View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Jaime1
Joined: 11 May 2008 Posts: 66
|
Posted: Mon Nov 30, 2009 1:58 am Post subject: Survival Thai for the Classroom |
|
|
I want to compile a list of phrases for the classroom we can all use. Here are a few I know . Add some if you like.
Sit Down - Nang Long
Be Quiet - Niyap Noi
Understand? - Kow Jai Mai
Listen - Fang
Homework - Gan Ban
Quiz - Tot sob
Exam - sob
Repeat after me - Pootam
Read - An
Break - Pak
Break 5 minutes - Pak han na ti
Raise your hand - Yok mi Kun
Don't cheat - Ham Lok
What is your name? - Kun Chu Alai
How old are you? - Ayuk Tow Lai
Paper - gradart
Pencil - din-saw
That's all wrong - Phid thang-phe
Stop doing that! - ?? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
MaiPenRai

Joined: 17 Jan 2006 Posts: 390 Location: BKK
|
Posted: Mon Nov 30, 2009 3:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
While this is argued by many teachers, I don't think it is necessary to use most of what you have posted in class. If you are teaching primary or very low levels, it MAY be useful at the beginning, but you should be trying to encourage and facilitate classroom language in English.
Hands up, sit down, listen, be quiet, paper, pencil, read, etc. can be taught, modelled and drilled visually. Not sure why you would want to say to a young second language learner "That's all wrong"?
Many teachers tend to use Thai instructions in class because the students tend to respond better to "Ngiep" rather then "Be quiet!", but it is a slippery slope. I admit that I used to use Thai very occassionaly, but learned that the more I used it, the more the students expected it.
I have lots of experience working with Thai schools and admin and I know that most of the schools really dont want to hear the foreign teachers using Thai in the classroom (Thai teachers can do that).
There are also are few mistakes in your translations, but no need to be picky.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
sr
Joined: 05 Oct 2009 Posts: 62
|
Posted: Mon Nov 30, 2009 9:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
If you are teaching English why are you using Thai? When I teach English (university level) everything is done in English as this is the only way that the students learn. Granted if they have a problem with some words then I will explain in Thai, but that is very rarely. I also have them look up any words in the Thai English dictionary. Remember you are teaching English not Thai even at the lower levels.
As was pointed out by MaiPenRai they will become more depended on you to speak Thai to them if they don�t understand, so it is better if you don�t start that.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Jaime1
Joined: 11 May 2008 Posts: 66
|
Posted: Wed Dec 16, 2009 5:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
you should add your own classroom phrases instead. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
roguegrafix
Joined: 30 Jan 2007 Posts: 125
|
Posted: Wed Dec 16, 2009 7:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
I agree with the above. I occassionaly use Thai in class but mainly if I'm trying to tell a joke and it has nothing to do with what we are learning. If you really want them to listen (and I'm talking about university students here not young school kids), swear at them in English using a few F words. They sure pay attention then!  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
perfectweapon
Joined: 12 Dec 2009 Posts: 58 Location: Roaming the wild blue yonder
|
Posted: Wed Dec 16, 2009 8:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
Roguegrafix the problem with that is if you swear at them, and they repeat it outside in ear shot of someone then guess what? You got it, it will come back on you, and you will have all kinds of problems. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
NigerianWhisper
Joined: 21 Mar 2009 Posts: 176
|
Posted: Wed Dec 16, 2009 11:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
roguegrafix wrote: |
I agree with the above. I occassionaly use Thai in class but mainly if I'm trying to tell a joke and it has nothing to do with what we are learning. If you really want them to listen (and I'm talking about university students here not young school kids), swear at them in English using a few F words. They sure pay attention then!  |
Swearing at your students just shows that you don't have the required skills to manage a class.
You should endeavor never to lose your temper or control of your emotions. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
perfectweapon
Joined: 12 Dec 2009 Posts: 58 Location: Roaming the wild blue yonder
|
Posted: Thu Dec 17, 2009 12:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
NW this is also very true  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
MaiPenRai

Joined: 17 Jan 2006 Posts: 390 Location: BKK
|
Posted: Mon Dec 21, 2009 7:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
Rogue, are you a teacher? I think its just common sense that swearing at your students is just plain wrong and demonstrates a lack of understanding or effort in classroom management.
I've had grade 3 students that all know (because I taught them and we reinforced it lesson after lesson) pen, pencil, stand up , sit down, notebook, quiet, come here, write, read, etc. There is no reason that all teachers cannot do the same.
Schools do not pay you to practice Thai with the students. Plenty of time for that outside the classroom. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Mini09
Joined: 22 Dec 2009 Posts: 1 Location: Pattaya
|
Posted: Wed Dec 30, 2009 1:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hi,
Thanks Jaime, I found these phrases really useful. Chances are I will be teaching very young kids/kindergarten and not 'directly' teaching English, so being able to get the kids (2-4 year olds) attention is very helpful. I know that when teaching older kids you need to speak in English all the time, but Im sure thats not the case for everyone
Mini |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
davidrwest2005
Joined: 30 Aug 2006 Posts: 12 Location: Hubei
|
Posted: Wed Dec 30, 2009 3:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I don't know anything about Thai language but I am curious where people actually stand on the issue of using the native language in the classroom at at the school.
My guess is that the people who are against using the native language in the classroom are sticking to the teacher trainers' rule. I was taught that using the native language is counter productive. But I suspect for the most part that the teachers who are against using the native language in the class cannot use it very well themselves.
These are my reasons for using the native language in the class:
*translating
1. it's a skill
2. in some instances it saves time
*knowing what the students think
survival Thai for the classroom isn't necessarily about learning phrases to say to the students. How about listening to what the Thai students are saying in Thai? My bet is that the students are saying something like: Did he say copy the blackboard? or I don't understand.
*Communicating with homeroom teachers
When the other teachers know what I am doing and know me as a person, they become great resources for handling classroom management issues.
*relating to the students as people.
Young learners cannot be expected to strictly use English. Young learners are some of the most personable students you can hope to meet. make friends with them on the break and they will jump through hoops of fire for you during the lesson.
* confirm their comprehension
my guess is that 80% of a class relies on a handful of bright students to find out what is going on. Getting feedback from them in any form is an accomplishment. The goal is to get them to respond in English but a correct response in Thai is not the worst. Some students have better reading skills than speaking skills.
*understand the way they understand language
We all grasp new concepts by attaching them somewhere to existing concepts. I'm sure there is a fancy word for this. Thai and English are so dissimilar that learning English for a thai student is difficult in ways that an English speaker might not imagine. When we hear Tinglish we are hearing this 'carry over' from the native language. (Again, I forgot the fancy word). I see nothing wrong is pointing out the Thai structure the student is mistakenly applying to English and then eliciting from the class the correct English structure.
*they are used to learning from a teacher who switches between their native language and the target language.
I know this line of reasoning is impressive only up to a point.. I too try to encourage the students to use English more. Sometimes my efforts are in vein. But for the most part, I still have a sense of control in the classroom because I know where the breakdown occurs and I know what the class is saying.
I wish the students had the attitude necessary for total immersion. But in most instances it is not realistic. This is easier with advanced adult/college students. Doing this on a consistent basis requires a lot of effort and my hat is off to the teachers who do this and succeed. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
NigerianWhisper
Joined: 21 Mar 2009 Posts: 176
|
Posted: Fri Jan 01, 2010 3:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
davidrwest2005 wrote: |
My guess is that the people who are against using the native language in the classroom are sticking to the teacher trainers' rule.
For very good reasons.
I was taught that using the native language is counter productive. But I suspect for the most part that the teachers who are against using the native language in the class cannot use it very well themselves.
I suspect that you were taught in a 4 week (max) TEFL type course. For sure (and no offense intended) you are not a product of either an Education degree or post-grad in Applied Linguistics etc.
These are my reasons for using the native language in the class:
*translating
1. it's a skill
2. in some instances it saves time
It is not about 'saving time', it is about learning.
*knowing what the students think
survival Thai for the classroom isn't necessarily about learning phrases to say to the students. How about listening to what the Thai students are saying in Thai? My bet is that the students are saying something like: Did he say copy the blackboard? or I don't understand.
Depends on the age group. For sure if you use Thai in a classroom you better make sure you are almost fluent as a single mis-prounounced word can cause difficulties.
*Communicating with homeroom teachers
When the other teachers know what I am doing and know me as a person, they become great resources for handling classroom management issues.
No disagreement there.
*relating to the students as people.
Young learners cannot be expected to strictly use English. Young learners are some of the most personable students you can hope to meet. make friends with them on the break and they will jump through hoops of fire for you during the lesson.
Not sure what the point of that statement is however, why cannot young learners be expected to strictly use English? How do you think young Thai learners learn Thai? Total immersion in the language from all around.
* confirm their comprehension
The goal is to get them to respond in English but a correct response in Thai is not the worst. Some students have better reading skills than speaking skills.
Errrrrrrr, show me any young learner that has better reading skills than speaking and I will show you a flying pig.
*understand the way they understand language
We all grasp new concepts by attaching them somewhere to existing concepts. I'm sure there is a fancy word for this. Thai and English are so dissimilar that learning English for a thai student is difficult in ways that an English speaker might not imagine. When we hear Tinglish we are hearing this 'carry over' from the native language. (Again, I forgot the fancy word). I see nothing wrong is pointing out the Thai structure the student is mistakenly applying to English and then eliciting from the class the correct English structure.
And you are trying to explain this in Thai or English? Again, explanations of this sort are not appropriate for young learners. It's just plain confusing.
*they are used to learning from a teacher who switches between their native language and the target language.
I know this line of reasoning is impressive only up to a point.. I too try to encourage the students to use English more. Sometimes my efforts are in vein.
Confusing response............and it's spelled 'vain'. Teach them 'vein' in Science.
But for the most part, I still have a sense of control in the classroom because I know where the breakdown occurs and I know what the class is saying.
I doubt that very much.
I wish the students had the attitude necessary for total immersion. But in most instances it is not realistic. This is easier with advanced adult/college students. Doing this on a consistent basis requires a lot of effort and my hat is off to the teachers who do this and succeed.
You will NEVER have total immersion from younger students. Ask yourself this...........you ever have a class of say 6-8 year olds? They sit in the chairs for 40-50 minutes? Do you know what the average attention span is in time? How about concentration levels, blood sugar levels etc? As an example.....there are very good reasons why Numeracy lessons tend to take place AFTER morning/lunch breaks. Research as to the reasons why.
|
I am sorry but for the most part your post is both misguided and ill-informed.
If you REALLY wish to learn HOW to teach EFL (particularly to younger learners) then take the time out to study Piaget (Developmental Theory) and Stephen Krashen (Language Acquisition)
Your somewhat lengthy post suggests you are dedicated. It just needs to be pointed in the right direction.
Mai Pen Rai got it right in his/her responses.
Last edited by NigerianWhisper on Sat Jan 02, 2010 9:09 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Pauleddy
Joined: 19 Mar 2006 Posts: 295 Location: The Big Mango
|
Posted: Fri Jan 01, 2010 11:33 pm Post subject: Vane, Vein or Vain |
|
|
"...sometimes my efforts are in vein"
mistakenly corrected to vane
both wrong
needs to be "...efforts are in vain"
vane is a noun--a device for measuring wind direction.
I am amazed that the first teacher got it wrong, and was then wrongly corrected by another teacher. Says a lot for Thailand. Little wonder that things are bleak.
pedantic PaulEddy |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Mr. Kalgukshi Mod Team


Joined: 18 Jan 2003 Posts: 6613 Location: Need to know basis only.
|
Posted: Sat Jan 02, 2010 3:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
Let's stay on topic, please.
The topic relates to using Thai in the classroom.
If the discussion does not focus on the topic, the thread will no longer be available. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Mr. Kalgukshi Mod Team


Joined: 18 Jan 2003 Posts: 6613 Location: Need to know basis only.
|
Posted: Sat Jan 02, 2010 12:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Two members chose to deliberately disregard the warning above and so the thread is now locked after their postings were deleted.
Other action is pending. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|