|
Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
chinatwin88

Joined: 31 Aug 2009 Posts: 379 Location: Peking
|
Posted: Sat Sep 12, 2009 5:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| I don't think it can be disputed that, in China, displays of physical affection are much more common between women than men (e.g. holding hands in public). |
I would have to dispute this idea as I have often thought the culture on a whole, was rather same sex orientated (men, walking holding each other and couples strolling where as the man was carrying his (I think) womens purses). There are no official laws on the books against this kind of sexual expression and I have found gays in all forms of employment. It is my feeling that they suffer no more or no less than they would back in the US and fare even better if they are in large metropolitan areas much like the more liberal areas of the US. As far as I know there were no stonewall incidents (other than political purges in which the sexual orientation could have been an excuse) in china so the historic aversion to gay establishments have not been a strong factor in preventing a gay scene from developing. Somewhat seemingly gay students may be denied to be gay by co classmates and teachers and even given hormones to correct their tendencies. As far a government intervention or lack of benefits for gay partners, there seems not to be an issue for most citizens MOD EDIT |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
chengdu4me
Joined: 19 Feb 2009 Posts: 120 Location: Chengdu, Sichuan, China
|
Posted: Sat Sep 12, 2009 10:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
China being a conservative society, as well as a society that has "regional" views on pretty much any subject is going to be pretty difficult to pin down on this subject.
Shanghai you can get away with almost anything. Beijing, the same, but only in certain parts of the city. The less "metropolitan' it is, the less tolerant the locals, the officials are going to be of "independent" thinking or behavior.
So, the bottom line is this...what you can get away with in one city will get you five or ten years in a re-education camp in another, only deported in another, and maybe just fired from your job for breach of contract in yet another. Yes, homosexual conduct is illegal in China. It is a social crime, much like prostitution and the "cure" is a few years or more at very hard labor while you think about your behavior. Yes, you agreed not to break the laws of China when you signed your contract. Yes, if you get fired, deported, jailed, or fined, it is entirely your fault. Please remember that in China, you have no rights, no recourse. If the local police decide you are going to a re-education camp, you will just disappear, you do not get a phone call, you do not get to write Aunt Millie, your school wil not be notified, neither will the US consulate( or your country of citizenship) and there will be no "trial" Re-education camps are not part of the penal system. You are not be punished, therefore there is no need for a trial. You are being "educated" in moral behavior and learning to live in a manner that is reflective of the views of society. Class usually begins the moment you are in custody with a good beating!
Having said this, all that is left is your decision whether to flaunt the issue and take your chances, or keep your private life very, very discreet and exercise your lifestyle perogatives when you head for the big city on your breaks.
Whatever you do, be careful. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
chinatwin88

Joined: 31 Aug 2009 Posts: 379 Location: Peking
|
Posted: Sat Sep 12, 2009 11:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
Gay sex was decriminalised in 1997 in China. Before that, people used to be prosecuted under �hooliganism� laws which included homosexuality, sex in public, group sex, sex by force or sex with a child. Chinese Psychiatric Association and Psychiatrists in 2001, China no longer classify "tongzhi" as having a pathological condition. Didier Zheng was the first openly gay internet tv host on an internet show called Tongxing Xianglian or "Connecting Homosexuals". I am not sure if it is still available.
In the 1970s, a similar shift in attitude in the US served to open people minds to alternative lifestyles, so they are only 30 or so years in the rears of other countries social awareness. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
lerenah
Joined: 31 Aug 2009 Posts: 13
|
Posted: Sat Sep 12, 2009 1:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Wow, this is definitely a wealth of information. Thank you to everyone for expanding my awareness on this issue in China. To answer an earlier post's question, I am living in Shanghai. I don't plan on flaunting my orientation, but I just wanted to get a good feel for what would happen if I'm out on the weekends and get spotted with my partner by a manager or something. The information provided here definitely helps me to keep it in perspective. It seems as if I'm going to have to be quite discrete to play it safe because I definitely would not want to lose my job. Basically, this is the question I mostly wanted to get answered from this discussion, whether or not schools have equal opportunity laws set in place to protect their employees from discrimination. And from what I gather so far, they don't have them. So, I'll have to keep my proper distance from people I don't trust. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Hansen
Joined: 13 Oct 2008 Posts: 737 Location: central China
|
Posted: Sat Sep 12, 2009 2:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
"If the local police decide you are going to a re-education camp, you will just disappear, you do not get a phone call, you do not get to write Aunt Millie, your school wil not be notified, neither will the US consulate( or your country of citizenship) and there will be no "trial" Re-education camps are not part of the penal system. You are not be punished, therefore there is no need for a trial. You are being "educated" in moral behavior and learning to live in a manner that is reflective of the views of society. Class usually begins the moment you are in custody with a good beating! "
The above comment is a fantasy, something contrived by an overactive and paranoid imagination. While these camps may exist for the local people, the idea that a foreign citizen would essentially be kidnapped by the authorities and disappear into a gulag is unbelievable.
In the case of serious criminal activity, one might be incarcerated. In most cases deportation would be the best choice. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
chengdu4me
Joined: 19 Feb 2009 Posts: 120 Location: Chengdu, Sichuan, China
|
Posted: Sat Sep 12, 2009 6:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hansen , if you beleive that, then you are the one living in a fantasy. While deportation might be the easiest way to resolve the situation in most officials view, there have been and are today, westerners in re-education camps. I personally know of a Brit that spend three years in a reeducation camp in Yunnan province for "encouraging adultery". He had an affair with a married woman while teaching in Kunming. His reward for this was three years of his life that probably took 30 years off of it. He is in terrible health now, with many chronic and untreatable problems. He was not given any warning, trial, phone call, nothing! He got picked up, taken to the police station, beaten, taken to a camp and dropped off. No one on earth heard from him again until he was released and deported. He was released 8 months ago.
Beleive what you want, live how ever you want, but if you think that a quick trip to the airport is the resolution for social crimes committed by a westerners is always the path taken, you are sadly mistaken. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
IT2006
Joined: 17 Jan 2009 Posts: 91 Location: Wichita, KS, and westward.
|
Posted: Sat Sep 12, 2009 6:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| The Ever-changing Cleric wrote: |
...[sic] homosexuality, as well as politics, religion, and race, are all covered in two of the textbooks we use. these topics are fair game in the classroom and if handled properly, the lessons/discussions can go well. |
I am willing to concede that the subject could useful in class if they're "covered in two of the textbooks [you] use."
I just wonder which subjects those textbooks are intended for. Sociology? Behavioral psychology?
In truth, I had a BUSINESS ENGLISH textbook that had many dialogs in it. One situational dialog whose theme was homosexuality was intended to be funny. Because the department's syllabus prohibited any deviation, the class read through it. Nobody caught the humor, largely because the book was written for Chinese who live in the west. (How many of us have NOT encountered such text books?).
After we read through the dialog, I got blank stares. The only response I got to the dialog was "What does this have to do with business English?"
I started to explain the humor of it, but since the situational dialog was so far out of the present cultural context, I abandoned it.
Later, when I showed the dialog to the dean of the FL department, she was a little distraught that nobody had ever brought the matter to her attention, and (apparently) no one in the department ever read through the whole book.
If I felt comfortable discussing the subject, the time allotted for discussion of the topic would be proportional to the amount of space it is given in the book.
I would also be very careful not to overstep my position as an English teacher. If the class doesn't feel comfortable with it (and if I did not feel comfortable with it) I would not even discuss it in class.
MOD EDIT |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tainan
Joined: 01 Apr 2009 Posts: 120
|
Posted: Sat Sep 12, 2009 11:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| I just wanted to get a good feel for what would happen if I'm out on the weekends and get spotted with my partner by a manager or something. |
Spotted by a manager doing what with your partner? Sitting in a restaurant eating and talking? I do think making out in public isn't a good idea anywhere, and certainly not in China. But if the manager has gone into a gay bar and seen you, he's probably not someone you have to worry about... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kev7161
Joined: 06 Feb 2004 Posts: 5880 Location: Suzhou, China
|
Posted: Sun Sep 13, 2009 12:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| I do think making out in public isn't a good idea anywhere, |
For anybody or just gay people?  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
The Ever-changing Cleric

Joined: 19 Feb 2009 Posts: 1523
|
Posted: Sun Sep 13, 2009 12:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
| IT2006 wrote: |
| The Ever-changing Cleric wrote: |
...[sic] homosexuality, as well as politics, religion, and race, are all covered in two of the textbooks we use. these topics are fair game in the classroom and if handled properly, the lessons/discussions can go well. |
I am willing to concede that the subject could useful in class if they're "covered in two of the textbooks [you] use."
I just wonder which subjects those textbooks are intended for. Sociology? Behavioral psychology? |
Those textbooks are a survey of the English speaking countries, a two volume set. In one part of one of the books, there are chapters on the following:
1. family
2. Food and Dining Customs
3. Customs and Traditions
4. Attitudes and Views
5. Religion
6. Social Problems
Chap. 6 (Social problems) discusses the wealth gap, violence in society, decaying morality, (which is where homosexuality is covered), racial discrimination, and finally, the causes for all of these "problems."
These books are in the possession of all English majors, not sociology majors or anything else, although some other department might use the books, I don't know. What I do know is that I'm not the only FT in China using these books, and I'm sure I'm not the only person who's ever had these discussions in class.
| IT2006 wrote: |
| I would also be very careful not to overstep my position as an English teacher. If the class doesn't feel comfortable with it (and if I did not feel comfortable with it) I would not even discuss it in class. |
I don't think I'm overstepping my position. With all due respect IT2006, I'd be teaching material I had been given to teach. I know you claimed above that you had a book with a homosexual-oriented dialogue that shocked the dean in a book that no-one else in the department bothered to read beforehand, but I don't see it as my job to worry about the textbooks, or whether or not anyone else has ever screened them. If we have them obviously someone approved them.
Anyway, let me be clear. As stated in my first post on this thread, I've only approached this topic (homosexuality) as ONE PART of a lesson, it wasn't THE lesson. I'm comfortable with it, and so far, the students haven't had a problem with it.
In my opinion, there are two ways to approach discussions like homosexuality/other sensitive topics with our students. First, there's the ham-fisted approach some FTs have tried. This is the approach where the teacher's opinion is the most valid one, they're right, and the book, or China, or everyone else, is wrong. Think any of the four T's that some people have brought up in class (provoked or not). It's a real "in your face" approach where the FT more or less goes on and on about something they may know little about, or presents a completely one-sided view that's guaranteed to offend. There's little discussion and the students walk away with nothing more than a low opinion of the person they just listened to. I've seen FTs like this in action, inside the classroom and out, and those are the people who would be best advised to stay away from certain topics.
But if your students know you, and respect you (obviously a discussion on social problems wont be the very first lesson you have with a particular group), and you present the material on a "sensitive" topic like homosexuality in a way that gets students thinking about the subject in a different light, then I don't see a problem with it. I cover the material in the book (which in fact is very outdated in some areas), explain what the current situation in my country is, and give the students a handful of questions (which they work on in small groups) in which they offer their opinion(s)/views.
Students do not resent this latter, more subtle approach. I've been at the same school going on five years, had similar discussions in class for three of them, and I'm still here.
One more point - about how students might react to a discussion that is potentially combustible. During the economic crisis last year, we had a class where we discussed unemployment and the wealth gap in various countries (main focus was China though). When I compared the wealth gap in various countries, and claimed that the wealth gap in China was X, during a break a student came to me and said "Teacher, I think you're wrong about that." My immediate reaction was what I could possibly have said to offend someone, maybe the figures I gave about China made the country look more poor than it really was. In fact, the student told me that my figures for the wealth gap in China were wrong because the government here doesn't tell the truth about such matters (in the figures released), and that my number made China look better than it really was.
Finally, I think some FTs here treat their adult uni students like kids too often (I've heard this from some students first hand about one or two other FTs they've had) and don't give them enough credit for what they really know, and just rehash the same stuff over and over in class. If you establish a good rapport with the students via the classroom, you can broaden the horizons somewhat and they can sometimes pleasantly surprise you. Maybe I'm just lucky and have more mature/intelligent students, or maybe its something else... or a combination of things... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
lerenah
Joined: 31 Aug 2009 Posts: 13
|
Posted: Sun Sep 13, 2009 4:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I agree with Ever-Changing Cleric on this one. I have a friend who happens to be Chinese and she's very curious about homosexuality. She's open-minded to differences and she enjoys learning about them. To say that the Chinese people aren't open-minded about this topic would be an assumption. Given their communist history, most of them are trying to get as far away from it as possible. This attitude makes them more interested in the western world. It seems the younger generation is trying to be more individual like the western world. Also, because they've been so conditioned to study things (rope learning), they tend to approach sensitive subjects from a very logical perspective more than an emotional one, which is quite different from western approaches. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Renegade_o_Funk
Joined: 06 Jun 2009 Posts: 125
|
Posted: Sun Sep 13, 2009 4:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
When first coming to China from a Western Country, one may think Lesbians are rampant among Chinese girls, as they are walking around holding hands everywhere. Unfortunatly that is not the case Im not sure exactly why they do it, part of being close friends or they feel safer that way
Anyways, in Beijing most locals don't go bars, and would probably have no clue which bars were gay bars. As mentioned above, if your boss showed up at a gay bar, you probably would not have much to worry about. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
alter ego

Joined: 24 Mar 2009 Posts: 209
|
Posted: Sun Sep 13, 2009 9:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
| lerenah wrote: |
| I have a friend who happens to be Chinese and she's very curious about homosexuality. She's open-minded to differences and she enjoys learning about them. To say that the Chinese people aren't open-minded about this topic would be an assumption. |
This contradicts your original post, and your questions and concerns about being outed as a homosexual, doesn't it? If the Chinese people, (society as a whole, the general public, etc.) were open-minded about homosexuality, why would you start this topic and why would you be worried about losing your job?
Perhaps a less assuming way to express the open-mindedness of Chinese society to homosexuality would be to say that a small percentage of Chinese people (the liberal minority) are open-minded about it, and a much larger percentage (the conservative majority) are not. Otherwise, why would you ask if you had to hide it in the first place? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
lerenah
Joined: 31 Aug 2009 Posts: 13
|
Posted: Sun Sep 13, 2009 10:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'm not necessarily contradicting myself, more than I'm agreeing with what's become an underlying discussion within this discussion. As I stated in my earlier post my reason for posing the question was to get a 'feel', by getting a 'feel' I mean taking what I already know and inviting other opinions to expand my awareness. Now, given that since I've posted this, the topic has gone in the direction of not just discussing how homosexuality is viewed in China and on the job, but in the direction of whether or not certain Chinese people are open-minded enough and mature enough to openly discuss it in an educational way. This topic is slightly different from my original question. Therefore, to answer your question. No, it is not a contradiction. Another reason for posting is to get a good discussion going. I'm always intrigued with the intelligence I find on forums like this and thought there's no harm in simply posting a question, even if I may have my version of the truth to get a good feel for how other's might see it as well. What's so wrong about that? And even if I were to have my mind made up at the beginning and were to change my mind towards the end or middle of the discussion,which I haven't, what would be so wrong about that? So, why would I post if I already knew? Because I don't know it all.
Last edited by lerenah on Sun Sep 13, 2009 10:30 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
lerenah
Joined: 31 Aug 2009 Posts: 13
|
Posted: Sun Sep 13, 2009 10:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Are we in a courtroom? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling. Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|