Site Search:
 
Get TEFL Certified & Start Your Adventure Today!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Myers-Briggs, personality & teaching
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> General Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Aramas



Joined: 13 Feb 2004
Posts: 874
Location: Slightly left of Centre

PostPosted: Sat Aug 28, 2004 3:17 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Jungian psychology is rather fascinating, but I tend to think of it as a quasi-mystical modernist cult that has more in common with scientology than with science.

Introversion/extaversion are Jungian concepts that have been absorbed into the language with simplified and erroneous meanings.

From the Carl Jung web page at Shipton http://www.ship.edu/~cgboeree/jung.html/, courtesy of Dr. C. George Boeree;

Quote:
Introversion and Extroversion

Jung developed a personality typology that has become so popular that some people don't realize he did anything else! It begins with the distinction between introversion and extroversion. Introverts are people who prefer their internal world of thoughts, feelings, fantasies, dreams, and so on, while extroverts prefer the external world of things and people and activities.

The words have become confused with ideas like shyness and sociability, partially because introverts tend to be shy and extroverts tend to be sociable. But Jung intended for them to refer more to whether you ("ego") more often faced toward the persona and outer reality, or toward the collective unconscious and its archetypes. In that sense, the introvert is somewhat more mature than the extrovert. Our culture, of course, values the extrovert much more. And Jung warned that we all tend to value our own type most!


I'm an INTP, as was Socrates, Descartes, Pascal, Newton, Einstein, and of course, Carl Jung

(Excuse the typos - I had an accident at work on tuesday that severed all of the tendons in the back of my right hand, and my left hand isn't the sharpest tool in the shed.)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
laodeng



Joined: 07 Feb 2004
Posts: 481

PostPosted: Sat Aug 28, 2004 8:16 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Spot on! I don't think anyone in mainstream psychology takes Jungian typology seriously these days. Not only is is Myers-Briggs based on this typology, it is simplistic in the extreme (my opinion).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Will.



Joined: 02 May 2003
Posts: 783
Location: London Uk

PostPosted: Sat Aug 28, 2004 9:00 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well it proves a couple of things this test.

I am insecure enough to take it.
I am stupid enough not to understand the results yet.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jojo_rock



Joined: 04 Jun 2004
Posts: 9

PostPosted: Sat Aug 28, 2004 4:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

This is me. It's interesting, but mostly just confirmed what I know about myself already. It also said I'd make a good teacher so WOO! confidence for me! I'm in the right job!

ESFJ

slightly expressed extrovert

moderately expressed sensing personality

moderately expressed feeling personality

slightly expressed judging personality


In response to what Ben said "My results are above. I agree that I'm definitely an introvert socially, but I don't see myself as an introvert as a teacher in the classroom.

Can our personalities change (without being schizo) depending on the particular situations we're in?"

I personally find that my personality changes in the classroom. I tell people what to do, I perform, I am centre of attention. Normally I hate doing those things
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
moonraven



Joined: 24 Mar 2004
Posts: 3094

PostPosted: Sat Aug 28, 2004 5:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

A couple of thoughts--for the person who said that mainstream psychology doesn't take Jungian concepts seriously: what are you calling mainstream psychology? Psychology encompasses everything from experimentally based learning research--what we called running the rats in the 60 and 70s--to depth psychology, psychometrics, and so on. Jungian psychology is still very influential--second only to Freudian in its influence--as the number of Jung Societies around the world indicate. If more people did a bit of reading about Archetypes, for example, perhaps the world would not be in the state of unconscious chaos in which we find it. If more of us understaood what the Shadow is--individually, nationally, culturally, we would not have to project it onto others 24/7, but could integrate it and live and let live.

I take exception to the idea of changing personalities in the classroom. Especially in regard to "being the center of attention". It is not the job of a teacher to be the center of attention, but to create--through a dialog--conscious students (and in the process become conscious as well.)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
JosephP



Joined: 13 May 2003
Posts: 445

PostPosted: Sat Aug 28, 2004 5:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

INTP, for what's worth.

My home is quite tidy and orderly, but my desk is a mess. My classes start off with the best of intentions, but then one thing leads to another and zoom...off on a tangent. Are these really attributes of INTP types?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Deborann



Joined: 20 Oct 2003
Posts: 314
Location: Middle of the Middle Kingdom

PostPosted: Sat Aug 28, 2004 7:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

You still need to be aware that type changes according to situations and time. What you see yourself today in a particular situation is not what you are in different situation.

The shadow side is very important - and given very little exposure!!

If you read Jungs works there is a lot more than a simplistic four letter definition of a personality.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Aramas



Joined: 13 Feb 2004
Posts: 874
Location: Slightly left of Centre

PostPosted: Sun Aug 29, 2004 12:11 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

There is extraordinary depth to Jung's stuff, but the symbolism is rather overwhelming. Personally I'm not in the habit of wandering around in my grey matter looking for a young girl guarding a pond, or a heavily armed dwarf. Still, it takes all sorts.

Whatever can be said about the weirder bits, Jung's typology is surprisingly accurate. The description of INTP's at intp.org http://www.intp.org/intprofile.html is so accurate it's scary. The descriptions at http://www.typelogic.com/ are also good, if somewhat brief. If nothing else, Jungian typology supercedes the zodiac Razz

As for the crux of the Jungian biscuit, it provides the most elegant vehicle for comparitive mythology that I've encountered.

Oh, and Deb - What happened to you? Have you discovered a decaf that doesn't taste like Yarra water? I happen to enjoy the caffeine rush of several Lavazza espressos, but then I'm not inclined to explosive verbal diarroea Razz Mine just kind of dribbles out chock full of chunky bits of unwholesome goodness Shocked
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
double agent



Joined: 18 Jun 2003
Posts: 152
Location: In the wild wild west

PostPosted: Sun Aug 29, 2004 1:14 am    Post subject: i took it Reply with quote

i took it and it was long and spread over
several daYS




oh ya and my academic comfort level is PHd which I would have to agree. The fact that I can not bare to be around unread people is something I struggle with.
The meek shall inherit the earth.... mmmm...i doubt it.

I think it was several different IQ tests it was years ago...so I can't recall,


mmmmmmm....

Summary in layman terms.
Intelligent foker who doesn't like annoying gits.
In other words, I m the one in the bar getting wrecked and sputtering
orders. Ya thats right. I am your TESL teacher roaming country to country starting my own tesl student cult.
Twisted Evil Twisted Evil Twisted Evil Twisted Evil Twisted Evil Twisted Evil Twisted Evil Twisted Evil


Last edited by double agent on Tue Aug 31, 2004 8:58 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Snoopy



Joined: 13 Jul 2003
Posts: 185

PostPosted: Sun Aug 29, 2004 7:52 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Moonraven wrote "I never enter a classroom without a written plan". Has Moonraven, in many years of experience, never had to do "doorhandle preparation"? Sometimes you have to take a class at a moment's notice, or else you know exactly what you are doing to follow on from the previous lesson and are not suffering from senile dementia.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Bet



Joined: 14 May 2004
Posts: 354

PostPosted: Sun Aug 29, 2004 9:09 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

INFP. Did this years ago with a roomful of TESL colleagues ... very interesting to see a group in this light. It can help to think this way when there's conflict in the workplace. People can accept the behaviour of others more easily by saying, "Oh, well, that's because they're a such-and-such type." Also helps in putting teams together.

I believe it's an accurate description of me, or is that just me as I see myself ?

I have a feeling (or intuition ?! ) that most TESOL teachers would be introverted, though the sample in China might not be representative.

For classroom and some other practical purposes I'd like to be more judge than perceiver but 'tis not how I am made...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
moonraven



Joined: 24 Mar 2004
Posts: 3094

PostPosted: Sun Aug 29, 2004 5:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Uh--Snoopy, not only do I not suffer from senile dementia (I have almost unlimited contempt for jokers like you who know absolutely squat but insist that wisdom comes with youth and not from experience), but I do not accept taking classes at a moment's notice--and if I did find myself in that position--which would be highly doubtful--I have been teaching and PREPARING CLASSES for enough years to have an appropriate class planned out on one of my lesson plan cards--the larger size index cards are great for that. (When I was teaching and directing a Harmon Hall language school here in Mexico--where our books frequently fell apart--one of my students restitched my books, and even incorporated my lesson plan cards in the binding process!)

Not only is it a slap in the face to students to have them put up with an unprepared teacher trying to improvise a class, it is downright foolish on the part of the teacher. Of course there are arrogant improvisers out there who think that all they have to do is speak English in the classroom and they have given a class. I have not had any qualms of conscience about firing those ESL parasites.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jpvanderwerf2001



Joined: 02 Oct 2003
Posts: 1117
Location: New York

PostPosted: Mon Aug 30, 2004 5:20 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Of course there are arrogant improvisers out there who think that all they have to do is speak English in the classroom and they have given a class. I have not had any qualms of conscience about firing those ESL parasites.


moonraven,

Arrogant? Pot, meet kettle. Kettle, pot.

I would be remiss if I did not stand at awe in the wake of your obvious superior intellectual capacities, impeccable teaching abilities and extraordinary test-taking abilities (re: the infamous perfect SAT score).

Geez, are you this pompous while instructing your students?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
moonraven



Joined: 24 Mar 2004
Posts: 3094

PostPosted: Mon Aug 30, 2004 2:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Green continues to be NOT your color.

My students receive no pomposity from me--they are respectful, work their butts off in my classes, have a great time learning, and know a good thing when they see it. In short, they are smart. I reserve pomposity for folks who are not so smart....and who deserve to receive it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jpvanderwerf2001



Joined: 02 Oct 2003
Posts: 1117
Location: New York

PostPosted: Mon Aug 30, 2004 3:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Green continues to be NOT your color.
In short, they are smart. I reserve pomposity for folks who are not so smart....and who deserve to receive it.


moonraven,

You either mistakenly (and inexplicably) think I'm envious (of you?!) or have me confused with a muppet.

Please be careful you don't throw out your shoulder while patting your own back.

Oh, and I would be curious as to how you decide if someone is "smart" or not. Are you the judge? If so, by what mandate? Will you ever answer one of my questions?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> General Discussion All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Page 2 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

Teaching Jobs in China
Teaching Jobs in China