| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
7969

Joined: 26 Mar 2003 Posts: 5782 Location: Coastal Guangdong
|
Posted: Mon Mar 13, 2006 5:55 am Post subject: ..... |
|
|
the first thing i try to achieve in my class is some talking, talking about anything. once the students in china have the confidence to talk, one on one, or in front of the class, things become much easier.
i always tell my students at the outset, just talk. if you use chinglish, no problem, i can (usually) still understand you. we can fine tune and improve the english as we move along.
measurable improvement or not, if a student who was reluctant to speak in week 1, is speaking by week 5, 10 or 20, then progress has been made. this is china, i set the bar relatively low and if we exceed that in class, fine. if not, back to the drawing board next year.
7969 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Malsol
Joined: 06 Mar 2006 Posts: 1976 Location: Lanzhou
|
Posted: Mon Mar 13, 2006 5:57 am Post subject: Maybe |
|
|

Last edited by Malsol on Mon Feb 05, 2007 9:48 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
vikdk
Joined: 25 Jun 2003 Posts: 1676
|
Posted: Mon Mar 13, 2006 7:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
Goals are always a sticky playing area for the teacher - shizer in the west with certain countries going back to the nice an'easy to understand "back to basics" regulations of national curricula, educational standard and school league tables - then those goals are made even murkier when the more difficult to understand concepts of modern pedagogy - such as personal developement, social education and the rights of respect with regard to an individual student's abilities and talents are thrown into this ugly politicaly charged pile!!! Teachers are pushed in a direction towards the political goal but know that methods will and should be questioned if the social and developmental elements of teaching are scrapped along the way.
With this in mind more and more teachers are turning the question about goal around 180 degrees and starting to concentrate on a whole other area - the goal of what kind of teacher do I want to be - because If you aint answered this question the chances are your views regarding the goals of your teaching, and what you are prepaired to do in the name of education, are going to be pretty confussed!!!
So with this more simplified goal in mind - and reflecting on the fact that the Chinese mainstream educational goal seems to be "make that student pass exams almost regardless of any consequences" - then I have drawn up a list of possible goals which any FT could aim for -
goal 1 - oramental white monkey - be an ornament who's only impact is to advertising a product (the English language) through appearance and cultural roots - the kids and the monkeys soon seem to get bored of each other.
goal 2 -obedient white monkey - the transition from ornament to a tool which can be operated through precise instruction, where teacher loyally follows the line of instruction - kids tend to hate these monkeys after a while - so boring - unless the instuction and backup for the monkey is of a high class (rarely the case in China)!
goal 3 - naughty white monkey - the FT who is dissalusioned and starting to rebel - but still tows line since employer and employee still have a use for one another - kinda OK with the kids, shows lots of VCD's lets the class entertain itself - monkeys and kids help each other pass the time.
goal 4 - innovative white monkey - those monkeys that can invent their own teaching "tricks" - these monkeys are often headstrong and sometimes bite - so some owners don't really like them - but there seems to be growing demand for them since the kids seem to love 'em and their new tricks on a longterm basis - can also be effective with regard to teaching the English language.
goal 5 - the loner white monkey - the monkey that doesn't want to be regarded as a monkey so tries to be a freelancing creature removed as much as possible from any local master (the person who does so much to remind then they are an ape) - the creature soon discovers that they can't entirely escape monkey status since this is a valuable selling point - but what the hell maybe this is a starting point on that long road to their own personal version of freedom and respect. Being a loner isn't any gaurantee that kids will like 'em or indeed if its classroom effective or has any good tricks - but some bosses like to bring them into their language zoo's since surving alone in the jungle seems to impart a certain quality over them. But this monkey has the ability to run at the slightest whiff of conflict - so their independance is usualy respected to a certain degree.
By the way most of these monkeys should be able to reach that goal teaching a student to say hello - but that of rocking traditional Chinese teaching methods by generating a full blown classroom discussion which both entertains and educationaly stimulates the student - well shouldn't that monkey show a few wild qualities that singles it out from the usual pets  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Henry_Cowell

Joined: 27 May 2005 Posts: 3352 Location: Berkeley
|
Posted: Mon Mar 13, 2006 10:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| dajiang wrote: |
| You shouldn't be too cynical Roger. I'm surprised that you, with your experience of many years, are so wary of 'discussion'. You seem be holding your students in quite low esteem? |
Why so "surprised"? This is one of Roger's perennial complaints. He has stated here that he thinks speaking skills and writing skills are pretty much the same, so he prefers teaching writing. And he always has the lowest expectations of his students -- and their families and culture.
Nothing new here. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
sheeba
Joined: 17 Jun 2004 Posts: 1123
|
Posted: Tue Mar 14, 2006 6:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| Just talking their heads off isn't an educational goal! If their language doesn't improve measurably then it's been a waste of efforts and time! |
I agree . I do sometimes wonder what the point in discussions in Chinese classrooms are . Debating is a good idea if you have the types of students that constructively and honsetly analyse their own and other students thoughts but is this happening ? Not where I am anyway .
My best debating classes have come from German teenagers . After that the Chinese debating sessions seem a waste of time.
I think a poster mentioned you need to set up discussions carefully and I think this is so true but an objective such as 'discuss x ' is just ridiculous. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
vikdk
Joined: 25 Jun 2003 Posts: 1676
|
Posted: Tue Mar 14, 2006 11:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| My best debating classes have come from German teenagers . After that the Chinese debating sessions seem a waste of time |
And why do you think German kids are better - because they have been brought up in a society where open and constructive critical argumentation are the foundation for social progression - kinda comes to them naturally.
| Quote: |
| I do sometimes wonder what the point in discussions in Chinese classrooms are |
So sheeba when living in China - amid the pollution and grime (just to name a couple of minor irritations that also bug many of the locals) - and then thinking of environmentally aware Germany - and how the population has learnt to formulate in meaningful language their desires regarding their environment, so as to force change. You may come to the conclusion that some good has come out of training the German school population to discuss a subject - and while of course Germans can influence a situation through their democracy, something the Chinese aren't in such a strong position to do - you can, if given the chance, at least give your students a very modest experience in how to debate a subject instead of just letting things lie because there has never been a chance to speak up � of course a rather tiny gesture, but I think there is at least a seed of point there- and ya never know their could be little improvement in their English at the same time
By the way wonder if there were any FT's in the third reich or DDR - did they also think class discussions a waste of time [/quote] |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
sheeba
Joined: 17 Jun 2004 Posts: 1123
|
Posted: Tue Mar 14, 2006 2:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| if given the chance, at least give your students a very modest experience in how to debate a subject instead of just letting things lie because there has never been a chance to speak up � of course a rather tiny gesture, but I think there is at least a seed of point there- |
Ok vikdk . I see a seed of a point too but the larger picture of what I am trying to do is improve my students' language skills . Most of these students won't even communicate with one another and sometimes I even get a refusal or a ' bu hui shuo yingyu!' Quite Ironic really !
I personally won't waste much time with debates as I don't feel it something really appropriate for my students needs. Before I leave this place I want to have at least have students feel a desire to continue their learning from where I left them . The different levels in class at my University really make the debate's a no no as I suspect must be the case in many universities . If they can't even communicate at a basic level (some of my students won't even look at each other in the face ) then I don't see a point to debates in this environment . I would rather initially work on the important job in hand in building confidence in the student's ability to converse with one another - to actually feel at ease using the language with one another . For me right now I feel communication games are working quite well . The kind of stuff the OP probably did with his younger classes . The kind of activities that have worked for me with 8 year old kids . Basic English language learning can be fun and I think that it also has a practical use . Not to say I'm doing it right but I will continue to work in this fashiion. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
vikdk
Joined: 25 Jun 2003 Posts: 1676
|
Posted: Tue Mar 14, 2006 2:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I see your point sheeba - the practicalities of a situation sometimes make those finer nobler goals of education a tad difficult to achieve - but thebn again surely they shouldn't be completely scrapped - anyways what the hell!!! I work with kindy kids, hardly any hard hitting discussion going on with my students  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
sheeba
Joined: 17 Jun 2004 Posts: 1123
|
Posted: Tue Mar 14, 2006 3:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| the practicalities of a situation sometimes make those finer nobler goals of education a tad difficult to achieve - but thebn again surely they shouldn't be completely scrapped |
not at all !! We have dreams as learning teachers too right !  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|