View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
johnslat

Joined: 21 Jan 2003 Posts: 13859 Location: Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA
|
Posted: Mon Sep 08, 2014 7:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Dear Capt Lugwash,
"Chief among other native English dialects are Canadian English and Australian English, which rank third and fourth in the number of native speakers. For the most part, Canadian English, while featuring numerous British forms alongside indigenous Canadianisms, shares vocabulary, phonology and syntax with American English, leading many to recognize North American English as an organic grouping of dialects.[10] Australian English likewise shares many American and British English usages alongside plentiful features unique to Australia, and retains a significantly higher degree of distinctiveness from both the larger varieties than does Canadian English."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_American_and_British_English
Regards,
John |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Capt Lugwash
Joined: 14 Aug 2014 Posts: 346
|
Posted: Mon Sep 08, 2014 7:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Your point being?
Wikipedia (which can't even spell its name right) is the sole authority?
Give over. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
johnslat

Joined: 21 Jan 2003 Posts: 13859 Location: Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA
|
Posted: Mon Sep 08, 2014 7:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Dear Capt Lugwash,
If you can't see my point (and Wikipedia lists its sources), it must be because I'm writing in American.
Regards,
John |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Sashadroogie

Joined: 17 Apr 2007 Posts: 11061 Location: Moskva, The Workers' Paradise
|
Posted: Mon Sep 08, 2014 7:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Some interesting technical terms abounding here. Top class linguistics! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Capt Lugwash
Joined: 14 Aug 2014 Posts: 346
|
Posted: Mon Sep 08, 2014 7:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quite possibly. I do not subscribe to Wiki for anything other than a quick reference. I prefer my facts to be just that, facts and not somewhere you, I and Joe Soap can amend only to be later emended by an unpaid volunteer.
American is an alien language and should be recognised as such. After all, with the help of the French you won your independence (ungrateful to say the least) and then proceeded to snub the "special relationship" so why on earth don;t you simply declare your language to be American? America thinks it governs the world anyway so what is there to lose? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Sashadroogie

Joined: 17 Apr 2007 Posts: 11061 Location: Moskva, The Workers' Paradise
|
Posted: Mon Sep 08, 2014 8:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Facts are fairly thin on the ground here : )
But the opinions are STRONG! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Capt Lugwash
Joined: 14 Aug 2014 Posts: 346
|
Posted: Mon Sep 08, 2014 8:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Didn't take long for the omniprescent wasp to come to the jam jar. There is absolutely nothing under the sun it has no opinion on, is not an expert on or is better qualified for.
All hail! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Sashadroogie

Joined: 17 Apr 2007 Posts: 11061 Location: Moskva, The Workers' Paradise
|
Posted: Mon Sep 08, 2014 8:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Facts still thin. But the ante is upped... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Capt Lugwash
Joined: 14 Aug 2014 Posts: 346
|
Posted: Mon Sep 08, 2014 8:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The facts are there for anyone to see. American uses different words and expressions or do I really have to start listing them?
Probably, so here are a few:
Horseback riding/horse riding (we normally only ever ride on the back of a horse)
Sidewalk/kerb
Progrfam/programme (except when referring to computers)
Hood/bonnet
Trunk.boot
Faucet/tap
Restroom/toilet
Fender/bumper
Wiener/God knows
The list goes on.
The facts are that the USA would never have won the war of independence were it not for French aid and yes, recently the special relationship was snubbed by I believe Kerry but of course you know everything so I am farting into a force ten gale. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Sashadroogie

Joined: 17 Apr 2007 Posts: 11061 Location: Moskva, The Workers' Paradise
|
Posted: Mon Sep 08, 2014 8:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
What language do they speak up north? Those canny fellows with their thees and thous. Different pronouns! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Capt Lugwash
Joined: 14 Aug 2014 Posts: 346
|
Posted: Mon Sep 08, 2014 8:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I do believe they are not nouns? And besides that, thee and thou for your information (although as the board expert you already know) are quite accepted albeit archaic nomenclatiure for us. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
wangdaning
Joined: 22 Jan 2008 Posts: 3154
|
Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2014 1:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
Are you sure the terms you expressed are used throughout the UK/US?
Of course, we use horse riding, how else would you ride a horse if not on its back. Never in my life have I heard someone say horse back riding (I could imagine some people from a large city saying it though).
The language is English, I would doubt the sincerity of calling it that at this time. It seems more like a mix of non-English languages. What does native English sound like? I mean without all the borrowed words and grammar. Is it Celtic? Or are you just pretending? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
likwid_777

Joined: 04 Nov 2012 Posts: 411 Location: NA
|
Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2014 2:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
Don't worry, the interconnectedness of the world is going to slowly diminish the differences of these dialects anyway. I remember when "bro" started to be used widely Down Under, many were deemed "wiggas" for using this type of 'Merican talk. Now almost every country uses it, no big deal. Those two to five hundred years which we colonials/convicts were away from the mother ship was what gave us the different accents, idioms and slang. With the internet and exported TV and film, English is only going to become more homogenised. The Aussie dialect is only the most "distinctive" because Brits and 'Mericans are not exposed to Australian TV, film and music. Aussies grow up with a lot of British and 'Merican film, TV and music, so we know it, and the accents. Even if Aussies make a film or music video clip, it is often tailored for the 'Merican audience. For example, I saw a music video the other day where cash was handed over in the clip, and the wad was of green bills, not our own colourful notes.
We are familiar with your accents and sayings, whereas you are not familiar with ours. As (post-European invasion/settlement) Australians try to move away from a "national identity" which met its peak in the 1980s (in my opinion), these unique aspects of our language are being used less and less. Most (sub)urban Aussies decided that our identity was too base, backward or loutish, and now want to be "sophisticated" ie *beep* men with no balls toting man bags. So what I'm trying to say is, that even if one uses Aussie slang, he will often be met with a raised eyebrow from the new wave of Australians, who are disappointed that someone is highlighting a charade of sorts. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Sashadroogie

Joined: 17 Apr 2007 Posts: 11061 Location: Moskva, The Workers' Paradise
|
Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2014 4:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
Capt Lugwash wrote: |
I do believe they are not nouns? And besides that, thee and thou for your information (although as the board expert you already know) are quite accepted albeit archaic nomenclatiure for us. |
The point is that it is nothing unusual to see a few nouns here and there that vary from place to place. But fundamental units like pronouns would make for stronger evidence for a 'different language'. Therefore a case could be made that those northern types speak a different language altogether. So, I'm not sure who you mean by 'us' - hardly a homogenous grouping even in England proper.
And as it happens, quite a few so-called Americanisms are archaic forms that were once accepted in Britain too. I read that in a book in university. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Sashadroogie

Joined: 17 Apr 2007 Posts: 11061 Location: Moskva, The Workers' Paradise
|
Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2014 4:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
Nomenclatiure? Is that a typo or an archaic spelling? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|