Site Search:
 
Get TEFL Certified & Start Your Adventure Today!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Define a year�s experience
Goto page Previous  1, 2
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> General Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
furiousmilksheikali



Joined: 31 Jul 2006
Posts: 1660
Location: In a coffee shop, splitting a 30,000 yen tab with Sekiguchi.

PostPosted: Fri Jun 01, 2007 3:52 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well, I take it the ad should be taken literally but I completely agree with dmb and tedkarma's comments. I know teachers who brag about the length of time they have spent teaching and use it as an excuse for incorrigibility:

"Don't tell me how to teach I've been teaching this way for 83 years and I know what I'm doing..."

These teachers are invariably awful at their job.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rusmeister



Joined: 15 Jun 2006
Posts: 867
Location: Russia

PostPosted: Fri Jun 01, 2007 5:16 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

To clarify my earlier comments:
1) Most teachers find teaching beginners more difficult for the first couple of years that they do it (How many teachers stay in overseas TEFL more than a few years?). Understanding the problems of beginners requires a clear understanding of beginning foreign language acquisition, which means they should understand what a person needs to learn FIRST - understanding the structure of English is mandatory and having had at least some experience learning a second language is almost as important.

However, I can agree that the problems of advanced learners are much broader, primarily in terms of detail, as you branch out from grammar into stylistics, whereas within a couple of years even a beginning teacher who perserveres with beginning students should have worked out many of the most important things to be taught and have developed some ideas of how to teach them.
IOW, the teacher of beginners must understand how the tree and main branches are formed; the ToAS must know how to draw the twigs and the leaves.

To the OP:
I solved the problem of classroom hours by thoroughly learning the curriculums I was teaching; once I knew what was to be taught well, I was able to cut out most lesson-planning. (Let's see, we're in unit 6, comparison of present tenses and topic of shopping, or whatever...)
When you're paid by the hour for contact time only, you are strongly encouraged to get real results without wasting a lot of time outside of the classroom. That said, it does take a few years of (FT) exp, working with good materials and colleagues to reach that point. Hopefully, you are developing your own shticks to cover whatever the material isn't covering...

Agree with FMSA that any teacher that is closed to learning something new is likely to be a terrible teacher. The assumptions of teachers who brag like that is that they have nothing more to learn. But I would still insist that all other things being equal, more experience is better.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
fluffyhamster



Joined: 13 Mar 2005
Posts: 3292
Location: UK > China > Japan > UK again

PostPosted: Fri Jun 01, 2007 6:10 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yup, the 'experience' figure is just ballpark to whittle down the number of initial applicants - there are usually more detailed questions later, such as what type and/or level of learners one's taught, using what textbooks etc.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
furiousmilksheikali



Joined: 31 Jul 2006
Posts: 1660
Location: In a coffee shop, splitting a 30,000 yen tab with Sekiguchi.

PostPosted: Fri Jun 01, 2007 6:35 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

rusmeister:

JTE is Japanese teacher of English.
ALT is assistant language teacher who co-teaches with a JTE in a subordinate role.
Eikaiwa literally means "English conversation" and in this case refers to the chain schools in Japan such as NOVA, GEOS, ECC etc that often have a low reputation for quality teaching. I believe that in Korea the equivalent is a hagwan (or hogwan?)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rusmeister



Joined: 15 Jun 2006
Posts: 867
Location: Russia

PostPosted: Fri Jun 01, 2007 9:59 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

furiousmilksheikali wrote:
rusmeister:

JTE is Japanese teacher of English.
ALT is assistant language teacher who co-teaches with a JTE in a subordinate role.
Eikaiwa literally means "English conversation" and in this case refers to the chain schools in Japan such as NOVA, GEOS, ECC etc that often have a low reputation for quality teaching. I believe that in Korea the equivalent is a hagwan (or hogwan?)


Thanks!
It is a little confusing if the acronym is only used in a certain geographical location...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> General Discussion All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

Teaching Jobs in China
Teaching Jobs in China