|
Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
ImanH

Joined: 16 Oct 2004 Posts: 214 Location: Istanbul
|
Posted: Wed Oct 19, 2005 8:01 am Post subject: The Level of English at Universities |
|
|
As some of you know, although I don�t teach English I do teach in English at a university in Istanbul. Last term I taught third and fourth students who, for the most part, were comparable to the students I taught in the UK (although the best student here was very good - considering English was not her first language - and the worst was very poor). However, this term I am teaching first-year students with a far wider range of academic and language abilities. In fact in some cases the English is pretty abysmal.
As an example, this is an e-mail I received from one student:
Quote: |
I sended handouts with �zhan have you not? I did not come to school last week so your student�S �ZHAN MUST LEAVE YOU
|
This was in response to an e-mail I had sent with a handout of the week�s lecture attached. I have been doing this since the beginning of term, and refer to the handouts constantly in class.
In fact what this student means to say is that she had asked another student to return to me a photocopy of a chapter I had given her and was asking whether or not he had left it with me.
My question is, how is it possible after one year of prep., not to mention, one assumes, several years of schooling in English, or at least English lessons, that this student�s English can be so poor? I can understand difficulties with speaking, but in composing a relatively simple statement and question � (although I�m told, in fact, that this is the hardest skill to master; it�s just that my experience in Turkey has been otherwise).
This is not an idle question. I am genuinely interested and am trying to understand how it is possible that a student with this level of English both has this level of English and is able to proceed to a degree course. What is being/can be done (if anything) to assist these types of students? What are the potential differences you see between universities and why? I know there are people that post here who have taught/are teaching at Bilgi, in Eskisehir, at Fatih, in Izmir, at Koc, at Sabanci, (any state universities?); not to mention a range of schools that presumably produce future university students. It would be nice if this didn�t descend into the rather simplistic private/state university argument (in fact my husband, who teaches at a state university, tells me that the English of some of his students is probably on par), but I�m wondering if there are other differences that some might feel are significant? Is it simply the case that students are not provided with an adequate amount of English language teaching from an early enough age � in which case is the idea of studying for a degree in a language which isn�t one�s first just unworkable? Is it that it�s assumed that they will � by the time they graduate � be adequately proficient in English, and the actual process of obtaining the degree is seen as part of their English language training? Certainly the third and fourth years� English was significantly better; even the poor student.
I�d be very interested to hear any thoughts. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Otterman Ollie
Joined: 23 Feb 2004 Posts: 1067 Location: South Western Turkey
|
Posted: Wed Oct 19, 2005 10:13 am Post subject: English medium universities?? |
|
|
The fact is that although many universities put themselves forward as English medium the reality is different . One idea is that if sufficent exposure is available then the language will be assimilated, however ,those of us who try to do our jobs in these establishments know that its not enough .
In one place I know they are concerned about this issue and the question of a student going for a degree without the ability to use English on even a basic level leaves one perplexed to say the least .There are solutions to this problem and we are ready to provide answers to overcome them ,but ,is anyone going to listen ? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
justme

Joined: 18 May 2004 Posts: 1944 Location: Istanbul
|
Posted: Wed Oct 19, 2005 10:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
It's a good question, Iman. I've been wondering a lot of the same things.
From your student's email, aside from the language, I see another big problem, which is inability to use a keyboard-- I also have students who don't seem to know how to use the shift buttons, punctuation marks, or what that big bar at the bottom is for...
Most students who finish prep (if they finish the first time around) here at Fatih are around pre-intermediate level, with a few doing a little better than that. The ones who take summer school or who take prep a second time are usually at a much lower level, say, strong elementary. It comes down to a matter of money-- if they don't pass all the students who should fail, there won't be enough students entering into the departments.
One of my better students from last year came to office to tell me he can't understand anything in his engineering lessons. He said they just all go to the professors afterwards to have them explain everything in Turkish. I say he's a 'better student,' nonetheless, I don't kid myself into thinking he was in any way equipped to handle uni-level material.
Most students out of prep here take 'English 101' classes along with their department classes. In theory, these are sheltered English courses to go along with their other classes, but in practice, they're just a higher level general prep because we all know they aren't really 'prepared.'
Frankly, I wonder what the point of English medium university is. The students can't ask questions or handle their reading in English-- most of the reading they can find translated into Turkish somewhere, and they find ways to deal with their lectures in Turkish as much as possible. Also, there are many Turkish professors here whose English is as bad as the students' who have the gall to complain that we aren't preparing them well enough, but can barely form a comprehensible sentence themselves.
I, too, wonder how their English can be so bad after a year, or how they can fail to grasp things you've told them repeatedly, like the example you gave with the handouts. We started doing portfolios last year, and students were told many times throughout the year (in Turkish and English) that they would turn in Portfolios containing their year's work at the end of 2nd term, yet about half my class came to me at the end of last year saying they had thrown everything away. They have 5-7 hours of lessons a day, 5 days a week, but still I have a repeat student who, today, couldn't understand 'Do you know Mehmet Hoca?' It's incredibly discouraging (okay, that one's an extreme example), but I really don't know if it's the students going about it the wrong way, or if we are, or if it's just not realistic to expect even intermediate abilities after a year. At Interlang, about half of the students went from zero to strong Intermediate in 6 months, with a lot fewer contact hours.
I'm sure there's a lot more to be said on this, but I have to get back to checking these pathetic quizzes I've been handed... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Mark Loyd
Joined: 13 Sep 2005 Posts: 517
|
Posted: Wed Oct 19, 2005 12:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Honeymoon period over at your school I see. Now you are beginning to see what was said all along about such places being crap and all the students passing. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Golightly

Joined: 08 Feb 2005 Posts: 877 Location: in the bar, next to the raki
|
Posted: Wed Oct 19, 2005 12:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
part of the problem is not so much a lack of English as very bad study skills. Put simply, some students just don't have a clue about how to do the most basic of academic things, such as organise a folder or portfolio, or look up a piece of information in an encyclopedia. Once they've acquired these abilities, they generally begin to perform much better. It's not really surprising when you consider the spoon-fed educational environment in most schools - you sit in class, you listen to teacher, you do what he/she says, you get pat on head. In short, these poor kids simply don't know how to be independent learners. Is it any wonder their English is bad? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
justme

Joined: 18 May 2004 Posts: 1944 Location: Istanbul
|
Posted: Wed Oct 19, 2005 1:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
All really good points, Golightly. It's their lack of study skills that's causing them to have all the wrong approach. No matter what you tell them about trying to speak or ways to think about learning a language, very few of them actually get it. Most seem to approach it like you would math or maybe history, by trying to memorize everything. Most will try this for months before catching on that it's impossible to memorize everything, and by then they're discouraged and way behind.
I'm still suprised about what appears to be a lack of dedication to learning. After paying all this money, the least you could do is try. But a lot of them can't even be bothered to get basic materials like notebooks and erasers, let alone organize their notes and homework into folders. What's this coming to school with, instead of a book bag, a pretty shopping bag that your mommy packed for you in the morning? Or turning in assignments written on a piece of unlined paper torn from last year's day planner then torn in half? Are staples so hard to come by? While I understand that a lot of the scholarship students here have a hard time paying for food let alone materials, the others have no excuse. Then there's the learning itself-- their education system has trained to prepare for exams rather than to actually learn anything, and in the end that's all they really care about. The destination versus the journey. Most speaking excercises become a pointless waste of time because they all just want to be the first one to call out 'Finished!' rather that to actually practice anything.
Don't even get me started on the exams which, upon passing, the students are 'competent' users of English.
The scholarship kids present a whole different problem-- their scholarships pay for school, and maybe books, but nothing else-- families are expected to come up with the rest which for a lot of them, just isn't possible. Some of the kids here get by on a bowl of soup a day. The teachers have had to set up a fund out of our salaries to donate money for food, paper, pencils, etc. How is it no one thought of this when they made the scholarship program? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ImanH

Joined: 16 Oct 2004 Posts: 214 Location: Istanbul
|
Posted: Wed Oct 19, 2005 1:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks for the response so far - at least the sensible ones.
Otterman Ollie - you say who will listen? ME. That's why I'm asking. I want to know what I can do. But I know what you're implying - that the university admin doesn't listen. Well then why not? Have you tried? What has been the general response?
Justme � good point about the keyboard skills. Not something I�d considered, but something relatively easy to fix. Also very interesting point about there being insufficient numbers of students to enter departments. You suggest this would be about money, but what about the state universities? But this point made me very curious
Quote: |
At Interlang, about half of the students went from zero to strong Intermediate in 6 months, with a lot fewer contact hours. |
Why? Why can�t this be translated to a university setting? And also how can it be SO bad. I mean my Turkish skills are not great by any means but it�s OKish and I�ve had barely any formal tuition and am cursed (or blessed) with a family and Turkish friends here who are all excellent English speakers. What I find interesting is that students do often assume that I am fluent in Turkish because I�ve been here a couple of years. And I wonder if there is a general assumption that a language can be learnt by a process of osmosis or something.
It also sounds like you are making a distinction between state and private in the sense that you are talking about the fact that your students are paying. I agree that if you are paying one would think that it would be more valued and/or that your parents would give you a harder time about achieving. Or is it that this encourages a view that one can abdicate responsibility to who they are paying for, us the teachers?
Golightly, some of the problems you point out also seem easily fixable - teach them study skills. I had lots of study skill sessions when I was first an undergraduate. Is that undertaken here at the prep level? Any level?(I'll check for my university). I totally agree with your other assessment. It seems to me that schooling in general is about churning out little automatons who won't think for themselves; possibly even more so here, I'm not sure. But of course university is about getting students to think for themselves. I do think the approach to academia here is one where it is still the teacher/student role (or rather expert/apprentice). That�s very clear from the ridiculously high number of contact hours, which simply reinforces their continued spoonfed status, rather than a shift into independent learning.
It just seems to me that some things are relatively easy to fix, so why aren�t they? Yes other issues are far tougher. Is it fundamentally down to the fact that actually the staff/admin themselves are not convinced of the benefits of English medium teaching? Does anyone know why and how this came about? Which goes back to your point, justme, what is the point of an English medium university? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
justme

Joined: 18 May 2004 Posts: 1944 Location: Istanbul
|
Posted: Wed Oct 19, 2005 1:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
But this point made me very curious
Quote:
At Interlang, about half of the students went from zero to strong Intermediate in 6 months, with a lot fewer contact hours.
Why? Why can�t this be translated to a university setting? |
I started thinking about this after I wrote it. I think, actually, this is akin to a false statistic. A majority of dershane students are elementary or pre-int, and I'd say over half quit around pre-int. So the ones that progress like that are from the half that decided to stay.
Iman, you mentioned about the parents-- there is a lot of pressure from parents to acheive, so much so that a lot of the poor dears are going crazy. But the pressure from parents is often all wrong-- the parents themselves often haven't gone to university, and a lot of them didn't even get to high school. So there are plenty of kids whose parents with 6th or 8th grade educations are looking at their grades and saying, 'You got a 60. That's low. Get a 100 next time or you're in big trouble and we won't love you anymore,' and that's how they're 'helping' their kids. And parents are perfectly happy for blaming the teachers when their kids do poorly. Last year we had a girl who was sneaking back to Balıkesir to hang out with her boyfriend instead of coming to school. When her father got her attendence report, he came to the teacher in a rage asking why no one told him his daughter was in Balıkesir with her boyfriend.
Academia in Turkey seems to have little relationship to independent thinking-- in fact, what most of them do in university doesn't even fall under my definition of academia. School, especially university, is a means to an end-- getting a job and making money. I'm not saying this isn't true in the US as well, but that idea of spending a few years in school to learn for learning's sake, and to open young people's minds to new ideas, doesn't really exist. My husband wanted to study archeology in uni, and his �SS was more than enough, but his father wouldn't pay for him to study something that wouldn't earn him a high-paying job. His brother is currently hating business admin, but at least he gets to go. I had another friend who was brilliant and aced the �SS-- she wanted to study art history, but I think under the uni system here she couldn't be accepted into an art history program because her scores were too high... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
scot47

Joined: 10 Jan 2003 Posts: 15343
|
Posted: Wed Oct 19, 2005 2:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Isn't it simply the case that not everyone has got what it takes to learn a foreign language to any decent level of competence ?
In my youth, many moons ago, it was the received wisdom that somewhere about 10 or 15 percent could learn a foreign language in an academic setting. Then the fashion came for everyone to learn a foreign language. Now, in the land of my birth, learning forewign languages has become an arcane skill, limited to a few gifted students.
Can everyone learn a FL ? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
justme

Joined: 18 May 2004 Posts: 1944 Location: Istanbul
|
Posted: Wed Oct 19, 2005 2:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
You're spot on about that too, scot. It's a whole 'nother can of worms. But even if only 10-15% of the population can learn in an academic setting, it doesn't explain why so many prep students learn so little in the amount of time given... I mean, people are capable to varying degrees, but my problem is that a majority of students seem incapable of learning anything, for a variety of reasons. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Baba Alex

Joined: 17 Aug 2004 Posts: 2411
|
Posted: Wed Oct 19, 2005 2:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
scot47 wrote: |
Isn't it simply the case that not everyone has got what it takes to learn a foreign language to any decent level of competence ?
In my youth, many moons ago, it was the received wisdom that somewhere about 10 or 15 percent could learn a foreign language in an academic setting. Then the fashion came for everyone to learn a foreign language. Now, in the land of my birth, learning forewign languages has become an arcane skill, limited to a few gifted students.
Can everyone learn a FL ? |
IF you look at countries like Sweeden, Iceland, Belgium, Germany loads of people speak 2nd languages, especialy Sweeden and Iceland. I think we should look at how the Swedish educational system works, they have loads of very successfull English Universities, and most Swedes can speak English to excellent level. We should ask the Swedes about how to teach languages. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Mark Loyd
Joined: 13 Sep 2005 Posts: 517
|
Posted: Wed Oct 19, 2005 2:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hello
Many Turks already do speak a second language-it is Turkish. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ImanH

Joined: 16 Oct 2004 Posts: 214 Location: Istanbul
|
Posted: Wed Oct 19, 2005 2:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
The only way to deal with trolls is to limit your reaction to reminding others not to respond to trolls. |
Source: http://members.aol.com/intwg/trolls.htm |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ImanH

Joined: 16 Oct 2004 Posts: 214 Location: Istanbul
|
Posted: Wed Oct 19, 2005 2:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
When I read your response Scot47, it seemed bleeding obvious that of course some people just won't be 'gifted' with languages. And then I read your reply Baba and thought yeah that's true too! So what does the research say on this and why are the Scandinavians doing so well in this area? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Baba Alex

Joined: 17 Aug 2004 Posts: 2411
|
Posted: Wed Oct 19, 2005 2:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
There is always the report post button, the one that a certain ex poster that Mark admires was so fond of. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling. Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|