|
Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Mister Al

Joined: 28 Jun 2004 Posts: 840 Location: In there
|
Posted: Sat Sep 01, 2007 12:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
Leon Purvis wrote
| Quote: |
| If you don't come to class and meet my standards, you can't pass. |
Lostinasia wrote "My students don't follow my direction - they fail. They don't like it, they can quit, or of course, fail. I don't play the game. My classroom is mine, not the schools."
Absolutely agree. I also teach at university, not EFL but Law and Business, but will not allow my department to dictate to me regarding standards, discipline, plagiarism, attendance etc. I make sure my students understand that it's their job to learn and my job to help them learn. If you want to pass or achieve a higher grade come to class and learn. If you don't, don't bother. Don't get me wrong I ain't no army sergeant-major and have a fairly good relationship with most of my 200+ students. The old maxim 'Make sure your students know who's the boss and do this in the first week' is my advice for the OP. If a student wants to sleep, play games, mock the teacher blah blah blah- kick them out the class until they play YOUR game. You can only gain respect.
I think at the end of the day, all a teacher can really do in China (or elsewhere for that matter) is give students the opportunity to improve their knowledge/skills by the use of sound pedagogy. If they don't want to take the opportunity it's the students problem, not the teachers'.
BTW, making use of the class monitor as mentioned by arioch 36 is also sound advice.[/quote] |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Brian Caulfield
Joined: 14 Sep 2004 Posts: 1247 Location: China
|
Posted: Sat Sep 01, 2007 2:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
The students always say I am very strict when I get my evaluations . This is because I pull papers when they cheat or plagarize. I don't fail them but give them one mark lower than the lowest . I just don't want to waste time marking the paper . It tells me nothing about what I need to teach them if it is copied work so why mark it ? I have been teaching farmers kids mostly . They are honest and try hard . They lack confidence in general but are bright kids . They will get jobs because they understand work .
I try to keep my average around 83% no matter how weak they are . I am just an oral English teacher , so as long as the pecking order is right there are no problems |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
lostinasia
Joined: 11 Apr 2007 Posts: 466
|
Posted: Sat Sep 01, 2007 4:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Brian Caulfield wrote: |
| I am just an oral English teacher... |
Now that sums it all up. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Songbird
Joined: 09 Jan 2005 Posts: 630 Location: State of Chaos, Panic & Disorder...
|
Posted: Sat Sep 01, 2007 5:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
2 things-
1. First lesson, give out card and for homework get each student to get a passport sized photo & stick in the corner, along with their English and Chinese names. Perhaps also what they want to learn in your particular class. This makes it loads easier to remember names and put names to 200+ faces.
2. Also in the first lesson, get each class monitor to write out a copy of their class timetable. That way you can shuffle classes if you wish depending on when both you and them are free (I have 1 class I will need to do this with) and also if you are sick and need to cancel, you can see easily when to reschedule a class rather than chasing after them. I always keep a copy of each class's timetable in the back of my diary, makes it handy for me.
Oh yeah, and ALWAYS get the class monitor's phone numbers (preferably mobile)- SO much easier to get hold of them (department office is useless!)! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
arioch36
Joined: 21 Jan 2003 Posts: 3589
|
Posted: Sat Sep 01, 2007 8:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
Worldly wrote
| Quote: |
| However, from my protracted attempts to digest and understand the tertiary academic environment in China, and from my own teaching experience in a very similar Asian culture, I wonder if most Western lecturers can survive at their Chinese institutions with such a standard. |
Are you teaching in China? In regards to oral English class, I feel if you are a lecturer, you have failed. It's more stage management, the less you talk, the more successful you are. But you have to be on the prowl constantly. You have to totally control that classroom, and the students must know it. Students have no notebook? They immediately go out and buy one, or never come back. This is not a put down on oral english. It can be very worthwhile. Two years each group of five students had to do a satire play, awesome stuff. But they are not allowed to express in most classes. And they MUST be directed, forcefully at times.
| Quote: |
Leon Purvis wrote Quote:
If you don't come to class and meet my standards, you can't pass.
Lostinasia wrote "My students don't follow my direction - they fail. They don't like it, they can quit, or of course, fail. I don't play the game. My classroom is mine, not the schools." |
Absolutely. The teacher must be the center and must control. And you know what... never complaints from the school or most students, though I admit, when I threw the kid's books out of the fifth floor window, perhaps a little overkill. Now I just tell the monitor to get such a student (rare) out of the classroom.
[/b] |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
arioch36
Joined: 21 Jan 2003 Posts: 3589
|
Posted: Sat Sep 01, 2007 9:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
Songbird
| Quote: |
2. Also in the first lesson, get each class monitor to write out a copy of their class timetable.
Oh yeah, and ALWAYS get the class monitor's phone numbers (preferably mobile)- SO much easier to get hold of them (department office is useless!)! |
Good stuff.
About the pictures... often most of them don't look like the student
If the class size is 30 or less, we do the name game, students must say each others English given name (real names) and Chinese family name. They like it. In larger classes I try to remember based on what group they are in. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Worldly

Joined: 04 Dec 2006 Posts: 74 Location: The Cosmos
|
Posted: Sat Sep 01, 2007 1:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| arioch36 wrote: |
Absolutely. The teacher must be the center and must control. |
I agree classroom control is essential. However, if the teacher is the "center," that's contrary to most modern pedagogical practices (in the West) regarding adult learning. If the students aren't adults, or are adults that are less mature, then classroom control becomes more important. In adult learning environments, the lecturer is never the center of attention. Adult learning is always student-centered.
| arioch36 wrote: |
| I threw the kid's books out of the fifth floor window, perhaps a little overkill. |
Yes, that's overkill, completely unnecessary, disrespectful, and probably one of the most unprofessional acts I've ever heard. At every institution I've worked, that behavior would have triggered a strong reprimand (at the minimum), or immediate dismissal.
Wherever you teach adults, this type of "controlling" or "dictatorial" behavior is more likely to cause far more problems than it can ever resolve. I don't recommend adopting such practices. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Lobster

Joined: 20 Jun 2006 Posts: 2040 Location: Somewhere under the Sea
|
Posted: Sat Sep 01, 2007 4:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
<rant on>
Like Anda, I'm a teacher trainer, and we encounter perhaps a different set of classroom issues. Of course, I also tend to put in a bit of time in public high schools to keep my edge, but we get to see another angle on the system through work at the teachers' colleges.
I agree with the other posters that it's best to keep in mind that, although we are used to teaching using western methodologies, our students are not familiar with them, and they should be adapted to get the best results based on student needs and approaches. It's nice to think about what may be the most progressive and acceptable practices developed back home, but the integration into a foreign system on a piecemeal basis is not, in my opinion, the best tactic. The ideal of having a completely student-centred classroom environment rests on the ability of students to take initiative for learning. How does this fit in with what you know about the Chinese learner?
Many FTs come here with the idea that the education system needs to be reformed, but by that they think it needs to follow a course similar to that of their home country's. After all these years, what changes have actually taken place due to their efforts? Why have these efforts been so ineffective?
Education is one of the cornerstones of culture. Every nation educates to produce the type of future citizens it wants and needs. OK, so most of you have probably already given this some thought. When I read threads such as the long-running "Promoting change in China's Classrooms", it makes me just want to shake my head at the sheer blindness to the role of an FT in China and a type of stubborn individual cultural/pedagogical attitude that evokes images of a video crusader or Don Quixote jousting with windmills. What do your students really need, good communicative language skills or high marks on some nit-picking and perhaps error-ridden examination? If you chose the former, you're going to be one sad puppy at day's end.
Now, in the classroom, control is perhaps one of the critical factors for a successful course. Allow me to refer you to this site for some assistance and understanding:
www.disciplinehelp.com
There have been some good ideas and some strange ideas given on this thread. Getting to know the students, and having them prepare a "class passport" is one that I also use. The little booklet has a picture, English and Chinese names, contact info and ideas about learning and also includes a personal pledge to try to work hard. If you want to take it a step further, you may also have a place for assignment and test/quiz results, comments and other outcomes; sort of a running report card.
At the start of each class, I stand outside the door in the hallway and greet the students as they enter the classroom. As they enter, I will ask them whether they have their materials, have completed their assignments, or just how they feel that day. I am a strict disciplinarian, but I never get angry. You'd be surprised at how much students will accept if you discipline with affection and humour, and how little they can accept anger or rejection. Hey, all of us have to be there when we'd rather be elsewhere, but I'm the only one who's getting paid for the time. With 1 RMB purchasing about as much as $1 back home, who could be angry at getting even 150 an hour? Before you go throwing books or mobile phones out the window, take a deep breath and count to three. When you let it out again, make it a laugh.
<rant off>
RED |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
arioch36
Joined: 21 Jan 2003 Posts: 3589
|
Posted: Mon Sep 03, 2007 7:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
So Worldly, how long in China? In the classroom? I left my Pyche ed grad course partly because of the stupidity of what some of their teachings were. Too much PC crap designed to be published in journals real teachers never use, never successful in the classroom. The famed educator Dewey (of the Dewey Decimal Sysytem) was a total failure as a teacher and administrator.
Wordly writes
| Quote: |
| I agree classroom control is essential. However, if the teacher is the "center," that's contrary to most modern pedagogical practices (in the West) regarding adult learning. If the students aren't adults, or are adults that are less mature, then classroom control becomes more important. In adult learning environments, the lecturer is never the center of attention. Adult learning is always student-centered. |
Please, repeat your textbook contrite garbage elsewhere. Yes it sounds nice. My parents were teachers, grandfather a headmaster, I was a professional student.
First...lecturer??? Again, if you are a lecturer, you have failed as a teacher in China. Very few of our courses use this. Our job is to get students to do! (Students centered) Which requires that they be focused on us.
Lecturer and student centered...oxymorons. When you lecture, you are the center of attention. But again, a lecturer is not going to be a good oral teacher. Seems strange that every teacher with real experience seems to disagree with your westeren idea of student-centered teaching. But having spent many years at the uni, I can say this also is not what exists in the university level or high school level. The teacher is, has always been the center. The lecturer is always the center of attention!! Every classroom I have ever been in, the teacher was the center, who would sometimes shine the spotlight on a student momentarily
P.S. the class I threw the books out of... still have many friends from those students, and I was actually applauded. Good class reviews. Now three years at the college. But now I have mellowed. I tell the monitor to do it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
arioch36
Joined: 21 Jan 2003 Posts: 3589
|
Posted: Mon Sep 03, 2007 7:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| At the start of each class, I stand outside the door in the hallway and greet the students as they enter the classroom. As they enter, I will ask them whether they have their materials |
Yes, I make the habit of saying goodbye to them. And when you can say their name to them, this is worth as much as the cleverest of lesson plans.
| Quote: |
| Before you go throwing books or mobile phones out the window, take a deep breath and count to three |
.
Maybe I should not have said "threw out the window". No anger, though sometimes I do let students "see anger". I told the student the next time he openeds his other textbook in my classroom it was going out the window. I do try to keep my promises
I think each teacher must teach within their personality, though. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
arioch36
Joined: 21 Jan 2003 Posts: 3589
|
Posted: Mon Sep 03, 2007 7:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
www.disciplinehelp.com
I didn't find this to applicable to classroom problems in China. A lot of the problem is just years of training of going to the classroom and doing nothing. That's why I like teaching Grade 1 freshman at college. I can instill in them good learning habits. As of this day I can still say that every freshman college student I have had has graduated. By grade three, forget it. You can help them a little, but their bad habits have become so ingrained, and they know they can do anything and still graduate
Of course at this site they don't mention the truth, that what America does to its problem boy is zonk him out with speed (ie Ritalin), despite long term effects. But their words sound nice |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Lobster

Joined: 20 Jun 2006 Posts: 2040 Location: Somewhere under the Sea
|
Posted: Mon Sep 03, 2007 9:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
I think there's a lot of truth in what you said about the applicability of theory in the classroom, particularly the Chinese classroom. I mentioned the discipine website because it appears that many people who teach here have absolutely no theoretical knowledge of teaching and have difficulty with classroom control, which leads to a poor learning environment and a frustrated teacher. They really want to be perceived as a friend and then can't maintain order. It should be remembered that behind every behaviour, there's a person with issues in their life. I feel that a successful teacher has developed a deep understanding of the human condition and think about students' lives outside the classroom. I personally confiscate contraband materials, use them as a discussion point, and have the transgressor make a case for their return at class end.
RED |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
vikuk

Joined: 23 May 2007 Posts: 1842
|
Posted: Mon Sep 03, 2007 12:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| I feel that a successful teacher has developed a deep understanding of the human condition and think about students' lives outside the classroom. |
Also think of their school life-histories inside those classes - and how their classroom habits have been helped along by a pedagogical process that is very different from the one most of us have been used to.
This of course starts from kindy/schoolday 1 - and is geared to getting the child used to forced learning (learning as a discipline and duty rather than a pleasure) - through the assumption that the knowledge passed on by the teacher is always 100% correct (the teacher is an official figure who should not be questioned) - and through a system that gives the student very little choice with regard to adjusting and altering the course of their educational progress (other than passing or failing exams).
This type of approach could be well described as - indoctrination pedagogy.
However the problem with this type of system - is that it represents the old stuffy generation of post 49'ers and not the new developing international China. As such it could be seen as being way out of tune with the new youth - who show their in-classroom agitation for it - if for nothing else out of sheer boredom and personal distaste for the way it dominates Chinese childhood and youth - through their rather strange classroom behaviour. By the way this theory hasn't taken into account other social factors such as the little emperor syndrome, over schooling or even Chinese nationalism and the FT.
So I�m afraid many FT's - especially those who maybe untrained, inexperienced, uninspired, naive - when they arrive into a classroom of bored pizzed off students - may seem a real soft touch � after all not many of us have been trained into managing classes in this type of "hard-core, no fun" educational environment (school kids here get really hard to manage by the age of about 10 - because they're amazingly bored by an amazingly boring education system). Hey-presto your classrooms maybe dominated by student anarchy - misbehaving younger kids - which higher education establishments may mature into the pupils for their classrooms of living death - where older students read, sleep, mobile message or even nose-pick their lessons away.
And the solution - well you can take the Hitler approach and scare the opposition into submission (Chinese school-teachers), or very little (Chinese univesity lecturers). Or better still - more of you good teachers - could get down to grass-roots level and start to work at pre-school/primary level - since this is the area where changes should be made in Chinese education.
Of course this is also naive BS since any change in educational environments here is going to take more than a few FT's - but if some of you guys are surprised when you see what goes on in institutions for the older students - you should take a look inside the ordinary schools for younger kids. Now that can be totally mind-bending. When you realise the numbing school existence they have to endure - then you can start to work out why students may develop the way they do in China - and why some of best intended projects to liven up the classroom turn out to be dismal disasters � through factors that Chinese education really does seem good at producing � student exhaustion and apathy. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling. Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|