|
Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
dixie

Joined: 23 Apr 2006 Posts: 644 Location: D.F
|
Posted: Sat Aug 09, 2008 5:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
My new job provided a cultural lesson for its new hires this past Thursday, and it was quite interesting. The things that were discussed, and that helped me to better understand Mexico (even after two years here) were -
1. Mexico is a collectivist cultural, and thus the interest of the individual are subordinate to those of the group. Conflict is seen as negative, and destructive to the group. Thus one's id is based on their social network. Harmony, rather than speaking one's mind is a key value. In contrast, the US culture (and to a lesser extend CND, Britian, etc) are individualistic countries, there "I" is stronger than "We". People are independent, and are praised for being so.
2. Mexicans communicate in an Indirect (high context) manner, meaning words, and non-verbal clues are important to understanding what is being communicated from person to person. People in this type of culture tend to infer, imply, or suggest rather than say things directly. Again, in contrast, the US culture is direct (low context), and you say what you mean, and rely for the most part on the words, rather than non-verbal expressions to communicate your message.
3. Mexican live in a Polychronic culture, meaning that time is limitless, and people are never too busy. Time is the tool, and servant of the people, and is suited to their needs. Schedules, and datelines are often changed, and there is a greater emphasis on doing numerous tasks at once, with emphasis on relationship building, rather than deadline meeting. US culture is Monochronic, and time is commodity, and there is only a limited amount, thus it must be used carefully, and not "wasted". Emphasis is placed on concentrating on one task at a time, and with a commitment to schedules.
The example used for being a collective country (no.1) was the raising of children. In the US 18 is seen as the age when kids leave home, whereas here it is usually whenever the child marries, even if that means he/she will be 35 and still living with mom, and dad. We see the Mexican way as a child taking advantage of a parent, or that there is something wrong with the kid. It is also how we have the "Mama's Boy" idea. For Mexicans though, they see it as looking after their child, who will in turn look after them when they are older, and needing help - it is a group effort, forever, and ever, to help each other survive. Mexicans on the other hand see it as cruel to have our children leave home so young, even though most US kids are ready to display their independence, and "make it" without mom, and dad.
For number 2, the example was that of inviting a Mexican to your house for a dinner, or party, and being told "yes", only to have them not show up. Because conflict is a strong negative, the "yes" is given becasue it is seen as being more polite than saying "sorry, but I have other commitments". They don't want the person inviting them to think that they are worth less than other people in their life. Thus why it is important to be able to read, and understand the non-verbal clues.
And for number three, I think we all have many examples that spring to mind!! The one given in the course was the idea of the mother-in-law calling right when a person is living for work to say that she has a water leak, and needs a plumber. Even though the relative is going to be late, their mother-in-law becomes first priority, and they get to work when they do. Relationships are always above other priorities. In the US however, you buy your agenda, that has a two page spread for each day, which is then divided up into 15 minute blocks so that you can precisely schedule every moment, and activity.
Whew...hope thats not too long, and hopefully it might help others to more clearly see why they are getting frustrated. I know it helped me, and I am trying to be more aware of my frustrations, and recognize why they exist, and that this IS who Mexico is, and so I need to adjust, or forever swing between honeymoon period, and critical period, which I really do not want to do!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MO39

Joined: 28 Jan 2004 Posts: 1970 Location: El ombligo de la Rep�blica Mexicana
|
Posted: Sat Aug 09, 2008 6:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| dixie wrote: |
For number 2, the example was that of inviting a Mexican to your house for a dinner, or party, and being told "yes", only to have them not show up. Because conflict is a strong negative, the "yes" is given becasue it is seen as being more polite than saying "sorry, but I have other commitments". They don't want the person inviting them to think that they are worth less than other people in their life. Thus why it is important to be able to read, and understand the non-verbal clues.
|
I've lived longer than 2 years in Mexico (though not consecutively), but some things still get my goat. the above example is one of them. So it's seen as more considerate to accept an invitation you have no intention of keeping than to tell the person offering the invitation that you have a previous commitment When you don't show up at the event you've been invited to, how does that make the person you've in a sense "stood up" feel? Certainly of less value than other people in your life! I think it's more a matter of lying to get out of an uncomfortable situation than wanting to make someone think they are very important to you. And what non-verbal cues are you supposed to read every time you offer someone an invitation? Or should you just suppose that many of the people you have invited just won't show up? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dixie

Joined: 23 Apr 2006 Posts: 644 Location: D.F
|
Posted: Sat Aug 09, 2008 7:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| MO39 wrote: |
| dixie wrote: |
For number 2, the example was that of inviting a Mexican to your house for a dinner, or party, and being told "yes", only to have them not show up. Because conflict is a strong negative, the "yes" is given becasue it is seen as being more polite than saying "sorry, but I have other commitments". They don't want the person inviting them to think that they are worth less than other people in their life. Thus why it is important to be able to read, and understand the non-verbal clues.
|
I've lived longer than 2 years in Mexico (though not consecutively), but some things still get my goat. the above example is one of them. So it's seen as more considerate to accept an invitation you have no intention of keeping than to tell the person offering the invitation that you have a previous commitment When you don't show up at the event you've been invited to, how does that make the person you've in a sense "stood up" feel? Certainly of less value than other people in your life! I think it's more a matter of lying to get out of an uncomfortable situation than wanting to make someone think they are very important to you. And what non-verbal cues are you supposed to read every time you offer someone an invitation? Or should you just suppose that many of the people you have invited just won't show up? |
I agree with you, but all of the Mexicans in the audience were in 100% agreement with what was said.
The other thing we discussed was explicit culture (characteristics we id as belonging to our culture, and can readily explain) vs. tacit culture (everything we know about our culture but dont know how to explain). Explict culture are things such as ones music, literature, dance, food/drink, ceremonies, manners, etc. while tacit culture is truth, child rearing, work, decision making, friendship, responsibilities, etc. For example, every culture has their own idea of what distance is appropriate in relationship to personal space. US believes it be about a foot, and a half, and when greeting someone you shake hands, and keep a "comfortable" distance. Here however, you greet by kissing, and closing that foot, and a half space. That is tacit culture - something we do, but dont usually explain or think about - its just done.
So while we feel angry, and frustrated, and whatever when a friend stands up our invitation, that is OUR culture speaking, but the action taken by that friend is THEIR culture. And, we are in Mexico so...
Another point that was made by the person giving the talk is that originally we were NOT suppose to mix cultures. We had our groups, and would club any strange group that tried to approach us. Thus, we segregated ourselves and evolved within a "one culture" idea. Nowadays, with so much travel, and whatnot, many ppl are trying to live in another culture, and failure to adapt is normal, because originally we were not suppose to adapt! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Milenka

Joined: 30 Jun 2008 Posts: 113 Location: Mexico City
|
Posted: Sat Aug 09, 2008 8:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| ontoit wrote: |
1. Accept and embrace the superiority of the other's turf, the food, the women, the culture, etc, and agree quickly and earnestly when individuals from that turf point out the failings and absurdities of where you come from. In short, take your place at the bottom of the pecking order and embrace it.
|
On a sidenote, let's hope one day us, women, are not included in a list of objects/aspects belonging to someone's turf.
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MO39

Joined: 28 Jan 2004 Posts: 1970 Location: El ombligo de la Rep�blica Mexicana
|
Posted: Sat Aug 09, 2008 8:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
dixie, I really appreciate your sharing what you learned at the workshop at your new school. If I seem to be a bit cantankerous in my reaction to what was said, it's not because I haven't heard it before, in cultural anthropology classes, for example, and, of course, I've experienced it from the times I've spent living in Mexico. I think that sometimes rude behavior (and, yes, I have Mexican friends who would agree that not showing up for a dinner you've been invited to is rude) should not be explained away by using cultural differences as an excuse.
When you wrote that all the Mexicans in the audience (why were they in the audience, by the way, if the purpose of the talk was to explain Mexican culture to non-Mexicans?) were in agreement with what was said, does that mean that they thought that things were fine that way, or were they able to assess their culture from an outsider's point of view? I wonder how many of them have spent any time not living immersed in their own culture. That would certainly make a difference in their attitudes. And that business that failing to adapt to a new culture is normal because cultures were originally not supposed to mix - that's going back a long way in human history, to a time when few people traveled much beyond their village and didn't have much contact with people who didn't share their language and culture. I don't know how valid it is in today's world...
Anyway, I'm curious to read what others forum participants have to say about all this. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MO39

Joined: 28 Jan 2004 Posts: 1970 Location: El ombligo de la Rep�blica Mexicana
|
Posted: Sat Aug 09, 2008 8:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Milenka wrote: |
| ontoit wrote: |
1. Accept and embrace the superiority of the other's turf, the food, the women, the culture, etc, and agree quickly and earnestly when individuals from that turf point out the failings and absurdities of where you come from. In short, take your place at the bottom of the pecking order and embrace it.
|
On a sidenote, let's hope one day us, women, are not included in a list of objects/aspects belonging to someone's turf.
 |
Good one, Milenka. Ontoit has seemed to have forgotten that many TEFLer's are women themselves and don't regard the women of the country they've chosen to live in for a bit as just another exotic cultural commodity to enjoy. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dixie

Joined: 23 Apr 2006 Posts: 644 Location: D.F
|
Posted: Sat Aug 09, 2008 10:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| MO39 wrote: |
dixie, I really appreciate your sharing what you learned at the workshop at your new school. If I seem to be a bit cantankerous in my reaction to what was said, it's not because I haven't heard it before, in cultural anthropology classes, for example, and, of course, I've experienced it from the times I've spent living in Mexico. I think that sometimes rude behavior (and, yes, I have Mexican friends who would agree that not showing up for a dinner you've been invited to is rude) should not be explained away by using cultural differences as an excuse.
When you wrote that all the Mexicans in the audience (why were they in the audience, by the way, if the purpose of the talk was to explain Mexican culture to non-Mexicans?) were in agreement with what was said, does that mean that they thought that things were fine that way, or were they able to assess their culture from an outsider's point of view? I wonder how many of them have spent any time not living immersed in their own culture. That would certainly make a difference in their attitudes. And that business that failing to adapt to a new culture is normal because cultures were originally not supposed to mix - that's going back a long way in human history, to a time when few people traveled much beyond their village and didn't have much contact with people who didn't share their language and culture. I don't know how valid it is in today's world...
Anyway, I'm curious to read what others forum participants have to say about all this. |
I too am interested in what others have to say. Personally I found it interesting just because it allowed me to better understand (not like) things that I have, and others have, experienced here.
As for having trouble adapting to another's culture, what country exists that has no issues with immigrants? Or that immigrants don't have troubles adapting to their new country? There are people who live abroad for 30 plus years and never pass the critical / honeymoon swing. It wasn't that long ago that natives were ripped from their families, and forced into government schools to assimilate them into "Canadian Culture".
The beauty of travel is getting to experience other people, and cultures, but I think it can be a hard thing to adapt to, especially if you go to make it your new home. And if it involves learning a new language....  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ontoit
Joined: 18 Jun 2006 Posts: 99
|
Posted: Sun Aug 10, 2008 12:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Milenka wrote: |
| ontoit wrote: |
1. Accept and embrace the superiority of the other's turf, the food, the women, the culture, etc, and agree quickly and earnestly when individuals from that turf point out the failings and absurdities of where you come from. In short, take your place at the bottom of the pecking order and embrace it.
|
On a sidenote, let's hope one day us, women, are not included in a list of objects/aspects belonging to someone's turf.
 |
Before Mario Puzo assembled the collective wisdom of man's experience with social relations into one tome, Hemingway had provided the essential proto rule-of-thumb for behavior in a foreign culture in For Whom the Bell Tolls : "Bring plenty of cigarettes to offer to the men and don't mess with the women."
Women, like it or not, are a highly sensitive and potentially very dangerous subject vis-a-vis strangers in a strange land. Women are a part of the male/animal psychology and instinctual hard wiring and so have taken their place in his social constructs as well. To wit: men in a culture want outsiders to admire but keep their paws of their women.
No, if you will excuse me, I am going to step outside and piss on a tree. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MO39

Joined: 28 Jan 2004 Posts: 1970 Location: El ombligo de la Rep�blica Mexicana
|
Posted: Sun Aug 10, 2008 12:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
| ontoit wrote: |
| Milenka wrote: |
| ontoit wrote: |
1. Accept and embrace the superiority of the other's turf, the food, the women, the culture, etc, and agree quickly and earnestly when individuals from that turf point out the failings and absurdities of where you come from. In short, take your place at the bottom of the pecking order and embrace it.
|
On a sidenote, let's hope one day us, women, are not included in a list of objects/aspects belonging to someone's turf.
 |
To wit: men in a culture want outsiders to admire but keep their paws of their women. |
In your little scheme of the way things (and cultures) work, I suppose what the women in a culture want is of no consequence, including whether or not they want any man's paws on them! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ontoit
Joined: 18 Jun 2006 Posts: 99
|
Posted: Sun Aug 10, 2008 1:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
| MO39 wrote: |
 |
To wit: men in a culture want outsiders to admire but keep their paws of their women. [/quote]
In your little scheme of the way things (and cultures) work, I suppose what the women in a culture want is of no consequence, including whether or not they want any man's paws on them![/quote]
Frankly, no. At least not in terms of the biological imperative. But the evolution of our social construct has made it necessary for men to be sensitive and clever, to buy flowers, send cards, notice your hair style, remember your birthday and otherwise make nice to lure you into our clutches, or paws, as it were.
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Milenka

Joined: 30 Jun 2008 Posts: 113 Location: Mexico City
|
Posted: Sun Aug 10, 2008 2:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
| ontoit wrote: |
At least not in terms of the biological imperative.
 |
I have no faith whatsoever in any "biological imperative" or "instinctual hard wiring". Biologism has more and more proven to fail when explaining social behavior. Anyway, this is a debate I've many times engaged in and have no interest in going at it again: it's never fruitful. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MO39

Joined: 28 Jan 2004 Posts: 1970 Location: El ombligo de la Rep�blica Mexicana
|
Posted: Sun Aug 10, 2008 2:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Milenka wrote: |
| ontoit wrote: |
At least not in terms of the biological imperative.
 |
I have no faith whatsoever in any "biological imperative" or "instinctual hard wiring". Biologism has more and more proven to fail when explaining social behavior. Anyway, this is a debate I've many times engaged in and have no interest in going at it again: it's never fruitful. |
I agree with you, Milenka. Though I feel my feminist hackles rising when confronted with attitudes like those of ontoit, I also realize that no good can come of reacting emotionally to his hopelessly outdated ideas. So I hereby take myself out of this discussion. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ontoit
Joined: 18 Jun 2006 Posts: 99
|
Posted: Sun Aug 10, 2008 2:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Milenka wrote: |
| ontoit wrote: |
At least not in terms of the biological imperative.
 |
I have no faith whatsoever in any "biological imperative" or "instinctual hard wiring". Biologism has more and more proven to fail when explaining social behavior. Anyway, this is a debate I've many times engaged in and have no interest in going at it again: it's never fruitful. |
A complicated area, indeed; but the majority of the population couples and makes babies, so regardless of which position one takes on the issue, the result is the continuation of populations, from which people like us spring and eventually wander into foreign cultures, where we connect with others and discuss how one gets along in those cultures, which leads to the cultural/biological debate and whether the acceptance/rejection of foreigners is nature or nurture
The cycle continues. . . |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
sweeney66
Joined: 26 Mar 2008 Posts: 147 Location: "home"
|
Posted: Tue Aug 12, 2008 1:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
Dixie, that's great information! Sounds kind of familiar, too, though I don't know why. To me, it's just fascinating to ponder.
I also think it's great that your school presented the info in a bi-cultural setting. So your colleagues know a bit more about where you're coming from, too.
I'm sure that I've unknowingly offended some of my friends with my directness. "No, sorry, I can't. I have other plans." Or students! "Well, what mark did you expect, when you've missed half the classes?"
Ha!
Well, they put up with me. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MO39

Joined: 28 Jan 2004 Posts: 1970 Location: El ombligo de la Rep�blica Mexicana
|
Posted: Tue Aug 12, 2008 2:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
| sweeney66 wrote: |
I'm sure that I've unknowingly offended some of my friends with my directness. "No, sorry, I can't. I have other plans." Or students! "Well, what mark did you expect, when you've missed half the classes?"
Ha!
Well, they put up with me. |
I think that often Mexicans who have friends from non-Latin cultures realize that we do have different ways of reacting to invitations and are more direct in many ways. Some Mexican friends have told me that they like this and wish Mexicans could be a bit less indirect about things, though maybe they were just being "nice". |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling. Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|