|
Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
teacheringreece
Joined: 05 Feb 2005 Posts: 79
|
Posted: Mon Nov 10, 2008 10:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
I've often wondered about this usage. But it's not that it's strange that 'sit' can be used transitively - 'sit' can always be a transitive a verb, it's just that used transitively it has the meaning of 'tell/make somebody to sit somewhere', e.g. 'She sat the children down in the living room and went to start dinner.'
But yes in the UK it's very common to say 'He was sat over there' instead of 'He was sitting over there'. So the 'mistake' is actually using a passive form instead of a continuous form. Exactly the same is possible with 'stand', i.e. 'He was stood over there.'
I suppose it might have to do with 'be sat' being shorter than 'be sitting', as SueH says, although obviously if we applied that rule generally then every continuous form would be replaced by a passive structure to economise in this way. But we just do it with two semantically related verbs - sit and stand. It's a strange one. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ESL Hobo
Joined: 23 Oct 2008 Posts: 262
|
Posted: Mon Nov 10, 2008 10:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hi teacheringreece,
'Sat down' is a seperable phrasal verb, dont know if that makes a difference, any expert grammarians out there?
You know what they say, "All grammarians go to hell, "
As Brother Sammy once said upon standing at the gates of Hell when asked how many times he had been married, he replied, "Three times", "OK you can go you'e served your time, get outa here."
This is not a sexist statement BTW, women who have been married three times get a free pass, too.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
johnslat

Joined: 21 Jan 2003 Posts: 13859 Location: Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA
|
Posted: Mon Nov 10, 2008 11:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
Dear guty,
"But as educated native speakers, do you really want conformity across the English speaking world? Doesn't the variety add to the beauty of the language?"
Hey, I'm all for non-conformity. However, don't we, as teachers, have the responsibility to teach, not what a small section of the English-speaking world might use (that way lies madness), but what is considered generally accepted usage?
Regards,
John |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
guty

Joined: 10 Apr 2003 Posts: 365 Location: on holiday
|
Posted: Mon Nov 10, 2008 12:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Johnslat said
| Quote: |
Hey, I'm all for non-conformity. However, don't we, as teachers, have the responsibility to teach, not what a small section of the English-speaking world might use (that way lies madness), but what is considered generally accepted usage? |
I completely agree with that, which is why my previous sentence was ..
| Quote: |
| Not from an EFL perspective, quite obviously a foriegn learner needs to know a set of rules, and that they will often be broken by native speakers. |
However, as an educated native speaker, I am quite interested in how accepted usage become accepted as correct.
If it is as simple as
| Quote: |
| new forms are generally accepted when a large portion of a population uses forms or terms with above average frequency. |
then surely 'ain't' would have been regarded as correct for many years, and EFL teachers would add add 'innit' to every sentence when teaching British English. Do youse know what I mean? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ESL Hobo
Joined: 23 Oct 2008 Posts: 262
|
Posted: Mon Nov 10, 2008 12:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hi Guty,
I said, "Generally accepted" not absolutely correct.
Anyway, this paraphrase is from one of the greats of Linguistics, not mine.
Cant remember who said it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling. Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|