Site Search:
 
Get TEFL Certified & Start Your Adventure Today!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

2004 TEM-4 Grammar Question
Goto page Previous  1, 2
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> China (Job-related Posts Only)
View previous topic :: View next topic  

Twelve is to three ____ four is to one.
what
15%
 15%  [ 3 ]
as
84%
 84%  [ 16 ]
that
0%
 0%  [ 0 ]
like
0%
 0%  [ 0 ]
Total Votes : 19

Author Message
Old Dog



Joined: 22 Oct 2004
Posts: 564
Location: China

PostPosted: Fri Apr 01, 2005 11:08 am    Post subject: A is to B Reply with quote

Since I'm sure that only those interested will have followed this thread this far, I'll add a bit more.

I put Google to work in two windows. The first gave me the results for "Grammar "A is to B as C is to D". http://www.google.com/search?q=grammar+%22A+is+to+B+as+C+is+to+D%22&hl=en&lr=&newwindow=1&start=30&sa=N


The second gave me the results for "Grammar "A is to B what C is to D". http://www.google.com/search?q=grammar+%22A+is+to+B+what+C+is+to+D%22&hl=en&lr=&newwindow=1&start=10&sa=N

If anyone chooses, they might notice the following:

Re: "A is to B as C is to D" results seem to demonstrate that this is the normal way in English of expressing an analogy.

Re: The "A is to B what C is to D" search provided results that derive almost totally from foreign sites, Chinese, Japanese, Korean. Among them, I found in
http://www.cer.net/article/20050317/3131434.shtml, the following from the 2001年英语专业四级考试全真试题答案:

45.答案:A
【参考译文】智力对于大脑,就像视力对于躯体一样。
【试题分析】本题为语法题,考查对句子结构的理解。
【详细解答】 what引导的是一个类比性状语从句,说明主句行为的方式、方法,其结构为�A is to B what C is to D�,意思是�A对于B来说,就像C对于D一样�。根据句意,选项A为正确答案。
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
carken



Joined: 14 Feb 2003
Posts: 164
Location: Texas, formerly Hangzhou

PostPosted: Fri Apr 01, 2005 2:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I maintain that this statement is in analogy form, in which case the correct answer would be "as".
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
Norman Bethune



Joined: 19 Apr 2004
Posts: 731

PostPosted: Fri Apr 01, 2005 6:06 pm    Post subject: Re: Grammar rule Reply with quote

Old Dog wrote:
As for "what" and "that", I would either wash my mouth out or cut off my hand were I to be found using them. As for "context", the context appears to be a standard mathematical expression in which "as" is the received form. I cannot imagine in what context "what" and "that" might be considered to be correct in a formal grammatical situation.



But I betcha can think of many a context in which either would be spoken or used informally.

Your comment brings up an interesting side issue. Is there truly such a thing as "formal grammatical situation" where every rule in the grammar and linguistics texts are agreed to and adhered to rigidly by everyone?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
tofuman



Joined: 02 Jul 2004
Posts: 937

PostPosted: Fri Apr 01, 2005 6:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

A is to B as C is to D.

I'm no grammarian, but the point of the sentence seems to be made by the following:

a. A is to B [is the same] as C is to D.

b. A to B is the same as what C to D is.

c. A to B is the same [relationship] as C to D.

d. It also might be stated: A to B [is] what C to D [is].

What came first, grammar or language? Language obviously. Grammar is simply an attempt to establish rules that preserve, articulate, and perhaps define the language.

Words are merely symbols that articulate ideas. The purpose of grammar is to put those symbols in a relationship that eases the conveyance of ideas.

The point of the sentence is to make clear the relationship of the letters to the reader. c. [sic] above, "A to B is the same as C to D" makes the point clearly. To elaborate: The relationship between A and B is the same as the relationship between C an D.

If grammatical rules obscure the idea that is being conveyed, they are a hindrance rather than a help and should be discarded.

The idea should be clear to the native speaker first.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NorbertRadd



Joined: 03 Mar 2005
Posts: 148
Location: Shenzhen, Guangdong

PostPosted: Wed Apr 06, 2005 12:35 pm    Post subject: my USD 0.02 Reply with quote

"Twelve to three" would specifically be a ratio, thus "Twelve's to three as four's to one" would be most correct.
Please pardon my contractions.

The second definition from the Pocket Oxford Dictionary--purchased here--agrees with the third at http://www.m-w.com, viz., in the way or manner that <do as I do>.
Oxford's example is: I speak as your friend; but this example isn't the same as the one given.

I looked in Strunk and White and Garner's Dictionary of Modern American usage and couldn't find anything.

Without any prior thought, I voted "what" because it sounds more direct and Strunk and White states: Use definite, specific concrete language.

A poster above says to look at the context. I came up with these three examples:

The KKK's to the American Deep South what Osama's disciples are to the Arab Street.
Poverty is to the spirit what sloth is to ambition.
Six is to half a dozen what twenty-five cents is to a quarter.

Many prescriptivists would describe the above as colloquialisms.

A solution would for TEM-4 is to do once was done with TOEFL and give many short essay questions. Without a doubt, this would show the true ability of the student more accurately.

Cheers!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ymmv



Joined: 14 Jul 2004
Posts: 387

PostPosted: Wed Apr 06, 2005 2:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

While every native speaker here and other places have come down on the side of AS as the correct choice in the original question (and I agree), a number of examples have been found and cited where WHAT was used.

Among the examples I have received:

The Chinese example (which I discount because it is not a parallel construction): What the dry, salted cod is to the Portugese, pasta is to the Italians.

But we also have:

A nest is to a bird what a house is to a man.
Honey is to a bee what milk is to a cow.
Smell is to the nose what taste is to the tongue.
The KKK's to the American Deep South what Osama's disciples are to the Arab Street.
Poverty is to the spirit what sloth is to ambition.
Six is to half a dozen what twenty-five cents is to a quarter.
Bass is to the disco fanatic what Mellow Gold is to the smoker.

I also did the Google "As is to B as C is to D" "A is to B what C is to D".Actually, I did the search prior to posting this question. Like others who reported back, I , too noticed that the returns for the "A is to B what C is to D" query hit mostly Asian websites. Moreover, I noticed that many of the hits were simply inbred copies of other sites. (No surprise there.) The examples in support of what were the same or similar to the above-cited ones.

Although my initial reaction to the stated question, a pure analogy, was that AS is the correct answer and in most general analogies, AS "sounds" correct to my mind's ear, in the above examples, WHAT sounds correct to my mind's ear (even the Chinese example).

Here is what I noticed: In all the examples given, the form is A is to THE/A/AN B what C is to THE/A/AN D. In each instance B and D take an article. (One execption, no. 5 - ambition. but ambition is a noncount noun and rarely takes an article.) "As we all know", Chinese ESL learners have a difficult time dealing with articles in English. Perhaps this is the source of the confusion to the Chinese English speakers.

Based upon all the input ("posturing" - as one poster put it) provided by all the teachers who generously contributed to this thread, I would like to hypothesize a new rule of grammar. I haven't seen it anywhere else that I could find but it seems to fit most of what sounds right in my "mind's ear". Let's call it the CFT (China Foreign Teachers) Rule Regarding Analogies:

1. In general, A is to B AS C is to D. This conforms with the international English, mathematical and scientific nomenclature of A : B :: C : D.

2. If, in A is to B ___ C is to D, both B and D take an article (ie. a/an/the), it should be read as "A is to the B WHAT C is to the D". If B and/or D are noncount and don't take an article, same result, I think.

3. If it is a Chinese "standardized" test (eg. CET 4, 6; TEM 4,8; PET; Gao Kao) the answer is always WHAT ... at least until the "standards" change.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
andrew_gz



Joined: 15 Feb 2005
Posts: 502
Location: Reborn in the PRC

PostPosted: Wed Apr 06, 2005 4:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thank you all!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
kyoko



Joined: 07 Apr 2005
Posts: 3
Location: Chongqing, China

PostPosted: Fri Apr 08, 2005 6:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

[quote="smalldog"]I think most of us only chose 'as' because we're used to IQ tests with that sentence structure. [/quote]

Also, the webster-merriam dictionary states as a definition to WHAT:
Function: adverb2
in what respect : HOW

But i do still think "as" or "just as" could work.
It's a mathematical phrase anyways. Nto really your typical grammar example. I feel sorry for those who are tested in such a crazy way

3!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> China (Job-related Posts Only) All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

Teaching Jobs in China
Teaching Jobs in China