|
Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
kykysha
Joined: 19 Aug 2006 Posts: 5
|
Posted: Mon Aug 21, 2006 4:19 am Post subject: Expat? |
|
|
I am currently a US citizen and am thinking of becoming an expat. I researched as much about it on the internet as I could. But there are a few things I was unable to find, and am hoping someone here can answer a few questions for me?
First, how exactly do you *become* an expat? That is the one thing I could find no mention of anywhere.
Second, what are the benefits of being an expat? I.E are you faced with less travel restrictions, like visas and such? Are you allowed much more freedom in travel, and what if you find a place you like and decide to put down roots?
My main interest lies in Odessa, Ukraine, which is my main reason for posting in this forum. But from there I would like to travel other places as well.
Thanks for any help you may have to offer. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
PeterBar
Joined: 20 Jul 2006 Posts: 145 Location: La France profonde
|
Posted: Mon Aug 21, 2006 7:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
You become an expat by leaving your home country and living/working in another country. I think you are maybe confusing the word 'expat' with the idea of becoming a permanent resident.
You can travel whenever and wherever you want in the world as long as you can pay the fares and obtain any necessary visas.
You can actually choose where you want to live as long as you register with the authorities. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
BrianPBG
Joined: 31 Oct 2005 Posts: 5 Location: bowleys quarters
|
Posted: Mon Aug 21, 2006 11:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Like Peter stated, to "become" an expat, it would require simply a passport, and a visa to travel to Ukraine. But, having a few thousand $'s, and an opportunity doesn't hurt.
Mind you, most expats are there because of circumstances that led one way or another to finding a job in which ever country they ended up in. Some popular jobs include engineering, IT jobs, and teaching English.
Benefits, financially at least, would include an $80,000 tax exemption from US taxes. In the case of Ukraine, a $100,000 exemption and instead, has you pay a monthly tax rate; roughly $50. If you meet a crazy broad, you can always move to another country, and in Odessa there are a lot of em.
However, it seems, like Peter eluded, that maybe you believe an expat is someone who gives up his primary citizenship, and is seeking permanent citizenship somewhere else. That is a whole different topic. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
kykysha
Joined: 19 Aug 2006 Posts: 5
|
Posted: Tue Aug 22, 2006 1:43 am Post subject: hrmm |
|
|
Well, you are right in that I am wanting to give up my citizenship, but not necisarilly (I really can spell, honest) looking for citizenship anywhere else.
What is the difference, between an expat and an immigrant? I know that as an immigrant I would have to file for immigration status. But as an expat? Just go to another country and say 'Oy! I don't want to be american anymore, think I'll stay here awhile'
And thanks much for your informative replies! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
PeterBar
Joined: 20 Jul 2006 Posts: 145 Location: La France profonde
|
Posted: Tue Aug 22, 2006 4:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
To give up your American citizenship without becoming a citizen of another country would make you "Stateless"
I suggest that you really do not want to find yourself in that situation.
Maybe it would be a good idea if you look in a dictionary for the meanings of these words, and then consider the implications.
An immigrant is someone who leaves his own country and goes to live permanently in another country - just like all those people who left Germany, England, Ireland Russia and many other countries in order to cross the Atlantic to settle in N.America.
Last edited by PeterBar on Thu Aug 24, 2006 10:25 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
expatella_girl
Joined: 31 Oct 2004 Posts: 248 Location: somewhere out there
|
Posted: Tue Aug 22, 2006 5:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
Methinks kykysha is an extremely young and naive tadpole. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
kykysha
Joined: 19 Aug 2006 Posts: 5
|
Posted: Thu Aug 24, 2006 5:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
I see, sorry to have bothered you. I'll go elsewhere with my naive questions. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
maruss
Joined: 18 Mar 2003 Posts: 1145 Location: Cyprus
|
Posted: Thu Aug 24, 2006 10:14 am Post subject: giving up U.S. nationality etc... |
|
|
With millions of people worldwide desperate to obtain citizenship of western countries,it does seem very odd, not to say unwise for someone to want to give theirs up, especially to go and live in somewhere like Ukraine or Eastern Europe!By all means go abroad and emigrate if you are fed-up where you are-I left the U.K. in 1979-but I cannot see any reason to give up your nationality?-and that definitely applies to anyone going to Russia! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
maruss
Joined: 18 Mar 2003 Posts: 1145 Location: Cyprus
|
Posted: Thu Aug 24, 2006 10:22 am Post subject: Odessa |
|
|
I have a good friend who was originally born in Odessa and defected to the U.S.A. when he had the chance back in the Soviet era!He has now retired there but still keeps his U.S. passport and told me he values it like he values his life!He also, at 66 , married a 28 year old woman from there last year and keeps asking me to visit him, preferably without my wife as he promises I will not be lonely in Odessa! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Deicide

Joined: 29 Jul 2006 Posts: 1005 Location: Caput Imperii Americani
|
Posted: Thu Aug 24, 2006 1:02 pm Post subject: Is he taking the piss? |
|
|
kykysha wrote: |
I see, sorry to have bothered you. I'll go elsewhere with my naive questions. |
Sorry but when I read this post I seriously thought that the lad was taking the piss? I mean...what are the benefits of being an ex-pat? Well as a (former) American myself I can say, you become much, much cooler than the gits back home with their large scale loans, down payments, bland and boring fucking lives in the same spot as they grew up and of course you get to see the world...I have been an ex-pat for 8 years now...at times it's hard but the languages I have learned and the people I have met have made it all the more worth it...mate, do get out of the states if you can...it is a shithole and the most insular country in the west...sorry about to go off on my anti-american from an american rant...I'll stop |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
rusmeister
Joined: 15 Jun 2006 Posts: 867 Location: Russia
|
Posted: Fri Aug 25, 2006 4:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
I thought it was pretty obvious that kykysha (kukusha?) simply didn't understand the meaning of the term "ex-pat". No sense jumping on her (him?) about it.
Deicide is largely right in that we choose a life that is different from that of our friends and family back home, and we feel (in lesser or greater degrees) a sense of separation from that home and that life. The only thing I would disagree with is your signature, D.
I feel like the hobbits felt on returning to the Shire at the end of the Lord of the Rings (book, not movie). I've grown and changed. They haven't. I understand them. They no longer understand me. Being an expat tends to broaden your view of the world considerably. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
kykysha
Joined: 19 Aug 2006 Posts: 5
|
Posted: Fri Aug 25, 2006 11:56 pm Post subject: Oy |
|
|
well, I did take it to personally, was in a bad mood sorry
Basically, what I was trying to figure out is what exactly *is* an expat.
When I searched google all I could find was general info, how long they have to pay US taxes, how much they have to pay etc.
I was wondering how they support themselves, going from country to country, how hard it was to obtain visas etc.
For those who are curious, I don't mind sharing my reasons. I've become disenchanted with the beuracracy(sp?) government meddling and basically all the b.s I spent some time trying to invison where we where headed, and came to the conclusion that my path lay in a different direction. No family ties here, spent most my time traveling around the US. Now I want to travel outside, and see what else is out there.
As for why I want to start in Ukraine, I have several friends that I would like to visit. I know that if I ever got in trouble or needed help I could count on them when I needed. So I wanted to start there.
And yes, kykysha = kukusha (nickname one of my friends in Ukraine gave to me I am starting to understand better, and I thank you for your replies and patience with a expat noob  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Deicide

Joined: 29 Jul 2006 Posts: 1005 Location: Caput Imperii Americani
|
Posted: Sat Aug 26, 2006 7:26 am Post subject: Without theological debate, why do you disagree with my sig? |
|
|
rusmeister wrote: |
I thought it was pretty obvious that kykysha (kukusha?) simply didn't understand the meaning of the term "ex-pat". No sense jumping on her (him?) about it.
Deicide is largely right in that we choose a life that is different from that of our friends and family back home, and we feel (in lesser or greater degrees) a sense of separation from that home and that life. The only thing I would disagree with is your signature, D.
I feel like the hobbits felt on returning to the Shire at the end of the Lord of the Rings (book, not movie). I've grown and changed. They haven't. I understand them. They no longer understand me. Being an expat tends to broaden your view of the world considerably. |
Just curious...I also agree with you on everything but the signature ...but I have learned not to engage theists in deabte, they simply are not open minded enough to other ideas...best... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
rusmeister
Joined: 15 Jun 2006 Posts: 867 Location: Russia
|
Posted: Sat Aug 26, 2006 11:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
Being open-minded is not always good when it means being open to mistakes, like 2+2=5 or a peach pit will yield an apple tree, just as tolerance is not always good when one speaks of tolerating the poisoning of one's body.
GK Chesterton and CS Lewis will slaughter Roberts or any other champion of atheism you'd care to field.
It is not that Deists are closed minded; it's that (those that have reasoned it out) have a much better handle on what to be open-minded about. Denying reason is not something I'll be open-minded about.
En garde!  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Deicide

Joined: 29 Jul 2006 Posts: 1005 Location: Caput Imperii Americani
|
Posted: Sun Aug 27, 2006 6:26 am Post subject: Yes well, en garde back... |
|
|
rusmeister wrote: |
Being open-minded is not always good when it means being open to mistakes, like 2+2=5 or a peach pit will yield an apple tree, just as tolerance is not always good when one speaks of tolerating the poisoning of one's body.
GK Chesterton and CS Lewis will slaughter Roberts or any other champion of atheism you'd care to field.
It is not that Deists are closed minded; it's that (those that have reasoned it out) have a much better handle on what to be open-minded about. Denying reason is not something I'll be open-minded about.
En garde!  |
Until I know whether you are a Theist or a Deist I will find this difficult to reply to. You should clarify your position first. If you are a Deist I can almost see it working. It is Theism that I cannot agree with. However based on what you wrote it seems that you equating the existence of God with logical axioms such as 2+2=4 or that water by definition is composed of 2 hydrogen atoms and 1 oxygen atom. This aasumption is specious and quite simply silly. To begin with if the existence of your Sun God were as evident and rational as you seem to imply he would be an acknowledged fact the world over, much as everyone agrees that wolves,whales and cockaroaches exist or recognise the necessity of consuming food as sustenance and drinking water to preserve one's life. We do not see this and the thousands of disparate religions, deities and faiths throughout mankind's history and in the present lend absolutely no credence to the a priori assumption you are making, in fact they do much the opposite as they suggest that the 'fact' as you see it is a matter of subjective perspective and choice on an individual level. I assume that you are advocating the Christian Sun God known to most as Jesus Christ (as suggested by your quotes and your use of Chesterton). Using C.S. Lewis and Chesterton as Champions of the Christian faith is a commonly used tactic and they have been 'slaughtered' by enough atheists. Take Bertrand Russell instantly comes to mind:
"If I were to suggest that between the Earth and Mars there is a china teapot revolving about the sun in an elliptical orbit, nobody would be able to disprove my assertion provided I were careful to add that the teapot is too small to be revealed even by our most powerful telescopes. But if I were to go on to say that, since my assertion cannot be disproved, it is intolerable presumption on the part of human reason to doubt it, I should rightly be thought to be talking nonsense. If, however, the existence of such a teapot were affirmed in ancient books, taught as the sacred truth every Sunday, and instilled into the minds of children at school, hesitation to believe in its existence would become a mark of eccentricity and entitle the doubter to the attentions of the psychiatrist in an enlightened age or of the Inquisitor in an earlier time."-Bertrand Russell
http://www.positiveatheism.org/hist/russell0.htm
"The reason organized religion merits outright hostility is that, unlike belief in Russell's teapot, religion is powerful, influential, tax-exempt and systematically passed on to children too young to defend themselves. Children are not compelled to spend their formative years memorizing loony books about teapots. Government-subsidized schools don't exclude children whose parents prefer the wrong shape of teapot. Teapot-believers don't stone teapot-unbelievers, teapot-apostates, teapot-heretics and teapot-blasphemers to death. Mothers don't warn their sons off marrying teapot-shiksas whose parents believe in three teapots rather than one. People who put the milk in first don't kneecap those who put the tea in first."-Richard Dawkins
With all due repect good sir asserting a priori that your Sun God is axiomatic given is simply unwise and naive. You profess not to be open minded and thus I do not think you will examine the history behind Sun God you worship as the Son of Man, nevetheless if you do take a look at the history you will realise that Yeshua (Jesus Christ) is simply an amalgem of gnosticism, pagan hero/deity cults and bears a striking resemblance to virtually all of the myths regarding saviour deities.
http://www.askwhy.co.uk/christianity/0310SunGod.html
You probably won't read it but if you do you will realise that there is litle unique about the Christian deity. I shall post something of my own from another expat site to further show you the true history of your deity.
Of course if you are a Deist and not a Theist then there really is no point to this...you still need to clarify this position...best |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling. Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|