|
Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Was your CELTA or equivalent course worth it? |
| Yes |
|
70% |
[ 19 ] |
| No |
|
29% |
[ 8 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 27 |
|
| Author |
Message |
fluffyhamster
Joined: 13 Mar 2005 Posts: 3292 Location: UK > China > Japan > UK again
|
Posted: Fri Dec 20, 2013 7:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
I think we had that covered with the TESOL part. Don't tell me you've also been counting letters, Shroob!  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kurtz
Joined: 12 Mar 2008 Posts: 518 Location: Phaic Tan
|
Posted: Fri Dec 20, 2013 9:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Worth it in terms of learning a lot in the 4 weeks, but it was cheapened by how easy it was to pass. One guy in my group was an absolute train wreck. He failed at least 3 lessons, was obviously crazy and did some terrible things like bang his fist on the board and lose his temper and they gave him a pass. Got to have higher standards than that, but I guess it doesn't look too good for the Cambridge course if too many punters fail; they will lose people to the competition. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
spiral78

Joined: 05 Apr 2004 Posts: 11534 Location: On a Short Leash
|
Posted: Fri Dec 20, 2013 2:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| Got to have higher standards than that, but I guess it doesn't look too good for the Cambridge course if too many punters fail; they will lose people to the competition. |
Good example of how all courses really do not apply the same standards. I have known literally dozens of trainees who didn't pass.
I can recall a few who lost their temper similarly to what you describe and no way would they be sent out with a stamp of approval to teach, honestly - far too much risk that they will snap at students or co-workers in the future. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
fluffyhamster
Joined: 13 Mar 2005 Posts: 3292 Location: UK > China > Japan > UK again
|
Posted: Fri Dec 20, 2013 3:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| The poll could do with a "Not sure" option. I often forget to vote in these polls, and was inclining towards a tentative "Yes" when I noticed someone had cast a "No" vote (would be interesting to know who and why etc, but they probably wish to remain anonymous LOL). I therefore finally cast a "No" vote to keep this other dissenter company, and people were likely assuming he or she were me, so I was damned either way. Anyway, a minority to be sure (could've told you that without the poll, Spiral), no contesting that! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
smithrn1983
Joined: 23 Jul 2010 Posts: 320 Location: Moscow
|
Posted: Fri Dec 20, 2013 8:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| D-M wrote: |
Im yet to see or read about another way TBH. And the conversations I have with colleagues here in China kinda lack substance for me ... 'Well, if the students dont want pair work and want you to explain 30 news words per lesson, just do it man!', doesnt cut it for me. |
While maybe not exactly the same thing, I have had many students who have only learned English with local English teachers. Where I've taught this generally involves a huge focus on grammar and only cursory attention paid to speaking or even vocabulary. What vocabulary is taught is often taught in list format, and may or may not be reinforced by a single reading or listening assignment.
The problem with this style of teaching, I find, is that students often completely divorce grammar from meaning. They seem to have no idea that the present perfect, to take one example, actually means something. They're simply running through a list of rules in their heads and trying to find the one that fits best. All the different parts of the language (grammar, lexicon, syntax, morphology) are still separate in the students' heads, and they have no idea how they all fit together. CELTA's more communicative methods help here, but I'm not sure they're foolproof. I'm still working on how to break this habit among some of my students.
| D-M wrote: |
Teacher training for me = setting aims that could be achieved. Rely on student TT rather than teachers. Giving students a greater role in the structure and administration of the lesson. Understanding language and how it relates to students. The elimination of simple yet common teacher mistakes. |
I think this structure works well with students from a European background. My limited experience teaching students from Asia taught me that they expect structure to come from the teacher. I think culture plays a huge role in how much student input you can use in course structure. If a culture demands that the teacher know everything, it can be difficult to engage in course-designing dialogue with the students. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sashadroogie

Joined: 17 Apr 2007 Posts: 11061 Location: Moskva, The Workers' Paradise
|
Posted: Sat Dec 21, 2013 12:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
While it is true that local culture will influence decisions taken by teachers, I'm not convinced that this ever should affect teacher knowledge. Basic knowledge of parts of speech, for example, is essential no matter where one is based. However, knowing it is distinct from how one teaches it.
It is not, it seems to me, a simple case of Europeans accepting student-centred lessons, and that Asians rejecting them. I think it is more to do with Europeans, generally, having plenty of experience of this type of language learning, but usually only after a local teacher chalked and talked them past the basics. Most Europeans can see the value of student-talking time, but not all of them do. Plenty, in Russia, for example, will still expect their teacher to have a commanding role in all interactions. It is here that learner-training is crucial. Pointing out the rationale for an activity goes a long way to gaining the co-operation of the class. Explaining that a teacher monitoring is still an active teacher reassures learners that they aren't being neglected. Comparing self-discovery presentations to explicit grammar presentations can help learners see the underlying logic of not just lecturing. All this is commonplace in European contexts, but I'm not so sure it is so in Asia. Perhaps others can clear that up.
In any case, from what I have gleaned, class number is probably the overriding factor affecting choices made in classrooms. If you have over 20 learners in a group, forget tefltastic notions like above. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
smithrn1983
Joined: 23 Jul 2010 Posts: 320 Location: Moscow
|
Posted: Sat Dec 21, 2013 7:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Sashadroogie wrote: |
While it is true that local culture will influence decisions taken by teachers, I'm not convinced that this ever should affect teacher knowledge. Basic knowledge of parts of speech, for example, is essential no matter where one is based. However, knowing it is distinct from how one teaches it.
|
I think you've misunderstood my meaning, Sasha, and I should have been more clear. When I wrote that certain cultures "demand that the teacher know everything" I was actually thinking of the students who abdicate any responsibility for deciding the course material, and expect the teacher to design the entire course by themselves. I always make it a point to find out my students' goals in the first lesson so I can design the course around these goals. I've had more than a few students (even at intermediate levels and above) tell me, "You are the teacher. You know what we need. We will study what you prescribe." Most of the time, the students said this right after I'd met them, and I had only the foggiest idea of what they needed to learn.
As for grammar knowledge, you are absolutely right, most esteemed comrade Sasha. There is no excuse for a teacher not knowing the parts of speech, when to use which verb tense, or why the words go in this order and not that, etc. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sashadroogie

Joined: 17 Apr 2007 Posts: 11061 Location: Moskva, The Workers' Paradise
|
Posted: Sat Dec 21, 2013 8:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Fair enough - I probably misunderstood something. I'm doing that a lot these days. Must be all the winter medicine I am taking, hic!
But back to the point of planning a course for learners. First up, I do not think this features that much in Celta or equivalents. Or does it? Perhaps my brain cells really have been depleted...
In any case, asking learners what they think the course should be comes across to many of them like a dentist asking which tooth should be crowned, e.g. unprofessional, and lacking in insight. Much more acceptable is to tap on a tooth with a sharp surgical instrument and ask if it hurts, while reeling off arcane medical jargon to your nurse : )
Similarly, for TEFLers, a lot of determining course needs seems to depend on how information is gathered. Rather than saying "do you think we should study telephone English then?" it can be more productive to ask if using the telephone is important in the line of work, and then later on explaining that the course you have planned will include this feature.
This is especially so for Russian learners, at least in my humble experience, but other TEFLers in other contexts may have another approach. But I'd be surprised if many teachers from any context say that learners have a fully worked out plan for their teacher to follow, or any plan at all beyond 'learning English'.
More medicine is required. Carry on! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Shroob
Joined: 02 Aug 2010 Posts: 1339
|
Posted: Sun Dec 22, 2013 7:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Sashadroogie wrote: |
But back to the point of planning a course for learners. First up, I do not think this features that much in Celta or equivalents. Or does it? Perhaps my brain cells really have been depleted...
|
If I remember correctly, my CELTA featured a lesson (90 minutes I think) on curriculum design.
Though should it have this in the first place? The CELTA is an entry level qualification, how realistic is it to expect entry level teachers to be in charge of curriculum design? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nomad soul

Joined: 31 Jan 2010 Posts: 11454 Location: The real world
|
Posted: Sun Dec 22, 2013 9:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Shroob wrote: |
| If I remember correctly, my CELTA featured a lesson (90 minutes I think) on curriculum design. Though should it have this in the first place? The CELTA is an entry level qualification, how realistic is it to expect entry level teachers to be in charge of curriculum design? |
I doubt the objective of a short, introductory curriculum design component is to prepare entry-level teachers to confidently develop/design curriuculum. However, since it focuses on the "what" students should learn (i.e., the outcomes and assessed learning objectives), curriculum design is quite relevant to teaching in terms of planning and designing effective lessons. Granted, some EFL teachers work off of established lesson plans (if at all), so they're not likely to have perceived curriculum design as an important element of their CELTA/TEFL training. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sashadroogie

Joined: 17 Apr 2007 Posts: 11061 Location: Moskva, The Workers' Paradise
|
Posted: Sun Dec 22, 2013 12:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| So, not much of a look-in for curriculum design beyond a basic introduction to what it is, and no expectation that a recently minted Celta trainee would have half a clue how to plan a course from scratch. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Shroob
Joined: 02 Aug 2010 Posts: 1339
|
Posted: Sun Dec 22, 2013 6:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Sashadroogie wrote: |
| So, not much of a look-in for curriculum design beyond a basic introduction to what it is, and no expectation that a recently minted Celta trainee would have half a clue how to plan a course from scratch. |
That's my point, they probably won't know how to compile a course but at the same time they shouldn't be expected to.
| nomad soul wrote: |
| I doubt the objective of a short, introductory curriculum design component is to prepare entry-level teachers to confidently develop/design curriuculum. However, since it focuses on the "what" students should learn (i.e., the outcomes and assessed learning objectives), curriculum design is quite relevant to teaching in terms of planning and designing effective lessons. Granted, some EFL teachers work off of established lesson plans (if at all), so they're not likely to have perceived curriculum design as an important element of their CELTA/TEFL training. |
Yes, that's what I'm trying to say. Curriculum design is relevant in that it's the 'framework for lessons', but it's something that should be given to (or created in combination with DOS or senior teachers) the newly qualified teacher, not something they should be expected to create solo. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sashadroogie

Joined: 17 Apr 2007 Posts: 11061 Location: Moskva, The Workers' Paradise
|
Posted: Sun Dec 22, 2013 7:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Agreed. And in any reputable institution, new teachers would not be expected to do so. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nomad soul

Joined: 31 Jan 2010 Posts: 11454 Location: The real world
|
Posted: Sun Dec 22, 2013 9:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Shroob wrote: |
| Curriculum design is relevant in that it's the 'framework for lessons', but it's something that should be given to (or created in combination with DOS or senior teachers) the newly qualified teacher, not something they should be expected to create solo. |
But that isn't a CELTA course issue. Problems involving the expectation of teaching duties/responsibilities are between the employer and the teacher, especially if they're in conflict as to what the teacher can realistically carry out (based on his/her level of skills) versus the "impossible dream." |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Shroob
Joined: 02 Aug 2010 Posts: 1339
|
Posted: Mon Dec 23, 2013 1:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| nomad soul wrote: |
| Shroob wrote: |
| Curriculum design is relevant in that it's the 'framework for lessons', but it's something that should be given to (or created in combination with DOS or senior teachers) the newly qualified teacher, not something they should be expected to create solo. |
But that isn't a CELTA course issue. Problems involving the expectation of teaching duties/responsibilities are between the employer and the teacher, especially if they're in conflict as to what the teacher can realistically carry out (based on his/her level of skills) versus the "impossible dream." |
Which is my point, I never said it should be part of the CELTA. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling. Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|