View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Golightly

Joined: 08 Feb 2005 Posts: 877 Location: in the bar, next to the raki
|
Posted: Fri Sep 02, 2005 2:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
do {url=http://url]your text[/url}, but instead of the curly brackets, just use the standard square brackets. hover your pointer over the URL key when you're writing to see the example. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
dmb

Joined: 12 Feb 2003 Posts: 8397
|
Posted: Fri Sep 02, 2005 2:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks I'll test it out next time I have one of my useless links to share with you all.
(btw why did you use curly brackets ) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Golightly

Joined: 08 Feb 2005 Posts: 877 Location: in the bar, next to the raki
|
Posted: Fri Sep 02, 2005 3:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
i tried it in square brackets and it turned out like this, thereby rather defeating the object of showing how it's done. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
dmb

Joined: 12 Feb 2003 Posts: 8397
|
Posted: Fri Sep 02, 2005 3:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks again, it looks like you have given me some interesting reading when I am back at work next week. Have agood weekend. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
justme

Joined: 18 May 2004 Posts: 1944 Location: Istanbul
|
Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2005 10:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'll be the one to jump in with the anti-US (read anti-Bush) stuff...
http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2005_09/007023.php
Bush cut federal emergency funding (FEMA) and changed FEMA from a cabinet position to be a part of Homeland security. Clinton had set aside funding for restoration and repair of the levees, and Bush cut that too.
So while the disaster itself was pretty bad, it was exacerbated by a slow federal response-- those people most certainly should have been evacuated well before the hurricane hit (and they had more than enough warning), but there was no funding to do so, so only people who could afford to get out managed to escape.
Then there's the problem of offers of aid from other countries:
http://www.cnn.com/2005/US/09/03/katrina.world.aid/
They're offering help from all over the world (even Sri Lanka has offered $25,000 and Afghanistan offered $100,000), but, at least as of Friday, the Americans can't figure out how to accept, either because of reasons of diplomacy, national security, or both. For example, Castro offered to send 1,100 doctors. Can America accept this without losing face? Can they openly demonstrate enough trust in Castro not to send a bunch of communist terrorists, or people who will (gasp!) deliberately overstay their visas? And how long will it take the Dept. of Homeland Security to process 1,100 Cuban passports? And Qatar offered $100 million dollars but accepting it presents a diplomatic problem.
Which is all damned stupid. Another thing that's stupid is the failure of private US companies to send help. For example, why couldn't Greyhound send a couple hundred busses to evacuate people instead of making them wait for the state and the government to do it? Why weren't there more companies giving food and water and housing in the beginning?
So yes, you all are right that the US is rich and should be helping itself. But at the same time, the US did little to prevent the human toll of the hurricane (and in fact may have worsened it with Bush diverting emergency and levee funds to the Dept. of Homeland Security and Iraq, not to mention the reduced National Guard after they've mostly been sent to Iraq), and the victims are largely poor, inner-city people who lack the infrastructure (or access to the infrastructure) to help themselves.
And that's my rant. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
dmb

Joined: 12 Feb 2003 Posts: 8397
|
Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2005 10:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
There is a thread on the China off topic forum. Alot of people agree with you.(miss out the first page)
btw welcome back Justme |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
justme

Joined: 18 May 2004 Posts: 1944 Location: Istanbul
|
Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2005 11:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thank you. It's nice to be back, though I am a little more homesick than usual... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
justme

Joined: 18 May 2004 Posts: 1944 Location: Istanbul
|
Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2005 11:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
Wow, that was my first foray into China (Off-Topic)-land, and they get a whole lot nastier than we do here. Makes us all look rather kitten-ish. Bravo for us, I say...
One poster there gave a list of private companies that have pledged money and stuff, so I was a little off in saying that they weren't. On the other hand, given how much private resources there are in America, that list looks pretty pitiful... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Baba Alex

Joined: 17 Aug 2004 Posts: 2411
|
Posted: Wed Sep 07, 2005 7:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
justme wrote: |
Wow, that was my first foray into China (Off-Topic)-land, and they get a whole lot nastier than we do here. Makes us all look rather kitten-ish. Bravo for us, I say...
One poster there gave a list of private companies that have pledged money and stuff, so I was a little off in saying that they weren't. On the other hand, given how much private resources there are in America, that list looks pretty pitiful... |
You have been reported to the moderators for flagrant use of intelligence and reason in your arguments.
Only kidding, nice post. Kayne West, who is a famous American Hippidy-Hoppidy music producer, had some very strong words to say on the subject. http://www.nme.com/news/113589.htm. The comment from NBC saying he 'departed from the scripted comments that were prepared for him'was great. Free speech anyone? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
dmb

Joined: 12 Feb 2003 Posts: 8397
|
Posted: Wed Sep 07, 2005 8:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
Wow, NME. Takes me back a few years. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Baba Alex

Joined: 17 Aug 2004 Posts: 2411
|
Posted: Wed Sep 07, 2005 8:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
dmb wrote: |
Wow, NME. Takes me back a few years. |
old NME reader are we? I still read the online version, just to keep up with what the kids are into. The print version is rubbish nowadays mind. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
dmb

Joined: 12 Feb 2003 Posts: 8397
|
Posted: Wed Sep 07, 2005 8:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
old NME reader are we |
And melody maker(and.... ahem No.1 but i keep that quiet ) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Baba Alex

Joined: 17 Aug 2004 Posts: 2411
|
Posted: Wed Sep 07, 2005 8:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
dmb wrote: |
Quote: |
old NME reader are we |
And melody maker(and.... ahem No.1 but i keep that quiet ) |
.
MM.. me too. Don't remeber No.1, what about 'Big Girl's Party'? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
dmb

Joined: 12 Feb 2003 Posts: 8397
|
Posted: Wed Sep 07, 2005 8:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
No. 1 from the early 80s. Pop trash. They used to give lyrics to the top ten at the time. I used to cut them out and keep them in a file But then I was a young teenager and knew nothing. For example the first record I ever bought was a certain song by Joe Dolce. Luckily soon after I discovered Madness, undertones,etc |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Baba Alex

Joined: 17 Aug 2004 Posts: 2411
|
Posted: Wed Sep 07, 2005 8:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
dmb wrote: |
No. 1 from the early 80s. Pop trash. They used to give lyrics to the top ten at the time. I used to cut them out and keep them in a file But then I was a young teenager and knew nothing. For example the first record I ever bought was a certain song by Joe Dolce. Luckily soon after I discovered Madness, undertones,etc |
I'm a bit young for that then. Who's your favourite new wave band? I was listening to The Housemartins the other day, I'd forgotten how damn good they were. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|