Job Discussion Forums

denise · Joined: 23 Apr 2003 Posts: 3419 Location: finally home-ish

Even if it is only lust, I'll take that over chocolate.

d

johnslat · Posted: Tue Mar 16, 2004 9:17 pm Post subject: Choco Nut

Dear denise,
You'll be soooooorrrrry!!!! The lustful urge is quickly satiated, and if there's no love, the two participants soon grow sick and tired of each other. But chocolate - ah, chocolate. Age cannot wither nor custom stale its infinite variety.
Regards,
John

Sara Avalon · Joined: 25 Feb 2004 Posts: 254 Location: On the Prowl

I guess if a chocolate bar wasn't more than 200 calories to consume,
Always came in exquisite quality (not that cheap, tasteless, generic brand),
Had no side effects or gimmicks whatsoever that could cause agitation, restlessness, or regret, only comfort....

.. oops, sorry.. typo: replace "chocolate bar" with "man".

continued: then I'd definitely still pick chocolate.

saudade · Joined: 11 Feb 2004 Posts: 48 Location: Campinas, Brazil

I'll take the lust, please, Alex. For 200.

Lynn · Joined: 28 Jan 2003 Posts: 696 Location: in between

1)love
2)choco (or other favorable snack)
3)sex

foster · Joined: 07 Feb 2003 Posts: 485 Location: Honkers, SARS

Like Leroy, I am not a fan of chocolate...so I would choose love. Having someone to talk with, fight with, touch etc...would be worth more to me.

Wolf · Joined: 10 May 2003 Posts: 1245 Location: Middle Earth

I can (and have) lived without giving in to neither lust nor chocolate. I'd prefer love, with all its communication, compromise, sacrifice, commitment, etc.

khmerhit · Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2004 3:54 am Post subject:

saudade requested

Lanza-Armonia · Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2004 12:23 pm Post subject:

Well, I'm a totally chocolate/sugar feend. But one does need the occasional orgasmic experience no and again....

LA

Roger · Joined: 19 Jan 2003 Posts: 9138

I don't know what to prefer:
a) a femme fatale who gets so sunburnt in the desert aht she cannot
lie on any of her sides, let alone have me on top of her;
b) chocolate that melts in the fierce sun of the desert before I
touch it.

Tong Dawei · Joined: 31 Jan 2003 Posts: 215

I know sugar is bad for me and that sex is good and with so much working against you on the island I would not want to compound matters by sacraficing my health. I also know that I think about sex and do something about it much more often than with chocolate.

LOVE: i want some! But what is it? Some sort of social construct with differing versions appearing every where you go? I want friendship, intimacy and sex in a pretty package. I don't believe that love should be filled withboth fun times and sad times due to fighting. Friends should be able to communicate enough to avoid conflict, non? Just cause you are intimate doesn't mean that you can't give someone some space when they are being irritable, non? Can't a guy and girl have a rewarding friendshipship just as same sex friends do? Why not. Is it because women view they act of gratifying a man's sexual urge as a service to be reimbursed with financial and or emotional compensation. By emotional compensation i mean feeling entitled to have more than equal control over the partnership and an unwillingness to compromise?

I'm not trying to be a flame magnet, just looking for some answers is all!

Lanza-Armonia · Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2004 2:01 pm Post subject:

...and we must alsi congratulate Roger on his well-rounded 2400 posts.

Hats of indeed

LA

johnslat · Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2004 2:09 pm Post subject: Only one's required to play

Hmm, should I dare to point this out? Heck, why not? Regarding sex, well as many of you might already be aware, a partner is not an essential requirement in satisfying one's lust. Now, anyone want to tell me how you can get the same satisfaction from chocolate when you've got no chocolate?
Regards,
John

Lanza-Armonia · Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2004 2:14 pm Post subject:

With pleasure Slatty ol' boi

Either a can of coke and/or a nicely size pot of Haggen Daaz ice cream gives you the same kick...

LA