| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
guest of Japan

Joined: 28 Feb 2003 Posts: 1601 Location: Japan
|
Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 3:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
In response to the last poster -
No Child Left Behind is forcing all teachers to get the masters, so even if that $2000 bump doesn't do it for you, the threat of unemployment might.
PhD is a big risk. At that level it takes a lot of publications, experience and networking to make a go of things. A PhD will increase your public school teacher earnings to a level that often exceeds university jobs without the need to publish. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jgmodlin

Joined: 01 Mar 2006 Posts: 120 Location: USA
|
Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 5:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I think the teacher's unions might have a thing or two to say about that. Are you teaching in public schools in the USA now? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Chancellor
Joined: 31 Oct 2005 Posts: 1337 Location: Ji'an, China - if you're willing to send me cigars, I accept donations :)
|
Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 8:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| jgmodlin wrote: |
It seems like the MA reaps better rewards for those teaching overseas. As a public school ESL endorsed teacher in the US, the difference between having a Master's or a Bachelor's was less than a couple of thousand dollars where I was teaching. It would take a decade or more to make up the cost of grad school at that rate. As to teaching at the college level in the US, most of the ESL positions I know of in the mid-Atlantic would be part time community college gigs (forget full time they rarely exist anymore) that pay $20-30 an hour for maybe two or three classes a semester. The teachers in my area who taught community college all had regular public school ESL jobs during the day to pay the bills.
IMHO, getting a Master's in TESOL or Linguistic Arts makes good sense abroad but may be of little extra financial value back home. A PhD, however, would obviously be a good move to secure a tenured American university position. |
In New York State all teachers have a certain amount of time (I think five years) to go get a master's. In some instances, a master's is required under No Child Left Behind for "highly qualified" status. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jgmodlin

Joined: 01 Mar 2006 Posts: 120 Location: USA
|
Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 9:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| If, like my county, they reimburse tuition it's not a bad deal. Virginia and most states I know of do not have any requirement for teachers to get an MA. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
guest of Japan

Joined: 28 Feb 2003 Posts: 1601 Location: Japan
|
Posted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 3:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| I think the teacher's unions might have a thing or two to say about that. Are you teaching in public schools in the USA now? |
Teachers unions have typically been for advanced degrees as long as the money to match it goes up.
Yes, I'm teaching in Boston now.
| Quote: |
| a master's is required under No Child Left Behind for "highly qualified" status. |
Exactly, and No Child Left Behind wants every teacher to be highly qualified. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
robertokun
Joined: 27 May 2008 Posts: 199
|
Posted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 5:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah, a master's is required to get tenured in my home state as well. At least at the secondary level. NCLB and all that is a whole other can of worms . . .
As for no full time jobs at the university/community college level anymore, that's what scared me away from the M.A. Applied Linguistics/TESOL degree in the first place and made me go the K-12 state certification route instead. They've got to be there somewhere, though, those mythical tenue track TESOL positions.
At least with the M.A. Applied Linguistics/TESOL your degree is good anywhere in the world and in a variety of contexts. The limitations of state certification is yet another can of worms that could be opened . . . but . . .
B.A. with teacher's certification and an M.A. Applied Linguistics/TESOL is the royal flush of this game if you ask me. I would have never guessed when I was 18 though . . . haha |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DaveW125
Joined: 18 Feb 2007 Posts: 54
|
Posted: Mon Nov 09, 2009 9:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Like the OP I�ve also been toying with the idea of getting an Ma in TESOL or the like. However, I think I�m a little different than most of the posters in this thread as I have no real wish to teach adults or in universities. Does anyone know if an Ma would open any further doors in the industry with regards to teaching kids. I already have a TEFL cert and a Masters (in law, for what it�s worth) but would like to progress as far as I can in the ESL industry and improve my own knowledge and ability to teach. I�m pretty sure that getting a teacher cert would be the best option but due to a number of reasons this isn�t doable for me for at least the next year or so. If anyone has any input that would be great, thanks. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Chris_Crossley

Joined: 26 Jun 2004 Posts: 1797 Location: Still in the centre of Furnace City, PRC, after eight years!!!
|
Posted: Mon Nov 09, 2009 10:36 am Post subject: University teaching jobs in the UK without a DELTA? |
|
|
I know from personal experience that at least one university in England, which shall remain unidentified, absolutely insists on applicants for even part-time jobs teaching ESOL at its so-called International Centre possessing the DELTA (or its fellow UK equivalent, the Trinity Diploma in TESOL) even if you have already got a master's degree in applied linguistics.
In February '09, I applied for such a vacancy at this university, only to discover, much to my incredulity and anger, that the three tutors interviewing me had failed to spot that I do not have the DELTA, even though I had been invited to this interview.
They said rather sheepishly that they "weren't sure" if I had it or not, but, in these days of the so-called information superhighway (or is that already an outmoded term?), they could simply have either emailed or phoned me up and ASKED!
They didn't. This was a clear example of sheer and utter incompetence.
However, I don't doubt that there must be other universities in the UK that do not necessarily insist on pretending to be amongst the elite institutions by only wanting to hire DELTA holders to do ordinary classroom jobs without administrative duties in addition.
One university in Scotland did contact me to say that I was invited to a (phone!) interview to become a pre-sessional tutor despite my lack of any DELTA - and I did make it plain to this uni that I have no DELTA. Unfortunately for me, my full-time employer's Head Office decided to move the start of the academic year forward by a fortnight with no explanation, and so I had to contact the uni to say that it was, under the circumstances, no use going through with the interview, because the two courses would have clashed for at least one whole week and I could not be in two places (Scotland and China) at once!
I hope that I, a "DELTA-less" EAP tutor, will be successful next year in getting pre-sessional teaching jobs during the summer! The pay would have been very good if I had been able to take that Scottish uni summer job, though, so I am a bit miffed at being compelled to pass up the chance to take it! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
spiral78

Joined: 05 Apr 2004 Posts: 11534 Location: On a Short Leash
|
Posted: Mon Nov 09, 2009 11:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I would presume that the British unis that offer MA TEFL/Applied Linguistics would accept teacher candidates without a DELTA, as it's not a prerequisite for the MA programs. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Chris_Crossley

Joined: 26 Jun 2004 Posts: 1797 Location: Still in the centre of Furnace City, PRC, after eight years!!!
|
Posted: Mon Nov 09, 2009 12:20 pm Post subject: Entry requirements may differ |
|
|
| spiral78 wrote: |
| I would presume that the British unis that offer MA TEFL/Applied Linguistics would accept teacher candidates without a DELTA, as it's not a prerequisite for the MA programs. |
The entry requirements for MA programmes differ from the entry requirements for being a teacher of ESOL at universities for the simple reason that one wishes to become a student in the first case and a teacher in the second case. One necessarily has no bearing on the other. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|