View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
hellionzap
Joined: 19 Oct 2009 Posts: 61 Location: Nizwa
|
Posted: Sat Feb 27, 2010 11:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
I repeat, raspberry. And to you sir, double that. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Never Ceased To Be Amazed

Joined: 22 Oct 2004 Posts: 3500 Location: Shhh...don't talk to me...I'm playin' dead...
|
Posted: Sat Feb 27, 2010 11:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
Well, I am...speechless, by your witty reparte. But, at least, it's encouraging to see that you correctly know how to address superiors. ... ...
NCTBA |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
boundforsaudi

Joined: 29 Jan 2003 Posts: 243
|
Posted: Sat Feb 27, 2010 5:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
Is it not an profession worthy of research, refinement or any progress? |
Not really. I mean you either know the difference between "a" and "an" or you don't. If you need PD to figure it out, you need to look for a different line of work. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
johnslat

Joined: 21 Jan 2003 Posts: 13859 Location: Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA
|
Posted: Sat Feb 27, 2010 5:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Dear boundforsaudi,
Funny you should mention that. "Teaching How to Use the Articles" was the topic of a "lecture" that all the staff at the IPA in Riyadh had to attend one day. The US embassy had flown in an "expert."
All assembled in the room put up with this "presentation" (delivered, by the way, in the most condescending manner) until, at the end, the very self-satisfied lecture made the mistake of asking, "Any questions?."
One grizzled Ph.D's query was this:
"Just how much do they pay you to teach your grandmother to suck eggs?"
Regards,
John |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
desultude

Joined: 19 Jan 2003 Posts: 614
|
Posted: Sat Feb 27, 2010 6:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I didn't mean to imply anything by "advanced degrees" other than the fact that people at all levels of education know bull#$&* when they hear it- and most of the jargon driven PD is that.
On the other hand, there are good courses to be had.
It is too bad that you have to fish through so much dross to find a few pearls. Most of what I have learned about teaching English has been self taught, Most of my time at conferences has been spent at the book tables advancing my education.
I do know people with NO degrees who have the heart and personality to teach. I know PhDs who cannot teach a lizard to crawl. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Geronimo
Joined: 11 Apr 2007 Posts: 498
|
Posted: Sat Feb 27, 2010 7:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
�Learning must be equal to or greater than the rate of change� Reg Revans
Reg Revans is widely credited with being the founding father of
Action Learning....but, who was Reg Revans
http://www.imcasocrates.com/resources/download/111602.PDF
Geronimo |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
johnslat

Joined: 21 Jan 2003 Posts: 13859 Location: Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA
|
Posted: Sat Feb 27, 2010 7:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Dear Geronimo,
"In all cases, people learned better, faster and more enduringly from their own problems than from management �experts� importing �prefabricated�
knowledge."
"The learning is most effective if it is self-managed and focused on finding internal solutions, rather than seeking external help."
Rex sounds like my kind of guy.
Regards,
John |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Neil McBeath
Joined: 01 Dec 2005 Posts: 277 Location: Saudi Arabia
|
Posted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 3:05 am Post subject: Enquiring minds might want to know |
|
|
Yet again a fascinating thread, particularly as somne people are opening their mouths only to stick their feet into them.
eslbear, I share your disappointment with the negativity that some people have expressed on this thread. Most of us have, at some time, attended a PD event that has been less than stimulating - I remember one lecture at Dammam on where one could stick posters - but we remember them precuisely because they were so bad.
When, however, we have people who seem to believe that Action Research is a new buzz word - Action Research has been around for at least 20 years - or use the term "jargon" for what is simply the formulaic language of a discouyrse community, then it becomes clear how imoportant PD really is.
THe "I-did-my-training-25-years-ago-so-I-know-everything" attitude really does not wash any more. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
boundforsaudi

Joined: 29 Jan 2003 Posts: 243
|
Posted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 3:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
Transmission modes of teaching are replaced with various forms of dialogic and collaborative inquiry. Learning is seen to emerge through socialization into the professional thinking and practices of a community of practice. |
Calling this abortion "jargon" would be to pay it a compliment. Calling it "the formulaic language of a discourse community" is just more bullsh.... In any case, it sounds like a freshman stretching to make the 500 word minimum.
Same goes for this pseudoscientific nonsense. Sounds like a fresman who wrote his composition the night before his calculus exam:
Quote: |
Learning must be equal to or greater than the rate of change. |
Last edited by boundforsaudi on Sun Feb 28, 2010 5:32 pm; edited 3 times in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Neil McBeath
Joined: 01 Dec 2005 Posts: 277 Location: Saudi Arabia
|
Posted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 3:42 am Post subject: Enquiring minds might want to know |
|
|
Dear boundforsaudi,
If you real-ly have prob-lems with this type of lang-uage, then it might held if you took some sort of read-ing course.
And if most educationalists had to choose between the opinions of Professor Jack Richards and your opinions, guess who would probably get the majority vote. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
boundforsaudi

Joined: 29 Jan 2003 Posts: 243
|
Posted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 3:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
Educationalists? Please watch your language. This is a family forum. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
desultude

Joined: 19 Jan 2003 Posts: 614
|
Posted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 4:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Dear Neil,
I am sure that what you are saying and quoting is an intentionally farcical way of demonstrating how ridiculous most of the jargon laden BS is.
Educationalist! If I didn't guess that you were having a go at us, I would have to wonder where you ever got such a word. Is that like Congregationalist? A new religion of learning and teaching?  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Geronimo
Joined: 11 Apr 2007 Posts: 498
|
Posted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 4:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Dear John,
Dr Reg Revans outlined the role of Action Learning in improving the rate of learning in an age when the rate of change is accelerating.
I thought that you might be interested in taking a look at the 2 short video clips of his talk in the USA back in 1994 , which are available for viewing at:-
http://www.gullonline.org/media/action_learning.htm
Regards,
Geronimo |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
johnslat

Joined: 21 Jan 2003 Posts: 13859 Location: Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA
|
Posted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 4:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Dear Geronimo.
Thanks - this reminds me (in a way) of Toffler's "Future Shock" (published in 1970.)
"Possibly the best section in the book is that on education. Here he advanced a powerful critique: �what passes for education today, even in our �best� schools and colleges, is a hopeless anachronism.� He then added: for all this rhetoric about the future, our schools face backwards towards a dying system, rather than forwards to an emerging new society."
It seems such an obvious idea - and yet, here we are, forty years later,
still, for the mist part, "facing backwards."
which brings to mind the last line of "The Great Gatsby":
"So we beat on, boats against the current, borne back ceaselessly into the past."
Regards,
John |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
desultude

Joined: 19 Jan 2003 Posts: 614
|
Posted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 5:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Geronimo wrote: |
Dear John,
Dr Reg Revans outlined the role of Action Learning in improving the rate of learning in an age when the rate of change is accelerating.
I thought that you might be interested in taking a look at the 2 short video clips of his talk in the USA back in 1994 , which are available for viewing at:-
http://www.gullonline.org/media/action_learning.htm
Regards,
Geronimo |
I went, I looked, and I saw what everyone does when they learn anything. But it was given a nifty equation and yesterday's version of a Powerpoint demonstration. I guess that makes it revolutionary. But if he were truly revolutionary, in 1994, it would have been in Powerpoint.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|