|
Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| AsEnglishIncreasinglyBecomes the'InternationalLanguageOfCommunication'OftenBetweenPeople who are more than likely to be non-native speakers, should we not think about teaching a simplified version of the language which is easier and quicker to learn? |
| Yes, we should. |
|
15% |
[ 3 ] |
| No, we shouldn't. |
|
73% |
[ 14 ] |
| I already do. |
|
10% |
[ 2 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 19 |
|
| Author |
Message |
The Voice Of Reason
Joined: 29 Jun 2004 Posts: 492
|
Posted: Sat Nov 04, 2006 6:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The word 'free' still existed in Newspeak, but it could only be used in such statements as ' This dog is free from lice' or 'This field is free from weeds'. It could not be used in its old sense of 'politically free' or 'intellectually free', since political and intellectual freedom no longer existed even as concepts, and were therefore of necessity nameless.
Newspeak was designed [...] to diminish the range of thought, and this purpose was indirectly assisted by cutting the choice of words down to a minimum.
Slender English / Dumbed-Down English / Deconstructive English / Newspeak would require the ridding of all the rich language that we�ve greedily gorged ourselves on, selected from our fat language menu, from the past, so as to secure our retardation of a future.
Last edited by The Voice Of Reason on Sat Nov 04, 2006 6:44 pm; edited 2 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
WastedMiddleAge
Joined: 21 Sep 2006 Posts: 7
|
Posted: Sat Nov 04, 2006 6:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Orwell wrote
...any struggle against the abuse of language is a sentimental archaism, like preferring candles to electric light or hansom cabs to aeroplanes. Underneath this lies the half-conscious belief that language is a natural growth and not an instrument which we shape for our own purposes.
[Politics and the English Language 1946]
To control a language you first need a socio-political standard by which to judge others. The poetry of my students' English communications over the years has taught me much , as has the intransigence of various native-speaker colleagues as to the 'wrongness' of their efforts. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
The Voice Of Reason
Joined: 29 Jun 2004 Posts: 492
|
Posted: Sat Nov 04, 2006 8:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The �struggle� for freedom of complexity of articulation against simplified language is in itself an abuse (of simplicity). This �struggle� needn�t be �aided� by any belief that language is, in any way, a natural (however meant) growth, but precisely for the safeguarding of the many-stringed instrument that is a language, which we use to shape our internal and external worlds, and which can be played with with dynamic subtly or simply simply.
The greatest reward is to know that one can speak and emit articulate sounds and utter words that describe things, events and emotions.
Camilo Jose Cela
| Quote: |
| The poetry of my students' English communications over the years has taught me much |
I wish I could say the same... such as too many things are 'beautiful' in [the English language of] China, and so beauty loses its edge and poetry is stemmed from the outset; like a painting painted with the painter selecting from a limited paint box, and painting with mittens on. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Steppenwolf
Joined: 30 Jul 2006 Posts: 1769
|
Posted: Sun Nov 05, 2006 2:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
The artificial creation of Simplynglish to suit the simply misunderstood communications needs of Chinese (i.e. foreigners) reminds me of the creation of Newsseak: an arbitrarily taken decree. A dictatorial fiat. In this instance - by lazy outsiders who want to be members of the worldwide English speaking community.
Why Chinglish and not Inlish? In ca. 30 years the Indians will outperform the Chinese economically; they already have a grown English version of their own. Will that be outlawed by Chinese veto at the UNO? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
vikdk
Joined: 25 Jun 2003 Posts: 1676
|
Posted: Sun Nov 05, 2006 3:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| The artificial creation of Simplynglish to suit the simply misunderstood communications needs of Chinese |
A perfect example of why many English users need to go back to the simple basics of the language when endeavoring to make their communications easily understandable. After all, for many non-native users of English, who haven't quite mastered a lot of the language's strange nuances, there's not much point in trying to speak/write -"all posh an' complicated" - when the actual message of the communication starts to be camouflaged by all those peculiar choices of words or strange sentence structures - since all they seem to do is create another difficult to understand variation of my ol' mother-tounge - whatthehellaretheychirpingonaboutish!!!!
By the way I'm fascinated in the implications that there are natural and unnatural processes involved in language evolution - can you fill us in on this Steppenwolf. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
InTime
Joined: 06 Dec 2005 Posts: 1676 Location: CHINA-at-large
|
Posted: Fri Nov 10, 2006 6:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
Krashen's words are relevant:
Language acquisition occurs best when
| Quote: |
| "real messages of real interest are transmitted and understood." |
China's learners have been overdosed on extrinsic motivation..
...while intrinsic motivsation remains underdeveloped/repressed/suppressed/perverted
Thus...so many English speakers here seem to speak English with more discomfort than fluency....
...metaphorically in the spirit of a combination of constipation and hemorrhoids...
Hence...my focus upon movie segments--as--intrinsically motivating
AND...yesterday I saw/bought a good collection of simplified books w/CD readings, such as:
*The Secret Garden
*Jane Eyre
*Alice's Adventures in Wonderland
*Romeo and Juliet
*A Christmas Carol
Jinan U. Press is the publisher, and they're classified in 3 categories, according to difficulty/complexity.ALL with lively CD audio!!!
Here at our center, our managerial/techie members are quite clear in their motivations...to use English/EIL to talk to their foreign bosses/clients.
Again...business English textbooks generally lack "real messages of real interest." BUT...there are great BizEnglish DVD movie resources here in China. Just today I discovered/watched a movie related to real-realities, such as Oil Politics/ Terrorism/CIA/China, with MUCH use of EIL:
| Quote: |
http://www.metacritic.com/film/titles/syriana?q=Syriana
100..............Rolling Stone Peter Travers
Takes off with the lightning speed of a thriller, the gonzo force of frontline journalism and the emotional wallop of a drama that puts a human face on shocking statistics.
50...The Hollywood Reporter Kirk Honeycutt
The character and geographical jumps leave you in a muddle with thinly sketched personalities and confusing plot points. Worse, dialogue dense with nuance and shaded meaning flies by too quickly.
100...Roger Ebert...Chicago Sun-Times
The movie begins with one of the Gulf states signing a deal to supply its oil to China. This comes as a strategic defeat for Connex, a Texas-based oil company. At the same time, an obscure oil company named Killen signs a deal to drill for oil in Kazakhstan. Connex announces a merger with Killen, to get its hands on the oil, but the merger inspires a Justice Department investigation, and --
Let's stop right there. The movie's plot is so complex we're not really supposed to follow it, we're supposed to be surrounded by it. Since none of the characters understand the whole picture, why should we? If the movie shook down into good guys and bad guys, we'd be the good guys, of course. Or if it was a critique of American policy, we might be the bad guys. But what if everybody is a bad guy, because good guys don't even suit up to play this game? |
BELOW is from a bi-lingual edition of the novel, Dead Poets Society, relevant in some ways to foreigners learning Chinese, and in other ways to Chinese learning English:
| Quote: |
"A man is not 'very tired'. He is 'exhausted'.Don't use very very sad, use ..."
He snapped his fingers and pointed to a boy.
"Morose?"
"Good!!!" Keating said with a smile.
"Language was invented for one reason, boys..."
"To communicate...?"
"No," Keating said. "To woo women...and, in that endeavor, laziness will not do. It also won't do in your essays."
Creeds and schools, in abeyance, I permit
to speak at every hazard. Nature without
check with original energy.
"Uncle Walt (Whitman)again...ah, but the difficulty of ignoring those creeds and schools, conditioned as we are by our parents, by our traditions, by the modern age.How do we, like Walt, permit our own true natures to speak? How do we strip ourselves of prejudices, habits, influences? The answer, my dear lads, is that we must constantly endeavor to find a new point of view."
"You must strive to find your own voice, boys, and the longer you wait to begin, the less likely you are to find it at all. Thoreau said: 'Most men lead lives of quiet desperation.'Why be resigned to that? Risk walking new ground." |
It's my considered opinion...
that China will evolve its OWN user-friendly English/EIL voice...
regardless of our protests/pre-tests...
let/let/let
cut/cut/cut |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Steppenwolf
Joined: 30 Jul 2006 Posts: 1769
|
Posted: Fri Nov 10, 2006 1:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Krashen seems tobe most misunderstood by his followers, blind and unreflecting adherents of his ideas. IT's not just the Chinese students who get an overdose on what you call "extrinsic" information (whatever that means - I don't understand it but I guess you are saying they get too much theorising, lecturing, the flour of the ravioli, not the meat that fills it). Why is it then that others pick upsomething useful from their overdose of "extrinsic" English instruction but not the Chinese? Maybe we should look at how the Chinese teach their stuff, not at how FTs do their job!@ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
vikdk
Joined: 25 Jun 2003 Posts: 1676
|
Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2006 4:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| Krashen seems tobe most misunderstood by his followers, blind and unreflecting adherents of his ideas. |
Wow steppenwolf I'm impressed - you must know a lot of Krashen followers to be able to make a statement like that - but then again it could have been another example of complicated English, which, although I can just about wade through its grammatical errors, still has me scratching me head while trying to figure out the logic of its message!! After all is a simpleton like me to understand - that somebody versed in the theories of Krashen understands them less than the bog-standard factory worker who doesn't know his Krashens from his crackers. Simple English Steppenwolf - no radical changes in the rules of grammar, or stuff like that, just communications that are easily understood - your posts are prime examples of why its use should be encouraged!!!!
Last edited by vikdk on Sat Nov 11, 2006 4:51 am; edited 2 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
InTime
Joined: 06 Dec 2005 Posts: 1676 Location: CHINA-at-large
|
Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2006 4:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
RE: Steppenwolfe's
| Quote: |
| IT's not just the Chinese students who get an overdose on what you call "extrinsic" information (whatever that means - I don't understand it but I guess you are saying they get too much theorising, lecturing, the flour of the ravioli, not the meat that fills it). |
InTime
| Quote: |
China's learners have been overdosed on extrinsic motivation..
...while intrinsic motivsation remains underdeveloped/repressed/suppressed/perverted |
RE:
| Quote: |
| Maybe we should look at how the Chinese teach their stuff, not at how FTs do their job!@ |
Definitely those early years raise the "affective filter" and leave psychic scar tissue. FTs can benefit from realizing this. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling. Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|