|
Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
notamiss

Joined: 20 Jun 2007 Posts: 908 Location: El 5o pino del la CDMX
|
Posted: Thu Nov 06, 2008 7:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
James Hetfield wrote: |
I google-cheated: AMLO y Stephen Harper:
Andr�s Manuel L�pez Obrador is one of the most famous desafuero processes in recent Mexican history took place during 2004 and 2005. This process was originated by a land owner who sued the Federal District's government on the grounds of improper expropriation of a patch of land called El Encino. This case detonated in L�pez Obrador's (AMLO) hands in 2005, when a vote by the Chamber of Deputies lifted his constitutional immunity against criminal charges. If officially charged, he would have lost all his civil rights, including the right to run for the presidency in 2006, unless he was either quickly acquitted of all charges or managed to serve his sentence before the electoral registration deadline. On April 27, 2005, President Vicente Fox announced changes in his cabinet, a re-evaluation of the legal case against AMLO and legal changes so civil rights are only suspended once a citizen is found guilty. Fox and L�pez Obrador met in the first week of May 2005, as part of the efforts to calm the political climate. The new Attorney General found a way to avoid prosecuting L�pez Obrador.
|
Sorry, partial marks only. I'd give this a 4/10.
AMLO is a person, not a court case (as all but the first sentence of your quote makes clear). And his surname name isn't Obrador (as you referred to him above). |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
thelmadatter
Joined: 31 Mar 2003 Posts: 1212 Location: in el Distrito Federal x fin!
|
Posted: Thu Nov 06, 2008 7:01 pm Post subject: Re: mmmm |
|
|
MELEE wrote: |
thelmadatter wrote: |
So if change doesnt happen during the next four years, it wont be Obama's fault but the American people's. Wow.. only 2 days after the election and the weaseling is in full swing.
|
weaseling?
WTF?
If anything "right wingers" ought to agree with what I said. It's not Fox's fault that Mexico has not changed as much as many people had hoped it would. One man can not make that kind of change alone.
I for one and happy to see a man in the White House who believe in doing for the country, rather than the country doing for him. I didn't live through the first one and am quite disgusted by the sense of entitlement that W team projects. Does anyone think Obama is going to the White House to pad his and his buddy's pockets?
Either way there are still some of the original checks and balances in place so one man will not make a huge difference. But I can't stop believing that millions of small differences can add up to a huge one. So yes, if there is no significate change over the next 4 years--it's all of our faults, I guess many of us are comfortable in the status quo. (But I don't see how that is weasling--realistic yes.) |
But Obama didnt run on everyone doing his part and on being realistic.. he ran as "The One" whose election will make it all right.
pad his and his buddy's pockets??? Guaranteed the cronies and sychophants are already asking for their handouts, in money, power or both. Obama owes too much to too many people to get where he is now.
Whatever sense of entitlement GW and friends had, fortunately, is always fleeting. If nothing else this election proves that. Republicans need to do some soul searching and find new blood. Fortunately, there is enough of it right now and some (Im thinking of Jindal here) have a chance to prove what they can do BEFORE even thinking about a national role (smart man that Gov of Louisiana)
I tried explaining to my BF that Obama's election will not make the immigration issue all better but he would not listen... just kept repeating that McCain hates Mexico and Obama would do right by them. That is not realism.
However, it seems that the US needs to go through bouts of extreme idealism (Kennedy, Carter and now Obama) to realize that we can not "play nice to make everyone love us and give everyone all the money they need" Reality is a b---h.
I dont know if you are weaseling MELEE... its just that you came right out and said what the left and the media started doing more subtly yesterday... downsizing expectations. However, the campaign shot them sky-high and many people bought it hook, line and sinker... after all if a "racist" America can elect a black man president, anything is possible right????
The hangover is starting already. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
MELEE

Joined: 22 Jan 2003 Posts: 2583 Location: The Mexican Hinterland
|
Posted: Thu Nov 06, 2008 7:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I've been here since September and I didn't see any Obama campaigning claiming he is "the one". Maybe because I'm in a "red state".
I don't think Obama will do anything about immigration--it will take a lot more than a president to change that mess, I don't even have a good idea about what sort of immigration reforms I would like to see. I would like it if my husband could finally get a tourist visa, it is ridiculous that he could get residency, but he can't come for a visit. But that's another issue.
Mainly what I see on the ground at the moment is celebrating the fact the the US has made it to a time in which a black candidate could get elected. of course the economic crises and republicans in power helped that.
Just one more thing since I have a four year old demanding lunch.
I saw the greatest bumper sticker.
Voting is like driving. You choose R to go backwards and D to go forwards. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Guy Courchesne

Joined: 10 Mar 2003 Posts: 9650 Location: Mexico City
|
Posted: Thu Nov 06, 2008 7:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
Now I'll try to control my motormouth. Stop ranting politics and start my big TEFL job hunt in Latin America. I must be careful not to upset you because I may need your expert advice in near future! In Latin America I may wind up teaching at a Catholic school, which will certainly test my Marxist Atheism, so I better start learning to bite my tongue more often! RAGE FATIGUE.... I'm exhausted.... !Salud! |
No worries mate. I just can't resist baiting Marxists when they come out to play.
Quote: |
I tried explaining to my BF that Obama's election will not make the immigration issue all better but he would not listen... just kept repeating that McCain hates Mexico and Obama would do right by them. That is not realism. |
Nope, and not that simple either. If anything, I think an Obama presidency will face srong protectionist pressures from the Dem base..unions, Jack the Plumber, manufacturing, etc. That means less help on an immigration accord or a higher wall maybe. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
kosherpickle
Joined: 24 Nov 2006 Posts: 93
|
Posted: Fri Nov 07, 2008 10:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
all i have to say is, james hetfield, if that is really you, you should stop sucking. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
James Hetfield

Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 99 Location: Los Angeles
|
Posted: Fri Nov 07, 2008 11:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
O MAN you are so right Kosher! I see with crystal clarity now that firing Jason Newsted was my worst decision and ruined my life forever.
I mean Trujillo's great but he aint no Newsted.... I deeply deeply regret how horribly horribly wrong my life turned so now I vow to spend the rest of my days teaching English to filthy foreigners in the worst cesspits of the world for peanuts.... O JEEEZ I hope I never see another ESP Black JH-2 Explorer!!!  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
geaaronson
Joined: 19 Apr 2005 Posts: 948 Location: Mexico City
|
Posted: Sat Nov 08, 2008 5:46 pm Post subject: some thoughts. |
|
|
interesting political conversation, spiced by the rhetorical rehash from Weatherman days. Having gone through anti-vietnam protests back in the late 60`s and listening to my non-fellow travellers, some of them Diaper Commies including at least one ex girlfriend, it`s a joy to hear the diatribe against the capitalist system as it is so amusing. So let`s get on your bandwagon, by golly, and all those pointy head ESL instructors in Mexico`s major cities need to go to the hamlets in Oaxaca and teach English to the campesinos a la Mao Tse Tungs Cultural Revolution. We will send you off in the first wave.
Probably there will be a move underway to incorporate the secondary agreements to NAFTA into NAFTA per se. This was an issue back in 1993 when Clinton decided not to risk torpedoeing NAFTA by insisting on environmental and labor issues written into the treaty itself but have them as secondary side agreements.
Obama, if I read it correctly, wants to revise NAFTA to include the side agreements into the original body of the agreement. As they are side agreements there are no means for enforcing either environmental safeguards in maquiladores in northern Mexico,(which incidentally are polluting the US border states with their emissions) nor are there any guarantees for truly independent unions in Mexico. For years the Mexican government buys off union organizers by giving them cozy bureaucratic positions at good salaries and an office in MX City that no one goes to. PEMEX and the teachers unions are the only independent unions and they, in contrast to so many other unions, have too much power.
How far Obama`s changes will be depends on the people of the USA. Will Americans embrace hybrid cars? Carter tried to change the habits of Americans back in 1979 but they were short lived when within the next decade American importation of oil skyrocketed. Will the left eventually accept new nuclear power plants? Will the Sierra Nevada crowd accept windmills dotting the landscape? How sustained will the governments efforts in transferring energy from the combustionable engine and petroleum to solar, electric and wind power?
We forget that politicians can only get so far ahead of the people. The people are opposed to putting Bolton, Perle, Rice and especially Rumsfield on trial at the Hague Court. Pelosi and Reid know they would only become politically marginal if they insisted on doing exactly that. In my mind, it`s a no-brainer. they are guilty of war crimes, in violation of the Geneva Convention. But there is no way that the US population would allow such a thing to happen. And despite everything said to the contrary, the people usually rule. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Prof.Gringo

Joined: 07 Nov 2006 Posts: 2236 Location: Dang Cong San Viet Nam Quang Vinh Muon Nam!
|
Posted: Sat Nov 08, 2008 6:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Interesting.
I don't think Obama will do much about immigration. Not much about anything else for that matter. Most of these guys never do. I don't think it's a left or right wing thing. It's just the way it is.
I would like to see some more "socialist" ideas blended in with US free markets. Stuff like national healthcare, free public education though the Uni level, better unemployment bennies and a few more workers rights (ones that get enforced that is).
Funny, I was into Marxism and the whole leftist thing back when I was 16.
Grew outta of it and I haven't looked back at Communism since. Last time I checked it was on it's deathbed. Only two countries that are left that could even be described as close to Communist: N. Korea (Great tourist destination) and Cuba (but with cell phones, microwaves and other 20-30 year old technology pouring in, it's kinda hard to tell how long that will last) 
Last edited by Prof.Gringo on Sat Nov 08, 2008 8:11 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Guy Courchesne

Joined: 10 Mar 2003 Posts: 9650 Location: Mexico City
|
Posted: Sat Nov 08, 2008 6:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Prof, you're a hard one to nail down. On one thread, you support the gunning down of socialist-minded students and here you like the idea of some socialist programs? What gives?
Quote: |
I don't think Obama will do much about immigration. |
I think you're right on this. The climate isn't good for anything on immigration. Calderon isn't pushing either. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Prof.Gringo

Joined: 07 Nov 2006 Posts: 2236 Location: Dang Cong San Viet Nam Quang Vinh Muon Nam!
|
Posted: Sat Nov 08, 2008 8:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Guy Courchesne wrote: |
Prof, you're a hard one to nail down. On one thread, you support the gunning down of socialist-minded students and here you like the idea of some socialist programs? What gives?
Quote: |
I don't think Obama will do much about immigration. |
I think you're right on this. The climate isn't good for anything on immigration. Calderon isn't pushing either. |
Yes, I am a tough one to nail down!
Peaceful socialist programs like what exist in Western Europe are great. It's the unruly lawbreakers that use anything as an excuse to create chaos that I don't really like.
I don't see immigration as a high priority in the next few years. How popular is a guest worker program going to be in the US when there's 9% (and going higher everyday) unemployment and no construction or service industry jobs to be filled? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
El Gallo

Joined: 05 Feb 2007 Posts: 318
|
Posted: Sun Nov 09, 2008 7:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Canadians calling Americans Marxists - how entertaining! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
geaaronson
Joined: 19 Apr 2005 Posts: 948 Location: Mexico City
|
Posted: Sun Nov 09, 2008 7:59 pm Post subject: further thoughts |
|
|
Yeah, immigration probably will take a back burner but now that there are 6-8 new senators and 15-20 new congressmen of the Democratic persuasion, it`s likely if any movement on the issue comes about it will come from Congress, not the White House. As it may, the Dems are about to hit big business with some changes in the rules of the tax game, and it may behoove them to liberalize immigration policies to assuage the pain. Don`t forget, Mexican labor is cheap labor in the manufacturing and service industries, something medium sized businesses always love.
So my prediction is that the McCain-Kennedy bill will be resurrected, possibly rewritten and pushed through sometime late spring, early summer of next year, with no help at all from the White House.
So, no, guys, I disagree with both Gringo and Guy about that one. You will mark my words and eat yours. At the latest, immigration will be mostly dealt with by November of 2009. As for American workers pain, you will see more liberal benefits for unemployment, so that will take care of that constituency on the labor issue. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling. Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|