|
Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
vikuk

Joined: 23 May 2007 Posts: 1842
|
Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 12:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| I've met ex-pats who've lived here for decades with just rudimentary Japanese. I am embarrassed for them since they are often too oblivious to appreciate how retarded they sound. |
Please don't let this discussion sink into a rant about folk who don't want to learn Chinese - after all that's something to do with personal choice, and even personal ability. Rants on this subject may start to look like a gloat - and you know how we hate those other ex-pats gloating over their high wages while your average FT just earns the odd peanut.
So far the debate has been focussed on professional criteria - the advantages of using Chinese in certain EFL situations. Many reasons have been put forward that state that Chinese is a great EFL teaching tool.
So far the points against are
- your boss doesn't allow you to use Chinese.
- students may laugh at your bad Chinese
- elite language schools in the US can teach an L2 in L2 only learning environments.
I think we're lacking some convincing argument from the anti-camp!!!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
fat_chris
Joined: 10 Sep 2003 Posts: 3198 Location: Beijing
|
Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 3:21 pm Post subject: Re: NOT KNOWING CHINESE |
|
|
| miamimaestro wrote: |
Hey fellow ESL teachers. Just curious? Give me your perspective in teaching ESL in China. What if you don't know the local language?  |
My post was a response to a broad question. I just gave a perspective on "what if you don't know the local language?"
Agreed though, vikuk, no need to gloat and I hope I didn't come across as doing so. As for those FT's, for instance, who gloat about their 8,000 RMB/month position, as has happened to me on occasion in an ex-pat bar, in retrospect, to brag about 8,000/month...ridiculous!
I believe that the use of the students' L1 in the classroom by both the instructor and the students can be beneficial in learning the L2. I don't believe in a NO CHINESE! rule. Of course, how much Chinese used is a different story...
Shuize, I try my damndest to not be one of those. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
vikuk

Joined: 23 May 2007 Posts: 1842
|
Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 3:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| Of course, how much Chinese used is a different story... |
The above quote should be the start off point for the serious part of the debate!!!!!!
The "how much" measure also must have something to do with the ability levels of your students - which brings me to a word of warning for wannabe China FT's -
If you're offered a job teaching children - and are told that you must teach under "English only in the classroom" rules - then be prepared for fun. In these kind of classes most of the kids have lost the plot after 2 minutes - and if you haven't any Chinese speaking assistance - then, more often than not, that lesson is a lost cause. Many a poor Ft has tried to battle on in such circumstances - but the teacher loss rate is high in the mega-stress world of kiddy EFL China.
For newbies wanting some sort of protection against the horror of Chinese kids gone berserk - make sure your new employers guarantee Chinese teaching assistance in your classes. It makes life teaching English to children so much more easier, and indeed pleasant. And believe it or not - children, who now understand a lot more of what's going on, can actually learn in these well controlled classes  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
The_Hanged_Man

Joined: 10 Oct 2004 Posts: 224 Location: Tbilisi, Georgia
|
Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 4:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I think the amount of classroom management required plays a large role in how much of the native language is needed.
For a group of highly motivated bright university or adult students probably very little is required if you are focusing on conversational aspects.
On the other hand if you are teaching a bunch of sullen middle school students who being forced to take the class and who couldn't care less about learning English then obviously you will need to use the native language. Conducting crowd control and maintaining discipline would be pretty much impossible if the students don't understand precisely what you are saying. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
vikuk

Joined: 23 May 2007 Posts: 1842
|
Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 4:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| On the other hand if you are teaching a bunch of sullen middle school students who being forced to take the class and who couldn't care less about learning English then obviously you will need to use the native language. |
Does this not sound like familiar ground to most China FT's - couldn't the above job description (at many levels of education - not just middle school) sum up so many Chinese EFL jobs  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
shuize
Joined: 04 Sep 2004 Posts: 1270
|
Posted: Fri Mar 28, 2008 12:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I understand if someone who does not plan to stay more than just a few years does not want to put in the effort to achieve fluency in an Asian language. But when one gets to the 10 or 15 year mark and it's pretty obvious he is not going anywhere, it's not gloating to expect him to get off his butt and learn a bit more than a slow child. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
tw
Joined: 04 Jun 2005 Posts: 3898
|
Posted: Fri Mar 28, 2008 5:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
| vikuk wrote: |
| Quote: |
| you really wouldn't want to speak Chinese to them. |
Why not???? |
With a Chinese face and fluently bilingual, I'd be no different from a Chinese teacher who can speak fluent English if my students knew I can speak Chinese, that's why. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
vikuk

Joined: 23 May 2007 Posts: 1842
|
Posted: Fri Mar 28, 2008 5:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| With a Chinese face and fluently bilingual, I'd be no different from a Chinese teacher who can speak fluent English if my students knew I can speak Chinese, that's why |
I think we learn from our own school experiences - that there isn't a standard teacher. I think we learn from our China experiences - that Caucasian appearance doesn't guarantee high standards of EFL teaching!!!!
With this in mind - don't think so much about your appearance - but think more about utalising all those pedagogical tools you have in engineering effective learning environments. Which may mean that it makes good educational sense in resorting to use your Chinese in situations when students just can't understand your English - even if on a personal level you don't wish to be confused with a local teacher.
But then again this advice is of no use to the OP - since I don't believe he is of Asian heritage!!!!
On a more on-topic note, lets go to the question regarding our ex-pats and their lack of the local lingo. Well that's a personal choice for them - but in these forums the posts should focus on professional teaching matters. In that respect I think it would be far better for this debate to dwell on those employers who so willingly send FT's into Chinese classroom situations with no real Chinese language back-up (I'm specifically thinking here about newbies who are not given professional Chinese teaching assistance). If this is a case of not giving this service in the name of economy - then maybe a bit of this forum's hot air should sent in the direction of those errant employers 
Last edited by vikuk on Fri Mar 28, 2008 5:55 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
arioch36
Joined: 21 Jan 2003 Posts: 3589
|
Posted: Fri Mar 28, 2008 5:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
Vikuk
| Quote: |
| Does this not sound like familiar ground to most China FT's - couldn't the above job description (at many levels of education - not just middle school) sum up so many Chinese EFL jobs |
DOn't agree. Most of my classes over the years, most students have wanted to learn. Which goes to one of my points
tw
| Quote: |
| With a Chinese face and fluently bilingual, I'd be no different from a Chinese teacher who can speak fluent English if my students knew I can speak Chinese, that's why. |
Of a class of 40 (I am teaching non-english majors at a mid low 2nd tier college) about five are ready to go the first class ( a higher percentage if in an english major class) Another 25-30 need help to understand I want of them. As tw states, we are not Chinese. I do not teach like any Chinese teacher they have
With most classes, using CHinese and english, especially the first three weeks, gives many of them the ability to know clearly what is expected, and how they can improve, and be proud of their study.
Another five or ten (usually boys who sit in the back the first week) will constantly need Chinese to help them speak english IMO
Another 5 are lazy or rebellious, and will hurt the class if not held accountable. Here is where the threat of failing being backed up by a good department, and hopefully a good class monitir is vital. With a good class monitor and dep's .. no student fails, and every student participates enough that is doesn't hurt the dynamics of the class. If those 5 boys are allowed to be lazy, well " Jin zhu zhe chi, Jin mo zhe hei", one bad apple spoils the bunch.
These five boys, knowing Chinese won't help much, but if the montior and dep't don't know much English, being able to speak a little Chinese will help you win the Dep't and monitor and other Chinese teachers help in holding these five accountable
P.S. [color=red]I have found, that if you can't speak Chinese even a little, you will not get to know many Chinese teachers. But if you can even speak a little chinese, the doors open, they open up to you some, and you start learning so much more about how the school works
Opinions?
Last edited by arioch36 on Fri Mar 28, 2008 6:03 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
vikuk

Joined: 23 May 2007 Posts: 1842
|
Posted: Fri Mar 28, 2008 6:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
Well arioch you must be familiar with the sullen Chinese student who doesn't want to learn, after all you write -
| Quote: |
Another five or ten (usually boys who sit in the back the first week) will constantly need Chinese to help them speak english IMO
Another 5 are lazy or rebellious, and will hurt the class if not held accountable |
- and then go on to give further accounts on how you use the Chinese language to try and rectify your classroom problems.
What would the FT with no Chinese language resources be able to do in those situations you've described 
Last edited by vikuk on Fri Mar 28, 2008 6:04 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
fat_chris
Joined: 10 Sep 2003 Posts: 3198 Location: Beijing
|
Posted: Fri Mar 28, 2008 6:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
| shuize wrote: |
| I understand if someone who does not plan to stay more than just a few years does not want to put in the effort to achieve fluency in an Asian language. But when one gets to the 10 or 15 year mark and it's pretty obvious he is not going anywhere, it's not gloating to expect him to get off his butt and learn a bit more than a slow child. |
Shuize, I wholeheartedly agree.
Regards,
fat_chris |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
arioch36
Joined: 21 Jan 2003 Posts: 3589
|
Posted: Fri Mar 28, 2008 6:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
for the five or ten weakest students, they need to be put in a group with someone who will keep them going. Find who speak english best in that group (I use groups of four of five usually), and have them translate. The second week of class I always break the class into groups (boys and girls evenly dispersed) for each activity they talk first to one group member, then the next. By week five, ubderstanding of my method settles in fairly well, litle chinese used, little talking by me. (Then act week 13, they start slipping a little)
really, in a good class, this happens anyway, and I encourage it. In a group, where understanding isn't clear, hopefully one will explain. But the explanation isn't always correct. How can a teacher know? And they want it from the teacher. When it comes from the hands of another student, classroom dynamics change. It also increases the dresed habit of a "better" student doing all the work for a poorer student and answering every question for the poorer student
I have had classes (Especially my first year) where I had to have a student translate for the class) For me, not ideal. First, other students were resentful. they thought the student translating thought they were special, two girsl came to me and said, "You know, whe's not the only one who has good english). It breaks the chain of command, so to speak.
For these students with poor english (and my Chinese is not great) our attempting to use poor english and poor chinese together sometime works well at creating a bond, as we struggle together. Also students see me struggling as well to learn a language. So I am not being a hypocrite in their eyes, telling them they should study english to make themselves a better student and be proud of themselves. Last semester I can remember two such boys directly. They always tried to say something to me outside class, despite terrible english. But the Chinese philosophy is cream rises to the top, ignore these students
What is your thought on the matter??? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
vikuk

Joined: 23 May 2007 Posts: 1842
|
Posted: Fri Mar 28, 2008 6:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| What is your thought on the matter??? |
Your post throws up another Chinese language resource that can be used by the FT - the bilingual ability of the class's best students.
Some students may actually learn more English from their roles as tutors/teaching assistants (learning as in getting to use English - recapping and practicing English through that teaching role) - than the more passive occupation of just listening to the teacher. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
arioch36
Joined: 21 Jan 2003 Posts: 3589
|
Posted: Fri Mar 28, 2008 7:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
Vikuk, your experinces please? or are you always teaching kids, in which case it is best not to speak Chinese, because that way you never have to talk to the parents!
One weakness of us laowai, is we do not use the strengths of the Chinese system.
The sytem is designed (by default or forethought0 to give key students a much more proactive and integral part in the education process. I consider this a stength because it can benefit in the developing of future leaders.
But I think many of us don't understand using the students and class leaders because it is foreign to our experience. this handicaps us Most laowai do not understand the role of class leader and study leader. Students are in charge of the computers, of many tasks. The con is that this can lead to abuses, and it can also lead to things being done is a piss-poor fashion |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
arioch36
Joined: 21 Jan 2003 Posts: 3589
|
Posted: Fri Mar 28, 2008 7:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| listening to the teacher. |
The number one fault of all oral teachers is that they talk to much. It's mine, at least. I give them a clear precise foundation of exactly how to talk, and let them go. I can't make them stop. I just have to prowl and keep them under close observation |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling. Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|