Site Search:
 
Get TEFL Certified & Start Your Adventure Today!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Current 12-yr. Educ. Reform - 'unprecedented'?

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> China (Job-related Posts Only)
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
LongShiKong



Joined: 28 May 2007
Posts: 1082
Location: China

PostPosted: Wed Feb 25, 2009 12:18 pm    Post subject: Current 12-yr. Educ. Reform - 'unprecedented'? Reply with quote

Quote:
Currently, the ministry (of Education) is collecting public opinion for an unprecedented 12-year education reform and development plan. The plan is said to be a very complicated project involving the whole of society.

A report on the draft plan, made by the ministry, said the Chinese government should give priority to education. It also said that the country will promote educational equality, relieve primary students from homework burdens and provide better salaries to teachers.

- Xinhua News Agency February 5, 2009 http://english.beijingreview.com.cn/headline/txt/2009-02/06/content_177225.htm


What are your thoughts on this?

I think we can all agree that problems with the current educational system in China are systemic, requiring fundamental (societal) change rather than the usual top-down approach. I have to admit, despite my skepticism, the fact the CPC shows awareness of this is a positive sign.
However, changing attitudes is far more challenging than hosting an Olympics or putting people in space.

For example, employers who hire applicants based on university rank rather than inherent skills are as much a part of the problem as parents frantically placing their kids in additional private classes. Ironically, the latter is almost a bigger problem in N.A as it is here with the exception that they're not academic classes.

I'm already seeing the effect of this reform. A Chinese friend of mine announced she's returning to the public sector from the currently better-paying private high school because of job security and the soon-to-be-implemented wage equity. My guess is that this may force many privates to close or raise tuition even higher to retain/attract superior teaching staff. If that happens, there'll be even more emphasis in such schools on exam/Gaokao performance.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Buck Lin



Joined: 13 Oct 2008
Posts: 405
Location: nanchang china

PostPosted: Wed Feb 25, 2009 1:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Good news. I want of work with Chinese in China, and the current situation where I make more than my Chines co-worker is not productive. I want to see class sizes like in other countries become the norm here in China.
Education is a business but it is also an investment in the future.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Yahoo Messenger
eddy-cool



Joined: 06 Jul 2008
Posts: 1008

PostPosted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 4:45 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

It would be extremely helpful if the parents could be roped into school management as responsible for their own kids.

FOr instance, schools could organise compulsory parent meetings to discuss discipline issues and objectives set for each subject.

Principals should be made answerable to someone; at the moment many of them seem to be little local emperors or empresses with unlimited powers and despotic management styles.

Also the local Education Bureaus implement policies that seem to be locally designed, suiting personal interests.
For instance the schools in the town where my wife works were recently told that 5 English teachers were expected to come forward to go to study in Canada for one term.
They have to make up their minds this very term as they will have to fly over to Canada in August.

No further information was provided except that 'it's going to cost them 65'000 yuan each, including a round trip, accommodation and tuition fees.'

Yes, that's right: They have to foot their further education by themselves (though they will receive their regular pay while studying). No promotions have been linked to their participation in the study programme.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Neilhrd



Joined: 10 Jul 2005
Posts: 233
Location: Nanning, China

PostPosted: Fri Feb 27, 2009 12:23 am    Post subject: top down or bottom up Reply with quote

I have to disagree with the idea that major educational reform in China can be achieved from the bottom up.

It seems to me that the central problem is that the government sees education not as a tool to access knowledge but as an instrument of political control. This is seen in the appointment of school and college principals based on their loyalty to the party and guanxi within it rather than their educational competence.

Furthermore the teacher training system remains obsessed with a very prescriptivve approach to teaching methods designed to ensure uniformity and inhibit creative thinking.

These things can't be changed by student or parent power exercised from the bottom up. Change has to be initiated from the top down. Only when the dead hand of political conformity is removed from the education system will classroom teachers be able to initiate change in their own classrooms without fear of political reprisals.

Another problem with bottom up theories of change is that they assume that parents and students have some awareness of the possible alternatives. In my experience this is not the case, at least outside Beijing and Shanghai. Many, many parents resist change of any kind and insist that their children be taught as they were taught. Fear of these parents often inhibits classroom teachers and even principals.

This problem is not unique to China. In Britain educational reform became so radical in the 1970s and 80s that parents were left behind and in many cases don't understand what schools are trying to achieve. The result has been an almost complete breakdown in dialogue between schools and parents in many places. China needs to avoid this mistake.

If reform is to happen here it will have to start from the top down but at the same time find some channel of communication to keep the parents onside.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Yahoo Messenger
Lorean



Joined: 21 Dec 2006
Posts: 476
Location: Beijing

PostPosted: Fri Feb 27, 2009 7:54 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

They will start to reform their education system when their economy can no longer grow on cheap labor.

Until then,
Don't bother.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
LongShiKong



Joined: 28 May 2007
Posts: 1082
Location: China

PostPosted: Mon Mar 02, 2009 6:17 am    Post subject: Re: top down or bottom up Reply with quote

Neilhrd wrote:

It seems to me that the central problem is that the government sees education not as a tool to access knowledge but as an instrument of political control.....If reform is to happen here it will have to start from the top down but at the same time find some channel of communication to keep the parents onside.


You're right, Neilhrd, a major function of public schooling is political, here and everywhere else. 'Educational reform' is really a misnomer when you think about it. 'Education' itself doesn't require 'reform', unlike the policy, especially of a previous administration.

How else can one comprehend how, even in the birthplace of 'educational reform', so few people are educated. After spending 4,000 hours learning English, the average Chinese cannot even put a complete sentence together. The current mode of education here in China is based on 19th century western models designed to accustom peasantry to the uniformity and military precision of industrial practices.

No doubt, the CPC's aim with this reform is in accord with it's goal to further develop its economy from mere manufacturing to one of innovation. But the fact this is already happening in spite of the current educational environment (or lack thereof) suggests that innovation and entrepreneurialism aren't the exclusive byproduct of a public school curriculum.

I also agree, the major stumbling block is getting people 'onside' in any public policy campaign that isn't a matter of national pride, especially here in China. For example, the failure of environmental and anti-smoking campaigns. This factor will significantly influence the scope of any reform.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> China (Job-related Posts Only) All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

Teaching Jobs in China
Teaching Jobs in China