Site Search:
 
Get TEFL Certified & Start Your Adventure Today!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

British Phrasal Verb Riles

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Mexico
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
El Gallo



Joined: 05 Feb 2007
Posts: 318

PostPosted: Fri Feb 13, 2009 7:26 pm    Post subject: British Phrasal Verb Riles Reply with quote

Hi,

Could one of you Brits please help out me (? Shocked ) with your rules for separating phrasal verbs?

I'm teaching a Cambridge First Certificate class at a University and need to make sure they understand the British rules for this.

I know you can separate phrasal verbs with adverb particles and nouns like:

"Key in the number" or "Key the number in" but I'm confused about pronouns. To my old gringo ears "Key it in" sounds right but not: "Key in it"

What about three word phrasal verbs.? I can "get it over with" but I think the correct British usage is "get over with it"

The book rules are not clear to me and also say you can't separate with prepositions as particles. So it's not OK to "turn the TV off" Is the word "off" here an adverb or preposition?

I'm oh so confused. Can you help out me? Shocked

Thanks!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
lozwich



Joined: 25 May 2003
Posts: 1536

PostPosted: Fri Feb 13, 2009 8:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I speak pretty good British English, and I would never say "Key in it", and nor have I ever heard anyone say "get over with it" to mean get it over with.

Try taking a look at Swan's Practical English Usage, in my edition, point 582 for a full explanation (that is easy to follow) of particle/preposition usage.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ontoit



Joined: 18 Jun 2006
Posts: 99

PostPosted: Fri Feb 13, 2009 11:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Trust your instincts and experience. If you are a university-educated native speaker and it sounds right, then it most probably is.

And if anyone gives you grief about it, tell them emphatically and in your best Winston Churchill accent that "This is the sort of nonsense up with which I refuse to put," before storming out of the room.


Last edited by ontoit on Sat Feb 14, 2009 1:01 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
El Gallo



Joined: 05 Feb 2007
Posts: 318

PostPosted: Sat Feb 14, 2009 12:41 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks for the advice. There doesn't seem to be any firm rules about this and I don't think British and American English is that much different in this regard.

Does anyone know if my students will encounter this on their First Certificate exam? Page 208 of the student book gives the rules I mentioned but they are confusing and don't seem to work in all cases.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
lozwich



Joined: 25 May 2003
Posts: 1536

PostPosted: Sat Feb 14, 2009 1:23 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

El Gallo wrote:
Page 208 of the student book gives the rules I mentioned but they are confusing and don't seem to work in all cases.


Which student book? Which part of the exam is it giving reference to? Don't forget that in FCE (and all other Cambridge suite exams) there is no way there can be any ambiguity in answers, so it is unlikely that there will be two possible answers for any question.

Did you try looking at the reference I mentioned? It explains it very clearly there, but its too much to type out here.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
El Gallo



Joined: 05 Feb 2007
Posts: 318

PostPosted: Sat Feb 14, 2009 1:47 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The student book is Cambridge Objective First Certificate. I haven't been able to find your other reference yet. Thanks again!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
lozwich



Joined: 25 May 2003
Posts: 1536

PostPosted: Sat Feb 14, 2009 3:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

We have that book where I work. If I have time, I'll have a look at the dastardly page 208 tomorrow.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Dragonlady



Joined: 10 May 2004
Posts: 720
Location: Chillinfernow, Canada

PostPosted: Sat Feb 14, 2009 4:44 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

deleted

out of date


Last edited by Dragonlady on Sun Sep 26, 2010 7:56 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
lozwich



Joined: 25 May 2003
Posts: 1536

PostPosted: Sat Feb 14, 2009 2:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Dragonlady wrote:
*My understanding is that Dec 2008 was the first sitting of the new exams so the availability of past exams is questionable.


I heard that exams are tested for up to two years before releasing them, so maybe the practice exams come from there. There's also a cracking book full of exams. I'll put the name on here later once I get to work.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TheLongWayHome



Joined: 07 Jun 2006
Posts: 1016
Location: San Luis Piojosi

PostPosted: Sat Feb 14, 2009 2:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

El Gallo wrote:
Does anyone know if my students will encounter this on their First Certificate exam? Page 208 of the student book gives the rules I mentioned but they are confusing and don't seem to work in all cases.

There is actually a very limited amount of phrasal verbs used in FCE exams, especially in the Use of English. I wouldn't go out of your way to teach hundreds of them. Go through practice exams and you'll see the same ones come up over and over again. Look after/take care/put off/call off are in nearly every exam!

Students already know a ton of phrasal verbs at this level. It's only when we start calling them phrasal verbs and explaining them that the mental block goes up. It's frustrating as most of them can use sit down, get up, stand up, find out etc. perfectly well.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
lozwich



Joined: 25 May 2003
Posts: 1536

PostPosted: Sat Feb 14, 2009 7:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ok, sitting here with said book in front of me..

I don't think the rule about separation or not is particularly British English or otherwise. If the verb doesn't have an object, that means it can't be separated. The example in the book "The engine cut out.." the verb cut out refers to the subject of the sentence, the engine. There is no object, or receiver of the verb.

The bit about the particle being an adverb, is saying that in, out, down, over are adverbs describing the verb part of the phrasal verb, and can be separated. The object in the keying the number in sentence is the number.

Does that clear it up?

The book of past papers I was thinking of is by Cambridge University Press, and imaginatively called "Cambridge First Certificate in English". There's a whole bunch of them, and they have numbers to tell you which edition it is.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
El Gallo



Joined: 05 Feb 2007
Posts: 318

PostPosted: Sat Feb 14, 2009 8:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks again!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Gary Denness
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Feb 18, 2009 1:12 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I am absolutely, stunningly tired after a 24 hour journey back from the UK (so forgive any crass stupidity), but I'm pretty sure the rule (and I believe it's a universal rule, not something the British are uniquely doing), is that when using a pronoun as the object, the pronoun must be used between the verb and preposition/whatever. If you are using the full word for the object it can go in either position.

Key the number in = fine
Key in the number = fine

Key it in = fine
Key in it = not fine
Back to top
MO39



Joined: 28 Jan 2004
Posts: 1970
Location: El ombligo de la Rep�blica Mexicana

PostPosted: Wed Feb 18, 2009 3:49 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Gary, you've got it, by George, you've got it. Actually I'm sure you've got the explanation right because it's the one I've used for years! Very Happy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Mexico All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

Teaching Jobs in China
Teaching Jobs in China