Site Search:
 
Get TEFL Certified & Start Your Adventure Today!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Classroom type vs. Distance learning
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Newbie Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
antonics



Joined: 19 Jul 2006
Posts: 1

PostPosted: Mon Jul 31, 2006 9:11 pm    Post subject: Classroom type vs. Distance learning Reply with quote

Hi,

Am about to take TESOL class soonest and am inclined to take distance learning instead of classroom type because there were some delays in the start of the classroom type of training owing to the fact that there were some students who backed out of the program leaving me alone which was not cost-effective for the school. (I hope they return my 50% downpayment!!!). I was able to locate a school within the Philippines which discouraged me from taking their classroom type of training for the same reason. I am about to embark on the distance learning but want to know the pros and cons. Distance leaning is much more affordable, i know, but what about the total scenario? Will i have less of a chance of getting a job because the TESOL certificate will reflect "distance learning"? The distance learning school accredited by ACTDEC will grant me associate teacher in TESOL. Will that already qualify me to teach abroad? Appreciate anyone who can clarify the picture. Best regards.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
ls650



Joined: 10 May 2003
Posts: 3484
Location: British Columbia

PostPosted: Mon Jul 31, 2006 9:30 pm    Post subject: Re: Classroom type vs. Distance learning Reply with quote

antonics wrote:
Will i have less of a chance of getting a job because the TESOL certificate will reflect "distance learning"?

What kind of job are you looking for? Any school willing to accept a generic TEFL certificate isn't likely to ask if it is distance or not.

Personally I would recommend a classroom-based course simply to gain experience teaching real students.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Justin Trullinger



Joined: 28 Jan 2005
Posts: 3110
Location: Seoul, South Korea and Myanmar for a bit

PostPosted: Tue Aug 01, 2006 3:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

When hiring teachers, I might accept a "generic TEFL qualification," as there are a lot of them around. But I would research exactly what the course involved.

A good course has:
Highly qualified trainers
at least 100 hours of classroom time
observed teaching practice (6 hours minimum, but more is good)

There are not many online courses that meet any of these requirements, let alone all of them.

I would only consider hiring the holder of an online cert that didn't meet these requirements if the teacher had other experience and qualifications. For example, I have a teacher working for me now (and she rocks!) who has an online cert. As she also has a degree in education, and several years classroom experience, I would have hired her, certificate or no certificate. But if she only had the online qualification, she'd have never made it to the interview stage.


Best,
Justin
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Chancellor



Joined: 31 Oct 2005
Posts: 1337
Location: Ji'an, China - if you're willing to send me cigars, I accept donations :)

PostPosted: Tue Aug 01, 2006 6:35 pm    Post subject: Re: Classroom type vs. Distance learning Reply with quote

ls650 wrote:
antonics wrote:
Will i have less of a chance of getting a job because the TESOL certificate will reflect "distance learning"?

What kind of job are you looking for? Any school willing to accept a generic TEFL certificate isn't likely to ask if it is distance or not.

Personally I would recommend a classroom-based course simply to gain experience teaching real students.
Obviously a distance TEFL course isn't going to be able to provide a teaching practicum but I can't see why it would make any difference whether one learned the rest of it by sitting in a classroom or sitting at home in front of your own computer. Obviously, since teacher training just isn't complete without a real teaching practicum, one should seek out opportunities (after getting the online training) to put that training to work in a classroom through volunteer teaching or by taking in something like i-to-i's onsite advanced courses in Spain and Thailand.

As for course content, here's the online course content from i-to-i:

Module 1 (2-3 hrs approx) : Student Motivation, Teacher Roles & EFL Methodology
Module 2 (6-8 hrs approx) : Grammar Awareness
Module 3 (3-4 hrs approx) : Classroom Management & Student Levels
Module 4 (6-8 hrs approx) : How to teach Grammar
Module 5 (4-5 hrs approx) : How to teach Vocabulary
Module 6 (3-4 hrs approx) : Observe & analyse a teacher in action (on DVD ROM)
Module 7 (1-2 hrs approx) : How to teach Speaking and Writing Skills
Module 8 (4-5 hrs approx) : How to teach Reading and Listening Skills
Module 9 (5-6 hrs approx) : Games & Lesson Planning
Module 10 (1hr approx) : Information & Resources

Additional modules also available for purchase (these are optional):
Young Learners (5 hrs approx) : Designed specifically for those who expect to teach young learners (6 - 12 year olds) overseas.
Business English (6 hrs approx) : Designed to help you teach to those who wish to develop their communication skills for business or professional purposes.
Teaching with Limited Resources (4 hrs approx) : has been developed to assist teachers who do not have access to modern equipment, adequate course materials and other teaching aids or for teachers who work or expect to work in developing countries.

There's also a 20-hour grammar awareness module that is not online but, instead, is a workbook that one must complete and send in to be graded.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Chancellor



Joined: 31 Oct 2005
Posts: 1337
Location: Ji'an, China - if you're willing to send me cigars, I accept donations :)

PostPosted: Tue Aug 01, 2006 6:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Justin Trullinger wrote:
A good course has:

at least 100 hours of classroom time

Since online courses are done online, how do you imagine such courses would include classroom time?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Glenski



Joined: 15 Jan 2003
Posts: 12844
Location: Hokkaido, JAPAN

PostPosted: Tue Aug 01, 2006 10:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Module 7 (1-2 hrs approx) : How to teach Speaking and Writing Skills
Module 8 (4-5 hrs approx) : How to teach Reading and Listening Skills

Interesting disparity in the number of hours allotted for these, let alone the grouping (speaking and writing? reading and listening?).

Oh, heck, an hour to tell someone everything there is to know about teaching Speaking, and then coffee, followed by another 60 minutes for training on Writing. Yeah, that'll about do. Gimme a break.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Calories



Joined: 17 Jun 2005
Posts: 361
Location: Chinese Food Hell

PostPosted: Wed Aug 02, 2006 12:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Dude, don't worry about it. You'll probably be fine with that. Do which ever course you feel you want to do. A lot of people on this board are upitity about their teaching qualifications because a lot of people on this board don't have any. Like me! Er, I mean, I got the oxford seminar which is way less work than that course. Got me a job no problem. Besides, if you get yourself a job as an "oral english teacher" then you don't need to worry at all.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Justin Trullinger



Joined: 28 Jan 2005
Posts: 3110
Location: Seoul, South Korea and Myanmar for a bit

PostPosted: Thu Aug 03, 2006 4:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Since online courses are done online, how do you imagine such courses would include classroom time?


Erm, I don't. That was my point.



Best,
Justin
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Chancellor



Joined: 31 Oct 2005
Posts: 1337
Location: Ji'an, China - if you're willing to send me cigars, I accept donations :)

PostPosted: Fri Aug 04, 2006 1:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Justin Trullinger wrote:
Quote:
Since online courses are done online, how do you imagine such courses would include classroom time?


Erm, I don't. That was my point.



Best,
Justin
So, by classroom time, do you mean as a student sitting in a classroom or as someone doing a teaching practicum. If the latter, show me even one course that specifically requires a 100-hour or more teaching practicum.

It's time for you to join the rest of us in the 21st century where sitting in a classroom is slowly being replaced by alternative methods of instruction.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Chancellor



Joined: 31 Oct 2005
Posts: 1337
Location: Ji'an, China - if you're willing to send me cigars, I accept donations :)

PostPosted: Fri Aug 04, 2006 1:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Glenski wrote:
Quote:
Module 7 (1-2 hrs approx) : How to teach Speaking and Writing Skills
Module 8 (4-5 hrs approx) : How to teach Reading and Listening Skills

Interesting disparity in the number of hours allotted for these, let alone the grouping (speaking and writing? reading and listening?).

Oh, heck, an hour to tell someone everything there is to know about teaching Speaking, and then coffee, followed by another 60 minutes for training on Writing. Yeah, that'll about do. Gimme a break.
Notice that the times are approximate. These are estimates of how long it would take an individual to complete the modules.

You foolishly assume that courses, online or otherwise, teach you "everything there is to know." Show me even one onsite course that teaches you "everything there is to know" about TEFL.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
tw



Joined: 04 Jun 2005
Posts: 3898

PostPosted: Sun Jun 10, 2007 9:02 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Beware of Oxford Seminars job placement service for its graduates! You are better off finding a job yourself. I activated my job placement service in May 2005 and the so-called coordinator never took the initiative to contact me other than to confirm that she had received my activation and later, the documents needed to process my case. I was told a recruiter had been working on my behalf to find me a job but I never heard from this recruiter, or any others that the coordinator later told me she had given my documents to. When I e-mailed her, she told me that because (1) I was not a university degree holder and (2) because of my Chinese background the recruiter was having a difficult time finding positions for me. She also used this excuse that because I had "insisted" on working in Dalian it made things more difficult. That was of course a lie because I had only said that my preferance was Dalian, but never did I say Dalian ONLY. As for the no-degree and Chinese-face problems, I received plenty of job offers from my own job searches and even had to turn down a few contracts before deciding on well-paying job in a northeastern Chinese university last year.

The Oxford Seminars course is useful for anyone without any teaching experience. To me it was just spending some money to buy a piece of paper in order to increase my marketability.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
GambateBingBangBOOM



Joined: 04 Nov 2003
Posts: 2021
Location: Japan

PostPosted: Mon Jun 11, 2007 7:22 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I've never taken their course, but I have known several people who have, and they've found really good jobs in Japan (where I met and worked with them), as well as in Toronto (even though they didn't have the supposedly required year long training from a community college or university- and it is this latter that I have. Note: private language schools can hire whoever they want). All of them have had university degrees, though.

I think the story the previous poster was getting may well have been exactly the position that the company felt they were in.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ktodba



Joined: 02 Aug 2006
Posts: 54
Location: UK

PostPosted: Mon Jun 11, 2007 10:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Are you looking for a 'qualification' that will allow you to get a job somewhere or are you interested in a qualification / course that will help you once you are in the classroom? An online course's suitability for employment will be determined by the individual customer but as far as developing as a teacher goes there's no substituite for experience in the classroom - there's always something different in a classroom from a training course and knowing how to react to the unexpected comes from in class experience first and foremost.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
JDYoung



Joined: 21 Apr 2003
Posts: 157
Location: Dongbei

PostPosted: Tue Jun 12, 2007 3:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Teaching is a people-skill. You learn people-skills by interacting with, duh, people. You learn in the classroom by making mistakes, learning from them and learning from the mistakes of others. It's a trifle difficult to do that on-line. Personally I think lots of courses can be learned on-line but teaching isn't one of them.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Justin Trullinger



Joined: 28 Jan 2005
Posts: 3110
Location: Seoul, South Korea and Myanmar for a bit

PostPosted: Wed Jun 13, 2007 5:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

There are some very well respected distance teaching qualifications. I'm considering a distance MA, and there are some pretty good names in the field.

I feel this option won't really be less effective than an on-site Masters, because it will allow me to stay in my own working environment, with my own students, and apply what I learn to my own classroom, then reflect on it with the feedback and evaluation of an experienced tutor. (Who will probably be in a different country.)

As a working teacher, I may choose this option, because it lets me keep working, avoiding the major "loss of income" cost of an on-site program.

BUt for a cert, it's a little different. Most people doing the cert aren't currently working as teachers. So most of what they learn on the cert is applied to...nothing. It remains purely theoretical, until they get their first jobs, where they are applying theory to practice for the first time, and their students are paying for it. This is true, even of a good online course.

But let's be honest. Most online certs aren't good. Most aren't even intended to be good. Most are intended to separate you from a few hundred dollars, and to do it in such a way that you believe you're getting value for money. And to pretend that their "qualification" is equivalent to or the same as the standard set by the on-site TESOL courses. (CELTA, Trinity, SIT) They aren't. And even these on-site courses are an entry level minimum. They don't "teach you all there is to know," nor anything like it. When they're good, the best of them teach you enough to start teaching without having too many disasters, and to learn from those disasters. That's all.

Quote:
It's time for you to join the rest of us in the 21st century where sitting in a classroom is slowly being replaced by alternative methods of instruction.


Thanks for the invite. I'm happy to join you. I'm NOT opposed to distance learning, or untraditional learning situations, in ANY way. But I am opposed to garbage disguised as a teaching qualification. Which is what most online certs add up to. I'm also opposed to misleading customers, which many online certification companies are guilty of. (By claiming, either overtly or through appearances, to offer an "equivalent" qualification for a lot less money, when it simply isn't equivalent.) I'm opposed to educational programs that don't work, whether the intention is fraudulent, or not. And, having worked with a lot of teachers over the years, I've come the conclusion that online certs are not a good bet.

Apologies to any of you who are involved in a truly high quality online certificate program. I've seen some. They do exist. But if you've done your homework, and are knowledgeable enough about the field to have chosen a good one, I assume that nothing I've written here is news to you.

Doing a first qualification in teaching at distance is a bad bet.


Best,

Justin


Last edited by Justin Trullinger on Mon Sep 17, 2007 6:39 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Newbie Forum All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

Teaching Jobs in China
Teaching Jobs in China