Site Search:
 
Get TEFL Certified & Start Your Adventure Today!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Teaching at a public school in Japan
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
 
Post new topic   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Japan
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
mdoor



Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Posts: 54

PostPosted: Wed Jul 21, 2010 1:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Glenski wrote:
I've already asked you to cut it out once.
Okay, I'll do the same. I do not wish to chase down people via PM to give them first hand information after you have mocked them or snowed them with rumor and hearsay in a thread that you have no experience in. Just as you have zero first hand experience in this thread. Would you please cut it out.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Glenski



Joined: 15 Jan 2003
Posts: 12844
Location: Hokkaido, JAPAN

PostPosted: Wed Jul 21, 2010 1:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

mdoor wrote:
I do not wish to chase down people via PM to give them first hand information ...
Then you and seklarwia are in the same boat.

Part of the problem, not the solution.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
seklarwia



Joined: 20 Jan 2009
Posts: 1546
Location: Monkey onsen, Nagano

PostPosted: Wed Jul 21, 2010 2:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Glenski wrote:
Then you have no reason to complain anymore about "falsehoods", accidental or otherwise, old or new, from the union website.

I didn't complain. Last I checked, this was a discussion forum. People come here to share and discuss information. I believe that is reason enough for me to say what I did. You shared links, I discussed an issue with them. But when I pointed out an inaccuracy and you started reading things into what I said, telling me I didn't think and then telling me it was my fault you misunderstood what I wrote and I should change what I said.

Quote:
If you are not part of the solution (and you seem to have the firsthand information they need), you are part of the problem (inaccurate information).

Nice that everthing is so clear cut, black and white in your world. It's cute that you can pass judgment so quickly: First, I don't think. Next, my choice of vocabulary is wrong. Now, I'm part of the problem... since you don't know my reasons perhaps you should keep your judgement calls to yourself. Afterall, I don't pass judgement on you for being so biased against dispatch companies despite having no firsthand experience with them and posting links to sites as if they hold the undisputed truth despite you not actually knowing whether they were or are now entirely accurate. We all know there are few good points working for dispatch and the placement/branch staff can prove a nightmare if you're unfortunate, but that doesn't necessarily mean that everything you read on the net about them is true, nor that the things that do have some truth to them should be painted across all dispatch employers or even across a single company in it's entirety.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Glenski



Joined: 15 Jan 2003
Posts: 12844
Location: Hokkaido, JAPAN

PostPosted: Wed Jul 21, 2010 9:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

seklarwia,
To say "you have no reason to complain" is an expression. It was meant to follow up on the fact that you know some information from the union page is false yet choose not to tell them about it. So, as the expression is intended, if similar announcements are made on this forum with regard to that union info, you really have no reason to say anything bad about it again (i.e., complain) because you have decided not to help fix it.

As for things in Japan being "black or white", I'm a huge proponent of the gray area. Have been for over a decade. But since this point about you knowing something and refusing to tell the union in order to help others in similar situations, that's pretty cut and dried unless there is some reason (which you have not given) for withholding. I'm not asking you what that reason is, but since it is unknown, we have equal reason to make the B&W call here.

Quote:
I don't pass judgement on you for being so biased against dispatch companies despite having no firsthand experience with them
This statement itself is passing judgment! As with mdoor, I'll simply reply that with the plethora of info out there on dispatch companies, firsthand experience is not needed to know what they are like on the whole.

I really don't see people defending dispatch agencies. Have read maybe less than a handful of threads on half a dozen forums in that regard, and some appeared to have been written by the agency itself. Are they all bad in all respects? No, probably not, but the vast majority seem to be. Again, if you have any specific info about any specific one, by all means post it!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Kaycie21



Joined: 21 Jul 2010
Posts: 14

PostPosted: Thu Jul 22, 2010 3:01 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I can't believe I signed up just to post this, but anyways.

Glenski's posts are usually very helpful, even if he doesn't have first hand experience. He has helped many people, even if it is with simple links that they were too lazy to look up themselves.

Regarding the original topic.. He did respond to what the OP asked about working as an ALT and how to land the positions. His dislike for dispatch agencies are somewhat allowed because they are shady, and like any other business are only out for themselves.

If your curious... I've worked for Altia and Interac.

To the OP: Don't be scared off by dispatch companies if you don't mind them, just stay with the big named ones and you will be fine.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
seklarwia



Joined: 20 Jan 2009
Posts: 1546
Location: Monkey onsen, Nagano

PostPosted: Thu Jul 22, 2010 9:03 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Glenski wrote:
As for things in Japan being "black or white", I'm a huge proponent of the gray area. Have been for over a decade. But since this point about you knowing something and refusing to tell the union in order to help others in similar situations, that's pretty cut and dried unless there is some reason (which you have not given) for withholding. I'm not asking you what that reason is, but since it is unknown, we have equal reason to make the B&W call here.

Okay. Since subtle doesn't work on you, I'll be blunt. If you want to share/discuss/dispute information, by all means do so; that's what the forum is for.

I have chosen not to contact the union. Instead, I have chosen to share information here and in other places, just as you have.
That is my personal decision based on things in my private everyday life. You, some random person on the internet who knows nothing about my situation, have no reason nor right to pass judgement on me as a person and what I decide to do in my real life: Keep those opinions to yourself!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Glenski



Joined: 15 Jan 2003
Posts: 12844
Location: Hokkaido, JAPAN

PostPosted: Thu Jul 22, 2010 9:20 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

seklarwia wrote:
Okay. Since subtle doesn't work on you, I'll be blunt. If you want to share/discuss/dispute information, by all means do so; that's what the forum is for.
Right. And you do that, too. Thanks...up to a point.

Quote:
I have chosen not to contact the union. Instead, I have chosen to share information here and in other places, just as you have.
But if I had the firsthand information you do and noticed the mistake/falsehood on a very important site like the union's, I'd contact them instead of letting it slip through the crack on a discussion forum.

That's the difference and my personal decision, albeit from a more professional stance.

Quote:
You, some random person on the internet who knows nothing about my situation, have no reason nor right to pass judgement on me as a person and what I decide to do in my real life: Keep those opinions to yourself!
But I do have a reason. You just don't like it.

Oh, well. Have a good day.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mdoor



Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Posts: 54

PostPosted: Thu Jul 22, 2010 12:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Glenski wrote:
mdoor wrote:
I do not wish to chase down people via PM to give them first hand information ...
Then you and seklarwia are in the same boat.

Part of the problem, not the solution.
Just more air Glenski. Seklarwia and I have both worked with dispatch companies.

As I echoed from a previous poster is that old information is rehashed over and over again (see payment for health checks). Giving out bad, outdated information from what you can expect from a dispatch is a problem. You don't have any experience with a dispatch company OR a public school. You can not define the problem or have any knowledge or experience about what may be a solution.

To say �dispatch companies are bad� is like saying �restaurants are bad�. It is just plain stupid to lump them all together. If you actually worked with a dispatch company you may have a concept of what I am talking about instead of imagining what it may be like.

You are like someone who never ate a meal in a restaurant in his life but deem yourself a top notch, vocal restaurant critic as you have read about plenty of restaurants online in the past. Rolling Eyes


Last edited by mdoor on Thu Jul 22, 2010 12:14 pm; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
seklarwia



Joined: 20 Jan 2009
Posts: 1546
Location: Monkey onsen, Nagano

PostPosted: Thu Jul 22, 2010 12:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Glenski wrote:
But if I had the firsthand information you do and noticed the mistake/falsehood on a very important site like the union's, I'd contact them instead of letting it slip through the crack on a discussion forum.

That's the difference and my personal decision, albeit from a more professional stance.

Do you really believe that, or is that just self righteous prattle?
Believe it of not, the world is a whole lot bigger than the narrow Glenki world you seem to believe we all exist in. There's alot of things you do not know or understand.
If you had the all the firsthand knowledge that I do (which you don't, purely because I'm not at liberty to share everything I know), had witnessed what I have (which quite clearly you haven't) and was in the same professional and private situation as me (which since you are no longer entry level and even if you were, teaching here is only a minor part of my professional career, so you most certainly are not), you would make the same decision as me because this union wouldn't be quite as important to you as it is to many in ESL out here and actually staying clear of this union would be in your professional interest.


Quote:
But I do have a reason. You just don't like it.

Since you seem to think that you know so much and obviously do not know when it's polite to keep your thoughts to yourself, why don't you try to put yourself in my shoes with the little you know but seem to think is enough reason to pass judgement and try to come even close to guessing a reason why I might choose not to contact the union. I'll even give you a really big hint:
In one of the reasons, 2 of the key parts of what resulted in a major problem were a couple of over-opinionated people much like yourself and your precious GU. If you search the union site for things other than negative posts about ALT dispatch companies, you might even get warm.

And then why don't you search how backwards they are when they "admit" an error and tell me whether the risking the afore mentioned problem was truely worth it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Glenski



Joined: 15 Jan 2003
Posts: 12844
Location: Hokkaido, JAPAN

PostPosted: Thu Jul 22, 2010 2:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

mdoor wrote:
Giving out bad, outdated information from what you can expect from a dispatch is a problem.
Yes, I agree. However, please show me the bad information.

I am known to admit errors. Show me my mistakes. I believe most of the posts I make regarding dispatch companies can be backed up by reported and/or official documentation, or can easily be lumped into the "general dispatch" category. What do you have to offer?

I'm all open to hearing otherwise. If you've worked for a whole bunch of them, say so. Otherwise your opinion/information is limited.

Quote:
You don't have any experience with a dispatch company OR a public school.
Yes, yes, yes. Why do you feel the need to repeat t his?

Quote:
You can not define the problem or have any knowledge or experience about what may be a solution.
You got me there. What problem are you referring to?

Quote:
To say �dispatch companies are bad� is like saying �restaurants are bad�. It is just plain stupid to lump them all together.
I agree with your latter statement. To make such a metaphor is silly.

Quote:
If you actually worked with a dispatch company you may have a concept of what I am talking about instead of imagining what it may be like.
A dispatch company?! n=1?????
Do you know how silly that sounds? This is not what is known as compelling evidence.

seklarwia wrote:
is that just self righteous prattle?
I think you have a problem separating the facts I write from some preconceived notion of who I am.

seklarwia wrote:
There's alot of things you do not know or understand.
Did I ever state or imply otherwise? Answer: no.

seklarwia wrote:
If you had the all the firsthand knowledge that I do (which you don't, purely because I'm not at liberty to share everything I know)...you would make the same decision as me...
And therein lies the rub! You chose not do divulge this point and to say nothing about it until now, and then only in veiled hints, so how was I or anyone else on this forum to know?

Now we know a bit more, that you are "not at liberty" to say anything. The only other time you wrote of it, you said you chose not to. Big difference, and it's no one's fault but yours that this has extended the thread. Had you written those 3 words earlier, it would have suggested some legal or similar principle was at play here. Without that, people could only guess. I didn't even go that far, but simply pointed out that having information but not supplying it was wrong. What came back was a snippy emotional retort. Now we see other factors have been at play in your "choice".

Meanwhile, you let the thread roll on with accusations about me instead of focusing on the issue at hand -- that of a mistake on an information site that apparently needs to be corrected. Please stop the name-calling.

seklarwia wrote:
why don't you try to put yourself in my shoes
For many reasons, mostly stemming from what we've just learned here.

Please take note that I'm not going to ask further what your reasons are, and you are not to take that as an indirect means of drawing them out. I have no intention of going off on some Internet search for information that you are unwilling/not at liberty to divulge. Finding out would not serve any useful purpose.

I am finished with this thread. It's way off course. I've stated my position, and it seems to have been grossly misinterpreted. Have a good day.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
seklarwia



Joined: 20 Jan 2009
Posts: 1546
Location: Monkey onsen, Nagano

PostPosted: Thu Jul 22, 2010 4:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Glenski:
Nice! It only took me telling you 3 times that you didn't know my situation so keep your opinions to yourself and then sharing 3 words which is now allowing you to start publically announcing my private matters that I wished to keep private to satisfy you. Don't you think that if I had wanted to share even that much I would have done so in the first place. So why should I have to share things that I don't want to just to get you to stop judging my actions? And I did not "let the thread roll on". If you had let the subject drop after I told you the first time, we wouldn't be here.

Glad you are finally finished with telling me I'm wrong for not to be doing what you think is right. Perhaps you will remember in future before assuming you have reason to judge others, especially if they are warning you off the subject...


mdoor:
Please don't think we are too united in thought. My gripe with Glenski is that he was sharing his opinions on my personal decisions despite knowing nothing and then continued to push the issue after me telling him not to; not that he posted the links in the first place.

He has info to share and takes the time to share it. Although in many cases it is difficult to become a true expert without firsthand experience, you can still learn a great deal from others and from reading. If you think there is an error or that info is dated and no longer relevant, point it out.
In the few posts that I have seen of yours recently, you seem to be trying more to discredit him rather than to be helpful.

There are horror stories out there that should be treated as one offs and there is info that should be taken with a huge pinch of salt. But at the end of the day dispatch is still dispatch; there is a huge gap in the benefits received in dispatch in comparison to some better direct hirer jobs. And whilst some dispatchers might not always be nightmarish to work for, there are more than a few companies that have earnt their horrendous reputations.

As I said before (but he obviously didn't understand), I do not pass judgement on the fact that he doesn't have firsthand experience, etc. I do not think he is part of the problem for sharing links especially to what should be a reliable resource (i.e. the GU). I, like I'm sure many others will agree, think that in the majority of instances he is of great service. I think the problem is that these days even supposedly trustworthy resources are either accidently or delibrately putting out false/misleading information (yep, found quite a bit of misleading info/wording including in their most recent Interac post, which coincidently is about health checks... go figure), so it is no longer always so clear what to and what not to trust.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mdoor



Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Posts: 54

PostPosted: Thu Jul 22, 2010 8:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Glenski wrote:
mdoor wrote:
Giving out bad, outdated information from what you can expect from a dispatch is a problem.
Yes, I agree. However, please show me the bad information.
I already did. You told me I should chase people down to corret it. You are clearly determined to post uninformed no matter how much it is pointed out to you. Take a look at this thread. Once again, you have never worked at a public school or with a dispatch company and yet you are the first responder, the most frequent and will likely be the last poster in this thread.

In the end I am not going to bother with it. I will just write this forum off as useless, seems many do.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ssjup81



Joined: 15 Jun 2009
Posts: 664
Location: Adachi-ku, Tokyo, Japan

PostPosted: Thu Jul 22, 2010 11:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hm, in my opinion, the most important thing to take into consideration is that "ESID" thing. Every Situation is Different. I'm working with a dispatch company too and I haven't had any problems at all with the company (*knocks on wood*), but all the information I tried looking up on the company was old and outdated and aside from the pay, I never came across any major complaints against the company itself, which is why I decided to go ahead and take the position, even though I was hesitant because of the negative posts I'd come across. I've never come across anyone complaining about the work conditions or being underpaid or even being paid late...mostly just the pay rate.

It seems that more people would gripe about something in general as opposed to those who don't have any problems (or haven't had any problems) at all which is probably why we see more negative posts about a company more so than positive ones.

Either way, bottom line is that ESID. Some people have good experiences, some have bad ones.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
flyer



Joined: 16 May 2003
Posts: 539
Location: Sapporo Japan

PostPosted: Thu Jul 22, 2010 11:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

ssjup81 wrote:
Hm, in my opinion, the most important thing to take into consideration is that "ESID" thing. Every Situation is Different. I'm working with a dispatch company too and I haven't had any problems at all with the company (*knocks on wood*), but all the information I tried looking up on the company was old and outdated and aside from the pay, I never came across any major complaints against the company itself, which is why I decided to go ahead and take the position, even though I was hesitant because of the negative posts I'd come across. I've never come across anyone complaining about the work conditions or being underpaid or even being paid late...mostly just the pay rate.

It seems that more people would gripe about something in general as opposed to those who don't have any problems (or haven't had any problems) at all which is probably why we see more negative posts about a company more so than positive ones.

yes, I think you hit the nail on the head, I think its human nature. When people are reasonably happy/content, they don't post it, but when something goes wrong they rush to the nearest PC.
While I have not worked for a dispatch company, I good friend of mine has worked for one for a few years now and he has never complained

yes, ESID
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
timothypfox



Joined: 20 Feb 2008
Posts: 492

PostPosted: Fri Jul 23, 2010 2:10 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

In summary, there are differences in opinion on the quality of employment opportunities at public schools when working with dispatch agencies. One opinion drawn from posts read on various Japanese job forums and the union site holds a negative view on how dispatch companies treat their employees. In contrast, members with first hand experience or spoke directly to someone employed with dispatch companies mention positive experiences working for dispatch companies and suggest information on the Internet about particular dispatch company work conditions is old or outdated and dispatch companies should be approached with an every situation is different philosophy.

I feel the two camps make valid points and that perhaps the truth lies somewhere in between, but that there are unquestionable industry problems with the dispatch portion of the alt industry.

From what I have seen on the Internet, dispatch companies appear to contract at 29.5 hours a week and thus avoid having to enroll teachers in the national pension system. Salaries tend to be significantly lower than direct hire alt positions and some are even less than 250000 yen a month. Many dispatch teachers complain of conflicting demands (usually schedule) between their school and dispatch company. Some complain of managers in dispatch companies who advise teachers with dispute that they either have no idea or to just shut up and grin and bear it.

If you can live with some or all of these issues (and a few others I forgot to list), dispatch work could be a positive experience for you.

Personally I would ask myself about work experience in a public school I was thinking of working at:
- What is the salary offer?
- Will the salary increase over time?
- Are there any temporary lay off periods (summer holidays?) Where you are not paid?
- How is the management staff of the agency that hired you (dispatch or DOE)?
- How is the environment, staff, students at the school you work at? (This is really a quality of work question)
- How easy is it to retain your position or seek another similar position if you get excessed from your school?
- Is your work good for long term employment (if this is a concern to you)?
- Does your employment provide help (financial or otherwise) with your visa, medical etc.? Housing?
- Are you happy with the location of the job offer and hours of work and # of days off?
- Are there any possibilities for bonuses?
- How do the overall benefits, salary, conditions of work compare with other alt positions?
- Is there an overall decline or stassis in the benefits, salary, conditions of your employment?
- Are you happy with your life doing the job?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Japan All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Page 3 of 4

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

Teaching Jobs in China
Teaching Jobs in China