|
Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Capergirl

Joined: 02 Feb 2003 Posts: 1232 Location: Nova Scotia, Canada
|
Posted: Tue May 27, 2003 11:23 am Post subject: Re: foreign languages |
|
|
scot47 wrote: |
I am still amazed at the number of UK and US EFL teachers I meet who have never learnt a foreign language. How can you understand what is going on in foreign language learning if you yourself have never learned one ? |
Wolf wrote: |
Bottom line: ESL teachers should try to learn an L2 systematically, just to understand their students' problems. |
Agree, agree, agree! Being an L2 learner is a huge asset as an L2 teacher.
In response to the "lazy" query, I say yes, it is pure laziness (and arrogance) for English speakers to not bother learning another language. The vast majority of the world's populace speak 2 or more languages. Some of my students speak 6 or 7 languages quite fluently. It amazes me that people where I come from will debate ad nauseum the alleged "problems" associated with learning a second language (French).  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Mike_2003
Joined: 27 Mar 2003 Posts: 344 Location: Bucharest, Romania
|
Posted: Tue May 27, 2003 2:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
it is pure laziness (and arrogance) for English speakers to not bother learning another language |
Wrong...
When I was in school I could choose three subject for my A-levels. I had the choice of picking a language as one of those. I didn't. Why? Because I was lazy? Wrong. There were simply other subject that were more important to me. For English speakers, learning another language is not an absolute necessity for most careers. It can be very useful, but not knowing one will rarely handicap you. Is it our fault? Of course not. People just choose whatever will open the most doors for them, or what they enjoy.
My counterpart at a school in, for example, Spain will realize that knowing English will be extremely advantageous if he wishes to do well in international business or many other sectors. So he is more likely to pick English as one of his choices.
We are both working equally as hard, the difference is that our priorities are different and thus our choices of subjects to study are different.
I'm sure that there are many subjects you yourself didn't study. Does that make you lazy? Or was it just that, given a limit choice, you picked certain subjects over others.
I agree that learning a second language is a very good idea and if I were in charge I would have kids start to learn one from a young age, but people don't always have the option or incentive to do it, especially when the education system they are in doesn't encourage it. To pigeon hole them all as lazy is terribly offensive as they may well have worked extremely hard at whatever subjects they DID choose.
Mike[/b] |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Capergirl

Joined: 02 Feb 2003 Posts: 1232 Location: Nova Scotia, Canada
|
Posted: Tue May 27, 2003 3:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sorry if you were offended, Mike. This is merely my opinion on the subject. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
scot47

Joined: 10 Jan 2003 Posts: 15343
|
Posted: Wed May 28, 2003 5:01 am Post subject: A Levels and Highers |
|
|
If you are unfortunate enough to be in the English educational system then you have that awful A-level system to contend with. North of the border in Scotland they have a more sensible, and more European approach with the broader system of Highers. There it is common to take 5 or 6 subjects, and so the inclusion of a modern foreignlanguage is common.
Go North, young man ! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
baby predator

Joined: 12 May 2003 Posts: 176 Location: London, United Kingdom
|
Posted: Wed May 28, 2003 5:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
Scot, I agree that the Highers system is a lot more flexible than the A level system, but the quality of foreign language teaching in Scotland is still abysmal. How well I remember my French teacher pronouncing "Ou est la gare?" with a thick Scottish accent.
Mike, I'm not sure where you are going with your argument. It's as if you are trying to prove that greed is the primary motive for most Europeans to learn English, whereas Brits only learn second languages for cultural or intellectual reasons. I think the situation is a lot more complex than that. Most Europeans do not work in international business; they spend most of their time speaking and working in their native languages - just like Brits. They learn English because their educational systems recognise the importance of English as a lingua franca and have better systems in place for teaching it. They also learn it because it is a compulsory subject for most of them - they don't necessarily have the luxury of choosing it like you or I could choose French, German or no languages at all. Sure, the ones who want to make it in international business probably do expend extra effort on learning English, but the groundwork has already been done.
And whilst its not just laziness that stops native English speakers learning another language, I agree with capergirl that laziness and arrogance play a huge part in our refusal to do so. And I can testify to the truth of this since I was both lazy and arrogant when it came to choosing my highers at school. I knew if I ever went to France or Germany, I'd be able to get by without speaking French or German. I dismissed the idea that learning someone else's language might open up new doors in my head - or teach me anything I didn't already know about languages, culture and communication. And I never even considered the possibility that I might LIVE abroad one day. Why would I want to, when I already lived in the greatest place on earth? Much as you and I might despise this attitude now, many of our countrymen and women still cherish it. You only have to look at the immense tourist compounds in Spain where Brits can go to experience "abroad" without havingto do anything demeaning like eat local food or try the local language.
Our empire may have crumbled, but the attitudes that formed it still linger on. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Mike_2003
Joined: 27 Mar 2003 Posts: 344 Location: Bucharest, Romania
|
Posted: Wed May 28, 2003 8:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
Baby predator,
Thank you for your comments. I think I need to clarify my point a little. You summarized it well with:
Quote: |
They learn English because their educational systems recognise the importance of English as a lingua franca and have better systems in place for teaching it. |
I don't think it is laziness that has lowered the stardards of second language acquisition in the UK, or if it has, then it is the tardiness of the educational ministers in power in recognising the importance and benefits of knowing another language.
In some countries children start learning another language at a very young age. This may be because the country is bi- or even tri-lingual, or due to the widespread exposure to another language in the media, or perhaps because they are fortunate enough to have an education system that encourages early learning. I don't think that it can be in any part attributed to a conscious decision of the child. Does he really recognise the importance of it? Does he contemplate the consequences of not started a second language program? I doubt it, he is just lucky that his parents, school and culture provide those opportunities.
Quote: |
if you are trying to prove that greed is the primary motive for most Europeans to learn English |
If you reverse that statement, how many Europeans do you think simply learn English for reasons other than career improvement or because they hope to live/work in an English speaking country someday? If English was a language only spoken in the UK and was of no importance on the international arena, how do you think this would affect the figures on English as a second language? I'd guess they would be significantly less.
My main gripe with the education system I went through was that it forced you to make too many important choices too early. I had to choose my A-levels when I was about 15. Your choice of A-levels largely depends on what you intend to do at university, which it turn is dictated by your intented career choice. So to all extents and purposes you are commiting yourself at an extremely young age. I don't about the other posters here, but I hd absolutely no idea what I wanted to do at that age. At least, from what I've just read in a previous post about the Scottish system, you can choose more subjects and not limit yourself so severely as in the English system.
Regards,
Mike |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
guty

Joined: 10 Apr 2003 Posts: 365 Location: on holiday
|
Posted: Wed May 28, 2003 6:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I still dont know what I want to do, and Im 36 and have been in EFL for 15 years |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jud

Joined: 25 May 2003 Posts: 127 Location: Italy
|
Posted: Sun Jun 01, 2003 9:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Actually it's not so easy to find an Italian who speaks English, particularly outside of Rome, Milan, Turin, etc.
English is often taught here like foreign languages are often taught in America: by non-native speakers whose control of the language is questionable, and who rely on translation. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling. Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|