positions, and rarely is the odd bird that can be mid or end, but not beginning, unless you are using inversion for emphasis (Rarely do I go to...)
Students say, "Oh!", study it for a minute, and then don't make any more mistakes (usually). (Inversion for emphasis is an advanced concept, so I don't teach that to beginners. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
arioch36
Joined: 21 Jan 2003 Posts: 3589
|
Posted: Thu May 22, 2008 8:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
Gaijin Always
Quote: |
I think both sentences sound unnatural for a N. American.
Quote:
Quote: |
) ''Our lives are closer and closer together''
vs.
B) ''Our lives are together closer and closer'' |
I would probably say,
"Our lives are growing closer and closer together."
Is sentence B unnatural? Sounds like nothing I would ever say ! |
Ditto. I have no clue ... what are these sentences supposed to mean?
I would consider both sentences wrong unless you can give meaning to the sentences
Maybe some Brit thing? The question I always ask when I can't "get it". It is hard for me to see grammar and meaning being closer together here
Our lives are closer and closer together
and
Our lives are together, closer and closer.
Would have the same meaning? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Gab
Joined: 09 Apr 2008 Posts: 26 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Thu May 22, 2008 12:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
That's my fault, I extracted that piece from a longer sentence, because that was the part causing confusion.
In short, my question is: IN GENERAL, must degree modifiers be placed BEFORE the adjectives they modify?
And in that particular sentence ''Our lives are closer and closer together'', as strange as it sounds, would you all agree that ''closer'' is a degree modifier, and ''together'' is an adjective?
Thanks! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
johnslat

Joined: 21 Jan 2003 Posts: 13859 Location: Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA
|
Posted: Thu May 22, 2008 3:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
But sometimes the position makes a BIG difference:
Only I know the right answer.
I only know the right answer.
I know the only right answer. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
arioch36
Joined: 21 Jan 2003 Posts: 3589
|
Posted: Fri May 23, 2008 3:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
How about intonation?
"What is this thing called love?"
or
"What is this thing called love?"
Put the emphasis on "this thing" in the second question "love" in the first.
Careful though, you could earn a slap on the fa |
Maybe about week five I do a spiel about how intotation, I usually have two pairs of students do dialogues each week, and invariably some of them will be totally monotone. Linking intonation to the Chinese language is useful, because Chinese uses tones for meanings.
The sentence I stole from some book along the way is "I don't know where she is now.
Quote: |
In short, my question is: IN GENERAL, must degree modifiers be placed BEFORE the adjectives they modify? |
"In General" or "must"?
In General, I would certainly agree with. But in ENglish at least, you can extra extra words (like prepositions) and chang word orders still getting the same meaning, though perhaps slightly different emphasis
If you are dealing with lower level students, I would use the word "must". If dealing with higher level students, "in general" seem more appropriate
Quote: |
Grammatically, yes I imagine, however who would be pedantic enough to claim the impact of the statement is lost with positioning? |
Agree with Slat, positioning and commas can definitely change the meaning, though not always.
The awful French textbook of history
The textbook of awful French history
Or other variations.
Still don't understand the meaning of the original sentence. Please clue me in |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Bamby
Joined: 13 Oct 2007 Posts: 40
|
Posted: Thu Jun 26, 2008 8:56 pm Post subject: Re: HELP! Grammar question |
|
|
Gab wrote: |
Hi everyone, I was trying to explain the reasoning behind this sentence structure and was hoping someone could validate:
A) ''Our lives are closer and closer together''
vs.
B) ''Our lives are together closer and closer''
Sentence A is correct because in this sentence ''closer'' is a degree modifier, and must therefor be placed BEFORE the adjective.
...right? hahaha |
Both A & B don't make sense. For (A) I would say: Our lives are growing closer; or Our lives are growing closer together; or Our lives are close.
For (B) maybe I would say: Our lives are close, together; or Together, our lives are close. You have to use the apostrophe when you use an independent clause with an dependent clause. What you did has nothing to do with a modifier. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
johnslat

Joined: 21 Jan 2003 Posts: 13859 Location: Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA
|
Posted: Thu Jun 26, 2008 10:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Dear Bamby,
B) ''Our lives are together closer and closer''
"For (B) maybe I would say: Our lives are close, together; or Together, our lives are close. You have to use the apostrophe when you use an independent clause with an dependent clause. What you did has nothing to do with a modifier."
First of all, I have to disagree regarding sentence A - it certainly makes sense to me.
As for what you wrote about sentence B, it (and sentence A) is a simple sentence, not a complex one. So, there is no "dependent clause", only a phrase (i.e. "closer and closer.") However, I think it's awkwardly phrased and would need a comma after "together."
In addition, I'm not at all sure what you meant by "you have to use the apostrophe." Do you mean that in a complex sentence, when the adverb clause begins the sentence, you need to use a comma at the end of the introductory adverb clause?
Regards,
John |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Bamby
Joined: 13 Oct 2007 Posts: 40
|
Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2008 5:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
johnslat wrote: |
Dear Bamby,
B) ''Our lives are together closer and closer''
"For (B) maybe I would say: Our lives are close, together; or Together, our lives are close. You have to use the apostrophe when you use an independent clause with an dependent clause. What you did has nothing to do with a modifier."
First of all, I have to disagree regarding sentence A - it certainly makes sense to me.
As for what you wrote about sentence B, it (and sentence A) is a simple sentence, not a complex one. So, there is no "dependent clause", only a phrase (i.e. "closer and closer.") However, I think it's awkwardly phrased and would need a comma after "together."
In addition, I'm not at all sure what you meant by "you have to use the apostrophe." Do you mean that in a complex sentence, when the adverb clause begins the sentence, you need to use a comma at the end of the introductory adverb clause?
Regards,
John |
You're right, I didn't mean "apostrophe", I meant the comma. My simple sentence concerning sentence "B" is the CORRECT one. What you wrote for sentence "B" is incorrect and makes no sense. Sentence "A" don't need the word "together" in it. It should be omitted unless you use a comma. Ex: Our lives are growing closer and closer, together. Sentence B most definitely has an independent clause. Our lives are together is a complete sentence. Closer and closer is not. You should have re-wrote it or just omit closer and closer. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
johnslat

Joined: 21 Jan 2003 Posts: 13859 Location: Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA
|
Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2008 6:42 pm Post subject: It's simple, not complex |
|
|
Dear Bamby,
Pardon me for asking, but do you know the definition of a dependent clause as opposed to a phrase? Sentence B is a simple sentence, not a complex one. Complex sentences have independent clauses (i.e. sentences) and dependent clauses (noun, adjective and adverb.) A dependent clause MUST have a subject and a verb, but it has no complete idea (e.g. When I get home, . . . . .)
Sentence B has NO dependent clause. The phrase, " . . . closer and closer together." is NOT a dependent clause. There is NO dependent clause in sentence B. Simple sentences are independent clauses and have NO dependent clauses.
Since you may find my explanation incredible, here's a quote:
Definitions
Independent Clause (IC)
An independent clause is a group of words that contains a subject and verb and expresses a complete thought. An independent clause is a sentence.
Example: Jim studied in the Sweet Shop for his chemistry quiz. (IC)
Dependent Clause (DC)
A dependent clause is a group of words that contains a subject and verb but does not express a complete thought. A dependent clause cannot be a sentence. Often a dependent clause is marked by a dependent marker word.
Example: When Jim studied in the Sweet Shop for his chemistry quiz . . . (DC)
(What happened when he studied? The thought is incomplete.)
Please go to the link below for further explanation.
ttp://owl.english.purdue.edu/handouts/grammar/g_clause.html
Regards,
John |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Bamby
Joined: 13 Oct 2007 Posts: 40
|
Posted: Tue Jul 01, 2008 8:23 pm Post subject: Re: It's simple, not complex |
|
|
johnslat wrote: |
Dear Bamby,
Pardon me for asking, but do you know the definition of a dependent clause as opposed to a phrase? Sentence B is a simple sentence, not a complex one. Complex sentences have independent clauses (i.e. sentences) and dependent clauses (noun, adjective and adverb.) A dependent clause MUST have a subject and a verb, but it has no complete idea (e.g. When I get home, . . . . .)
Sentence B has NO dependent clause. The phrase, " . . . closer and closer together." is NOT a dependent clause. There is NO dependent clause in sentence B. Simple sentences are independent clauses and have NO dependent clauses.
Since you may find my explanation incredible, here's a quote:
Definitions
Independent Clause (IC)
An independent clause is a group of words that contains a subject and verb and expresses a complete thought. An independent clause is a sentence.
Example: Jim studied in the Sweet Shop for his chemistry quiz. (IC)
Dependent Clause (DC)
A dependent clause is a group of words that contains a subject and verb but does not express a complete thought. A dependent clause cannot be a sentence. Often a dependent clause is marked by a dependent marker word.
Example: When Jim studied in the Sweet Shop for his chemistry quiz . . . (DC)
(What happened when he studied? The thought is incomplete.)
Please go to the link below for further explanation.
ttp://owl.english.purdue.edu/handouts/grammar/g_clause.html
Regards,
John |
I'm sorry we will not agree. It has nothing to do with it being so-called complex. You ought to put the commas where needed so it can make sense. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
rusmeister
Joined: 15 Jun 2006 Posts: 867 Location: Russia
|
Posted: Wed Jul 02, 2008 2:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hmmm. The government launched a program and actually put a man on the moon. Imagine if they placed as much national importance on teaching English and launched a program to produce a super textbook with authoritative definitions and methods that really worked...
Nah, they'd probably screw it up.
But it would be much more practical!  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Chancellor
Joined: 31 Oct 2005 Posts: 1337 Location: Ji'an, China - if you're willing to send me cigars, I accept donations :)
|
Posted: Thu Jul 03, 2008 7:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
gaijinalways wrote: |
I think both sentences sound unnatural for a N. American.
Quote: |
) ''Our lives are closer and closer together''
vs.
B) ''Our lives are together closer and closer'' |
I would probably say,
"Our lives are growing closer and closer together."
Is sentence B unnatural? Sounds like nothing I would ever say ! |
Agreed. There's somethiing missing in the first sentence (a word like "growing"). The second sentence definitely sounds unnatural, at least to North Americans. It depends on what exactly the person is trying to say. Are our lives closer and closer because we are together? Is the combining of our lives - bringing them together - making them closer and closer? Why not just scrap both sentences and say "Our lives are closer together"? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling. Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|