Site Search:
 
Get TEFL Certified & Start Your Adventure Today!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Teaching ESL w/ a single-subject credential (K-12)
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> General North America Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
go_lightly



Joined: 15 Jun 2005
Posts: 27

PostPosted: Sun May 21, 2006 1:31 am    Post subject: Teaching ESL w/ a single-subject credential (K-12) Reply with quote

Hello ~ I am looking for insight on teaching ESL (particularly in California), but in the public school setting. To date I have a BA & vocational TESOL certificate & am currently finishing a year teaching in Taiwan. Knowing how competitive it is to teach ESL in CA, i'm planning to obtain a single-subject credential in English with an ESL emphasis, which requires a 2nd BA in Linguistics. This is the program currently offered at San Jose State University. While this would qualify me to teach English in jr. highs & HS, i am more interested in teaching ESL or language development ~ even for K-6. But so far, it seems that the closest educational program i can find to qualify me for this is getting another BA in Linguisitics w/ the single-subject credentialing. Does anyone have any insight on teaching ESL for K-12??? Is it fair to say that one can make a full career out of it? Thanks...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
chinagirl



Joined: 27 May 2003
Posts: 235
Location: United States

PostPosted: Sun May 21, 2006 9:14 pm    Post subject: K-12 Reply with quote

I can't specifically speak for California, but it is safe to say that on the east coast, there is a career to be made in the public schools with a K-12 TESOL credential. I've got my teaching license in NY. However, I'm teaching overseas at the moment and when I get back I will probably also get my elementary license, as many states only recognize the TESOL K-12 licence as an endorsement, not as a base certificate. Each state is different.

Teaching in the public schools is a much more finanancially stable career track than adult education, however, depending on where you teach it can be much more stressful! BTW, I did my K-12 TESOL certifcation in NY as part of a master's degree program.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
IreneM



Joined: 12 Dec 2005
Posts: 19
Location: washington, dc

PostPosted: Wed Jun 07, 2006 3:42 pm    Post subject: esl teaching in states / pay Reply with quote

i did my student teaching in the boston puplic schools which had specific esl teachers/ classes. i have a ba in elementary edu, a tefl certificate and teaching experience... do you think i would need a masters for these positions? what about teaching older levels, like adults?

im concidering going back to school for masters, what would be the subject title for teaching esl and what is the expected pay for esl teachers in the states?

any help would be appreciated!

pura vda from costa rica,
irene
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address MSN Messenger
escapeartist



Joined: 05 Jun 2006
Posts: 3
Location: not there

PostPosted: Tue Jun 13, 2006 2:50 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi -
I'm not sure, but I think you might need the MA TESOL to teach K-12 in CA. I could be wrong. There are two different tracks for people who are MA TESOL, those who want to teach in CA K-12 and those who want to teach adults (jr. colleges, etc.). You are probably aware, the K-12 has more job security, benefits, etc.

Here's the link to SJSU's program, they don't really explain it much - I think you're better off contacting the professors or school:
http://info.sjsu.edu/web-dbgen/catalog/departments/LING.html

I think there are programs at SF State, CSU East Bay, and MIIS (Monterey Institute) - if you're considering the Bay Area.

Good luck
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rusmeister



Joined: 15 Jun 2006
Posts: 867
Location: Russia

PostPosted: Sat Jun 17, 2006 2:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

God help you.
I left the nightmare of CA, after obtaining my credential.
You can get your foot in the door in one of many desperate schools - they will help you get an emergency credential, if things haven't changed much in the past few years. Then you can go to SJ State and enroll in their English program with "CLAD" emphasis. (That's the term for 'I can work with people from other countries')
Unfortunately, you won't learn much from them on how to teach, but will get plenty of polit. indoctrination. Watch out for their Social Foundations of Education (and Psych. Foundations of Ed) courses (required)!
You don't need a second BA or an MA (a sad sign when they make the requirements for teaching sound like brain surgery - but this is how the univs make their money and how the unions justify demands for increased salaries). You just need a BA and to at least pass their PRAXIS test in the subject field you want certification in as part of the requirements to get in the program. Just the application and requirements to get in took me the better part of a year. Then 2 years of BS classes. Sure hope you aren't an orthodox Christian or hold strong conservative views - you'd be in for a rough ride.
The schools are also in sad shape - and I found that the public machine only gives lip service to caring whether those brand newly arrived immigrant teens in high school learn enough to get out of the car wash industry. In short, you won't find a free lunch there.
God bless, wherever you go!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
JZer



Joined: 16 Jan 2005
Posts: 3898
Location: Pittsburgh

PostPosted: Fri Jun 23, 2006 10:39 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yeah, if you go from teaching ESL abroad to inter-city schools it is black and white. Most ESL teachers are used to teaching rich kids or people who are busting their butts to learn English. In the public schools you will more than likely get a bunch of confused immigrant teens.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Chancellor



Joined: 31 Oct 2005
Posts: 1337
Location: Ji'an, China - if you're willing to send me cigars, I accept donations :)

PostPosted: Sun Jul 09, 2006 10:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The school district here in Buffalo, New York (it may have been a state-wide thing, though) told all its teachers a few years back that they had four years to get their master's degree.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rusmeister



Joined: 15 Jun 2006
Posts: 867
Location: Russia

PostPosted: Tue Jul 11, 2006 5:25 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

It is part of the general move to make the teaching profession inaccesible to ordinary people who have not gone through * or more years of brainwashing in so-called "higher education". The teacher's unions like this because it fosters the myth that you need to have as much training as a brain surgeon before you can be allowed to work with kids, which, in turn, justifies demands to continue to raise teacher salaries. (In CA the average teacher, even on an emergency credential makes an average of maybe $35,000 or more - that's not a lot in CA, but it's certainly enough to rent an apartment and pay the bills.) The point is, an ordinary person with common sense, a good old-fashioned basic education (Just read any 19th century American writer and tell me they didn't have a good basic education!) will not be allowed near children until they have been politically indoctrinated for a long time. I went through a California state program and survived because I was an older person with plenty of prior classroom experience and developed opinions. But the 23-yr-old girls in the program mostly don't have a chance. This makes mega-bucks for universities, justifies a massive administration in State Ed, billions and billions of dollars in forcing teachers to go back again and again, and most of the time you're not really being taught how to teach math better (although a lot of the "in-house trainings" proclaim that) but how to be more sensitive, and tolerant, and multi-cultural, and how to think "globally". Schools have become behavior indoctrination centers rather than places of learning.

If you've seen any at all of what I've seen, try reading John Taylor Gatto's stuff. Just Google him.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Chancellor



Joined: 31 Oct 2005
Posts: 1337
Location: Ji'an, China - if you're willing to send me cigars, I accept donations :)

PostPosted: Tue Jul 11, 2006 4:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

rusmeister wrote:
It is part of the general move to make the teaching profession inaccesible to ordinary people who have not gone through * or more years of brainwashing in so-called "higher education". The teacher's unions like this because it fosters the myth that you need to have as much training as a brain surgeon before you can be allowed to work with kids, which, in turn, justifies demands to continue to raise teacher salaries. (In CA the average teacher, even on an emergency credential makes an average of maybe $35,000 or more - that's not a lot in CA, but it's certainly enough to rent an apartment and pay the bills.) The point is, an ordinary person with common sense, a good old-fashioned basic education (Just read any 19th century American writer and tell me they didn't have a good basic education!) will not be allowed near children until they have been politically indoctrinated for a long time. I went through a California state program and survived because I was an older person with plenty of prior classroom experience and developed opinions. But the 23-yr-old girls in the program mostly don't have a chance. This makes mega-bucks for universities, justifies a massive administration in State Ed, billions and billions of dollars in forcing teachers to go back again and again, and most of the time you're not really being taught how to teach math better (although a lot of the "in-house trainings" proclaim that) but how to be more sensitive, and tolerant, and multi-cultural, and how to think "globally". Schools have become behavior indoctrination centers rather than places of learning.

If you've seen any at all of what I've seen, try reading John Taylor Gatto's stuff. Just Google him.
You make some reasonably good points but, at least in the part of the country where I live, teachers are struggling with a bit of an identity crisis wherein they genuinely want to be considered "professionals" on par with doctors and lawyers. It would make sense that they should need the level of education to go with it. Then again, what are they really learning in those masters programs (at least in state universities)?

I certainly don't believe in all this political correctness and tolerance nonsense but I think we have to accept the reality that as the economy goes global the rest of society is going to have to follow suit. Hence the rise of international schools in many countries and the increased use of the International Baccalaureate Organization curriculum. Is this a good thing or a bad thing? I don't know. What I do know is that American schools are going to have to change or else American students are going to be so far behind even much of the developing world that they'll never be able to compete in the global job market beyond entry level, unskilled jobs.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rusmeister



Joined: 15 Jun 2006
Posts: 867
Location: Russia

PostPosted: Thu Jul 13, 2006 4:47 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Chancellor wrote:
You make some reasonably good points but, at least in the part of the country where I live, teachers are struggling with a bit of an identity crisis wherein they genuinely want to be considered "professionals" on par with doctors and lawyers. It would make sense that they should need the level of education to go with it. Then again, what are they really learning in those masters programs (at least in state universities)?

So does it then follow that the justification for creating more and more requirements before allowing anyone into the classroom is that teachers have an "identity crisis" and want to be considered professionals?
That is an awful rationalization, but that is part of the reason this is happening. The public reasons they keep adding on requirements is to "ensure quality", but from the union standpoint, publicly funded salaries equal to brain surgeons' is the goal. The various programs in Education (Master's, etc) are designed to make everyone believe that education is a horribly complex task that only the surgeon or nuclear technician dare approach the reactor core - rank nonsense to those who taught themselves, like Abraham Lincoln or Frederick Douglass, or to the homeschooled, like Laura Ingalls, who received a teacher's certificate, grades 1-3 at the age of 16.



Quote:
I certainly don't believe in all this political correctness and tolerance nonsense but I think we have to accept the reality that as the economy goes global the rest of society is going to have to follow suit. Hence the rise of international schools in many countries and the increased use of the International Baccalaureate Organization curriculum. Is this a good thing or a bad thing? I don't know. What I do know is that American schools are going to have to change or else American students are going to be so far behind even much of the developing world that they'll never be able to compete in the global job market beyond entry level, unskilled jobs.


Political correctness and tolerance are not nonsense - they are the expressions of a deliberate ideology that now controls our schools of Education (those who teach the teachers who teach the nation). They are perfectly sensible if your goal is to eliminate unpredictable Yankee entrepreneurialism and individual thought (for example, ones that object to universal tolerance and subjectivity) and create nation (or world) of compliant and predictable consumers with just enough learning to read basic advertising and propaganda. And why should a big institution (or you, for that matter) care about whether its charges (students) are able to "compete"? Why should you "have a job"? Enterpreneurs make their own jobs and own livelihoods. But that lifestyle competes with corporate profits. Who do you think funds the teacher programs?

Read at least the first page this link. If interested, do some more reading.

http://www.johntaylorgatto.com/historytour/history2.htm
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Chancellor



Joined: 31 Oct 2005
Posts: 1337
Location: Ji'an, China - if you're willing to send me cigars, I accept donations :)

PostPosted: Thu Jul 13, 2006 2:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

What it comes down to is the position of teachers within a society. Are they on a par with doctors, lawyers and other "professionals" as at least many of the ones in my part of the world assert? Considering that we (rightly or wrongly) entrust teachers with the responsibility of educating our children (whatever "educating" is supposed to mean these days, there does seem to be more political indoctrination and less real academic subject matter), should we not demand more from them (I'd be happy if they could read and write beyond the high school level)?

I'm not convinced that a master's degree should be a required prerequisite for teachers (except, perhaps, if they're teaching university undergraduates) but I do think we should require prospective teachers to be masters of the subjects they're teaching.

My daughter once had an English teacher who was still a college student with a C in English.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rusmeister



Joined: 15 Jun 2006
Posts: 867
Location: Russia

PostPosted: Fri Jul 14, 2006 4:45 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Your questions are core questions. Here's mine (to help in answering them):
Is the purpose of the schools to make teachers feel good or ensure a well-paid workforce of teachers?

Who should decide the 'requirements' for a teacher? People who really care about the children? Who really cares about your children?

Did you take a look at those links?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Chancellor



Joined: 31 Oct 2005
Posts: 1337
Location: Ji'an, China - if you're willing to send me cigars, I accept donations :)

PostPosted: Fri Jul 14, 2006 4:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

rusmeister wrote:
Your questions are core questions. Here's mine (to help in answering them):
Is the purpose of the schools to make teachers feel good or ensure a well-paid workforce of teachers?

Who should decide the 'requirements' for a teacher? People who really care about the children? Who really cares about your children?

Did you take a look at those links?
I didn't look at those specific links but I have read some of the things Mr. Gatto has said about his experience in the New York City public schools. At least as far as American schools are concerned, his experience simply affirms my Libertarian belief that schools should immediately be wrested from the hands of government.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rusmeister



Joined: 15 Jun 2006
Posts: 867
Location: Russia

PostPosted: Sat Jul 15, 2006 5:28 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

What those links are to is his more recent research of the history of public education in America. It provides answers to some of your earlier questions and comments.

Not to go with just one man's info/exp., try John Stormer's recent work "None Dare Call It Education". Also on target. His slant's a little more Evangelical, and was written/published in 1999 (so busts on education excesses of the Clinton admin) but the info is otherwise good and worth reading.

It's really hard for anyone to see all this without going through a State teacher program and seeing the indoctrination and lack of practical preparation there, working in a public school (preferably high school - that's where the fruits are most clearly seen) for a few years and seeing not only the results in the children but the systematic sabotage (staff meetings, etc) from the district, county and state, and then leave (so that you don't have a special incentive to shut your ears to the conclusions that thoughts like Gatto's will eventually lead you to - if the system is your bread and butter, you aren't going to want to talk about dismantling it and rebuilding from scratch no matter what it's doing to kids).

The trouble is getting anyone to listen. Teachers and admin don't want to hear it. Even though they know the system's messed up, it IS their bread and butter, so they'll only talk about reform. But they've been "reforming" it for 40 years!
Parents don't want to hear it. They need a babysitter, even if their kids aren't learning a thing except how to access the sex scenes in Grand Theft Auto from their friends. (This leads into why a consumer-driven economy wants both parents to "go to work" - as opposed to an agricultural/small-scale enterpreneurial one where a parent raises the children rather than the state)

So any info you read or present to others has to take into account not only the student experience, but the teacher experience - from the prep program to the classroom to the staff meetings - as well, which is why Gatto's work is so convincing. I was there; he was there, too. Finally, how did this monster system come about? The history of education. Definitely take a look at the links. The stuff is free and online.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
pollitatica



Joined: 20 Sep 2005
Posts: 82

PostPosted: Sat Jul 22, 2006 6:11 am    Post subject: PA Reply with quote

I know that in PA, you need your teaching cert and your ESL specialist certificate to teach in public schools. of course, a Masters is helpful, but it's not necessarily REQUIRED.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> General North America Forum All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

Teaching Jobs in China
Teaching Jobs in China