|
Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
jonjack
Joined: 05 Apr 2005 Posts: 34 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Sat Apr 09, 2005 12:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
Its not how much agents cost schools its the fact that the money paid to agents comes out of the same budget as teacher expenses. There is no way to argue this except to say that agents get money that should go to teachers. You do not need to be a mental giant to see that, just put yourself in the position of a school owner.
When there were basically no agents, good teachers could negotiate much higher starting wages.
If you are trying to say the cost of living in Taiwan is exactly the same as in 1990, thats just a bad case of imagining the jar is half full. ie chronic denial.
Spending the money in country is a joke. You can argue that in some countries people go there for the experience but in the case of Taiwan the reputation around the world was always "it a good place to make/save money". Not "its a good place but only if you intend to spend your savings on night market sausage"!
Face facts, there are two basic reasons why wages stagnated then dropped, aside from the local economic factors which are less significant anywar so far.
1. Agent recruiting and it affects.
2. Related to the above, the advent of the internet which facilitates far more direct overseas recruiting and draws in far more teachers generally.
Thats correct there was pre-internet civilization.
When I arrived in Taiwan in 1991, there was lonely planet guides, networking, word of mouth, english language news papers, but only two then and one of the existing two didn't really count.
A taiwan beer at seven 11 was 16NT and one at a Shita area pup was basically 70-90NT.
Rent was a little cheaper than now in Taipei but much cheaper in Taichung.
Clothes like jeans were cheaper and those tasty little steaks with the egg on top with pasta was 80 NT not 150-180 or more like you see now.
Now don't turn me into a consumer guide, just take thoes as some of the examples I noticed this past year, there are endless examples.
To save the money we were saving and as easily as we were saving it you would have to make in the neighbourhood of 900NT per hour or better today.
IF you want to think that the situation has improved or maintained for teachers economically you are free to do so.
Aristotle I hope you are younger than I am because these people can really tire a person out.
/JJ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TaoyuanSteve

Joined: 05 Feb 2003 Posts: 1028 Location: Taoyuan
|
Posted: Sat Apr 09, 2005 3:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
So, Jonjon, if you are in Canada, how is it that you supposedly know so much about local economic conditions right now? If you are not simply Aristotle smerfing (and I see no denial from you on this), why do you send support for the guy in every message you've written here? Perhaps you'd like to comment on his society and his work advisories?
I'm not going to debate the salary freeze idea. That's perhaps one of A's more lucid points. Foreign exchange is also a concern, and a valid one. Most of us don't intend to be here for life. Sooner later, we want to cash in. If the nt falls too much in comparison to US and Canadian dollars, we lose alot. Freeze? Possibly. Declines? I haven't seen that. Schools haven't dropped their wages, at least as far as I've seen. They haven't raised them, either. 600 per hour jobs are commonplace. 650 ones are little harder to come by. 700 and above? Much harder; and often what is expected in terms of time and effort for these positions makes them less worthwhile than a lesser paying job.
I guess what I'm saying is I'm with you...somewhat. Whoever you are. Word got out long ago that Taiwan is a lucrative teacher's market. Schools now have numerous applicants for positions. They aren't desperate. Expectations are higher; teachers are expected to do more and the employers aren't under pressure to raise wages. And so they don't. Numerous threads have popped up in the last couple years about wages and job availability. Go over to Forumosa.com and see a thread titled "salaries" in their English teaching forum. I'd post a link, but I admit that I'm just too lazy. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jonjack
Joined: 05 Apr 2005 Posts: 34 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Sat Apr 09, 2005 6:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
I know something about the current situation because I make annually visits to Taiwan. I know the past situation because I lived there for many years.
I never said anything about blank cheque endorsements for Aristotle. I did say that he seems to have some historical insight on the esl market in Taiwan and that is refreshing.
As far as his warning/adviseries are concerned, we are probably alot better off for having someone like him around than not. I understand that he has been written off by many as an alarmist, etc. fine.
I say give me more like him.
/JJ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TaoyuanSteve

Joined: 05 Feb 2003 Posts: 1028 Location: Taoyuan
|
Posted: Sat Apr 09, 2005 8:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| we are probably alot better off... |
How so JonJack? How is it that someone so new to these boards as you knows so much about Aristotle as to come out in support of the guy? Not everything he says is total trash, but it often seems like the guy's on another planet.
http://www.eslcafe.com/forums/job/viewtopic.php?t=8741&highlight=
Here is one of many of his "warnings." He is, as usually, pilloried by people actually living here. But perhaps we are all wrong. Please make specific references to his advisories and show how these warnings are anything more than paranoid scare mongering and are, unbeknownst to the rest of us clueless idiots, factually correct. Please also enlighten us as to his "historical insight" (again making direct references) that the rest of us seemingly lack. Please show me. I've been reading these boards for quite a while. I want to know what I've missed. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jonjack
Joined: 05 Apr 2005 Posts: 34 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Sat Apr 09, 2005 11:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
What makes you think I'm new to the board? Do you think everyone who reads also posts, and on every part of the site they read?
About Aristotle now.
I still have a couple of good foreign friends in Taiwan who are teachers.
Neither of them seem too interested in the internet. Both have been in Taiwan for many years.
I have told both of them about this site and others like it. When explainig it to them I mentioned Aristotle to one of them. What he does or says he does etc. They were both very impressed and one of them was actually relieved, sort of a "finally someone..." type of attitude.
I could not remember anything specific about Aristotles postings but they loved the concept. On a later call I was able to tell one of them about a specific Aristotle posting which was a little bazarre. We had a great laugh.
He still loves the concept though.
But please, dont reconstruct your reality on my account TS. Maybe you or the majority you are self elected to represent are correct. Maybe the most useful thing we can do is tell newbies that Kaoshiung is hotter than Taoyuan.
/JJ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TaoyuanSteve

Joined: 05 Feb 2003 Posts: 1028 Location: Taoyuan
|
Posted: Sat Apr 09, 2005 12:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| Maybe you or the majority you are self elected to represent... |
Err... I don't claim to represent anyone. Aristotle has the self proclaimed teacher's association and claims to represent all.He's the one issuing "official" work advisories. Someone claims to represent everyone and it isn't me. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jonjack
Joined: 05 Apr 2005 Posts: 34 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Sat Apr 09, 2005 1:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It looks like we scared Aristotle off of this part of the board anyway.
Look at my other posting on the Tai/Chi cross straight question. I am hoping to see some interesting stuff on that board.
/JJ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Pop Fly

Joined: 15 Feb 2003 Posts: 429
|
Posted: Wed Apr 13, 2005 1:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
| jonjack wrote: |
What makes you think I'm new to the board? Do you think everyone who reads also posts, and on every part of the site they read?
/JJ |
Joined: 05 Apr 2005
Posts: 14
Location: Canada
Yeah, I wonder what makes us think you are a :newbie:????? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
clark.w.griswald
Joined: 06 Dec 2004 Posts: 2056
|
Posted: Wed Apr 13, 2005 3:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
For me, it's the lack of any originality or information of any relevance in the posts made by jonjack that makes me think that he isn't who he suggests he is.
His constant mention of Aristotle in each of his posts means most likely that he is either:
a. Aristotle
b. Has an Aristotle fetish
I don't consider that this person is as he claims - just someone who supports Aristotle and finds his posts informative.
The fact is that each time Aristotle makes a post here, it is soon followed by a chorus of 'please explains' with reasons given as to why the opinion given by him is floored. Aristotle NEVER answers these concerns with anything of any substance, nor admits that he is wrong, even when it is proved that he is indeed wrong.
If jonjack is just an Aristotle groupie as he claims, then that says more about his inability to identify good information, than it does about Aristotle ability to disseminate quality information.
| jonjack wrote: |
| Its not how much agents cost schools its the fact that the money paid to agents comes out of the same budget as teacher expenses. There is no way to argue this except to say that agents get money that should go to teachers. You do not need to be a mental giant to see that, just put yourself in the position of a school owner. |
This is not correct. The involvement of agents has not resulted in a lowering of teachers wages per se. My earlier questions stands - if by this logic schools who used agents were paying teachers less in order to cover the out of pocket expense of the agents services, then schools who don't use agents would be offering more. If this were the case then there would be a clear discrepancy between wages offered through agents, and those offered by schools who advertise and deal with teachers directly. A quick look at any site that contains job vacancies will show that this clearly isn't the case.
The only time that an agencies involvement could result in teachers getting less in their pocket is agents who collect the teachers wages from the school and skim off the top before paying this to the teacher. For obvious reasons these agents are best avoided.
If dealing through an agent then sign a contract with the school directly and collect your pay from the school. There is no extra security offered by letting the agent do this for you.
| jonjack wrote: |
| When there were basically no agents, good teachers could negotiate much higher starting wages. |
Good teachers can still do this, but the emphasis is on good. Just because you are a qualified teacher or just because you have been teaching for however long doesn't automatically make you a good teacher. I think that there are many characteristics of good teachers, but unfortunately far too many people get hung up on the above two.
The effectiveness of these negotiations in the current market has nothing to do with agents, but more to do with the current high supply of teachers. If you are the best teacher in world then the school will want you, but if you are asking for twice as much as the next guy who is half as good, then most schools will probably go with the cheaper guy.
| jonjack wrote: |
| If you are trying to say the cost of living in Taiwan is exactly the same as in 1990, thats just a bad case of imagining the jar is half full. ie chronic denial. |
Don't misquote me as I didn't state this. What I did state is that the cost of living (for me) hasn't changed that much except for the cost of gas. Everything else seems pretty much the same as it was years ago. I am sure that some things have gone up marginally, but not to the degree that I notice it. Despite this, my average take home pay has more than doubled in the last three or fuur years I kid you not!
So, no discernable difference in the costs of living, but a big jump in salary for me personally.
| jonjack wrote: |
| Spending the money in country is a joke. You can argue that in some countries people go there for the experience but in the case of Taiwan the reputation around the world was always "it a good place to make/save money". Not "its a good place but only if you intend to spend your savings on night market sausage"! |
You may want to spend your money on sausages but I prefer to invest.
I have made a reasonable amount of money in the real estate market here. I'm not rich by any stretch, but my money is safely tied up in my name with property investments that I buy and sell semi-frequently. I didn't bring any money into the country to do this, and all of my money from my pre-Taiwan days is invested in stocks back home (Unfotunately no property!) By doing this I have a steady income from my investments that I can either choose to let sit even if I return home, or sell and take the money out when the exchange rate is more favorable.
No one is saying that they wouldn't prefer a more favorable exchange rate, but there are things that you can do with your money in country in order to increase your income here. May as well make the best of situation that come to hand I say, rather than whinge and complain about them.
| jonjack wrote: |
| Face facts, there are two basic reasons why wages stagnated then dropped, aside from the local economic factors which are less significant anywar so far. |
Let me ask you again. Where is your evidence that teachers wages in Taiwan have dropped. I don't see it and this is because this is incorrect.
Stagnation of wages I partly agree with. There has not been a consistent increase in wages for new foreign teachers, however longer term teachers are now getting paid more reasonably.
This 'stagnation' is probably due to:
1. More teachers in the market therefore more supply but the same demand.
2. The fact that wages for new teachers were already relatively high years ago when compared with foreign teachers wages in other parts of Asia. The wages in Taiwan have not doubt held steady as they had to. Schools couldn't afford to increase them, nor was it really necessary for them to increase. Teachers made money here before and they still do.
| jonjack wrote: |
| IF you want to think that the situation has improved or maintained for teachers economically you are free to do so. |
I don't think this, I know it. Foreign teachers in Taiwan are now better off than they ever have been. Sure wages have remain constant but they are still well above the locals wages and higher than the foreign teachers wages in other Asian countries. The convenience of living in Taiwan has increased ten fold in the last several years, but the costs of living have only increased marginally.
Getting a job is not as easy as it used to be, but good teachers are still in high demand, and even average teachers can make decent savings here and live a decent life. Those that work the market well can really come out on top and this has always been the attraction of Taiwan for many. Illegals and lazy teachers with bad attitudes are the ones that are being squeezed out, and these are the ones that are crying foul. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jonjack
Joined: 05 Apr 2005 Posts: 34 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Wed Apr 13, 2005 6:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
I did not know that the law regarding foreign investment in real estate
had changed in the ROC.
Unless you are flipping property through a Chinese proxy this is something
that was not possible in the past.
I would love to know the details as to how this is possible.
As far as teachers wages - in 1991 I made 1280 NT per hour which was a net pay with the 20% and of course the later reduction to 10% in taxes paid by the company.
1991 is a long time ago Clark.
Aristotle is priceless. WE sure could have used hime back then, of course the internet was unheard of relative to now and you were'nt born yet.
/JJ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jonjack
Joined: 05 Apr 2005 Posts: 34 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Wed Apr 13, 2005 6:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
I did not know that the law regarding foreign investment in real estate
had changed in the ROC.
Unless you are flipping property through a Chinese proxy this is something
that was not possible in the past.
I would love to know the details as to how this is possible.
As far as teachers wages - in 1991 I made 1280 NT per hour which was a net pay with the 20% and of course the later reduction to 10% in taxes paid by the company.
1991 is a long time ago Clark.
Aristotle is priceless. WE sure could have used hime back then, of course the internet was unheard of relative to now and you were'nt born yet.
/JJ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TaoyuanSteve

Joined: 05 Feb 2003 Posts: 1028 Location: Taoyuan
|
Posted: Wed Apr 13, 2005 7:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
JonJack, I asked you to provide some evidence as to how Aristotles posts, specifically his "advisories," are anything more than scare mongering. You haven't done this, so I have to assume you have no such evidence.
| Quote: |
| Aristotle is priceless |
Now I know you're a troll... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
clark.w.griswald
Joined: 06 Dec 2004 Posts: 2056
|
Posted: Wed Apr 13, 2005 7:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
| jonjack wrote: |
I did not know that the law regarding foreign investment in real estate had changed in the ROC.
Unless you are flipping property through a Chinese proxy this is something that was not possible in the past. I would love to know the details as to how this is possible. |
Well if you are interested in this then I suggest that you spend some time researching property ownership in Taiwan. In short, foreign nationals are allowed to own property here in Taiwan and do not need a Chinese partner for this.
| jonjack wrote: |
| As far as teachers wages - in 1991 I made 1280 NT per hour which was a net pay with the 20% and of course the later reduction to 10% in taxes paid by the company. |
Well good for you jonjack. But you are not trying to suggest that this was the norm back then are you? The wage that you refer to was obviously an above average wage, just as NTD1,200 per hour is above average today. There are jobs that still pay this but they are few and far between, just as I suspect they were back when you arrived.
From my own personal experience that dates back to 1995, wages are actually higher now than they were when I first arrived, but not much higher. It would seem odd that they were much higher in 1991, went down considerably in 1995, and have been on a slow but steady increase since then. But even if this is so, it still negates your claim that wages are lower now than in the past.
| jonjack wrote: |
| 1991 is a long time ago Clark. |
Yes it is so why do you keep referring back to then. Why not relate to us some of your more recent experience here in Taiwan.
| jonjack wrote: |
| Aristotle is priceless. WE sure could have used hime back then, of course the internet was unheard of relative to now and you were'nt born yet. |
So you were here in 1991, which is fourteen years ago. I can assure you that I am older than 14!
Anyway, I am still waiting for some source to support your continued claim that wages collected by foreign teachers in Taiwan are down on the whole. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jonjack
Joined: 05 Apr 2005 Posts: 34 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Wed Apr 13, 2005 1:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
My wage was on the high side for esl wages.
But as I said several posts ago, the average back then was about 500
NT net. From What I see on the internet esl wages still net about the same.
So the only argument that wages are even the same would be if there has been zero inflation for 15 years, which is not the case according to the following East Asian scholars listed surname first; (1) Camilleri. Joseph A., (2) Simone. Vera, (3) Mahbubani, Kishore.
The above are not hard to find as they are widely published and you can argue you observations and interpretations of inflation with them.
But that was a nice try.
/JJ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TaoyuanSteve

Joined: 05 Feb 2003 Posts: 1028 Location: Taoyuan
|
Posted: Wed Apr 13, 2005 2:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Are you kidding me? I love how you just throw names out randomly. How about naming, specifically, the published works of the authors you make reference to; or, howabout quoting directly from these works or posting links to articles on the net? What was the main point of their arguments? Why do these "East Asian scholars" have names like "Camilleri" and "Simone?"
You're beginning to remind me of AKATDN. Spooky, but true. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling. Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|