Job Discussion Forums

2 over lee · Posted: Sun Oct 10, 2004 5:36 pm Post subject: Bush wearing transmitter!!

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uselections2004/salon/0,14779,1323334,00.html

I sometimes found the Guardian site hard to get in China, hope this is not the case for those who look at this link.

I noticed this�lump� in the first presidential debate, but thought he was just a bit hunchbacked. I actually thought maybe he had a screen with written messages on his podium from the way he always paused and looked down, but no he was listening!!

stillnosheep · Joined: 01 Mar 2004 Posts: 2068 Location: eslcafe

Ok. All is forgiven as far as your spat with 'Eric' is concerned. Still cannot equate Social Darwinism with Nazi eugenics though, though I can see how the latter could be manipulated in an attempt to back up the former.

It seems to me that the Republicans are simply playing the 'terrorist' card to stoke up fear in the hope that the old theory that fearful people vote for the right holds up. cf 'The Social Psychology of Fascism' or somesuch, by the guy who later posited the orgasmatron (his earlier work had more intellectual rigor) and that few people really seem to care whether Bush has a Brain as long as he can lull their fears by telling them that voting for them will make them strong and powerful and safe. I hope that I am wrong.

The orgasmatron... Now there was an idea. The idea being that right wing thinking/voting is a result of sexual frustration and that a device to collect, store and channel the orgones in the atmosphere so as to provide mind-blowing orgasms for all would help realise well-adjusted populations whose non-frustration would make them impervious to the fear stoking, power-promises of the right...

2 over lee · Posted: Sun Oct 10, 2004 6:16 pm Post subject:

stillnosheep · Joined: 01 Mar 2004 Posts: 2068 Location: eslcafe

The key words were manipulated and attempt.

You will never undermine the fact of evolution by attempting to implicate it in the horrors of the holocaust. No matter how many raving-looney right-wing creationist websites you post links to.

The orgasmatron theorist and Social-pyschology (or Mass-pyschology) of Fascism author was Willhelm Reich. A very interesting Book. Recommended.

2 over lee · Posted: Mon Oct 11, 2004 5:28 pm Post subject:

Right here we go. I didn�t check the websites carefully enough �sns�. I posted them with the purpose of showing that the Nazis used Social Darwinist theories as an excuse to persecute. ( I found them through a google search)
This fact is accepted by historians accross the political spectrum.

I am not a creationist and not right wing.

Would you like to make any comments about Bush and his transmitter?

Do not be a trolling baboon, who does not understand history.

stillnosheep · Joined: 01 Mar 2004 Posts: 2068 Location: eslcafe

2 over lee · Posted: Mon Oct 11, 2004 6:11 pm Post subject:

Ok so unless Robert actually starts taking Aussies to the gas chamber I can�t liken him to Adolf.

By the way I originally said this:

stillnosheep · Joined: 01 Mar 2004 Posts: 2068 Location: eslcafe

2 over lee: I don't think anyone else knows what's going on in this post anymore. Time we let it die, eh?

Seth · Joined: 05 Feb 2003 Posts: 575 Location: in exile

Seth · Joined: 05 Feb 2003 Posts: 575 Location: in exile

i do agree it's highly unlikely that it's a transmitter, but it's funny to speculate. if it is a transmitter it's not helping him much.

bush did, however, have a cheat sheet in front of him that he flipped over halfway through the debate.

nomadic · Joined: 14 Feb 2004 Posts: 118

Dazai · Joined: 11 Oct 2004 Posts: 74

nomadic wrote:

2 over lee · Posted: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:45 pm Post subject:

Robert Lubeck wrote:

nomadic · Joined: 14 Feb 2004 Posts: 118

2 over lee · Posted: Tue Oct 12, 2004 5:36 pm Post subject:

Just as an aside, �Robert�, have you read either of the two new biographies on your hero there?

Also despite all the Bush bashing I really think Kerry may have sealed his own doom in voting for the war. Kerry seems to me to say Bush�s only mistake was to rush, and he would have given the UN a little longer. What then, given he voted for this war, would he have done if the UN hadn�t changed its position in this �extra time�? His argument seems weak to me.

And yes we ( I�ll take this liberty as the voices in my head are screaming for their rights again) are all amused by the Orwellian spin you�re putting on things.