View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
The Fifth Column

Joined: 11 Jun 2014 Posts: 331 Location: His habitude with lexical items protrudes not unlike a damaged pollex!!!
|
Posted: Thu Oct 02, 2014 11:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
I'm pretty sure we can't advantage of the educational allowance anyway as our children are not yet school age. |
Ya think? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
HS123
Joined: 23 Sep 2014 Posts: 8
|
Posted: Thu Oct 02, 2014 12:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
If we could take the educational allowance and use it to fund nursery fees I'd be delighted, but the feedback I've had so far suggests this is not possible. Do you know anyone who gets the allowance for kids under 5 and, if so, from which employers? Thanks. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
nomad soul

Joined: 31 Jan 2010 Posts: 11454 Location: The real world
|
Posted: Thu Oct 02, 2014 12:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
HS123 wrote: |
Do you know anyone who gets the allowance for kids under 5 and, if so, from which employers? |
Nope. Those with non-school aged children pay out-of-pocket for a nanny. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
HS123
Joined: 23 Sep 2014 Posts: 8
|
Posted: Thu Oct 02, 2014 12:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Realised that The Fifth Column was probably being sarcastic - sorry |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
The Fifth Column

Joined: 11 Jun 2014 Posts: 331 Location: His habitude with lexical items protrudes not unlike a damaged pollex!!!
|
Posted: Thu Oct 02, 2014 2:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
HS123 wrote: |
Realised that The Fifth Column was probably being sarcastic - sorry |
Not nearly as sarcastic as singles or "barren" couples. While I was there, it was neverending recriminations about those of us who procreate that the added costs of schooling and more than one-two tickets home every year was the main reason that all of us didn't receive regular raises...
Doesn't seem that you can please anyone... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
veiledsentiments

Joined: 20 Feb 2003 Posts: 17644 Location: USA
|
Posted: Thu Oct 02, 2014 9:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
And then we singles got to hear from mommies/mummies who thought that we should arrange our teaching schedules and/or cover their classes to accommodate their little darlings' schedules. And we should cover for them at holidays so they could be with them. etc... etc.. I informed them that unless my pay was supplemented - preferably directly from theirs - I wasn't planning to do their work for them just because they had reproduced.
And then there were the two (or was it three) month maternity leaves that all of us got to cover for no extra pay. At one employer we had at least one teacher out on maternity leave every semester for 4 years.
Do I need to go on?
VS |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
The Fifth Column

Joined: 11 Jun 2014 Posts: 331 Location: His habitude with lexical items protrudes not unlike a damaged pollex!!!
|
Posted: Fri Oct 03, 2014 12:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
Do I need to go on? |
Please do!
Seriously, though. You're referring to selfish, uncouth people. The wife & I, after watching these types act just the way you describe, resolved AND operated under the "theory" that others had no hand in our decision to have a child and, rightly so, should not be tasked with suffering from his crying and so forth. Our kid was always entertained by us, sometimes in shifts, during his waking hours on those long flights and I can honestly say NEVER bothered a slumbering passenger.
Those who allow their children to bother or effect others should be ashamed of themselves.
I could go on, but my head wouldn't fit through the door... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
hamergirl
Joined: 17 Sep 2007 Posts: 32
|
Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2014 8:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
Wow VS, bitter much? Those of us with children greatly appreciate the "family first/child friendly" mentality here. Of course teaching/proctoring schedules should be made to accommodate families - it's how things work here. I have never heard of maternity leave having to be covered without pay at any of the three main universities here. Also, maternity leave is only 8 weeks, and when you were working here it was only 6.
Birth rates in the west are plummeting - largely due to the disdain with which families and children are treated there. This region's love of children and respect for the family is something they do very very right. It's a lovely place to raise a family. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
veiledsentiments

Joined: 20 Feb 2003 Posts: 17644 Location: USA
|
Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2014 1:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Bitter? No, that isn't the term that I would use, but everyone gets sick and tired of doing someone else's work for no extra pay... while having to listen to them whinge about how they are mummies and shouldn't have to do any of the extra work during evenings and weekends, and we single people should have to do it because we don't have any responsibilities to our families. Well sorry "mommy/mummy" but we have the same contract and you are the ones who chose to have children.
Same as one covers classes when any teacher is sick without extra pay - as stated in all the contracts, none of the 3 government universities and one private paid...
VS |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
spiral78

Joined: 05 Apr 2004 Posts: 11534 Location: On a Short Leash
|
Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2014 1:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
Birth rates in the west are plummeting |
Arguing this issue from facts rather than sentimentality indicates that falling birth rates (within some limits) are extremely beneficial overall. The demographics of the (overly) family-friendly Middle Eastern region produce dire economic and social forecasts for both short and long-term future of the region.
I'm with VS. - and with 5th. Column as a rational and responsible parent - on this one.
Last edited by spiral78 on Wed Oct 08, 2014 5:17 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
nomad soul

Joined: 31 Jan 2010 Posts: 11454 Location: The real world
|
Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2014 2:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
hamergirl wrote: |
Those of us with children greatly appreciate the "family first/child friendly" mentality here. Of course teaching/proctoring schedules should be made to accommodate families - it's how things work here. |
I hope you have also shown appreciation to your childless colleagues who, at times, have had to step in and cover for you.
There's certainly nothing wrong with an employer being family friendly. However, it shouldn't come at the expense of those who are childless whether by personal choice or involuntarily, who usually end up getting a raw deal when accommodating colleagues with children. The point is that all employees should be treated equally as well as compensated fairly. Anyway, considering education benefits for children aren't as generous as they were years ago, perhaps some see that as one way to equal things out. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
johnslat

Joined: 21 Jan 2003 Posts: 13859 Location: Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA
|
Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2014 2:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Let's also get angry at the institutions themselves, which rather than having sensible and fair procedures in place, shift the onus onto the teaching staff.
They are the real villains here.
Regards,
John |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
spiral78

Joined: 05 Apr 2004 Posts: 11534 Location: On a Short Leash
|
Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2014 5:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Dear John:
As you're aware, these things are so strongly culturally based....
The Netherlands is also extremely family-friendly and childless teachers are often expected to take up the inevitable slack when children require attention during work time.
I agree there should be a better way - those of us who are childless are not second class, though we're all-too-often treated that way.
Best,
spiral |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
johnslat

Joined: 21 Jan 2003 Posts: 13859 Location: Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA
|
Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2014 8:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Dear spiral87,
Well, culturally-based can cover a multitude of . . . . . behaviors, at least some of which could be, in my opinion, unfair treatment.
Lest I be accused of being "culturally-insensitive," let me make it clear that I include ALL cultures in that statement, and that, yes. I am also aware that my views of what's just and fair are very subjective and - you guessed it -culturally-based (and, no doubt, biased, as well).
Regards,
John |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
The Fifth Column

Joined: 11 Jun 2014 Posts: 331 Location: His habitude with lexical items protrudes not unlike a damaged pollex!!!
|
Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2014 9:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
In the army, we called this a field promotion!  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|