Site Search:
 
Get TEFL Certified & Start Your Adventure Today!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Caught in Uni Oral English trap
Goto page Previous  1, 2
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> China (Job-related Posts Only)
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
sheeba



Joined: 17 Jun 2004
Posts: 1123

PostPosted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 11:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Couldn't agree more Richie . Sad to say but I'm not going to teach them Oral English . Another problem is that they have me as a teacher for 4 and a half months and then that's it . Most of them after this time will just never continue .I can only go in there and stand up for the 2 percent in my class that will . Perhaps I can encourage more to gain interest .

Today one of the students who complained about my class last month really made me think . I asked him what he did outside class to learn English . He replied 'wake up and talk in the mornings ' Who to I asked (knowing the response ) 'Myself' he said . So he was complaining that I wasn't teaching properly which wound me up a lot (f you see my previous post on it) and telling me how to teach - The student who wakes up in the morning to talk English to a brick wall ! Must be Chinese methodology that I'm missing out on here .

I'll probably stay until next semester as I have other goals here that are not teaching related but honestly this is a viscious circle .
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mondrian



Joined: 20 Mar 2005
Posts: 658
Location: "was that beautiful coastal city in the NE of China"

PostPosted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 12:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

There is a very linteresting (and long) essay in the March 2004 Asian-EFL Journal by: Minsheng Li on Culture and Classroom Communication.
http://www.asian-efl-journal.com/04_ml.pdf
It is concerned with the satisfaction (or otherwise) of Chinese students studying English in New Zealand.
Many students end up being extremely dissatisfied and consider the experience to be a very expensive waste of money (perhaps their parents life-time savings). The reasons are many but dominant are the great change in teaching style of their new NZ teachers, who place emphasis on communication activities (which they do not understand either the content or purpose of); the lack of a text-book (for additional private study); the lack of teacher lesson planning and class preparation even though the teachers are ESOL "qualified"
It makes for very interesting reading and an insight of the "other side of the fence"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
sheeba



Joined: 17 Jun 2004
Posts: 1123

PostPosted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 12:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I was going to start a new thread but I should be able to drag it out on this one I hope . I reckon next year should be my last in China and I'd like to at least leave the teaching here with a feeling of accomplishment and something to take away . I'll probably end up in England some time teaching TESOL so I'll still be dealing with Chinese students and I want to learn as much as I can about their problems with language acquisition .I've already read some good advice here and my own research and experience has got the ball rolling this year but I still have headaches determining my students real problems.

I notice Klaus did not continue his thread on teaching and do wonder if Grammar really is a bigger problem in the class than I am giving it and him credit for . I also note that Stephen Roger Wolf also seems to hold some shared opinions in favour of some kind of grammar emphasis in lessons .

Now the reason I am talking about grammar is that it is the only area that has really confused me in China with regard to teaching . From my observations I can see that Pronunciation definitely needs addressing and I also see that vocabulary is important in context and the students need to understand how the vocabulary relates to the words that surround .

I've always persuaded my students to just try and communicate with one another and me . communication has always been emphasised but should I really be devising plans that introduce students to correct grammar usage . Why should I use grammar in class ? I certainly don't want to stop students in their speech because they make grammar mistakes if I understand their meaning but the problem is that we're communicating in Chinglish to some extent (at least on their behalf) and when they communicate with one another they most certainly use Chinglish .Or is this a problem ? (I hear Roger Stephen Wolf making big big noises in the background - sorry Rodge !) I'm not going to butt in when good communication is occuring but these days I have been pondering the need for my students to understand(use) grammar even at the basic level. Before I have thought that at the basic level I can still communicate but when I throw in a past continuous , present perfect or a more complex form and well to be Frank they're screwed . Does this stem from their inability to use the basic forms ? I'm guessing yes but to be honest I don't know .


I guess I'm asking what emphasis should grammar have in Oral english class , how should this be presented and how should grammar errors in class be dealt with ?Is communication the key in conversation or are we just delaying any further progress for our students ? Will efforts in promoting grammar use affect communication ?

I hope you guys can help a little . Cheers .

PS - I have looked for previous posts regarding Grammar in the class but oddly I can't find any .

S
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
sheeba



Joined: 17 Jun 2004
Posts: 1123

PostPosted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 12:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Interesting Mondrian . Some of that kind of mirrors the points on this post . I hope others will look at that .It's only 2 language schools that they've assessed right ? Also it talks about those with a TESOL cert . We all know that TESOL certs like the CELTA do not make a teacher . I would not expect someone with a CELTA necessarily to be able to explain grammar points to a student . And the teachers lessons seem terrible to me - no wonder they complained but I think it is a little biased to be honest- 2 language schools is no representation .I know from when I go and teach in the UK that there are some shocking teachers posing as TESOL professionals .

Anyway the point that the Chinese go to New Zealand to waste their money ? I don't think so .
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Shan-Shan



Joined: 28 Aug 2003
Posts: 1074
Location: electric pastures

PostPosted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 1:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

One potential for "teaching" grammar, and satisfying students' needs to feel that a "real" class is underway, is to combine controlled and uncontrolled activities into your lesson plan.

In the past, I've taught the future perfect and future continuous through this method. I begin by making explicit points about about the grammar, showing through contrast how these two "futures" differ from the simple future and from each other. Next, I do some controlled exercises where students, for example, are given sentences in the simple future, or in the present, and have to convert them to the correct "future" form according to tags at the end of the sentence (ex: "Dogs rule the earth in 2293" (already completed -- Dogs will have ruled the Earth by 2293).

After this controlled work is done, the students embark upon a communicative activity whose successful completion necessitates the use of both the future perfect and future continuous, giving students more practice with the grammar without knowing it and by using the grammar in a communicative, meaningful way.

Grammar needs to be taught in the classroom. How it's taught, though, should be both directly and via communicative exercises (the latter being getting the students to "do" the grammar in purposeful ways).Doing little isolated sentences in the present continuous are a bore, and connect to nothing. Embed the grammar into the tasks after first drawing students attention to the forms. This is what I have done (not in every lesson mind you), and have seen some decent results.

And Sheeba: don't get too worried about certificates. The best Chinese grammar teacher I had never completed university. The worst English grammar teacher I had ("English Descriptive Grammar" Ling. 205) had a doctorate in TESL and was head of the TESL program at my university!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
tw



Joined: 04 Jun 2005
Posts: 3898

PostPosted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 2:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

dajiang wrote:
If they've improved just a little by being with you in your class, then you've done a good job. And vice versa.


Amen!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Steppenwolf



Joined: 30 Jul 2006
Posts: 1769

PostPosted: Thu Oct 12, 2006 8:04 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

sheeba wrote:


I notice Klaus did not continue his thread on teaching and do wonder if Grammar really is a bigger problem in the class than I am giving it and him credit for . I also note that Stephen Roger Wolf also seems to hold some shared opinions in favour of some kind of grammar emphasis in lessons .

Now the reason I am talking about grammar is that it is the only area that has really confused me in China with regard to teaching . From my observations I can see that Pronunciation definitely needs addressing and I also see that vocabulary is important in context and the students need to understand how the vocabulary relates to the words that surround .

I've always persuaded my students to just try and communicate with one another and me . communication has always been emphasised but should I
I'm not going to butt in when good communication is occuring but these days I have been pondering the need for my students to understand(use) grammar even at the basic level. Before I have thought that at the basic level I can still communicate but when I throw in a past continuous , present perfect or a more complex form and well to be Frank they're screwed . Does this stem from their inability to use the basic forms ? I'm guessing yes but to be honest I don't know .


I guess I'm asking what emphasis should grammar have in Oral english class , how should this be presented and how should grammar errors in class be dealt with ?Is communication the key in conversation or are we just delaying any further progress for our students ? Will efforts in promoting grammar use affect communication ?

I hope you guys can help a little . Cheers .



S


Valid observations, and you deserve a well-thought out response. This will be a little difficult because I will have to touch upon some basics and some specifics.

So, regarding your confusion about how to "teach grammar" in China: you are probably in the same boat as myself and most others: upon being inducted here you heard "our students know ALL about grammar..." and your job is to "facilitate communciation...not to impart more grammar knowledge'.
This presupposed the (Chinese, usually) person who said this is competent and knows what Chinese students "have studied". However, in most cases our Chinese superior or colleague has a somewhat limited grasp of English or English grammar himself/herself; how then can they decide when their students have acquired "enough" of the matter?

The truth is that they never really learn to master it. IT's a bit like learning how to drive a car - in theory, without having any practice. See why China's roads are scenes of bloodshed and metallic massacres - it's because of the dichotomy of theory and practice: they do not fall into step. What the learner-driver has "studied" he/she will not practise on the road! In English communication we are faced with a similar problem: too many accidents. For proof to support my claim I would refer you to any essay written by your students, or for publications in English from some Chinese business, i.e. notices inside boxes containing pharmaceutical products, warranties or even adverts.

One difference in the teaching of grammar I can see here is that students don't practise using those grammar rules! Knowing about "guoqu" (that's "past tense" for you) is the best you can expect from them in a class on the past tenses; don't dream of expecting them to select the appropriate tense in their own writing or speaking.
In this respect Chinese students really learn and practise English in a very different way to how people learn foreign languages elsewhere (excluding, perhaps, other NE Asian countries).
I also note with apprehension that their own teachers never speak English with their own students (make that "almost never"). When I studied foreign languages our teachers taught us the grammar and literature of those languages in the target language. I am sure I cannot surprise you by relating to you I knew a Chinese "English Literature Teacher" who didn't know how to read even the CHINA DAILY; he sourced all his "knowledge" about Elizabeth Gaskell or Bernard Shaw and these writers' works from Chinese language materials! Are you telling me his students could possibly read a modern piece of fiction or even just a new TIMES or IHT?

I laud your efforts and successes at making your students express themselves in English; I have lower expectations on them but mine are still hard to sattisfy. I want them, above all, to learn to UNDERSTAND the spoken word. Have you ever noticed how little attention they pay to anyone talking to them? No matter whether you speak in Mandarin or ENglish - what is being said enters one ear and exits the other!

In teaching them you are also trying to modify their behaviours. One behavour you must change is their inattentiveness; they can afford to pay so little attention in classes where they merely emulate their teacher (chorussing vocables - you don't need to think doing that!).
If you ask your students a general question you will seldom draw any response; point to a student and require him or her to reply - they will say "can you say it again?" or "I didn't understand you..." And much the same happens when they are speaking in front to their own peers. Most take this as a chance to escape from class albeit only by day-dreaming, letting their thoughts wander away.

When it's their turn to produce English they put all their efforts into making English noises and what they actually produce is Chinglish. Do they understand each other speaking Chinglish? You bet - they don't understand that either!

I do not interrupt students speaking Chinglish - not too often. But I do ask their peers to point out some of their more obvious mistakes. If they cannot identify tense problems, lack of Subject-Verb Agreement SVA), the difference between 'he' and 'she' (ever noticed that no one seems to notice except when you repeat their mistaken pronouns?) then you should really wonder whether they have the right skills for your task.

I agree that pronunciation causes them major problems - but by no means the worst ones. Again, we can wonder whether ten years of formal classroom instruction and such lousy results can be blamed for their problems. Do they learn enough, or don't they practise enough? Do they practise the right way? Is that possible with up to 60 students simultaneously and unthinkingly repeating after their Chinese teacher?

I would contrast their teaching of English with how Chinese teachers instruct foreign students of Mandarin: it's not the same. At the beginning, there is a huge emphasis on PROPER ENUNCIATION! You learn to differentiate between 'Q' and 'ZH' and 'Z" as well as 'C" and 'CH'. You also drill the tones daily, ad infinitum. Nothing comparable in English takes place. But when you become aware of some of their more common errors you understand that a different teaching approach would potentitally take care of their pronunciation once and for all. I wonder whether they actually learn how to read English/ my guess is: no!

So, what emphasis should grammar have in oral class - in my opinion there should be no formal "oral English" classes at all (a luxury, really). English should be spoken about during regular classes, using ENglish as the medium of instruction. It should also be used in other subjects - literature (which most do not have to study!). Those events - using formal classroom instruction as 'events' in which English is used bilaterally, would lead to better handling of English by both teachers and students.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
sheeba



Joined: 17 Jun 2004
Posts: 1123

PostPosted: Thu Oct 12, 2006 9:59 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks guys . Roger , Shan Shan for ideas . I've been interviewing students today and come to conclusions that Pronunciation , Vocabulary and Grammar are problem areas that need urgent attention . I'm going to try and subtly stick in grammar parts to my lessons . Hopefully they won't notice . It's more an experiment for me to see if it is effective . Part of the problem I face with grammar teaching is that students feel that you are underestimating their levels. . It's a very odd situation in my eyes - Students that understand the theory but can't make the correct utterance. I've taught grammar before to them but you see how easily they fall back into their mistakes and habits .I feel more confident now of my ability to teach the students and I seem to have some respect in class which I have never had before . I think when they see that you care(and understand their problems) they work for you but the problem is they become more demanding of you as a teacher !

Problem before I think was the need to recycle in classes . Something that is very very important . They need the recycling and review otherwise they forget and all your efforts are wasted ! Of course I have the old levels problem in all this and teaching grammar is the most difficult skill to teach but doesen't teaching in China make you a flexible teacher !! Smile

cheers again
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> China (Job-related Posts Only) All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

Teaching Jobs in China
Teaching Jobs in China