|
Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| How much do you smoke? |
| I never smoke. Smoking stinks. Lung cancer is a stupid way to die. |
|
59% |
[ 32 ] |
| I smoke about a pack per month, only for special occasions. |
|
16% |
[ 9 ] |
| I smoke a pack per day, no apologies. |
|
12% |
[ 7 ] |
| I chainsmoke constantly and blow smoke in nonsmokers faces and I will never die because god told me so, NO APOLOGIES!!! |
|
11% |
[ 6 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 54 |
|
| Author |
Message |
johnslat

Joined: 21 Jan 2003 Posts: 13859 Location: Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA
|
Posted: Thu Nov 27, 2008 2:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Dear misterkodak,
"Since the US has no state sponsored healthcare, why the heck should the government care about how much and where I smoke or drink as long as I do it in a responsible manner?"
Well, there are Medicare and Medicaid, plus the the veterans medical services. And if someone gets an illness from drinking or smoking, they seldom just drop in the street and die there. They go to emergency rooms or "free clinics", and most get treated (poorly, perhaps, but treated.)
That, if fact, is a big factor in driving health care costs in the States sky high.
Were there universal health care, it would actually cost the government (i.e. the taxpayers) a lot less:
"The United States spends almost twice per capita on health care on average than other countries do. Yet, the American health care system suffers from rampant uninsurance, subpar life expectancy and infant mortality rates, and uneven performance on quality. Americans do not need more money for health care; they need more health care for their money."
"Myth Two: Universal Health Care Would Be Too Expensive
Fact One: The United States spends at least 40% more per capita on health care than any other industrialized country with universal health care
Fact Two: Federal studies by the Congressional Budget Office and the General Accounting office show that single payer universal health care would save 100 to 200 Billion dollars per year despite covering all the uninsured and increasing health care benefits.
Fact Three: State studies by Massachusetts and Connecticut have shown that single payer universal health care would save 1 to 2 Billion dollars per year from the total medical expenses in those states despite covering all the uninsured and increasing health care benefits
Fact Four: The costs of health care in Canada as a % of GNP, which were identical to the United States when Canada changed to a single payer, universal health care system in 1971, have increased at a rate much lower than the United States, despite the US economy being much stronger than Canada�s.
Conclusion: Single payer universal health care costs would be lower than the current US system due to lower administrative costs. The United States spends 50 to 100% more on administration than single payer systems. By lowering these administrative costs the United States would have the ability to provide universal health care, without managed care, increase benefits and still save money."
Regards,
John |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MO39

Joined: 28 Jan 2004 Posts: 1970 Location: El ombligo de la Rep�blica Mexicana
|
Posted: Thu Nov 27, 2008 6:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Dear johnslat,
From your post to Obama's ear!
Cheers,
MO |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
johnslat

Joined: 21 Jan 2003 Posts: 13859 Location: Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA
|
Posted: Thu Nov 27, 2008 6:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Dear MO39,
I hope - but Barry, who used to call me quite a lot during the pre-election period, has been strangely uncommunicative of late.
Regards,
John |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MO39

Joined: 28 Jan 2004 Posts: 1970 Location: El ombligo de la Rep�blica Mexicana
|
Posted: Thu Nov 27, 2008 6:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Dear john,
Well, he has been busy lately, a lot busier, I might add, than the current resident of the White House. Maybe we could send your post to his nominee for the Secretary of HHS .
Cheers,
MO |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rusmeister
Joined: 15 Jun 2006 Posts: 867 Location: Russia
|
Posted: Fri Nov 28, 2008 3:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
| johnnyenglishteacher wrote: |
The idea of nanny state isn't so much about power lying in the hands of a few vested interests, it's more about the idea of a few PC, do-gooding, left-wing liberal, bureaucratic busybodies trying to tell the hard-working people of Britain how to run their lives, making white British people the most oppressed in the world (Er, not my words, just what the average Daily Mail editorial comes up with). |
The plausibility of this can be tested by asking what the motivation is. Religious fervor, a zealous concern for others? Or, uh, money? As it's obviously the latter, it comes back to vested interests as encouraging the nanny state and funding the busybodies because it's good for (the VI's) business.
And newspapers, and the media in general belong to a very small number of rich people - the vested interests. They don't tell you what you really WANT to know - they tell you what they want you to hear. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
johnnyenglishteacher
Joined: 11 Aug 2006 Posts: 41
|
Posted: Fri Nov 28, 2008 1:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| rusmeister wrote: |
| johnnyenglishteacher wrote: |
The idea of nanny state isn't so much about power lying in the hands of a few vested interests, it's more about the idea of a few PC, do-gooding, left-wing liberal, bureaucratic busybodies trying to tell the hard-working people of Britain how to run their lives, making white British people the most oppressed in the world (Er, not my words, just what the average Daily Mail editorial comes up with). |
The plausibility of this can be tested by asking what the motivation is. Religious fervor, a zealous concern for others? Or, uh, money? As it's obviously the latter, it comes back to vested interests as encouraging the nanny state and funding the busybodies because it's good for (the VI's) business.
And newspapers, and the media in general belong to a very small number of rich people - the vested interests. They don't tell you what you really WANT to know - they tell you what they want you to hear. |
I concur. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Serious_Fun

Joined: 28 Jun 2005 Posts: 1171 Location: terra incognita
|
Posted: Sun Nov 30, 2008 7:18 am Post subject: Re: How much do you and your students smoke? |
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Chancellor
Joined: 31 Oct 2005 Posts: 1337 Location: Ji'an, China - if you're willing to send me cigars, I accept donations :)
|
Posted: Mon Dec 01, 2008 8:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I object to this entire thread on the grounds that it only asks about cigarette smokers. Some of us smoke cigars and/or pipes. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
johnslat

Joined: 21 Jan 2003 Posts: 13859 Location: Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA
|
Posted: Mon Dec 01, 2008 8:10 pm Post subject: Dear Mary Jane |
|
|
Dear Chancellor,
Not to mention other smokable substances.
Regards,
John |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
yamahuh
Joined: 23 Apr 2004 Posts: 1033 Location: Karaoke Hell
|
Posted: Tue Dec 09, 2008 2:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
| LongShiKong wrote: |
| Quit for the 4th and final(?) time in September |
Me too, only it was in October I'm now smoke free for 43 days and finding it actually quite easy this time around. I quit for a year back in 2004 when we moved to China which; given the amount of smoking in that culture, where cigarettes are handed to you by your host when you sit down for a meal, was pretty impressive. Started smoking again quite gradually; but was never 'heavy' and have been trying to quit for about 6 months.
Feel pretty good about it too and, given the fact that my wife still smokes, it has given me no small amount of pride in my self discipline.
Now if only I could resist the allure of 'Taiwanese tasty beer' to the same degree...  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Carll101
Joined: 17 Oct 2008 Posts: 45
|
Posted: Sun Dec 21, 2008 4:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
In the high school I taught in Thailand the boy's toilet was a big cloud of smoke... after a month I found out there was a toilet for teachers only !
Last edited by Carll101 on Mon Dec 22, 2008 10:24 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MO39

Joined: 28 Jan 2004 Posts: 1970 Location: El ombligo de la Rep�blica Mexicana
|
Posted: Mon Dec 22, 2008 1:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Carll101 wrote: |
| In the high school I teached in Thailand the boy's toilet was a big cloud of smoke... after a month I found out there was a toilet for teachers only ! |
Maybe the second-hand smoke you inhaled in Thailand can be blamed for your typing "teached in Thailand"!  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Carll101
Joined: 17 Oct 2008 Posts: 45
|
Posted: Mon Dec 22, 2008 10:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
That's how I used to look in there  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Lhenderson

Joined: 15 Dec 2008 Posts: 135 Location: Shanghai JuLu Road
|
Posted: Tue Dec 23, 2008 4:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
I smoke.
At home. In front of the dvd machine.
I would never inhale that dirty Tobacco. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Greg 09
Joined: 30 Jan 2009 Posts: 169
|
Posted: Sun Feb 08, 2009 12:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yes, but only after sex (I looked once).
On a more substantive note, why should I be disallowed opening a smokers' bar in the land of the free? I'd even post a Nanny General's Warning on the door, and the people-in-charge-of-your-decisions could even get all dramatic and mandate that it should read "Abandon All Hope Ye Who Enter Here". It won't matter, people like to do things and some of them might be bad for you, like driving on a highway. So what? How can you drink coffee or alcohol without a smoke? Its unnatural.
Healtcare costs? A risky door to open. Don't go there unless you really want Door #2, which is menu control. In my state I can't order a medium rare burger in a restaurant, it has to be well done. Phooey.
BTW johnslat, your chest enhancement looks great, but it reminds me of someone I dated, and there wasn't much in the way of substance behind hers either.
Last edited by Greg 09 on Sun Feb 08, 2009 3:11 am; edited 2 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling. Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|