|
Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
wilco
Joined: 22 Jan 2009 Posts: 39
|
Posted: Mon May 04, 2009 9:08 am Post subject: Serious TEFL |
|
|
Anyone any info about a company called "Serious TEFL", who offer online and in-class courses?
Thanks in advance |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Julieanne
Joined: 18 Mar 2004 Posts: 120
|
Posted: Tue May 05, 2009 1:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yes excellent course, very informative and interactive. See the testimonials on their site and placement is 100%.
PM me if you would like to know more. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
naturegirl321

Joined: 04 May 2003 Posts: 9041 Location: home sweet home
|
Posted: Tue May 05, 2009 1:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
It's less than 100 hours, I'd pass on it. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Julieanne
Joined: 18 Mar 2004 Posts: 120
|
Posted: Tue May 05, 2009 1:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
I asked about this and by the way they are going to have a 120 hour course by the end of May. I spoke with [email protected]
This is the site by the way
http://www.serioustefl.com |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
spiral78

Joined: 05 Apr 2004 Posts: 11534 Location: On a Short Leash
|
Posted: Tue May 05, 2009 6:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
wilco, you might want to do a search for julieanne's posts. She has been very strongly backing this particular course for a couple of years now. However, in the past, it didn't really meet the standard for a basic newbie course. Perhaps things have changed...
IF it is 120 hours ON SITE, and includes at least 6 hours of practice teaching with actual students, not peer trainees, then it's OK. If less - it's below the standard.
CELTA is the name brand newbie level course, but there are decent generic courses out there that also meet the basic standards above.
Ideally, you should consider taking the course in the country where you want to start teaching. There are some excellent reasons for this: you can get your feet wet in country/culture while you still have a support system, as training centres generally arrange for airport pickup, housing during the course, local language training, and orientation. Your practice teaching students will be more representative of those you�ll be working with when you start. You can be sure your cert will be recognized by local employers, and the training centre can give you invaluable information regarding reputable employers in the region. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Justin Trullinger

Joined: 28 Jan 2005 Posts: 3110 Location: Seoul, South Korea and Myanmar for a bit
|
Posted: Tue May 05, 2009 6:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Spiral and I are frequently sounding off on threads around here about quality teacher training, and often we agree. I'd like to disagree slightly, though:
Quote: |
IF it is 120 hours ON SITE, and includes at least 6 hours of practice teaching with actual students, not peer trainees, then it's OK. |
If it doesn't meet these standards, it's clearly sub-standard. But there are courses that meet, or seem to meet, these basic criteria and are still below average as well. Look into class sizes, experience of trainers, and accreditation as well. 120 hours and 6 or more of practice teaching are a start, but not a guarantee.
About serioustefl. Julianne, could you check your link and repost? The OP mentions online and onsite courses- the link you posted seems to go to a website advertising online courses only. Have you got another one? Or maybe somehow the OP heard about the new programs before they went up on the website?
In any case, I've had a browse around the website given, and have to say I wouldn't recommend SeriousTEFL, nor would I recognise it as a real certification for hiring purposes. (Referring to the $185 distance course on the link given- don't know about any others.) Distance only, no noticeable practice teaching, and who really believes you can get a real educational qualification for $185 anyway? This is the same thing that comes up again and again with online qualifications for teaching- I am NOT opposed to distance learning, but the standards for learning should be the same. Why should we accept a distance qualification as equivalent to an onsite program when the particulars of the course make sure that participants learn and grow less?
I'm also bothered by the fact that some info on the website seems to be misleading. Consider, from the FAQ section of the website:
Quote: |
3. Is this course recognized?
Yes. Due to our excellent reputation amongst International Employers, Educational Agencies and Associations, SeriousTEFL is recognized by employers worldwide especially with those who choose to offer their vacant teaching positions on SeriousTeachers.com in addition to: |
After "in addition to:" the logos of two well known professional organisations, NAFSA and IATEFL, are displayed. These are well known organisations, but they are dedicated to community building, networking, education, etc. The do NOT impose standards on membership that I know of; they are not regulatory bodies. So what it means for them to "recognise" this course doesn't quite compute.
I looked at their websites. Here's what IATEFL has to say about use of their logo:
Quote: |
IATEFL does not act as an accreditation body for organisations offering language or teacher training courses, or teacher development services of any kind. The appearance of the IATEFL name, acronym or logo on any organisation's website (including IATEFL affiliates and partner associations) - either with or without permission - does not imply the endorsement of that organisation's work, products or services. |
Taken from: http://www.iatefl.org/content/about/logo.php
Here's what NAFSA says about use of their logo:
Quote: |
Publicizing Membership/Use of NAFSA's Name and Logo
Members may publicize their membership, provided they make clear that individuals, and not organizations, are NAFSA members. Members may not imply that NAFSA has reviewed or endorsed their programs or activities, or that NAFSA membership confers any endorsement. Use of the NAFSA logo is prohibited. NAFSA Global Partners are provided with a special logo indicating their participation in the Global Partnership Program. |
Taken from:
http://www.nafsa.org/member_services.ms/about_membership
I don't claim any particular expertise about IATEFL or NAFSA. I'm not even a member of either. But it sure looks to me like these logos are being used to imply things that the organisations themselves deny.
Searching the IATEFL and NAFSA websites, I found no mention of SeriousTeachers or SeriousTEFL.
I'd be careful with these guys,
Justin |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
spiral78

Joined: 05 Apr 2004 Posts: 11534 Location: On a Short Leash
|
Posted: Tue May 05, 2009 6:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Actually, Justin, we still agree - you're entirely correct that a course can appear to meet the basic standard of 120 hours and supervised teaching practice...and still be below standard in actuality. I tend to stick to the formula because I can't possibly judge a generic course on any other level, unless I am personally familiar with it (as I am with a couple of the generic courses offered in Prague - both of which are really quite ok).
I should qualify my formulaic response to read 'such a course is likely/probably ok.' |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Justin Trullinger

Joined: 28 Jan 2005 Posts: 3110 Location: Seoul, South Korea and Myanmar for a bit
|
Posted: Tue May 05, 2009 7:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Agreed and agreed-
I just get nervous, because, as a lot of us online repeat the 120 + 6 mantra, course providers and ripoff artists alike are getting wise to it. I get a lot of applications that say "I have completed a 120 hour TESOL course with six hours of teaching practice."
And upon investigation, it was 120 hours online, possibly completed in 10, and 6 hours of "teaching" practice committed in some way that avoided real learners.
So I hate to be a hard *beep*, but if I don't personally know a course, it doesn't really carry much weight.
Bst,
Justin |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
spiral78

Joined: 05 Apr 2004 Posts: 11534 Location: On a Short Leash
|
Posted: Wed May 06, 2009 8:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah, I always mention the 120 hours ON SITE and teaching practice with actual students, but I have to say that I myself know of a few generic courses that meet this standard and are still pretty crappy.
I don't blame you for not being interested in candidates from some course you don't know.
Probably the best advice is still 'take a course in the country/region where you want to start working.' That way, local employers will know your cert... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Justin Trullinger

Joined: 28 Jan 2005 Posts: 3110 Location: Seoul, South Korea and Myanmar for a bit
|
| |