|
Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
spiral78

Joined: 05 Apr 2004 Posts: 11534 Location: On a Short Leash
|
Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 6:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
I know folks with Master's in TESOL who say that Celta certficates are worthless. They believe that you need two years in training at a qualified university to be an effective TESOL instructor.
This doesn't recognise that there are different teaching contexts. For that very large pool of students who can only afford/who only need basically-qualified teachers, a CELTA is certainly valid.
More specialised and demanding teaching/learning contexts (should) require higher-level quals.
At the uni LC where I work, we have (for now) a core group of MA Ed/TESL/TEFL qualified teachers, and a pool of CELTA-level freelancers. The mix works fine - not all of our work is specialised or demanding, though much of it is. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Sashadroogie

Joined: 17 Apr 2007 Posts: 11061 Location: Moskva, The Workers' Paradise
|
Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 9:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
Iceman33 wrote: |
Yeah, it's just their opinion, but I, personally, cannot see how a 4-5 week Celta course can be superior to an MA in TESOL (2-year) from a US university?
Folks with just Celtas and Deltas cannot teach at American universities -- and rightly so. |
Folks with just CELTAs generally can't teach in many universities anywhere. It is not designed for that. It's aimed at private language schools, mainly.
As for MATESOLs - no guarantee of success, though this seems counter-intuitive. Depends on the MA itself. An MA which gives you a solid grounding in EMT or syllabus design is of huge value, but it depends on what job you are applying for. If it doesn't provide any practical training in language teaching itself, then a CELTA or equivalent would in fact be 'superior' if you want a job teaching language learners, rather than an administrative post. I don't know that much about the specifics of MAs from US universities, but I have worked with MA graduates, and a few of them struggled with the most basic classroom management issues, for example, that a newbie CELTA holder wouldn't have. Not all of them struggled, mind. I would never generalise and say that all US MAs are therefore worthless. But I wouldn't assume that any MA holder is automatically going to be a stronger teacher either.
The basic theme running through all this is every teacher needs practical training. You are kidding yourself, and your students, if you believe otherwise. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
spiral78

Joined: 05 Apr 2004 Posts: 11534 Location: On a Short Leash
|
Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 11:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
s for MATESOLs - no guarantee of success, though this seems counter-intuitive. Depends on the MA itself. An MA which gives you a solid grounding in EMT or syllabus design is of huge value, but it depends on what job you are applying for. If it doesn't provide any practical training in language teaching itself, then a CELTA or equivalent would in fact be 'superior' if you want a job teaching language learners,
Good point. the MA holders on our team mostly also have CELTAS, which they earned earlier in their careers, and the 5 or 6 MA programmes we graduated from all include practical training (and critique:)) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Iceman33
Joined: 08 Nov 2009 Posts: 91
|
Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 8:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sashadroogie wrote: |
Iceman33 wrote: |
Yeah, it's just their opinion, but I, personally, cannot see how a 4-5 week Celta course can be superior to an MA in TESOL (2-year) from a US university?
Folks with just Celtas and Deltas cannot teach at American universities -- and rightly so. |
Folks with just CELTAs generally can't teach in many universities anywhere. It is not designed for that. It's aimed at private language schools, mainly.
As for MATESOLs - no guarantee of success, though this seems counter-intuitive. Depends on the MA itself. An MA which gives you a solid grounding in EMT or syllabus design is of huge value, but it depends on what job you are applying for. If it doesn't provide any practical training in language teaching itself, then a CELTA or equivalent would in fact be 'superior' if you want a job teaching language learners, rather than an administrative post. I don't know that much about the specifics of MAs from US universities, but I have worked with MA graduates, and a few of them struggled with the most basic classroom management issues, for example, that a newbie CELTA holder wouldn't have. Not all of them struggled, mind. I would never generalise and say that all US MAs are therefore worthless. But I wouldn't assume that any MA holder is automatically going to be a stronger teacher either.
The basic theme running through all this is every teacher needs practical training. You are kidding yourself, and your students, if you believe otherwise. |
I never heard of an MA in TESOL that is not heavily focused on practical training. I could be wrong, but I never say anything with much certainty these days.
And it's hard to believe that a Celta is superior in any way to an MA in TESOL (I'm not knocking down the Celta.).
Of course you probably had some MA holders in TESOL who were indeed bad at teaching. I know that I've had loads of "very qualifed" teachers in a whole range of subjects who couldn't teach to save their lives. LOL. Oh well, c'est la vie! But qualifications are qualifications.
Some schools are more impressed with theoretical/academic knowledge than in practical knowledge, even though "practicality" is what it's all about the TESOL classroom (most of the time). I can't change how things are.
I think we've failed to mention that schools hire different kinds of TESOL instructors, as we all know. You could be a teacher for business English, a general conversation instructor to adults/high schoolers/children, a TOESL exam preparer, or a university ESL writing professor. All of which will most likely have different qualification requirements. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
carl_00
Joined: 05 Jul 2008 Posts: 82
|
Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 10:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
AGoodStory wrote: |
To the OP: Carl, are you still considering the possibility of doing an on-site TEFL cert? Or are you now looking only at on-line courses? |
Well, my situation has now changed. I have a job. So, I no longer need the TEFL for just C.V. purposes. I still expect to do an on-site course (CELTA) but not for a year or two now. In the mean time though I would be interested in doing something online just in order to become better acquanted with TEFL-proper. I'll look into this more thoroughly in a few months time...might be something to do over winter...
Now, back to your discussion.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Sashadroogie

Joined: 17 Apr 2007 Posts: 11061 Location: Moskva, The Workers' Paradise
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Sashadroogie

Joined: 17 Apr 2007 Posts: 11061 Location: Moskva, The Workers' Paradise
|
Posted: Sat Aug 28, 2010 9:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
I never heard of an MA in TESOL that is not heavily focused on practical training. I could be wrong, but I never say anything with much certainty these days.
You'd be forgiven for thinking that. Indeed I used to myself. And to be fair, I am certain that the vast majority of reputable MAs are focused practical teacher training. However, I have also had to work with a few MA qualled colleagues who would probably have excelled in compiling a test battery, planning a 'culture course' or 'cross-cultural communication' etc., yet they were hopelessly out of their depth when confronted by elementary students struggling with auxiliary verbs. When asked why, they responded that it wasn't on their course, and seemed genuinely aggrieved that they had been given classes with students who 'knew nothing'.
Dunno. Maybe it was one of those on-line mickey mouse MA TESOL. But at the very least, with a CELTA or equivalent, you know what you are dealing with: an pre-service certificate which prepares newbies for further guidance on the job. Nothing more, but nothing less either. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
carl_00
Joined: 05 Jul 2008 Posts: 82
|
Posted: Sat Aug 28, 2010 10:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
The price of the course will probably dictate whether or not I take one, as I say, I still expect to do one on-site. But, I'd probably benefit greater by being enrolled on something rather that just hitting the books - which I already have . |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling. Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|