|
Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Pop Fly

Joined: 15 Feb 2003 Posts: 429
|
Posted: Tue Nov 22, 2005 8:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
| TaoyuanSteve wrote: |
| There is no soft landing available to those who use recruiters over contacting schools themselves. |
Actually....Footprints does include a soft landing.
The rest of this thread I agree with.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
clark.w.griswald
Joined: 06 Dec 2004 Posts: 2056
|
Posted: Tue Nov 22, 2005 10:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
TS I think that we are effectively arguing the same point, but as ususal you are taking things to a personal level.
| TaoyuanSteve wrote: |
| There is no soft landing available to those who use recruiters over contacting schools themselves. Most larger school companies will arrange for airport pickup and lodging for new teachers. What else is there? |
When you speak of larger schools I assume that you are referring to chain schools. As we all know chain schools are largely comprised of franchise schools that are independantly run and owned and therefore conditions vary. With the exceptions of Hess and Kojen I think that it would be incorrect to suggest that dealing with large schools equates to getting a soft landing when you arrive. Sure some of the independant franchises within these chains may offer a soft landing but the majority do not. They will simply welcome you to contact them when you get here.
Smaller schools are even more of a mixed bag. Once again some will go the whole hog while the majority won't.
What I am referring to when I say soft landing is airport pickup, accomodation on arrival and a guaranteed job (within reason - as I have stated before no job is guaranteed until you actually start work). Probably one advantage that a recruiter can offer that a school can't is the fact that if the planned job doesn't work out then at least a recruiter can help you find something else. A school would have no option but to say 'Sorry'.
I am curious TS, other than Hess and Kojen, can you list any schools for which it is standard practice to offer a soft landing?
| TaoyuanSteve wrote: |
| I have first hand experience dealing with recruiters to find work here. I suspect Clark does not. |
Actually I do and my experience was not a pleasant one either. It was not my intention to deal through a recruiter and in fact I was led to believe that I was dealing directly through the school. The recruiter in question there is definitely one of the ones to avoid and there are numerous complaints about his services. This is exactly what I mean. Let's identify the bad recruiters and promote the good ones. That is helpful information, not these broad generalizations that if they are a recruiter then they should be avoided.
| TaoyuanSteve wrote: |
| I do not, however, base my recommendations on my experiences alone. Too may people (and I have met a lot in my time here) I have encountered have been burned by, or otherwise disatisfied with, recruiters. |
Yes, I have acknowledged this and in no way have I attempted to downplay the fact that there are bad recruiters out there. In fact most of those complaints were likely made about a small handful of recruiters and I believe that you would agree with that. I am not suggesting that just because some of them do a good job that they all must. Unlike yourself I prefer not to generalize. I am merely acknowledging that some are good and some are not and disagreeing with your suggestion that they are all bad.
I have recommended three recruiters on this site in the past and I have yet to see any comments that would cause me to change my recommendations. In the same breath I can say that I have had issue with three recruiters on this very forum also and would not of course recommend them.
| TaoyuanSteve wrote: |
| Some would defend recruiters and their practices, but they often turn out to be people who are either recruiters themselves or operate websites that receive advertising monies from them. I have no hidden agendas behind what I write. My conscience alone dictates what I say. |
Do I detect a hint of bitterness here Steve?
Firstly I am not defending recruiters and their practices at all and your suggestion that I am is misleading. I am merely pointing out that your comments have limited validity as when you claim that all recruiters should be avoided you cannot possibly believe that you can make that comment accurately. Have you had dealings with all recruiters in Taiwan that would lead you to believe this to be fact? Where are the negative experiences about the companies that I recommend from time to time?
The content of my posts has not changed since I became involved with the buxiban site. I have always stated that you don't need recruiters but if you want to use them that some are better than others. My involvement with that site does not influence my posting over here and I find it rather immature of you to suggest that it does. Oh and for the record I get not financial benefit from anyones decision to go with a recruiter or not. I merely believe what I have always believed and that is that generalizations are often unfair and unreasonable whether they are levelled at recruiters or foreign teachers.
The fact remains that you are claiming that all recruiters should be avoided as they can't be trusted, and you base this opinion on the bad behavior of some recruiters. This is wrong, and it seems to me that this is what we are arguing.
What about Popfly's comment about Footprints above? Footprints is a recruiter, but according to Popfly they offer a soft landing. Where are the legitimate complaints about Footprints that lead you to believe that they should be lumped in with the 'bad recruiters'?
| TaoyuanSteve wrote: |
| Fact is, you can and should get work for yourself, whether here or contemplating coming here. All the tools you need to do so are at your fingertips. If you need help, check out Tealit.com, forumosa.com and this website to start. |
Certainly. The more information teachers get, the better informed they will be
| TaoyuanSteve wrote: |
| If you still need help, pm me. I'll direct you in the right direction and won't charge you anything (or make any money at all). |
That's a very generous offer Steve and one that I certainly won't argue with. Good luck!
| TaoyuanSteve wrote: |
| It is very important that you avoid the COMPLETELY AVOIDABLE risk of putting your trust in recruiters when contemplating your move to Taiwan. |
Why? Do you have information that would support the suggestion that the recruiters that I have mentioned as being good prospects are in fact not good prospects? If so it would be good to see this as I will certainly not recommend them if they don't deserve to be recommended. On the flip side, if you don't have any serious dirt on these particular recruiters then I am sure that you will do the respectable thing and accept that you have no reason to believe that they are in fact bad. Surely it is pretty ridiculous to lump these companies in with companies that we all know are bad, based solely upon the fact that they happen to be in the same line of business.
So just to clarify:
I am saying that recruiters are not necessary but if certain teachers want to deal with them then there are some recruiters out there that present good opportunities. Do your research and you will find out which companies should be avoided and which ones can be considered.
TS seems to be saying avoid them all they're all dishonest.
Mmm, I remember a time when Taiwanese used to consider that all foreigners in Taiwan were drug smoking backpackers. Fortunately the majority are not so closed minded anymore! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ki
Joined: 23 Jul 2004 Posts: 475
|
Posted: Tue Nov 22, 2005 1:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Like many others here, my virgin Taiwan experience involved being burned by a recruiter. And although I would suggest that they are certainly not necessary I have to admit that they are not all evil. They are a business and as such are more concerned with puting as many teachers with as many schools as possible, often with little care for teachers' specific requests. Other recruiters merely seek to rip teachers off no matter what.
Some people, no matter what you tell them, will decide that they want to come here with a "job secured" from overseas. Sometimes people aren't even aware that they are dealing with a recruiter at all. It would be best to identify which recruiters are dishonest and which ones are merely businesses, hopefully acting with some code of business ethics.
Don't sign anything from overseas.
Never sign a contract with a recruiter. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
missmoosey
Joined: 08 Dec 2005 Posts: 4
|
Posted: Mon Dec 19, 2005 8:46 am Post subject: my little experience with JD |
|
|
I didn't get nearly as far into dealings with John dewey as others here have, but here's what happened to me.
I was hunting the internet looking for a job in Taiwan as I made a quick decision to leave my current job in China, and came across loads of adverts from JD. As I've never been to Taiwan, I thought it best to take my chances with a recruiter. I emailed them, sending my resume, scans of my degree and CELTA, and outlined all my experience. I didn't say which job I was interested in, just asked if they could find me something. From reading other posts here, I assumed they would be quick about getting back to me, if not just outright offer me a job. That didn't happen. What did happen is that they repeatedly asked for scans of everything I had already sent them. I patiently sent them all off again with a smiley email. A few days pass with no response, so I re-read all their job info, pick out three, and email them again with my preferences. A few days wait, then I'm asked again for scans of all my documents, and sent the list of schools again.
This continues for 2 weeks. Every two or three days I send my scans and school preferences again, then they reply with a 'thank you, but we need all your scans. And which job would you like to apply for?' At the same time I was applying for loads of other positions and thankfully got a telephone interview which resulted in me getting this fantastic job in Kaohsiung. I emailed JD to tell them to stop processing my application, and guess what their response was? 'Thank you. We need scans of your documents. And what school would you like to apply for?'
My findings? JD/Andrew either can't understand enough English to read my emails, their office is completely automated, or they are just completely useless. Go for the private adverts, avoid recruiters. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Finn76
Joined: 07 Sep 2005 Posts: 29 Location: Mingxiong Chiayi
|
Posted: Thu Dec 22, 2005 4:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
yeh well,
I had a bit of a melt down last week when I had my school telling me they were going to take out 10,000NT from my next pay check for my ARC (which I have had for a few weeks now)... Then when I queried this, they got David from Dewey on the phone who also reiterated telling me "You are wrong, you must pay for your ARC - read the fine print in the contract"... so I got the school to actually GET out a copy of the contract as I didn't have it with me at the time and ... blow me down... I was correct. There in nice big black letters 'The school will pay for the ARC processing etc etc'.
My point being, David from Dewey was willing to get into a heated debate with me, supporting the school (who as usual were being incompetent or greedy - I haven't decided which yet) when no-one had bothered to actually READ the contract they had WRITTEN. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
clark.w.griswald
Joined: 06 Dec 2004 Posts: 2056
|
Posted: Thu Dec 22, 2005 12:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
As someone who has recommended this company in the past, I am certainly very interested by the negative feedback that is coming in, and it will be interesting to see what that company does to protect it's current good reputation. It seems clear that many of the problems stem from a single person in that company, but if that company chooses not to listen to the complaints that are being made and take action to rectify the problem then this will no doubt reflect badly upon their services and would certainly have a bearing upon my opinion of that company.
| Finn76 wrote: |
| ...my school telling me they were going to take out 10,000NT from my next pay check for my ARC (which I have had for a few weeks now)... |
Although there is no standard as far as who pays for things, in your case it seems quite clear that the school is responsible. More often than not covering the costs of the ARC is the teacher's responsibility.
What strikes me most about all of this is how much the school and the recruiter were claiming that the ARC costs. NTD10,000!!! The whole process inclusive of medical check, work permit, resident visa and ARC only costs around NTD3,000 at the most. I am not impressed by the fact that the school nor recruiter would misrepresent things by suggesting that the teacher should pay NTD10,000 for this.
Good on you for taking a stand and referring to your contract! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
teacha
Joined: 25 Aug 2005 Posts: 186
|
Posted: Tue Dec 27, 2005 1:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Finn76 wrote: |
yeh well,
I had a bit of a melt down last week when I had my school telling me they were going to take out 10,000NT from my next pay check for my ARC (which I have had for a few weeks now)... Then when I queried this, they got David from Dewey on the phone who also reiterated telling me "You are wrong, you must pay for your ARC - read the fine print in the contract"... so I got the school to actually GET out a copy of the contract as I didn't have it with me at the time and ... blow me down... I was correct. There in nice big black letters 'The school will pay for the ARC processing etc etc'.
My point being, David from Dewey was willing to get into a heated debate with me, supporting the school (who as usual were being incompetent or greedy - I haven't decided which yet) when no-one had bothered to actually READ the contract they had WRITTEN. |
That is soooooooooo typical. Ever feel like we're Seinfelds living in Taiwan? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Xenophobe
Joined: 11 Nov 2003 Posts: 163
|
Posted: Sun Jan 01, 2006 11:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I've always done my own paperwork and as far as I can remember the ARC only costs NT$ 1000. I've been in and out of Taiwan since 97 and a few times this fee was paid by my employer. I've paid anywhere from NT $ 700 - 1500 for my medical and the work permit is a cost that the employer must bear. They are not deducting NT $10 000 from your pay cheque, they are stealing NT$ 10 000 from you. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ki
Joined: 23 Jul 2004 Posts: 475
|
Posted: Mon Jan 02, 2006 5:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
| My last job quoted $13,000 for the arc if I didn't finished my contract. I thought that they may have included their own fees for labour used for the application process. (Which would still have been abnormally high anyway). |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
renzobenzo1
Joined: 22 Oct 2007 Posts: 85
|
Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2008 11:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
| i was given the wrong address by these people today for an interview. It cost me 3 hours, 2 bus rides and a taxi. Unacceptable to mix addresses up when giving them to prospective teachers. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling. Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|