View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Noor

Joined: 06 May 2009 Posts: 152
|
Posted: Sat Oct 24, 2009 3:52 pm Post subject: Why contact was broken |
|
|
.
Emiratis and expatriates used to live side by side, very much part of each other's lives. Today they live in different worlds.
http://www.thenational.ae/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20091024/WEEKENDER/710239836/1043
Besides my students, I haven't met many Emiratis since arriving in the Emirates. Apparently, many expats meet even fewer. How do those of you who live in the UAE get to meet the locals (that aren't your students)?
. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Noor

Joined: 06 May 2009 Posts: 152
|
Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2009 2:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
I suppose that could be said of many people in many situations.
Does that mean you don't try? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
veiledsentiments

Joined: 20 Feb 2003 Posts: 17644 Location: USA
|
Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2009 2:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
It is a bit easier for men to meet Emirati men... especially through sports. But for women, you are pretty much restricted to your students and perhaps the chance to attend weddings. (something I had to pass on as I am allergic to the traditional incense that is always burned)
But, it is just the way that Emirati culture has developed since the times mentioned in the article. With wealth, it means that the women have moved into the hareem. They have obligations to their family. Emirati families are huge and that is where they socialize. They rotate within the family compounds. We are out of the loop. It is not that they want to avoid us... they just don't understand why they would want to include us.
For example, at first I would get upset with my students who didn't complete their homework... blaming it on laziness or just adolescent foibles. But once I got to know these students, I began to understand that their lives are not their own. Guests are a constant when you have hundreds of cousins who live nearby. When they drop in, the daughters of the family are not allowed to go to their room and do their homework. They often serve the food/beverages... even though all the families have servants. Daughter often must do the direct serving or if not that, they must at least stay and entertain their aunts.
I don't mean this negatively - on either their side or our side.
When I lived in Egypt, I lived within the culture and still have many Egyptian friends from my years there. My neighbors were Egyptians. In the Gulf, you live with expats in high rise apartments. The Emiratis are in walled villas a few miles off. You can go for weeks without ever talking to an Emirati that isn't your student or works at your college.
VS |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Never Ceased To Be Amazed

Joined: 22 Oct 2004 Posts: 3500 Location: Shhh...don't talk to me...I'm playin' dead...
|
Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2009 5:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Very illuminating post, VS! I must remember to consider this...
NCTBA |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Double Cheeseburger
Joined: 22 Oct 2009 Posts: 18 Location: Camp Zebra- Guantanamo
|
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 6:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
Same for the boys, to a lesser extent. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Pikgitina
Joined: 09 Jan 2006 Posts: 420 Location: KSA
|
Posted: Wed Oct 28, 2009 6:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
veiledsentiments wrote: |
For example, at first I would get upset with my students who didn't complete their homework... blaming it on laziness or just adolescent foibles. But once I got to know these students, I began to understand that their lives are not their own. Guests are a constant when you have hundreds of cousins who live nearby. When they drop in, the daughters of the family are not allowed to go to their room and do their homework. They often serve the food/beverages... even though all the families have servants. Daughter often must do the direct serving or if not that, they must at least stay and entertain their aunts.
I don't mean this negatively - on either their side or our side.VS |
This is very true, and, like you VS, I tend to try to understand people and situations instead of simply generalising and bad-mouthing. I know you're not condoning these students' behaviour, but that you're simply offering a possible explanation. I think that's great. However, it doesn't make the situation any easier.
One generation on from the mid-90s (and I don't mean this negatively in any way), the students - and their attitude and behaviour - are most likely very different. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
veiledsentiments

Joined: 20 Feb 2003 Posts: 17644 Location: USA
|
Posted: Thu Oct 29, 2009 1:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
Pikgitina wrote: |
One generation on from the mid-90s (and I don't mean this negatively in any way), the students - and their attitude and behaviour - are most likely very different. |
Definitely... just from the fact that most of them have now had sisters and cousins who went through the system, so it is not such a new and novel thing for them. More of them feel that they 'deserve' a bit more than they probably do. Also the colleges were so much smaller then, so that after you are there for a couple years, you know most of the students. I also had the benefit of teaching both content and EFL, so I had students in various circumstances.
I also think that it is easier for women to teach in the Gulf universities... both the females and males strangely enough. The girls are much more manipulative of the men teachers.
VS |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Sheikh N Bake

Joined: 26 Apr 2007 Posts: 1307 Location: Dis ting of ours
|
Posted: Thu Oct 29, 2009 10:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
And at DWC, after the late 90s intifada and especially right after 9/11, many of the female students were very nasty to American male faculty. I left in 2002 so I can only imagine how it was after Dubya invaded the wrong country by mistake. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
johnslat

Joined: 21 Jan 2003 Posts: 13859 Location: Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA
|
Posted: Thu Oct 29, 2009 1:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Dear Sheik,
" . . . Dubya invaded the wrong country by mistake."
Ever hear of the phrase "accidently on purpose?"
Regards,
John |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
sliderama
Joined: 11 Nov 2007 Posts: 90 Location: al reef
|
Posted: Thu Oct 29, 2009 4:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
you 'mericans can be so myopic, it was more like unmistakably on purpose, no matter that it took the lives of 100,000 other iraqis, but basically it was to nail saddam for dear ol pappy bush |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Never Ceased To Be Amazed

Joined: 22 Oct 2004 Posts: 3500 Location: Shhh...don't talk to me...I'm playin' dead...
|
Posted: Thu Oct 29, 2009 4:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Duh!!!
NCTBA |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
veiledsentiments

Joined: 20 Feb 2003 Posts: 17644 Location: USA
|
Posted: Thu Oct 29, 2009 5:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
sliderama wrote: |
you 'mericans can be so myopic, it was more like unmistakably on purpose, no matter that it took the lives of 100,000 other iraqis, but basically it was to nail saddam for dear ol pappy bush |
American are myopic? That answer was myopic. There was one reason and one reason alone.
OIL
VS |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
johnslat

Joined: 21 Jan 2003 Posts: 13859 Location: Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA
|
Posted: Thu Oct 29, 2009 5:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Dear sliderama.
Generalize much? if so, you and Dubya have something in common.
I'm "'merican" and so are NCTBA and VS.
While I think that your "reason" might have some merit, I agree with VS that the promary reason was most likely oil - and the other assorted money-windfall benefits for "'merican" companies.
Follow the money.
Regards,
John
P.S. Along with your motive, another very possible one is that the wayward, bumbling son wanted to show his Dad (who refused to invade Iraq) how a REAL man would handle it. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Sheikh N Bake

Joined: 26 Apr 2007 Posts: 1307 Location: Dis ting of ours
|
Posted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 8:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
Myopic?? Some of you can't even recognize basic, simple irony when you see it. With six years of the Iraq war behind us, "invaded the wrong country by mistake" clearly suggests two things: 1. bumbling 2. accidentally on purpose.
I've never seen the logic of the pat Middle East answer that the reason for the Dubya's 2003 invasion was oil. Oil supplies were quite safe at the time and for the forseeable future. His idea was to have oil revenue pay for his military adventure, which it clearly didn't, and is not doing. Moreover, if the US simply wanted to take over all the oil for itself, it could have very easily occupied Saudi Arabia long ago, what with the latter's underachieving military. If I'd been commander in chief and all I wanted was oil, I would have dropped diplomatic relations with KSA due to the heavy concentration of Saudi 9/11 operatives, and then invaded the country. Personally, I think lust for oil took a back seat to Dubya & Co's plain stupidity and evil. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
veiledsentiments

Joined: 20 Feb 2003 Posts: 17644 Location: USA
|
Posted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 3:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Oil is the obvious factor when one doesn't want to write an essay. If it becomes too political it just gets locked anyway.
VS |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|