|
Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
klute
Joined: 02 Mar 2003 Posts: 17 Location: Tokyo
|
Posted: Wed Apr 28, 2004 10:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Gimp
To paraphrase yourself on the other Interac thread "Instead of dealing with the issues, my spelling is now being made fun of." I don�t know about you but I do not put these messages through grammar/spell checks. This is not a spelling bee, it�s discussion forum for employment issues in Japan. The reason I indicated your spelling error was because I was pasting a quote with an error in it . I will take the wrap for my spelling mistakes - which is pretty shocking at the best of times - not other people�s. The last time I pasted a quote on a forum I pasted �as is�, errors and all. I got ticked off by the person I was quoting from for poor spelling. So now I add a caveat. It was not a criticism. �Sic� is a perfectly common practice when quoting. I thought it a bit formal for a discussion forum.
So given that both our postings have spelling mistakes, along with 99% of other contributors I will quote you again "I'm still waiting for answers to most of my points.". Well, I am interested to hear your answer to just one - my Mon Apr 26, 2004 10:45 p.m. post - which in turn addressed your previous post about Interac work hours for a particularly low paid job.
And for anyone at Interac involved in the hiring process for this job, how about surreptitiously letting us know how many people applied for it. It would be interesting to know just how desperate the employment situation is in the ALT world - and if you take this job you are in a desperate situation. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
[email protected]
Joined: 22 Apr 2004 Posts: 67
|
Posted: Thu Apr 29, 2004 10:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
All right, let's get over the trivial stuff, including the spelling. It certainly looked like mine was being made fun of, and take a look at the previous postings making fun of my name, sexual orientation, being called evil etc. Too bad this website didn't have spell-check- I know I need it.
We seem to have serious differences over "facts" and I'm not going to re-state what I'm convinced is true. And let me make it clear that I too am disturbed over the noticeable decline in teacher wages in Japan, especially in the last year. There used to be all kinds of jobs close to 300,000 yen; now many are barely 250,000 and indeed some are lower.
What is going on? Too many teachers? Fewer jobs? Anyway it is a terrible situation, and I couldn't afford to work for those wages. I would NEVER work for under 200,00 a month at that Interac job, but maybe someone else would, and if the hours are reduced- as I believe they are- then who am I or anyone else to deny someone the job? But it is not Interac who is "destroying working conditions." They are simply just another private company working in a market situation.
Maybe it's the government's fault. Perhaps instead of letting anyone with a B.A. to come in, we should demand a teacher's certificate or a TESOL certification? How about a 250,000 a month law, or 3,000 yen an hour minimum? I know the minute my wages drop below 300,000 per month, I'm out of here.
Some people think it's the private, for profit schools. Perhaps, but I've seen some government run education facilities in Japan where the teachers have high, high wages and untouchable job security and the end result is the worst teaching I've ever seen anywhere. I know I'll get flack for this, but I also believe that too much goverment involvement and too much job security only make things worse.
So if you have some answers, let me know. I just don't believe Interac, Nova, Geos etc are cause of all the problems. The issues are much more complex than that. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Iwantmyrightsnow
Joined: 12 Feb 2004 Posts: 202
|
Posted: Thu Apr 29, 2004 11:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
[email protected] wrote: |
I just don't believe Interac, Nova, Geos etc are cause of all the problems. The issues are much more complex than that. |
Of course they are not the cause of all the problems but they should bear some of the responsibility. Interac in particular ( of the ones you mention) because of the way they participate in the bidding process for Board of Ed jobs (There are companies worse).
I have recently seen teachers at interac have transportation expenses eliminated, monthly salaries decreased, and payment for august/dec/jan eliminated.
I have also seen the amount that Interac gets paid by the BoE's (public record). They are making hansome profits but continue to decimate teachers' salaries. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Tonester
Joined: 24 Mar 2004 Posts: 145 Location: Ojiya, Niigata Pref
|
Posted: Fri Apr 30, 2004 12:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
Gimp, I'm happy that you are deciding to be more civil here and finally tell us where you're coming from. I've been following your messages and the replies and thought I'd tell you my experience.
I'm an ALT on the JET Program in my 1st year and I get 277,000 after taxes because I'm in the public JHS System. I have noticed that JET is declining a bit with some prefectures phasing out JET ALT slots in favour of private institutions such as Interac, ECC and other companies that provide ALTs. The trend does not seem very good to me. Eventually JET may disappear all together and then the companies have a monopoly.
Don't take me as being hostile towards you but it really concerns me. Immigration has removed the 250,000 minimum and companies are taking advantage of this. I understand that companies are not the only culpable entities but should take their share of the blame. Some BOEs who directly hire are also just as culpable (non-JET positions I'm talking about in regards to that and I don't mean all of them by any means).
What you say is true, the ESL field in Japan has a big problem! I understand what you're trying to say and respect that, but the situation is declining so badly in not just JET but the whole ESL field! What we get is the watering down of ESL in Japan and not very much incentive for professionals to come to Japan at all!
I must admit, I have a BA in Japanese only but I intend to get a TESOL Diploma to increase my opportunities so please everyone do not tell me how I don't deserve to be here because I do intend to become a professional teacher during my tenure as an ALT by doing some more study. I just though I'd try it first before committing myself to the field. I love my job but it is a limited one at best in terms of time-of-employment restrictions.
In conclusion, how do you feel about the field in general? Aren't you concerned like I am? This also goes out to everyone in this thread. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Gordon

Joined: 28 Jan 2003 Posts: 5309 Location: Japan
|
Posted: Fri Apr 30, 2004 12:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
Tonester, I think you've brought up some valid points. I have only been in Japan for 2 years so I can't see if it has declined or not. I do know with the falling wages here that it will not induce many professionals to come and teach. I know that money isn't everything, but we all need to live. Frankly, I'd rather teach students from almost any other country than the Japanese, in terms of student motivation and lack of involvement. Don't get me wrong, I like being in Japan, but the teaching part is hardly rewarding.
Schools are not concerned with bringing in professional teachers, in fact the inverse is true. Professionals wouldn't stand for the crap the Big schools shovel. I for one wouldn't work a day for them, but I probably would have 8 or 10 years ago. The lowering of the wages in Japan won't change the quality of teaching too much here. However, there is a point as to how much a person will work for, hopefully the salaries won't drop any more. I think 250,000 is the minimum a person should get paid to live and work the long hours here.
I don't mean to slight those of you who are professional teachers and work at one of the big chain schools. Perhaps you've carved a comfortable niche for yourself where you are and don't want to risk going elsewhere. I understand because I've experienced the same thing elsewhere. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Experienced
Joined: 31 Mar 2004 Posts: 18
|
Posted: Fri Apr 30, 2004 12:33 am Post subject: JICA?? |
|
|
Gimp wrote "...but I've seen some government run education facilities in Japan where the teachers have high, high wages and untouchable job security and the end result is the worst teaching I've ever seen anywhere""
Gimp, are you referring to the JICA/JOCV training facilities? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Tonester
Joined: 24 Mar 2004 Posts: 145 Location: Ojiya, Niigata Pref
|
Posted: Fri Apr 30, 2004 3:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thanking you all for your replies! Now another point I'd like to make:
I have learnt that in order to teach solo at a Japanese school you need a teaching license. It is issued by monbukagakusho and their requirements are at least a TESOL Diploma from a reputable institution (does not have to be a full degree, and not a certificate either) with at least approx 130 hours of training. It's called a "Rinji Menkyo".
What that means is that those people with such qualifications can escape the eikaiwa mill and teach properly. Of course, you'd need to find a school and then get the support of the principal. Conditions may or may not be better but for more info refer to Glenski's thread comparing Japanese public and private high schools.
In reply to earlier points, I'd like to say that if there were a lot more places for people with TESOL/TEFL/TESL qualifications and those professionals were allowed full control of their syllabus maybe we could see an improvement here. Another point on that would be that even places with professionals working there may not render good results in terms of english ability due to some (not all I must emphasize) managers or principals or head teachers- highers up to be a little more general criticising the methods of the said professional teacher who may be more qualified than said superior and restricting the said professional teacher in terms of leeway in teaching curriculum and lesson planning.
I must admit I'm not sure but I think NOVA may be guilty of this charge. Please correct me if I am mistaken because I hate being misinformed and then shooting my mouth (or in this case; keyboard) off.
Tell me everyone, is this happening to any of you out there? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
[email protected]
Joined: 22 Apr 2004 Posts: 67
|
Posted: Fri Apr 30, 2004 6:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'm not familiar with JICA?JOCV, but I am interested in comparing private and public institutions. What is your knowledge of the above? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
PAULH
Joined: 28 Jan 2003 Posts: 4672 Location: Western Japan
|
Posted: Fri Apr 30, 2004 7:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
Tonester wrote: |
Thanking you all for your replies! Now another point I'd like to make:
I have learnt that in order to teach solo at a Japanese school you need a teaching license. It is issued by monbukagakusho and their requirements are at least a TESOL Diploma from a reputable institution (does not have to be a full degree, and not a certificate either) with at least approx 130 hours of training. It's called a "Rinji Menkyo".
Tell me everyone, is this happening to any of you out there? |
To work as a teacher in a Japanese high school you must be qualified and certified as a teacher, if you want to teach a subject other than English. JET teachers are not qualified teachers and by and large are not allowed to teach by themselves without a Japanese teacher present. Glenski had to be certified by the Monbusho and hus school to teach science.
All Japanese high school teachers spend four years at university and get a certified teaching licence. Why shouldnt foreigners as well, if they will be teaching the Monbusho curriculum?
Tonester wrote: |
What that means is that those people with such qualifications can escape the eikaiwa mill and teach properly. Of course, you'd need to find a school and then get the support of the principal. Conditions may or may not be better but for more info refer to Glenski's thread comparing Japanese public and private high schools.
Tell me everyone, is this happening to any of you out there? |
Nice sentiment, but the reality is that in high schools the reason they study English in high schools is to pass a written entrance exam. Students study not so they can learn to speak English but to get into university. As long as that is the goal of parents, students, the headmaster and parents, oral proficency and good teaching will take a back seat to the immediate needs of the students. To see students becoming good at English you are going to have to employ a native speaker to teach students 3 hours a day, 5 days a week for 40 weeks of the year. This does not guarantee they will still be able to pass the university entrance exam, no matter how good the teaching of the foreigner or how much we want to escape the eikaiwa mill.
Tonester wrote: |
In reply to earlier points, I'd like to say that if there were a lot more places for people with TESOL/TEFL/TESL qualifications and those professionals were allowed full control of their syllabus maybe we could see an improvement here. Another point on that would be that even places with professionals working there may not render good results in terms of english ability due to some (not all I must emphasize) managers or principals or head teachers- highers up to be a little more general criticising the methods of the said professional teacher who may be more qualified than said superior and restricting the said professional teacher in terms of leeway in teaching curriculum and lesson planning.
|
I am currently doing research on english education at elementary schools- the biggest concern of Japanese teachers is there are not enough qualified and experienced foreigners with the right training, right qualifications and aptitude for teaching kids. Many here are just here to make a bit of money and see Asia. Many have no interest in gaining professional qualifications.
The teachers who are qualified are rotated among 4 or 5 schools each money, the kids may only see them once every six weeks, not enough to make a difference to the kids English. Just dragged out like a performing seal once a month.
Biggest problem endemic to the Monbusho is they develop these curriculums and new innovations without asking for input or feedback from teachers. Course outlines come down from on high from the Ministry and teachers have to teach by the book.
the problem is with English is that many of them have no idea how English ought to be taught, no idea about language acquisition or learning, so what we have is the grammar-translation mess in high school classrooms, with teachers who can not speak the language.
I really dont think in this lifetime the Ministry of Education (or schools for that matter) will cede control of design of their curriculums to foreign teachers and foreign experts. Teachers in elementary schools are being left to their own resources and designing their own english classes, but at this time there is no follow through at the high school level as English is still dominated by the entrance exam. Take away the entrance exam, the mandatory study of English at high school, make smaller classes and you may get somewhere.
They dont even recognise the Temple Masters degree as a formal university qualification, though many Japanese have earned one.
Many teachers can not get good results becuase they dont have the time needed to spend with students, the resources and funds to employ enough teachers to do the job properly and a lack of willingness of most high schools and Japanese English teachers to change their ways, because if you do, you will be putting many of them out of a job. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Mike L.
Joined: 28 Feb 2003 Posts: 519
|
Posted: Fri Apr 30, 2004 7:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
Good points Paul. I'll add a few more.
Quote: |
Biggest problem endemic to the Monbusho is they develop these curriculums and new innovations without asking for input or feedback from teachers. Course outlines come down from on high from the Ministry and teachers have to teach by the book. |
They are definitely of another world.
Quote: |
the problem is with English is that many of them have no idea how English ought to be taught, no idea about language acquisition or learning, so what we have is the grammar-translation mess in high school classrooms, with teachers who can not speak the language. |
I'd say they even gum up the old GMT. I'd also say most of the Japanese English teachers I've met wouldn't have the slightest idea of what you speak here. CLT, speaking English in class etc etc. These are "strange foreign ideas" to many here.
Quote: |
I really dont think in this lifetime the Ministry of Education (or schools for that matter) will cede control of design of their curriculums to foreign teachers and foreign experts. Teachers in elementary schools are being left to their own resources and designing their own english classes, but at this time there is no follow through at the high school level as English is still dominated by the entrance exam. Take away the entrance exam, the mandatory study of English at high school, make smaller classes and you may get somewhere. |
This is interesting as one would think with it's top down Monbusho would take charge here. I always figured with the elemntary schools and English either they couldn't figure out what to do or this anomily, giving up control, represented some sort of power struggle ending in a stale mate where no one faction in the ministry could quite force through their plan.
Quote: |
They dont even recognise the Temple Masters degree as a formal university qualification, though many Japanese have earned one. |
Although shocking I'm not suprised. Probably not much snowboarding at Temple. If they start recognizing them then the foreign universites will set up shop offer proper degress and drain vast amounts of cash away from universites that rip off parents with huge application fees and other nonesense. That wouldn't do.
Quote: |
Many teachers can not get good results becuase they dont have the time needed to spend with students, the resources and funds to employ enough teachers to do the job properly and a lack of willingness of most high schools and Japanese English teachers to change their ways, because if you do, you will be putting many of them out of a job. |
If you do anything properly, run a country, ballance a budget etc etc, you will certainly put people out of a job.
Ever notice how much dead weight there is in Japanese schools as far as staff especially in the admin section and certain departments? Many teachers teach a full load while others teach a few if any lessons on an average day. I knew a few Japanese teachers as an ALT who taught far less than I did. Some didn't even try to hide the fact that they had nothing to do.
I never saw a principle who didn't like gardening around the school.
Meanwhile there are still 40 kids in class. Young teachers are desperately needed but aren't hired.. Why is that? If your retired the dead weight and hired the new teachers class sizes would become more reasonable.
It's really too bad that Alex Kerr in his book Dogs And Demons didn't cover education more thoroughly.
His main point is that Japanese education system exists for control. I don't think they even have that anymore.
It's definitely woth a book on it's own. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Iwantmyrightsnow
Joined: 12 Feb 2004 Posts: 202
|
Posted: Fri Apr 30, 2004 9:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
I think rules for private schools may be different. I taught content based courses in a high school (as the sole teacher) even though I am only qualified to teach elementary.
Currently I am teaching EFL at a high school. Again I do this solo and am unqualified to do so. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
lajzar
Joined: 09 Feb 2003 Posts: 647 Location: Saitama-ken, Japan
|
Posted: Sun May 02, 2004 4:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thr rules for teraching licenses in Japan seem to be the same as for the UK. In the state schools, you need a licence to teach solo. In the private schools, no such requirement exists, but it is generally considered a good thing to have, as studying for it shows an intention to be a good teacher.
fwiw, I regularly teach EFL solo at a private high school here in Japan, and I have no teaching licence. And at least one of the teachers at my private school from when I was a student in teh UK did not have a licence. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Tonester
Joined: 24 Mar 2004 Posts: 145 Location: Ojiya, Niigata Pref
|
Posted: Thu May 06, 2004 1:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
Paul,
Just to address your points. I think you have misunderstood me slightly. I actually meant getting that licence after my ALT tenure is finished, not before and perhaps teaching at a private institution. Sorry, I should have clarified that. I also meant curriculum control by less qualified people in private institutions as well. Your points are valid; especially in regards to the monbukagakusho.
I also didn't intend to market teaching in this field as an easy touch thing either. I intended to say that if you are suitably qualified; there are chances to teach in private high schools but you have to know people either already there or otherwise. It is possible to get a Rinji Menkyo but it doesn't happen unless you have a certain number of credits (in your degree)relevent to the field you're teaching and you have the support of the principal. I was not talking about getting a "seishiki menkyo" where you do have to study at a Japanese university for four years in order to work in the public system. I understand that a person like myself cannot and will never be able to teach solo in a public school and that is not what I want to do anyway.
Although I was really addressing private institutions, not monbukagakusho your points are interesting. As for the reality in terms of english teaching at schools, I am getting more aware because I'm still an ALT and will be for at least until september next year. I think the problem is quite serious because it gives the wrong idea about english and other languages and makes people study for all the wrong reasons. My impression is that teachers in my place teach the language like it's mathematics and that everything must be conformed to formulae.
I don't know about everyone else but I think that is very sad indeed. The harsh reality of it all is absolutely grim. Schools or anyone higher up will never cede control of their ESL curriculums and until they do, and until they hire permament full-time professional english teachers with sufficient contact hours Japan's ESL field will perhaps never get better. I'm not intending to whine but just put forward my perspective.
Here's a point of controversy:
I think that the following policy by monbukagakusho sounds good in theory but in reality will be difficult at best to implement.
http://www.mext.go.jp/english/news/2002/07/020901.htm
http://www.mext.go.jp/english/topics/03072801.htm
What do others think? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling. Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|