| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
dmb

Joined: 12 Feb 2003 Posts: 8397
|
Posted: Sat Apr 03, 2004 6:38 pm Post subject: A question for you grammarians out there. |
|
|
Do you agree or disagree that 's can be used for plurals?
I've had my doubts. But a friend of mine quoted a couple of examples
The do's and dont's
The if's and but's
That guy uses too many and's
Are these acceptable? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
waxwing
Joined: 29 Jun 2003 Posts: 719 Location: China
|
Posted: Sat Apr 03, 2004 7:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
God no! I find this to be one of the worst forms of illiteracy.
But that's just me.. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dmb

Joined: 12 Feb 2003 Posts: 8397
|
Posted: Sat Apr 03, 2004 7:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I agree waxwing, but my friend thrust a book into my hand where he got the info. I can't remember the author. But the book was called "Panda eats shoots and leaves" |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
johnslat

Joined: 21 Jan 2003 Posts: 13859 Location: Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA
|
Posted: Sat Apr 03, 2004 8:16 pm Post subject: The apostrophe |
|
|
Dear dmb,
I'll weigh in with my opinion - that apostrophes need to be used:
1. to show possession
2. with contractions
3. with A FEW plurals
These last would include such examples as these:
1. A's are the only grade he gives.
(But in a context in which the plural is clear, apostrophes after upper-case letters are not necessary: "He got four As, two Bs, and three Cs.")
2. Don't forget to dot your i's
3. Mind your p's and q's
but NOT
The 1960s ( or '60s) in the USA were a time of change.
or
Bill and I have identical IQs
With some of the examples given above, you can see why an apostrophe would be needed to avoid confusion:
1. A's would seem to be "As"
2. and i's would otherwise seem to be "is".
So, I'd say the examples you gave are definitely acceptable.
Regards,
John |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Hogbear
Joined: 12 Oct 2003 Posts: 42 Location: New York City
|
Posted: Sun Apr 04, 2004 12:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
I agree with John. Use the apostrophe if it'll look weird (or create a word) without it. I'd use it for "do's and don'ts," otherwise you get the odd-looking "dos." For your other example, I'd use italics if available, i.e., "ifs and buts."
This is a style question, so it really has nothing to do with "illiteracy." The New Yorker uses the apostrophe in decades ("the 1950's"). |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
leeroy
Joined: 30 Jan 2003 Posts: 777 Location: London UK
|
Posted: Sun Apr 04, 2004 12:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
Eats, Shoots and Leaves (p.45) reckons that we use apostrophes (among other things) to indicate the plurals of letters ("How many f's are there in Fulham") and the plurals of words ("Do's and don't's").
On p.46 the author notes that
| Quote: |
| it no longer has to appear in the plurals of abbreviations ("MP's") or plural dates ("1980's"). Until quite recently it was customary to write ...[this]... and in fact this convention still applies in America. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
johnslat

Joined: 21 Jan 2003 Posts: 13859 Location: Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA
|
Posted: Sun Apr 04, 2004 12:54 am Post subject: Apostrophe-free zone |
|
|
Dear leeroy,
"or plural dates ("1980's"). Until quite recently it was customary to write ...[this]... and in fact this convention still applies in America."
Not within a hundred mile radius of MY house, it doesn't.
Regards,
John |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
leeroy
Joined: 30 Jan 2003 Posts: 777 Location: London UK
|
Posted: Sun Apr 04, 2004 1:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
John,
Lynne Truss (the author) is British - evidently she needs to brush up on her awareness of "world englishes"! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Hogbear
Joined: 12 Oct 2003 Posts: 42 Location: New York City
|
Posted: Sun Apr 04, 2004 4:05 am Post subject: Re: Apostrophe-free zone |
|
|
| johnslat wrote: |
| "or plural dates ("1980's"). Until quite recently it was customary to write ...[this]... and in fact this convention still applies in America." |
What?
The only publication I know of that uses the apostrophe in dates is The New Yorker, and not one styleguide sanctions it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
khmerhit
Joined: 31 May 2003 Posts: 1874 Location: Reverse Culture Shock Unit
|
Posted: Sun Apr 04, 2004 8:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| Eats, Shoots and Leaves |
Reminds me of dining out in Phnom Penh (in the old days, of course).
cambodia  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Stephen Jones
Joined: 21 Feb 2003 Posts: 4124
|
Posted: Sun Apr 04, 2004 9:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
The use of the apostrophe in dates was common until the end of the 1970's. It is frowned on now in American English, and probably is no longer common in British English either. The same applies to the use of the apostrophe after abbreviations and TLAs.
It is not incorrect to use it after those two types, nor after p's and q's or do's and don't's. John Slat appears to have given a reasonable rule of thumb. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
arioch36
Joined: 21 Jan 2003 Posts: 3589
|
Posted: Sun Apr 04, 2004 12:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| The use of the apostrophe in dates was common until the end of the 1970's. It is frowned on now in American English, and probably is no longer common in British English either. |
Seems like most people agree with this. But why the change? I don't now about others, but it becomes a problem in China. Why? Because most of the books written in English tend to be older books (avoid those copyright laws) and textbooks are often edited copies of older textbooks written by foreigners / Brits. What is a teacher to do?
I am doing my best to stamp out the use of "sth." in China. Somewhere, somehow, some foreigner taught the Chinese that sth is okay to write instead of something. So Chinese teachers use this, textbooks use this, and of course, my students want to use this "word". That, and the dreaded "and so on". Is this only a problem in China? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
waxwing
Joined: 29 Jun 2003 Posts: 719 Location: China
|
Posted: Sun Apr 04, 2004 1:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well I certainly learnt something.
I'm writing my own new style guide
I hate this kind of thing. Apostrophes are for plurals and contractions. That's it.
Why do we need them for this? If you ask me it just grew out of ignorance. There are still literally millions of native speakers making these plural/apostrophe mistakes every day. And we encourage them?
Grrrr
As for 'to avoid confusion' I think that's just a lot of .. ahem .. you know.
Nobody is going to get confused by 'I got three As at A-level'. What, are we going to ban homonyms from the English language??. With dates you don't even have that lame excuse!
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Shaman

Joined: 06 Apr 2003 Posts: 446 Location: Hammertown
|
Posted: Sun Apr 04, 2004 2:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Maybe I should stop correcting the "Frenchisms" made by my students. By adopting the following manner, it alleviates the ('s) problem.
"The girlfriend of my brother James got the mark of A on three tests."
"My brother James' girlfriend got three A's."
Shaman |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Hogbear
Joined: 12 Oct 2003 Posts: 42 Location: New York City
|
Posted: Sun Apr 04, 2004 3:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| waxwing wrote: |
Nobody is going to get confused by 'I got three As at A-level'. |
What about:
There are four is in Mississippi. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|