| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Lila Abu
Joined: 15 Jul 2010 Posts: 11 Location: Dubai
|
Posted: Fri Jul 23, 2010 1:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Did you really speak Luxumbourgisch? Did that help you to commune with the good burghers of Luxumbourg? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
veiledsentiments

Joined: 20 Feb 2003 Posts: 17644 Location: USA
|
Posted: Fri Jul 23, 2010 2:45 pm Post subject: Re: The Saudi Experience |
|
|
| lila abu wrote: |
| superfly snuka wrote: |
No doubt some of y. I'm curious... why have you stayed? Desperation? Curiosity? Masochism? Tried every other country already?
VS |
Ah..it's called ...money.$$$$$$$$$$$$! |
There is no amount of money that would make me change employers 4 times in 18 months. Doesn't this mean that not one of these employers was one who did a legal work/residence visa... so it is 18 months with no legal rights either. So these were not high pay employers most likely.
| scot47 wrote: |
| The inability to do this reflects in my opinion a level of contempt for locals and their culture. If you despise people, how can you teach them ? |
I have to disagree with this one. The only reason that I learned the language to the extent that I did was because I started out in Egypt where you have to use Arabic in your daily lives. In most of the Gulf, you can easily live your whole life there with the only Arabic speakers that you deal with daily are your students... and you are their main source to practice English. In the Gulf, your taxi driver speaks Urdu... the staff in shops speak Hindi or Chinese or Tagalog. Other than the common polite usages of Arabic, I almost never used it once in the Gulf.
"How can you teach them?" If your statement is valid, how can any English class be taught in the US, UK, or Aus/NZ when one may have students of 5 or 10 different languages sitting in front of you. Are you saying that you can only teach them if you know all their languages? That said, I found my survival knowledge of Arabic and the Arabic/English comparative linguistics with my MA to be very useful in teaching writing to Arabic speakers.
From my experience, it was not true that all or even most of the teachers who didn't speak Arabic "despised the people."
VS |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
lazycomputerkids
Joined: 22 Sep 2009 Posts: 360 Location: Tabuk
|
Posted: Fri Jul 23, 2010 4:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
My question to the OP: Is the poster a native speaker?
Because the post spoke to being a "slave" to administrative incompetence and given the life of a classroom teacher, terming our mistreatment as slavery is hyperbole. And yet I often hear the term from bilinguals. And as I view immigrant workers through the window of my air-conditioned bus on the way to university, crowds of day-laborers with no assignment, I remind myself that There But for the Grace of God Go I.
There are "slaves" to be found throughout the world and a classroom teacher is not one.
I think Scot47 speaks to, largely, western teachers that despite being immersed in an Arabic speaking country, dismiss the culture and its language as backwards. Chauvinisms, in a word. I agree such snobbery is often a meaningful indicator (of many) of a teacher's efficacy, though I have met effective teachers blusteringly critical of a country's government and culture.
But VS is right as well. ESL techniques do not require a teacher to speak a student's first language. And I know Scot47 knows this, so I feel like more than one topic is being bandied about. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
superfly snuka
Joined: 18 Jul 2010 Posts: 20
|
Posted: Sat Jul 24, 2010 1:46 am Post subject: Re: The Saudi Experience |
|
|
| veiledsentiments wrote: |
That must be some kind of record... 4 jobs in 18 months? I thought my attention span was short!
It does suggest that you may be part of the problem... I would have been outta there after the second one. Two strikes would have been enough for my game. I'm curious... why have you stayed? Desperation? Curiosity? Masochism? Tried every other country already?
VS |
I stayed to try working for a company and not a university which is going to pay me big money baby. Maybe it will be different and maybe not. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
superfly snuka
Joined: 18 Jul 2010 Posts: 20
|
Posted: Sat Jul 24, 2010 1:51 am Post subject: good pt. but.. |
|
|
[quote="spiral78"][i]Ponder to guess who I'm talking about?
quote]
it may very well be grammatically incorrect but then again so are many other phrases such as "If I were a rich man,..." should be "if I was..."
unfortunately as we study grammar , the rules we make have far to many exceptions that we often have to focus on the meaning rather than the structure and then hope they can construct similarly good sentences. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
johnslat

Joined: 21 Jan 2003 Posts: 13859 Location: Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA
|
Posted: Sat Jul 24, 2010 1:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
Dear superfly snuka,
" . . . such as "If I were a rich man,..." should be "if I was..."
Well, actually it shouldn't. That's the "Present Unreal" conditional, the subjunctive.
"If he was there" can be used, but not for unreal conditions.
A: Bill was at the party, too.
B: Really? Well, if he was there, I didn't see him.
and you might want to change this:
" . . . far to many exceptions that . . ."
to
" . . . far too many exceptions, so . . ."
Regards,
John |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
superfly snuka
Joined: 18 Jul 2010 Posts: 20
|
Posted: Sat Jul 24, 2010 2:03 am Post subject: I'm fluent in Arabic and... |
|
|
....i am a native speaker of english, and in either language the saudi arrogance shines through. Ask any other arab and they will tell you that saudis think they are better than everyone else. I am an american myself, and find many americans with the same sentiments about america. its all relative. but just because I have a critical mind about saudi doesnt mean I dont appreciate the culture i live in. Generally, in the streets saudis are down to earth. they are just people with personal struggles like you and me. But i think , the way to get people who are Openminded and can handle this culture, we need to be up front about all the bad things so they are not so shocked when they arrive(if they arrive). I don't hate saudis per se, but i think many of them, who havent traveled overseas, don't see the world in focus. they have biases and predjudices like the rest of us, plus many lack empathy or experience when dealing with people not from their own culture or country. Overall, they are just like many americans or europeans, or africans, or asians.....
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Never Ceased To Be Amazed

Joined: 22 Oct 2004 Posts: 3500 Location: Shhh...don't talk to me...I'm playin' dead...
|
Posted: Sat Jul 24, 2010 2:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
Wow! Yer insight jes' blew my mind!!!
NCTBA |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sheikh N Bake

Joined: 26 Apr 2007 Posts: 1307 Location: Dis ting of ours
|
Posted: Sat Jul 24, 2010 5:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Indeed. Randomly tossed platitutes of negligible value abound.
Lila, yes, Luxembourgish. Spent most teen years there cuddling and smooching with the local sexpots. Ma leve jong, gistern ovend hun uch zeng humpen gasaft!
Now don't get huffy on me. A "humpen" is a draft beer. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
superfly snuka
Joined: 18 Jul 2010 Posts: 20
|
Posted: Sat Jul 24, 2010 6:52 pm Post subject: grammar is not a pretty picture |
|
|
| johnslat wrote: |
Dear superfly snuka,
" . . . such as "If I were a rich man,..." should be "if I was..."
Well, actually it shouldn't. That's the "Present Unreal" conditional, the subjunctive.
"If he was there" can be used, but not for unreal conditions.
A: Bill was at the party, too.
B: Really? Well, if he was there, I didn't see him.
and you might want to change this:
" . . . far to many exceptions that . . ."
to
" . . . far too many exceptions, so . . ."
Regards,
John |
when did it become the "present unreal"? has it always been categorized like that? grammar is evolving(or devoloving depending on your perspective) not all grammar falls into a neat pocket and much of the new rules are based on present trends and communication. allowing were with I only adds to the confusion if you have to follow grammar rules. language flows not from rules but from experience. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
lazycomputerkids
Joined: 22 Sep 2009 Posts: 360 Location: Tabuk
|
Posted: Sat Jul 24, 2010 8:07 pm Post subject: Re: grammar is not a pretty picture |
|
|
| superfly snuka wrote: |
when did it become the "present unreal"? has it always been categorized like that? |
the subjunctive? Since Latin. I don't know about Greek. My attention to English in high school was so poor that I wasn't aware of the subjunctive until taking Italian courses. Volition and Condition is another shorthand for the subjunctive. Like Johnslat's "present unreal". Johnslat identified your error as one of subjunctive usage.
| superfly snuka wrote: |
| grammar is evolving(or devoloving depending on your perspective) not all grammar falls into a neat pocket and much of the new rules are based on present trends and communication. allowing were with I only adds to the confusion if you have to follow grammar rules. language flows not from rules but from experience. |
You might admit your ignorance instead of defending it. The subjunctive is not "new" and its use is not "allowed". You preach that grammar is organic, but fail to recognize the subjunctive is as organic. You're posting to a forum of English experts and abusing its informality. It's fine to drop capitalization and punctuation and argue that your use of "ponder" was a grammatical error, when its use was an error of diction, but with every post you make it clear English is not your strong suit. But, it's like anything else, to quote Woody Allen. Nobody, anybody and everybody knows nothing, anything and everything, respectively. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Never Ceased To Be Amazed

Joined: 22 Oct 2004 Posts: 3500 Location: Shhh...don't talk to me...I'm playin' dead...
|
Posted: Sat Jul 24, 2010 9:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
"language flows not from rules but from experience."
This pretty much sums up four jobs in 18 months. Jes' like the one on the Oman board who boasts about decamping at a moment's notice, it is the serious ones among us who wind up being the last one at the table holding the bill after all of the other jerks have had their fill and excused themselves to the "bathroom"....
Thanks a lot...
NCTBA |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mia Xanthi

Joined: 13 Mar 2008 Posts: 955 Location: why is my heart still in the Middle East while the rest of me isn't?
|
Posted: Sun Jul 25, 2010 12:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
"If he were" is part of a collection of several remnants of what was once a full subjunctive in English. The use of these remnants ("I demand that she be accepted") is considered formal English and a mark of formal education. It has simply evolved this way. Chances are, it will continue to evolve its way out of the language as fewer and fewer students receive formal instruction in English grammar.
But the point is that you are an English teacher, and as such, you should be expected to know these things. A strong knowledge of prescriptive grammar and a good grasp of how to analyze change in language are the very least you can bring to your classroom. If you can't at least bring that, then IMHO, you deserve just what you get. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kornan DeKobb
Joined: 24 Jan 2010 Posts: 242
|
Posted: Sun Jul 25, 2010 2:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Mia Xanthi wrote: |
| "If he were" is part of a collection of several remnants of what was once a full subjunctive in English. The use of these remnants ("I demand that she be accepted") is considered formal English and a mark of formal education. It has simply evolved this way. Chances are, it will continue to evolve its way out of the language as fewer and fewer students receive formal instruction in English grammar. |
That's too bad. These fine points of grammar serve to convey nuances of meaning and are thus valuable. Unfortunately, the evolution of which you speak may not be so natural but secondary to the failure of the supply of English teachers who know and are capable of teaching grammar to keep up with the demand.
It's depressing to come across "English teachers" who do not know grammar, punctuation, etc., (especially when I can't find a job!) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sheikh N Bake

Joined: 26 Apr 2007 Posts: 1307 Location: Dis ting of ours
|
Posted: Sun Jul 25, 2010 11:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
My pet peeves:
1. Your lucky you didn't loose your passport.
I've seen "loose" to mean "lose" even among so-called English teachers on these threads! As for the other stupid error...'nuff said.
2. If you would have stayed, you would have enjoyed the show.
Even a former boss of mine, the IEP director at the notorious George Mason Univ campus in the UAE, thought this was the correct usage of the past unreal conditional! She'd been a teacher-trainer for many years. So our "profession" has become merely a classroom management exercise in communicative fun games to "inspire" our little dears.
3. I think I'll lay down now.
4. Let's go see 'Up in the Air' tonight. Or did you see it already?
Even most educated people in the States now seem to have exiled the present perfect back to England.[/i] |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|