| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Yawarakaijin
Joined: 20 Jan 2006 Posts: 504 Location: Middle of Nagano
|
Posted: Mon Jun 09, 2008 11:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Kootvela wrote: |
| Both are correct. |
Agreed. Not really that big of a deal. Personally if someone in my company used the construction in (b) I would think him a little snooty.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
BobbyBan

Joined: 05 Feb 2008 Posts: 201
|
Posted: Tue Jun 10, 2008 6:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Yawarakaijin wrote: |
| Kootvela wrote: |
| Both are correct. |
Agreed. Not really that big of a deal. Personally if someone in my company used the construction in (b) I would think him a little snooty.  |
What's so snooty about "I'll never forget meeting my wife"?
"I'll never forget having met my wife" sounds bizarre. I don't know why the general consensus here seems to be for c) over b). |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Yawarakaijin
Joined: 20 Jan 2006 Posts: 504 Location: Middle of Nagano
|
Posted: Tue Jun 10, 2008 6:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
| BobbyBan wrote: |
| Yawarakaijin wrote: |
| Kootvela wrote: |
| Both are correct. |
Agreed. Not really that big of a deal. Personally if someone in my company used the construction in (b) I would think him a little snooty.  |
What's so snooty about "I'll never forget meeting my wife"?
"I'll never forget having met my wife" sounds bizarre. I don't know why the general consensus here seems to be for c) over b). |
Sorry. My mistake. I took the second example for being (b) not (c).
C is the one I meant sounded snooty. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
fluffyhamster
Joined: 13 Mar 2005 Posts: 3292 Location: UK > China > Japan > UK again
|
Posted: Wed Jun 11, 2008 9:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
| chechevitsa wrote: |
| fluffyhamster wrote: |
Unless the celebrity has arranged to meet (and how often does that happen!), it's probably more a case of you just seeing (i.e. catching a glimpse) of him or her (and him or her remaining unaware of your existence). |
what about book signings, or musicians who really make time for fan autographs? "celebrity" doesn't only mean actor/socialite, does it? I'll never forget having met Billy Bragg, for example. of course, when I went to type out that sentence, what wanted to spill off my fingers was definitely "I'll never forget meeting him." but then my spoken language is riddled with so-called errors... |
Hey, that's a nice expanded context. "I'll never forget meeting Famous Person at a book signing/when he or she was signing autographs after a gig...he/she was so polite, open, gracious and charming!" (That being said, I myself wouldn't want to burden a student with too many choices, and would probably go for something simpler, such as "Once, I met X!" or "I met X the other day!"). |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SeasonedVet
Joined: 28 Aug 2006 Posts: 236 Location: Japan
|
Posted: Mon Jun 16, 2008 12:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
BobbyBan wrote:
| Quote: |
Certainly, that is why I asked Seasoned Vet if he/she wouldn't mind posting the wording of the question.
Another idea is to put this up on the "General Discussion" forum and see what a wider audience can make of it.
Seasoned Vet, I don't know a lot about the etiquette on these things but would you mind posting back to show that you haven't forgotten all about us. It would be nice, I think. |
Sorry Bobby and everyone else, I haven't been checking this website ... er or should that be I didn't check this website ...er or should that be I haven't checked this website recently ???? just kidding
The question was worded the same way I typed it in the OP.
I was asked by a teacher to check the answers as she wanted to use it as a test question. When I first looked at it I chose "meeting" but then I noticed "having met" and I chose that and decided that since there is usually one correct answer that "having met" must be the correct one. But then I asked myself "what's wrong with saying "meeting?"
I wanted to be absolutely sure and not just trust my grammar ability so I threw it out here.
And yes it might be a good idea to send it to the General Discussion forum for more discussion.
Thanks to all for your imput thus far. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
markle
Joined: 17 Jan 2003 Posts: 1316 Location: Out of Japan
|
Posted: Tue Jun 17, 2008 7:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
| SeasonedVet wrote: |
The question was worded the same way I typed it in the OP.
I was asked by a teacher to check the answers as she wanted to use it as a test question. When I first looked at it I chose "meeting" but then I noticed "having met" and I chose that and decided that since there is usually one correct answer that "having met" must be the correct one. But then I asked myself "what's wrong with saying "meeting?"
I wanted to be absolutely sure and not just trust my grammar ability so I threw it out here.
And yes it might be a good idea to send it to the General Discussion forum for more discussion.
Thanks to all for your imput thus far. |
Again. Both are correct. There is no single answer without adding more context. Tell the teacher that.
I tell you the number of times that I come across this type of thing in local grammar books makes me want to scream. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SeasonedVet
Joined: 28 Aug 2006 Posts: 236 Location: Japan
|
Posted: Wed Jun 18, 2008 6:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Thanks. I told the teacher days ago that they were both correct and she decided to change the question. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
tanuki

Joined: 24 Oct 2006 Posts: 47
|
Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2008 10:27 am Post subject: Patterns |
|
|
Despite the original subject line saying "grammar question" the reality is that this "problem" is a combination of grammar and vocab-patterns.
Several people are right to ask for more contextual information because VERY often these kinds of silly grammar test questions are asked of students completely devoid of any kind of situational or pragmatic information... but it's actually not needed in this instance. And I'll show you why.
But first...
Please indulge me in a slight tangent that I promise is relevant!
Students at, say, Upper-Int level (and certainly at FCE-level and above) are given these big lists of verbs that either take "to do" or "doing".
This is taught as grammar.
And it couldn't be more unequivocally WRONG than if you were saying that the universe revolves around the Earth.
Or that Keanu Reeves is going to be written up in the history books as paralleling Marlon Brando.
Or that natto is a delicious and tasty treat which should be enjoyed by all first thing in the morning from small styrofoam containers.
If you currently teach this as grammar, please stop doing so; it's not.
This is a matter of vocab patterns. There is no magical generative system that students are looking for here. It is NOT grammar.
If you want to split hairs and be all conciliatory and warm and fuzzy and inclusive you can say it's "word grammar" but the fact is that these are more or less arbitrary patterns in the lexicon. Verbs A, B, C & D (+the other 4850-odd) take "to do" and verbs E, F,G, & H take "doing". (Yeah, there are two other groups in this kind of breakdown. That's for another time, perhaps.)
So, firstly, students are told that "forget" is always followed by "to". Bollocks.
"forget" is usually followed by [something, i.e, noun phrase], [(that) clause], or "to do"
... however...
...there is an expression in the English language that goes like this:
"I'll never forget doing [something]"
(As native or proficient speakers, the readers of this board will know that "I'll never forget to do [something]" has a completely different meaning, right?)
Now, I emphasised "usually", above. Why? Which is more frequently used in the language "forget to do" or "forget doing"?
That's a trick question! "forget doing" is ONLY used in the full vocab-pattern "[someone] will never forget doing".
So "forget to do" is the hands down winner in terms of frequency because how often, by comparison, do you think people use that other expression?
Re: The OP's exam Q issue... I think there's a good chance that the teacher who wrote it was gunning for a "to do" pattern answer, and possibly thinking that BOTH of the "doing" pattern answers were wrong!
So... back to the grammar!
Having established that "I'll never forget meeting him" and "I'll never forget having met him" are both perfectly permissible according to the particular vocab pattern being employed by the speaker... and... that the choice of verb to "slot into" the pattern produces a meaningful utterance...
(where "I'll never forget forgetting him..." is--if you want to be a complete pedant (pot'n'kettle, I know!), potentially meaningful--highly unlikely to be a meaningful sentence (because even if this were the idea, a native speaker would probably choose to say "I'll never forget the time (that) I forgot to do [something]")
...then it's simply a matter of emphasis. Using the "perfect aspect" to emphasise the "before-ness-ness" of the "meeting" in this example.
The reason that this choice (i.e. "I'll never forget having met him") sounds snooty is that it's redundant--due to the inherent meaning of the vocab pattern--and this kind of verbose emphasis tends to only associated with a particular social class.
Another example of what I mean by this last paragraph is something like:
"Excuse me, but do you perhaps think that you'd be ever so kind as to do X, my good chap?"
Ya feelin' me dawg?
Tanuki
-----------------------------------------------
http://www.eflteachertraining.com
If you're serious about this gig... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
fluffyhamster
Joined: 13 Mar 2005 Posts: 3292 Location: UK > China > Japan > UK again
|
Posted: Sat Jul 19, 2008 4:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| tanuki wrote: |
Now, I emphasised "usually", above. Why? Which is more frequently used in the language "forget to do" or "forget doing"?
That's a trick question! "forget doing" is ONLY used in the full vocab-pattern "[someone] will never forget doing". |
Forget using 'only' (or 'ONLY') in ELT! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|