Site Search:
 
Get TEFL Certified & Start Your Adventure Today!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

How much do you and your students smoke?
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> General Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  

How much do you smoke?
I never smoke. Smoking stinks. Lung cancer is a stupid way to die.
59%
 59%  [ 32 ]
I smoke about a pack per month, only for special occasions.
16%
 16%  [ 9 ]
I smoke a pack per day, no apologies.
12%
 12%  [ 7 ]
I chainsmoke constantly and blow smoke in nonsmokers faces and I will never die because god told me so, NO APOLOGIES!!!
11%
 11%  [ 6 ]
Total Votes : 54

Author Message
johnslat



Joined: 21 Jan 2003
Posts: 13859
Location: Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA

PostPosted: Thu Nov 27, 2008 2:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Dear misterkodak,

"Since the US has no state sponsored healthcare, why the heck should the government care about how much and where I smoke or drink as long as I do it in a responsible manner?"

Well, there are Medicare and Medicaid, plus the the veterans medical services. And if someone gets an illness from drinking or smoking, they seldom just drop in the street and die there. They go to emergency rooms or "free clinics", and most get treated (poorly, perhaps, but treated.)
That, if fact, is a big factor in driving health care costs in the States sky high.
Were there universal health care, it would actually cost the government (i.e. the taxpayers) a lot less:

"The United States spends almost twice per capita on health care on average than other countries do. Yet, the American health care system suffers from rampant uninsurance, subpar life expectancy and infant mortality rates, and uneven performance on quality. Americans do not need more money for health care; they need more health care for their money."

"Myth Two: Universal Health Care Would Be Too Expensive
Fact One: The United States spends at least 40% more per capita on health care than any other industrialized country with universal health care

Fact Two: Federal studies by the Congressional Budget Office and the General Accounting office show that single payer universal health care would save 100 to 200 Billion dollars per year despite covering all the uninsured and increasing health care benefits.

Fact Three: State studies by Massachusetts and Connecticut have shown that single payer universal health care would save 1 to 2 Billion dollars per year from the total medical expenses in those states despite covering all the uninsured and increasing health care benefits

Fact Four: The costs of health care in Canada as a % of GNP, which were identical to the United States when Canada changed to a single payer, universal health care system in 1971, have increased at a rate much lower than the United States, despite the US economy being much stronger than Canada�s.

Conclusion: Single payer universal health care costs would be lower than the current US system due to lower administrative costs. The United States spends 50 to 100% more on administration than single payer systems. By lowering these administrative costs the United States would have the ability to provide universal health care, without managed care, increase benefits and still save money."


Regards,
John
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
MO39



Joined: 28 Jan 2004
Posts: 1970
Location: El ombligo de la Rep�blica Mexicana

PostPosted: Thu Nov 27, 2008 6:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Dear johnslat,

From your post to Obama's ear!

Cheers,

MO
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
johnslat



Joined: 21 Jan 2003
Posts: 13859
Location: Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA

PostPosted: Thu Nov 27, 2008 6:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Dear MO39,

I hope - but Barry, who used to call me quite a lot during the pre-election period, has been strangely uncommunicative of late.

Regards,
John
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
MO39



Joined: 28 Jan 2004
Posts: 1970
Location: El ombligo de la Rep�blica Mexicana

PostPosted: Thu Nov 27, 2008 6:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Dear john,

Well, he has been busy lately, a lot busier, I might add, than the current resident of the White House. Maybe we could send your post to his nominee for the Secretary of HHS Very Happy .

Cheers,

MO
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
rusmeister



Joined: 15 Jun 2006
Posts: 867
Location: Russia

PostPosted: Fri Nov 28, 2008 3:04 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

johnnyenglishteacher wrote:

The idea of nanny state isn't so much about power lying in the hands of a few vested interests, it's more about the idea of a few PC, do-gooding, left-wing liberal, bureaucratic busybodies trying to tell the hard-working people of Britain how to run their lives, making white British people the most oppressed in the world (Er, not my words, just what the average Daily Mail editorial comes up with).


The plausibility of this can be tested by asking what the motivation is. Religious fervor, a zealous concern for others? Or, uh, money? As it's obviously the latter, it comes back to vested interests as encouraging the nanny state and funding the busybodies because it's good for (the VI's) business.

And newspapers, and the media in general belong to a very small number of rich people - the vested interests. They don't tell you what you really WANT to know - they tell you what they want you to hear.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
johnnyenglishteacher



Joined: 11 Aug 2006
Posts: 41

PostPosted: Fri Nov 28, 2008 1:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

rusmeister wrote:
johnnyenglishteacher wrote:

The idea of nanny state isn't so much about power lying in the hands of a few vested interests, it's more about the idea of a few PC, do-gooding, left-wing liberal, bureaucratic busybodies trying to tell the hard-working people of Britain how to run their lives, making white British people the most oppressed in the world (Er, not my words, just what the average Daily Mail editorial comes up with).


The plausibility of this can be tested by asking what the motivation is. Religious fervor, a zealous concern for others? Or, uh, money? As it's obviously the latter, it comes back to vested interests as encouraging the nanny state and funding the busybodies because it's good for (the VI's) business.

And newspapers, and the media in general belong to a very small number of rich people - the vested interests. They don't tell you what you really WANT to know - they tell you what they want you to hear.


I concur.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Serious_Fun



Joined: 28 Jun 2005
Posts: 1171
Location: terra incognita

PostPosted: Sun Nov 30, 2008 7:18 am    Post subject: Re: How much do you and your students smoke? Reply with quote

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Chancellor



Joined: 31 Oct 2005
Posts: 1337
Location: Ji'an, China - if you're willing to send me cigars, I accept donations :)

PostPosted: Mon Dec 01, 2008 8:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I object to this entire thread on the grounds that it only asks about cigarette smokers. Smile Some of us smoke cigars and/or pipes.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
johnslat



Joined: 21 Jan 2003
Posts: 13859
Location: Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA

PostPosted: Mon Dec 01, 2008 8:10 pm    Post subject: Dear Mary Jane Reply with quote

Dear Chancellor,

Not to mention other smokable substances.

Regards,
John
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
yamahuh



Joined: 23 Apr 2004
Posts: 1033
Location: Karaoke Hell

PostPosted: Tue Dec 09, 2008 2:00 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

LongShiKong wrote:
Quit for the 4th and final(?) time in September


Me too, only it was in October I'm now smoke free for 43 days and finding it actually quite easy this time around. I quit for a year back in 2004 when we moved to China which; given the amount of smoking in that culture, where cigarettes are handed to you by your host when you sit down for a meal, was pretty impressive. Started smoking again quite gradually; but was never 'heavy' and have been trying to quit for about 6 months.

Feel pretty good about it too and, given the fact that my wife still smokes, it has given me no small amount of pride in my self discipline.
Now if only I could resist the allure of 'Taiwanese tasty beer' to the same degree... Rolling Eyes
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Carll101



Joined: 17 Oct 2008
Posts: 45

PostPosted: Sun Dec 21, 2008 4:39 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

In the high school I taught in Thailand the boy's toilet was a big cloud of smoke... after a month I found out there was a toilet for teachers only !

Last edited by Carll101 on Mon Dec 22, 2008 10:24 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
MO39



Joined: 28 Jan 2004
Posts: 1970
Location: El ombligo de la Rep�blica Mexicana

PostPosted: Mon Dec 22, 2008 1:52 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Carll101 wrote:
In the high school I teached in Thailand the boy's toilet was a big cloud of smoke... after a month I found out there was a toilet for teachers only !


Maybe the second-hand smoke you inhaled in Thailand can be blamed for your typing "teached in Thailand"! Wink
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Carll101



Joined: 17 Oct 2008
Posts: 45

PostPosted: Mon Dec 22, 2008 10:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

That's how I used to look in there Embarassed
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Lhenderson



Joined: 15 Dec 2008
Posts: 135
Location: Shanghai JuLu Road

PostPosted: Tue Dec 23, 2008 4:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I smoke.

At home. In front of the dvd machine.

I would never inhale that dirty Tobacco.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Greg 09



Joined: 30 Jan 2009
Posts: 169

PostPosted: Sun Feb 08, 2009 12:47 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yes, but only after sex (I looked once).

On a more substantive note, why should I be disallowed opening a smokers' bar in the land of the free? I'd even post a Nanny General's Warning on the door, and the people-in-charge-of-your-decisions could even get all dramatic and mandate that it should read "Abandon All Hope Ye Who Enter Here". It won't matter, people like to do things and some of them might be bad for you, like driving on a highway. So what? How can you drink coffee or alcohol without a smoke? Its unnatural.

Healtcare costs? A risky door to open. Don't go there unless you really want Door #2, which is menu control. In my state I can't order a medium rare burger in a restaurant, it has to be well done. Phooey.

BTW johnslat, your chest enhancement looks great, but it reminds me of someone I dated, and there wasn't much in the way of substance behind hers either.


Last edited by Greg 09 on Sun Feb 08, 2009 3:11 am; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> General Discussion All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Page 3 of 6

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

Teaching Jobs in China
Teaching Jobs in China