|
Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Baozi man
Joined: 06 Sep 2011 Posts: 214
|
Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2011 7:11 am Post subject: Chinese Ed. Recent History (quick & dirty) |
|
|
Prior to Tianamen, only a select group of students were admitted to universities in China. They were given scholarships to study. The student protesters at Tianamen were all living off the government. They were really biting the hand that had been feeding them. After Tianamen, the scholarships were withdrawn. Today, few, very few, are given scholarships. Most students pay tuition.
The Chinese governmnt decided that the way to progress in China was more college graduates, consequently, provinces were given quotas to meet. To meet those quotas, universities were constructed, teachers trained and students recruited. The quality of the education was not really an issue. Meeting the quota was the issue.
For example, a few years ago, while studying at a Chinese uni, I became aware that some senior level students actually had no senior year classes. They spent their final year screwing around, in the internet cafe, banging their gf in by the "hour " love hotels, whatever. Since a bachelor's degree required 4 years, even though their studies were completed in three, they had to loaf around the campus their senior year.
For many students, their uni education is positively destructive. They learn nothing of practical value. They do get the idea that, since they attended a uni, they are too "good" to actually work; consequently, a generation of "Those who eat the flesh of the elderly" has arisen. These misfits live with their parents, spend their time in internet cafes, contribute nothing to society. They are essentially a welfare class created by the Chinese social scientists who saw "education" as the key to China's development. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
dean_a_jones

Joined: 03 Jul 2009 Posts: 1151 Location: Wuhan, China
|
Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2011 7:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
Certainly there are parallels to the UK, where until the 1990s university was free (and therefore for an elite number of students) and there were a lot of polytechs as alternatives to university. Now schools can charge as much as 9,000GBP a year for school, many former polytechs have successfully gained university status, degrees are devalued and quality has gone down.
You could probably also argue that time spent at university is often a waste for many in the UK, landing them with massive amounts of debt and few practical skills. Many do not spend their free time in study groups or the library, needless to say. Many leave and get jobs they could probably have obtained prior to study, and if not (i.e. the job wants someone with a degree) it functions as a document saying they could concentrate and put in enough work to obtain the piece of paper, rather than an indication of specific skills.
In any country where the middle classes are expanding, elite education (i.e. university) gets opened up to the masses, as it is see as an entitlement and a basic right. That tends to cause all sorts of problems for the schools, parents, students, graduates etc. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
roadwalker

Joined: 24 Aug 2005 Posts: 1750 Location: Ch
|
Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2011 8:26 am Post subject: Re: Chinese Ed. Recent History (quick & dirty) |
|
|
Baozi man wrote: |
{...}
For many students, their uni education is positively destructive. They learn nothing of practical value. They do get the idea that, since they attended a uni, they are too "good" to actually work; consequently, a generation of "Those who eat the flesh of the elderly" has arisen. These misfits live with their parents, spend their time in internet cafes, contribute nothing to society. They are essentially a welfare class created by the Chinese social scientists who saw "education" as the key to China's development. |
I think that was true of the first few groups of grads who presumed the prior guaranteed rice bowl (job) rules applied. Now my underclass students either don't want to think of such an event as far away as graduation, or they are worried about what to do, just as in the west. At any rate, perhaps with a few years of grads moving back, jobless, to their parents' homes the millions of people working as university administration will come up with a new solution. Probable outcome: "more rote memorization, especially in senior middle school!"
Quote: |
(dean_a_jones) Certainly there are parallels to the UK, where until the 1990s university was free (and therefore for an elite number of students) and there were a lot of polytechs as alternatives to university. Now schools can charge as much as 9,000GBP a year for school, many former polytechs have successfully gained university status, degrees are devalued and quality has gone down. |
Similar story in the US. I would venture that the quality hasn't suffered greatly in the major brick and mortar institutions, even for the technical or junior colleges, both aka community colleges. But we have a new phenomenon of online universities too, and some are real crap, while others seem to be pretty good for remote learning, or feature once a week or once a month meetings in person with professors. But most uni grads now are saddled with HUGE debt and tiny prospects for earning more than they would in a McJob. In fact many recent university grads are barristas (e.g. work at Starbucks) or other jobs requiring no university. Interesting to see how this plays out in China, and world wide, and which countries have the better, or least bad policies. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling. Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|