Site Search:
 
Get TEFL Certified & Start Your Adventure Today!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

No English, no job: Japan's English crisis
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Japan
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
nomad soul



Joined: 31 Jan 2010
Posts: 11454
Location: The real world

PostPosted: Wed Sep 28, 2011 9:50 pm    Post subject: No English, no job: Japan's English crisis Reply with quote

Fear for jobs ignites "English crisis" in Japan
By Mariko Katsumura, Reuters|Stringer
TOKYO | Thu Sep 22, 2011
(Source: http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/09/22/uk-japan-english-idUSLNE78L02A20110922)

TOKYO (Reuters) - It's eight in the morning in a Tokyo office building, and a dozen middle-aged Japanese businessmen sit inside small booths, sweating as they try to talk English to the instructors in front of them.

"I hope my wife will understand my hobby," one 40-something man says, opening his mouth widely around the English words. He is one of legions of Japanese businessmen, or "salarymen," struggling with a language they thought they had left behind them in school as fears mount that the growing push by Japanese companies into overseas business will mean a dark future for them without usable English.

This is especially true these days, with the strong yen and a lagging domestic market prompting more firms to look overseas for business opportunities essential for their bottom lines. "I had a business trip to Amsterdam last year and that really was tough. My boss spoke no English, and I had to speak English for the first time in 10 years," said Masahide Tachibana, a 39-year-old software developer. Tachibana now gets up at 5:00 a.m. to take morning lessons at a central Tokyo branch of Gaba, an English language school. "I've always wanted to brush up my English and that business trip ignited my aspirations," said Tachibana, as around him other businessmen and women pack up and hurry to work after their 45-minute, one-on-one lessons.

Japan , despite being the world's third-largest economy and a major export powerhouse, is known for its poor English-speaking ability even though six years of study are required in middle and high school. The country's average score on the TOEFL iBT, a computer-based test of English as a foreign language, in 2010 ranked 27th among 30 Asian countries, below Mongolia and Turkmenistan. Only 9 percent of 1,156 white-collar workers surveyed by Recruit Agent, a recruiting firm, claim to be able to communicate in English. Many respondents evaluated their speaking and listening aptitude as "Barely."

But things are starting to change, prompted by a growing sense of urgency about employment.

The first push came from online retailer Rakuten's 2010 decision to make English their official language. Fast Retailing, the operator of the Uniqlo apparel chain, also wants to make English its official language by 2012 and test its employees for proficiency. "Rakuten's decision triggered a shock-wave that's extended to many other companies, especially manufacturers, because they too are under pressure to expand outside a shrinking home market," said Yuriko Tsurumaki, a Recruit Agent spokeswoman. "Not all Japanese firms have businesses overseas for the time being but people are seeing possibilities and sharing a sense of crisis (about English)." Now nearly half of Japanese companies planning new hiring require applicants to be "business English users" - a big rise from 16 percent in July 2009, she said.

Highlighting fears among businessmen with poor English, a number of companies, including chip maker Elpida Memory and Murata Manufacturing Co, a maker of parts used in mobile phones and computers, are shifting some production outside Japan to cope with a currency near record highs. The surging yen is also encouraging Japanese firms to acquire businesses overseas to build more revenue pillars, with trading house Itochu buying Britain's tyre seller Kwik Fit for $1 billion. As a result, Japan's foreign language education market is growing, with learners more than willing to fork out plenty of money on lessons, DVDs or e-learning. It rose 1.6 percent to $9.8 billion in 2010 from a year earlier, said Yano Institute of Research, and is set to grow another 1.8 percent this year, making it a rare bright spot amid lagging Japanese private consumption.

"This is just the start of Japan's real globalisation. Everyone is feeling that they'll see a no-English-no-job situation," Gaba's president Kenji Kamiyama told Reuters in a recent interview. Thanks to avid English learners, Gaba says it has almost achieved its student number target for the year and predicts the upbeat trend will likely last for a while. Gaba says that on average, a student spends about 50,000 yen a month -- against an average 36,500 yen allowance for Japanese businesspeople.

Meanwhile, Rosetta Stone Japan, a Japanese unit of Rosetta Stone which provides software-based language-learning, says revenues for their English learning software more than tripled last year from a year ago. This year sales are seen doubling as more people spend for the company's software package priced at around 59,700 yen. "The English crisis shows the rapidly changing environment Japanese firms face. Most Japanese businessmen, for a long time, avoided an English-speaking environment," Gaba's Kamiyama said.

"But they now know that they can't stay that way... It's been a real kick in the pants for them." (End of article)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Glenski



Joined: 15 Jan 2003
Posts: 12844
Location: Hokkaido, JAPAN

PostPosted: Wed Sep 28, 2011 10:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Can I be cynical about this article? Please. I don't mean any harm.

This is a very recent article, but the news is essentially a year old about the companies that were mentioned. Overall, the idea that English is needed by businesses nowadays--or that it will definitely be needed in the very near future because of globalization--is not new at all.

I think the key part of the whole article lies in this quote:
"Now nearly half of Japanese companies planning new hiring require applicants to be 'business English users' "

IMO, what was seriously lacking from the article was an explanation of what is meant by "planning" and "business English users". Without that information, the article is just a rehash of many others over the past 2-3 years.

from the Japan Times in July:
Japanese companies looking to expand their overseas sales don't deny the merit of having employees proficient in English, but none has gone as far as to require their Japanese employees to speak English to other Japanese employees. Experts are unsure if Rakuten's ploy will succeed, saying it depends entirely on employee commitment...

Rakuten is one of a very small number of Japanese companies able to push English as its official language because Mikitani, who has an MBA from Harvard, is fluent in English and is very charismatic, analysts say, though making such a decision and getting positive results are two separate things.

"Rakuten has a culture of uniting under Mikitani's top-down decisions," UBS Securities Japan Ltd. analyst Sumito Takeda said. "For Mikitani, Rakuten is doing something normal at a normal speed, but the speed is very fast for other firms."

Other major firms have long focused on improving the English proficiency of their employees as they look to expand overseas amid the declining labor pool at home.

However, few have made it a rule to adopt English as their official language...

Rakuten has also acquired foreign companies, including Buy.com Inc. in the United States, and it has a major stake in a joint venture with Baidu Inc. in China. But the degree to which English is necessary at Rakuten is far lower than companies like Nissan and Nomura, and thus critics say it is questionable whether Rakuten employees' commitment will last.

"Even people who absolutely have to learn English give up learning. Many Rakuten employees don't need to speak English. I don't think Rakuten will succeed," said Giri Suzuki, who teaches Japanese linguistics at Taisho University in Tokyo and edited "Ronso: Eigo ga Koyogo ni naru Hi" ("Dispute: The Day English Becomes an Official Language").
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mr. Kalgukshi
Mod Team
Mod Team


Joined: 18 Jan 2003
Posts: 6613
Location: Need to know basis only.

PostPosted: Thu Sep 29, 2011 12:22 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Several off-topic and derailing postings have been deleted.

Stay on topic and avoid derailing or off-topic postings.

If not, the next step will be temporary or permanent bans.

Members observing same are requested to immediately contact the Mod Team by Report Post or PM.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
rxk22



Joined: 19 May 2010
Posts: 1629

PostPosted: Thu Sep 29, 2011 10:54 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think that is is getting to the point where Japan can no longer ignore English as a global language. They have been trying to play around with it, while truly ignoring it for decades. Maybe not now, but sometime in the future they will have to bite the bullet and take it seriously. The "英語難しい� attitude needs to go too.

but a lot of the domestic companies have been making investments overseas, as things like beer sales have been weak for a decade. They need to go overseas in order to survive the population decrease, and the stagnate economy. Companies like Meiji, Morinaga and the such will have to expand overseas as well, which will make English speaking needed.


Last edited by rxk22 on Thu Sep 29, 2011 1:07 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Glenski



Joined: 15 Jan 2003
Posts: 12844
Location: Hokkaido, JAPAN

PostPosted: Thu Sep 29, 2011 12:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

rxk22 wrote:
I think that is is getting to the point where Japan can no longer _____________ English as a global language.
What verb did you forget to add here?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rxk22



Joined: 19 May 2010
Posts: 1629

PostPosted: Thu Sep 29, 2011 1:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Glenski wrote:
rxk22 wrote:
I think that is is getting to the point where Japan can no longer _____________ English as a global language.
What verb did you forget to add here?


Ignore. Typed it between thoughts. Thanks for the catch.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mr_Monkey



Joined: 11 Mar 2009
Posts: 661
Location: Kyuuuuuushuuuuuuu

PostPosted: Thu Sep 29, 2011 1:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I was talking with a colleague of mine about this issue just the other day. He had an interesting take on it - the people at the universities and the education ministry aren't really going to do anything because it effectively invalidates how they became successful.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rxk22



Joined: 19 May 2010
Posts: 1629

PostPosted: Thu Sep 29, 2011 1:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Mr_Monkey wrote:
I was talking with a colleague of mine about this issue just the other day. He had an interesting take on it - the people at the universities and the education ministry aren't really going to do anything because it effectively invalidates how they became successful.


I think I understand your point, but could you elaborate a bit more? Be interesting to see where this goes.

My wife is Japanese, and got her masters, which required a massive amount of English, anyhow she said there will be no change. I kinda agree with her.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mr_Monkey



Joined: 11 Mar 2009
Posts: 661
Location: Kyuuuuuushuuuuuuu

PostPosted: Thu Sep 29, 2011 6:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Think of how you got your degree, and the interests that, if not govern, massively influenced the outcome. Then think of how most JTEs got their degree and their license to teach English in the public sector.

First of all, you have the front-line teachers of English, usually JTEs. As far as I have been able to ascertain (and my knowledge of this is limited), teacher training in Japan is a joke. The theory is assessed through an unsurprisingly difficult exam, probably because it focusses on discrete points that are likely irrelevant to actual classroom practice (i.e. arcane grammar and what some Japanese 'pedagogue' from 50 years ago said over dinner once). The practice is not assessed. The prospective teacher undergoes a two week 'practicum' whereby they essentially shadow an experienced teacher. For two weeks. Yes, two weeks.

The rest can be inferred from this.

The uni professors got where they are because they can take tests and write research papers, not teach. The people writing policy at MEXT got where they are because they can... take tests and write internal research/policy papers, not teach.

If you want to make a success of yourself in the Japanese education system, focus on knowledge, not skills. If you want to teach, go for the private sector.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Glenski



Joined: 15 Jan 2003
Posts: 12844
Location: Hokkaido, JAPAN

PostPosted: Thu Sep 29, 2011 10:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
the people at the universities and the education ministry aren't really going to do anything because it effectively invalidates how they became successful.
Government people are not "successful". With prime ministers changing hands as often as they do, education ministers and policies change equally rapidly. There is no consistency or longevity to make anyone really successful.

University profs are "successful" mostly because of the number of papers they publish.

Quote:
The uni professors got where they are because they can take tests and write research papers, not teach.
I don't know what you mean by "taking tests". There are no tests to become a uni prof. Uni profs, like most jobs in this country, get where they are because of the "old boy network": friends they made in high school and college, as well as their college advisors, got them the connections they needed to land the jobs they have. The lack of a critical assessment system allowed them to stay in place, and the number of papers they wrote moved them up in rank.

Quote:
the front-line teachers of English, usually JTEs. As far as I have been able to ascertain (and my knowledge of this is limited), teacher training in Japan is a joke.
Most JTEs who teach English are literature majors. The amount of actual EFL theory they study is minimal. There is actually more focus on the social aspect of being a teacher and being aware of the kids. Ultimately, a homeroom teacher has fewer classes to teach because they have more responsibilities to the HR, and they also serve as counselor, psychologist, disciplinarian (along with the sports coach), mentor, and surrogate parent.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mr_Monkey



Joined: 11 Mar 2009
Posts: 661
Location: Kyuuuuuushuuuuuuu

PostPosted: Fri Sep 30, 2011 1:18 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Glenski wrote:
Quote:
the people at the universities and the education ministry aren't really going to do anything because it effectively invalidates how they became successful.
Government people are not "successful". With prime ministers changing hands as often as they do, education ministers and policies change equally rapidly. There is no consistency or longevity to make anyone really successful.
Come on, Glenski. You know what I mean. Besides, it's not politicians who prepare the curriculum; it's MEXT civil servants. Government ministers tell MEXT to raise standards, etc. Policy is not practice.

As far as the definition of "successful" goes, would you deny that the civil service is an attractive career option for an experienced teacher? Would you deny that it is financially rewarding? Would you deny that civil servants are accorded high social status?

Quote:
University profs are "successful" mostly because of the number of papers they publish.

Quote:
The uni professors got where they are because they can take tests and write research papers, not teach.
I don't know what you mean by "taking tests". There are no tests to become a uni prof. Uni profs, like most jobs in this country, get where they are because of the "old boy network": friends they made in high school and college, as well as their college advisors, got them the connections they needed to land the jobs they have. The lack of a critical assessment system allowed them to stay in place, and the number of papers they wrote moved them up in rank.
Yes, but I wouldn't go so far as to suggest that they've not once either taken, produced, or administered a needless, arbitrarily difficult, test of English in their lives.

Besides, when teachers anywhere are judged on the number of papers they publish, and not the quality of their teaching or learning outcomes, there is a massive problem. It is highly dubious whether the insistence on published papers - an academic predilection - for people engaging in a highly practical activity holds any construct validity at all. I would suggest that it doesn't when such a requirement isn't convergent with adequate teacher-training. Papers on the uptake of the indefinite article over a one semester course mean little when the findings don't relate to classroom practice.

Quote:
Quote:
the front-line teachers of English, usually JTEs. As far as I have been able to ascertain (and my knowledge of this is limited), teacher training in Japan is a joke.
Most JTEs who teach English are literature majors. The amount of actual EFL theory they study is minimal. There is actually more focus on the social aspect of being a teacher and being aware of the kids. Ultimately, a homeroom teacher has fewer classes to teach because they have more responsibilities to the HR, and they also serve as counselor, psychologist, disciplinarian (along with the sports coach), mentor, and surrogate parent.
Yes, I know. In a study performed in Chiba in the 90s (I don't have the reference to hand, but can post it later), less than 5% of JTEs had TEFL as a major. Anecdotally (yes, I am aware of the limitations), most of the JTEs I've taught are intermediate learners themselves. This raises another issue: how do you assess the proficiency of your students when the ultimate goal would be for the learners to be as proficient as (and occasionally more proficient than) the teacher? You can't. This is another reason for the fluffy goals stated in the Japanese compulsory education curricula.

During my master's, I had a Japanese classmate. She was a high school teacher with IELTS 6.5 - pretty good (CEFR B2). Even towards the end of the course, after having the communicative approach stuffed down her throat for 9 months, she was writing papers focusing on how best to implement grammar-translation methodologies in her class. She didn't want to, and was a brilliant student, but the context she taught in demanded that she teach within an archaic paradigm to goals that she herself thought were stupid - arbitrarily difficult GTM-focused university entrance exams with little construct, criterion or convergent validity.

Compulsory, university-level EFL fares little better: massive classes full of switched-off kids who would rather pick their nose and eat it than study English. Japan's dismal performance on international standardised assessments is testimony to this.

These, in my opinion, are the obstacles to successful English learning in Japan. Companies like Rakuten realise that they can't rely on the compulsory education system to furnish the necessary language skills in their employees. What's most telling about the news story reproduced above is that the people interviewed were studying at GABA, whom I'm sure were very pleased at the name-drop.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Glenski



Joined: 15 Jan 2003
Posts: 12844
Location: Hokkaido, JAPAN

PostPosted: Fri Sep 30, 2011 2:40 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Mr_Monkey wrote:
Come on, Glenski. You know what I mean.
To be honest, no, I didn't know exactly. But that's why we have discussion forums--to find out.

Quote:
Besides, it's not politicians who prepare the curriculum; it's MEXT civil servants. Government ministers tell MEXT to raise standards, etc. Policy is not practice.
I agree with you there! The so-called standards by MEXT are under scrutiny, and not just by us foreigners.

Quote:
As far as the definition of "successful" goes, would you deny that the civil service is an attractive career option for an experienced teacher? Would you deny that it is financially rewarding? Would you deny that civil servants are accorded high social status?
I'll be really honest with you here. I could go either way on answering yes/no. A lot depends on so many ways of looking at it. I hope you don't mind me passing on a direct answer here, mostly because I think this point detracts from the main issue in the thread. Sorry.

[quote]University profs are "successful" mostly because of the number of papers they publish.

Quote:
Yes, but I wouldn't go so far as to suggest that they've not once either taken, produced, or administered a needless, arbitrarily difficult, test of English in their lives.
That's different. Taking a test of some sort (job entrance test?) is very different than having made one. Which goalpost are you running towards? If your point is that uni teachers (not JTEs) get where they are because of making tests, I would beg to differ. If you say that uni profs (not JTEs) make a lot of tests, I would also disagree. I've been in private HS and uni jobs, so I know what the J teachers do in both cases. What exactly did you mean?

Quote:
Besides, when teachers anywhere are judged on the number of papers they publish, and not the quality of their teaching or learning outcomes, there is a massive problem.
This is not limited to Japan, I hope you realize. The article that started this thread was talking only about Japan.

Quote:
It is highly dubious whether the insistence on published papers - an academic predilection - for people engaging in a highly practical activity holds any construct validity at all.
"Construct validity"? Help me out here.

As for a practical activity, that is debatable, too. Established (veteran) teachers may be comfortable sitting back on lesson plans and lecture notes that have collected dust for years, or they may have unsuitable grading practices (show up and you pass), none of which are really all that "practical". I shudder to think of the lessons that my own university's old man of the sea English teacher provided and left his students woefully unprepared for the next level of studies!

Insisting on publishing papers should have merit, I think. In EFL, just what research a teacher is doing to publish may be practical or theoretical (just like chemistry or physics). So, as long as the papers are in peer-reviewed journals (preferably international ones), they will be worthy of the research done. If not worthy, they will not be accepted. Universities here have their point system for promotions that go over all publications with scrutiny to confirm how many points they get. The problem (and I think you agree with this) is when institutions hold publications above anything else to determine a teacher's merit for promotion.


Quote:
During my master's, I had a Japanese classmate. She was a high school teacher with IELTS 6.5 - pretty good (CEFR B2). Even towards the end of the course, after having the communicative approach stuffed down her throat for 9 months, she was writing papers focusing on how best to implement grammar-translation methodologies in her class. She didn't want to, and was a brilliant student, but the context she taught in demanded that she teach within an archaic paradigm to goals that she herself thought were stupid - arbitrarily difficult GTM-focused university entrance exams with little construct, criterion or convergent validity.
I know what you mean. The system needs change, and until JTEs scream for it, it's not going to happen.

I've just done a little digging on English "literature" courses taught in Japanese by JTEs in universities. The schools that I looked into all taught such courses as grammar-translation events, not literature appreciation or comparison or strategy courses. Convenient labeling.

Quote:
Compulsory, university-level EFL fares little better: massive classes full of switched-off kids who would rather pick their nose and eat it than study English. Japan's dismal performance on international standardised assessments is testimony to this.
Again, no arguments there! System in HS needs changing to wake the kids up. Telling them that they need a TOEIC score (not TOEFL, as the article stated) to get a good job is insufficient, although a good start, but how many students even know what TOEIC is? Most of mine don't seem to know.

Also, the old boy network is so rigidly in place that grades don't matter. Pass or don't pass is all they care about. Teachers aren't all that strict on such things, either, which doesn't help matters.

Quote:
These, in my opinion, are the obstacles to successful English learning in Japan. Companies like Rakuten realise that they can't rely on the compulsory education system to furnish the necessary language skills in their employees.
But what Rakuten should be doing is finding ways to promote what is needed. The #1 guy there went to Harvard. Uh, how many of your underlings will do that? He is a very charismatic guy, unlike most businessmen here. Just telling your underlings to shape up in English or ship out is not going to last long. Wait and see.

Quote:
What's most telling about the news story reproduced above is that the people interviewed were studying at GABA, whom I'm sure were very pleased at the name-drop.
Rakuten's people have a group contract to study at Berlitz, if I remember right. GABA probably did eat up the free advertising, but think about how GABA actually performs its lessons: in one-on-one situations! Geez, how taxing can that be for teacher and student?! The school itself doesn't exactly have a stellar reputation, either.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Shimokitazawa



Joined: 16 Aug 2009
Posts: 458
Location: Saigon, Vietnam

PostPosted: Fri Sep 30, 2011 7:49 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Mr_Monkey wrote:
Think of how you got your degree, and the interests that, if not govern, massively influenced the outcome. Then think of how most JTEs got their degree and their license to teach English in the public sector.

First of all, you have the front-line teachers of English, usually JTEs. As far as I have been able to ascertain (and my knowledge of this is limited), teacher training in Japan is a joke. The theory is assessed through an unsurprisingly difficult exam, probably because it focusses on discrete points that are likely irrelevant to actual classroom practice (i.e. arcane grammar and what some Japanese 'pedagogue' from 50 years ago said over dinner once). The practice is not assessed. The prospective teacher undergoes a two week 'practicum' whereby they essentially shadow an experienced teacher. For two weeks. Yes, two weeks.

The rest can be inferred from this.

The uni professors got where they are because they can take tests and write research papers, not teach. The people writing policy at MEXT got where they are because they can... take tests and write internal research/policy papers, not teach.

If you want to make a success of yourself in the Japanese education system, focus on knowledge, not skills. If you want to teach, go for the private sector.


Mr Monkey,

Great posts. I agree with everything you've written. Even at the university level I have noticed English professors to have an intermediate level of proficiency - at best.

And yes, there are still a lot of Japanese teachers who are "introduced" to their positions by former graduate school advisers, teachers, etc. The "konne" (connections) is still important.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
nomad soul



Joined: 31 Jan 2010
Posts: 11454
Location: The real world

PostPosted: Fri Sep 30, 2011 8:16 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks for this enlightening exchange. Although the article states, "Now nearly half of Japanese companies planning new hiring require applicants to be business English users," is Rakuten's expectation that employees need English for business purposes or that they should learn to speak English in general? Either way, that's a lot of pressure to put on one's employees, especially if they're expected to learn English quickly and proficiently. Not very realistic.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Glenski



Joined: 15 Jan 2003
Posts: 12844
Location: Hokkaido, JAPAN

PostPosted: Fri Sep 30, 2011 1:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

nomad soul,
I do not have the inside track to Rakuten's strategy for language learning. I can say that the idea of making a Japanese company as fluent in English as he seems to tout is admirable, but I don't think it's really going to fly. The pressure is an overly charismatic businessman's way of either creating an enormously uniform group with the talents that he wants, or a major crack in a dam just waiting to widen. Japanese are not known to follow radical ideas like this very often, so I suspect a bit more of that crack before things level off.

What does he expect, you ask? Well, you can't have someone speaking just business English. That's too limiting for a learning situation. Gotta walk or crawl before you run, and that means people will have to be far more fluent in general English than they currently are, and perhaps at the same time learn some business English. Gotta picture where most of that English is going to be used, too. That is, within Japan or in overseas branch offices. To quote from the article, there's a reason for looking "outside a shrinking home market".

What I would like to know is where the "spokesman for a Recruit Agent" got the figures that "nearly half of Japanese companies planning new hiring" are doing that (undefined) planning. Data, please. Oh, and just how many (or what percent) businesses in Japan are hiring, by the way? Interesting wording, from a recruiter.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Japan All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

Teaching Jobs in China
Teaching Jobs in China