|
Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Twelve is to three ____ four is to one. |
| what |
|
15% |
[ 3 ] |
| as |
|
84% |
[ 16 ] |
| that |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| like |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 19 |
|
| Author |
Message |
Old Dog

Joined: 22 Oct 2004 Posts: 564 Location: China
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
carken
Joined: 14 Feb 2003 Posts: 164 Location: Texas, formerly Hangzhou
|
Posted: Fri Apr 01, 2005 2:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I maintain that this statement is in analogy form, in which case the correct answer would be "as". |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Norman Bethune
Joined: 19 Apr 2004 Posts: 731
|
Posted: Fri Apr 01, 2005 6:06 pm Post subject: Re: Grammar rule |
|
|
| Old Dog wrote: |
| As for "what" and "that", I would either wash my mouth out or cut off my hand were I to be found using them. As for "context", the context appears to be a standard mathematical expression in which "as" is the received form. I cannot imagine in what context "what" and "that" might be considered to be correct in a formal grammatical situation. |
But I betcha can think of many a context in which either would be spoken or used informally.
Your comment brings up an interesting side issue. Is there truly such a thing as "formal grammatical situation" where every rule in the grammar and linguistics texts are agreed to and adhered to rigidly by everyone? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
tofuman
Joined: 02 Jul 2004 Posts: 937
|
Posted: Fri Apr 01, 2005 6:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
A is to B as C is to D.
I'm no grammarian, but the point of the sentence seems to be made by the following:
a. A is to B [is the same] as C is to D.
b. A to B is the same as what C to D is.
c. A to B is the same [relationship] as C to D.
d. It also might be stated: A to B [is] what C to D [is].
What came first, grammar or language? Language obviously. Grammar is simply an attempt to establish rules that preserve, articulate, and perhaps define the language.
Words are merely symbols that articulate ideas. The purpose of grammar is to put those symbols in a relationship that eases the conveyance of ideas.
The point of the sentence is to make clear the relationship of the letters to the reader. c. [sic] above, "A to B is the same as C to D" makes the point clearly. To elaborate: The relationship between A and B is the same as the relationship between C an D.
If grammatical rules obscure the idea that is being conveyed, they are a hindrance rather than a help and should be discarded.
The idea should be clear to the native speaker first. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
NorbertRadd
Joined: 03 Mar 2005 Posts: 148 Location: Shenzhen, Guangdong
|
Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2005 12:35 pm Post subject: my USD 0.02 |
|
|
"Twelve to three" would specifically be a ratio, thus "Twelve's to three as four's to one" would be most correct.
Please pardon my contractions.
The second definition from the Pocket Oxford Dictionary--purchased here--agrees with the third at http://www.m-w.com, viz., in the way or manner that <do as I do>.
Oxford's example is: I speak as your friend; but this example isn't the same as the one given.
I looked in Strunk and White and Garner's Dictionary of Modern American usage and couldn't find anything.
Without any prior thought, I voted "what" because it sounds more direct and Strunk and White states: Use definite, specific concrete language.
A poster above says to look at the context. I came up with these three examples:
The KKK's to the American Deep South what Osama's disciples are to the Arab Street.
Poverty is to the spirit what sloth is to ambition.
Six is to half a dozen what twenty-five cents is to a quarter.
Many prescriptivists would describe the above as colloquialisms.
A solution would for TEM-4 is to do once was done with TOEFL and give many short essay questions. Without a doubt, this would show the true ability of the student more accurately.
Cheers! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ymmv
Joined: 14 Jul 2004 Posts: 387
|
Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2005 2:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
While every native speaker here and other places have come down on the side of AS as the correct choice in the original question (and I agree), a number of examples have been found and cited where WHAT was used.
Among the examples I have received:
The Chinese example (which I discount because it is not a parallel construction): What the dry, salted cod is to the Portugese, pasta is to the Italians.
But we also have:
A nest is to a bird what a house is to a man.
Honey is to a bee what milk is to a cow.
Smell is to the nose what taste is to the tongue.
The KKK's to the American Deep South what Osama's disciples are to the Arab Street.
Poverty is to the spirit what sloth is to ambition.
Six is to half a dozen what twenty-five cents is to a quarter.
Bass is to the disco fanatic what Mellow Gold is to the smoker.
I also did the Google "As is to B as C is to D" "A is to B what C is to D".Actually, I did the search prior to posting this question. Like others who reported back, I , too noticed that the returns for the "A is to B what C is to D" query hit mostly Asian websites. Moreover, I noticed that many of the hits were simply inbred copies of other sites. (No surprise there.) The examples in support of what were the same or similar to the above-cited ones.
Although my initial reaction to the stated question, a pure analogy, was that AS is the correct answer and in most general analogies, AS "sounds" correct to my mind's ear, in the above examples, WHAT sounds correct to my mind's ear (even the Chinese example).
Here is what I noticed: In all the examples given, the form is A is to THE/A/AN B what C is to THE/A/AN D. In each instance B and D take an article. (One execption, no. 5 - ambition. but ambition is a noncount noun and rarely takes an article.) "As we all know", Chinese ESL learners have a difficult time dealing with articles in English. Perhaps this is the source of the confusion to the Chinese English speakers.
Based upon all the input ("posturing" - as one poster put it) provided by all the teachers who generously contributed to this thread, I would like to hypothesize a new rule of grammar. I haven't seen it anywhere else that I could find but it seems to fit most of what sounds right in my "mind's ear". Let's call it the CFT (China Foreign Teachers) Rule Regarding Analogies:
1. In general, A is to B AS C is to D. This conforms with the international English, mathematical and scientific nomenclature of A : B :: C : D.
2. If, in A is to B ___ C is to D, both B and D take an article (ie. a/an/the), it should be read as "A is to the B WHAT C is to the D". If B and/or D are noncount and don't take an article, same result, I think.
3. If it is a Chinese "standardized" test (eg. CET 4, 6; TEM 4,8; PET; Gao Kao) the answer is always WHAT ... at least until the "standards" change. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
andrew_gz
Joined: 15 Feb 2005 Posts: 502 Location: Reborn in the PRC
|
Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2005 4:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Thank you all! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kyoko
Joined: 07 Apr 2005 Posts: 3 Location: Chongqing, China
|
Posted: Fri Apr 08, 2005 6:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
[quote="smalldog"]I think most of us only chose 'as' because we're used to IQ tests with that sentence structure. [/quote]
Also, the webster-merriam dictionary states as a definition to WHAT:
Function: adverb2
in what respect : HOW
But i do still think "as" or "just as" could work.
It's a mathematical phrase anyways. Nto really your typical grammar example. I feel sorry for those who are tested in such a crazy way
3! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling. Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|