Site Search:
 
Get TEFL Certified & Start Your Adventure Today!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Z Visa Medical Exam:
Goto page Previous  1, 2
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> China (Job-related Posts Only)
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Miles Smiles



Joined: 07 Jun 2010
Posts: 1294
Location: Heebee Jeebee

PostPosted: Mon Oct 31, 2011 8:20 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Not performing the tests then noting "not indicated" is not only unethical, it could be considered illegal depending upon the situation and jurisdiction.

No doctor can look at a patient and know for certain if a condition exists or doesn't exist unless he performs a test. Hepatitis, AIDS, HIV and a host of other ailments can be detected ONLY through testing and the known infection of one person by another who knows that he he is a communicable carrier.

Because a person exhibits no outward signs of a disease that is detectable only by test is hardly reason to check "not indicated" on a health survey. If your doctor thinks that doing so is ethical behavior, I think you should change doctors.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
steve b



Joined: 31 May 2011
Posts: 293
Location: China

PostPosted: Mon Oct 31, 2011 9:37 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

And precisely where does "not indicated" give the impression that someone categorically does not have a condition/ailment rather than the true meaning, which is that the doctor is stating he does not believe the patient suffers and that a test is in his/her opinion unnecessary?

Unethical/illegal would only relate to a doctor who asserted a patient was disease-free without carrying out thorough tests.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Miles Smiles



Joined: 07 Jun 2010
Posts: 1294
Location: Heebee Jeebee

PostPosted: Mon Oct 31, 2011 10:53 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

steve b wrote:
And precisely where does "not indicated" give the impression that someone categorically does not have a condition/ailment rather than the true meaning, which is that the doctor is stating he does not believe the patient suffers and that a test is in his/her opinion unnecessary?

Unethical/illegal would only relate to a doctor who asserted a patient was disease-free without carrying out thorough tests.


Part two of your answer asserts the fact that the doctor is expected to conduct a "serodiagnosis" and show the results. Take a look at the form. Page 2 of "Physical Examination Record for Foreigner" asks for "Laboratory Exam (serodiagnosis). One can fake the responses for HIV-Ab (I & II), RPR/TPHA, HAV-IgM, and Hbs-Ab, but the SGPT requires some specific numbers which may be gained only through a battery of tests. My doctor attached the lab results to my medical examination form. You might want to do some research to find out what it all means.

I don't care where you get your health exam: from a certified medical clinic or from a box of cereal. Just wear the pointed hat that accompanies medical results from the latter so I'll be able to spot you.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
steve b



Joined: 31 May 2011
Posts: 293
Location: China

PostPosted: Mon Oct 31, 2011 11:19 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I asserted no such thing but clearly with your method of interpretation I probably also stated that the earth was flat.

Patently you either advocate paying through the nose for something which in all probability you will undergo again on arrival or perhaps you had reason to believe that possibly you had contracted one of the specified diseases. I had no such fear and indeed flew through the more thorough tests once I arrived.

But then I used an experienced agent who advised me of all this beforehand, it cost pennies for my extremely good physician (who incidentally spent time a few years ago in Nanning studying Chinese methods) to complete the form ethically and legally due to his years of knowledge of my well-being and thus enabling me to be granted a visa.

If others wish to follow your lead and expend unnecessary monies then it begs the question as to who in fact is the dunce.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Miles Smiles



Joined: 07 Jun 2010
Posts: 1294
Location: Heebee Jeebee

PostPosted: Mon Oct 31, 2011 10:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Good luck and good health to you.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bluetortilla



Joined: 18 Apr 2006
Posts: 815
Location: Henan

PostPosted: Fri Nov 04, 2011 4:15 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I have hep c antibodies (liver function totally normal). Probably got it from a tattoo (ah, youth...). So am I gonna be tested for it and denied a visa when I arrive? I didn't show up on the medical here (guess they were just testing for b). Plan B- Vietnam?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Miles Smiles



Joined: 07 Jun 2010
Posts: 1294
Location: Heebee Jeebee

PostPosted: Fri Nov 04, 2011 5:26 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

If your medical clinic is enlightened, the examiners will know that the presence of antibodies does NOT indicate that you are a carrier. It merely means that you have been EXPOSED to the disease.

A guy with whom I worked got test results that showed antibodies for one of the hepatitis types. He was given some sort of medication that would "fix" it. The FAO didn't make a big deal about it. The FT never took the pills because research showed that the supposed medication did nothing for the presence of antibodies. He was also supposed to return for testing in a month. He didn't do that either. The clinic never followed up on it, and the FAO never mentioned it.

YOUR MILEAGE MAY VARY
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bluetortilla



Joined: 18 Apr 2006
Posts: 815
Location: Henan

PostPosted: Fri Nov 04, 2011 5:36 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Miles Smiles wrote:
If your medical clinic is enlightened, the examiners will know that the presence of antibodies does NOT indicate that you are a carrier. It merely means that you have been EXPOSED to the disease.

A guy with whom I worked got test results that showed antibodies for one of the hepatitis types. He was given some sort of medication that would "fix" it. The FAO didn't make a big deal about it. The FT never took the pills because research showed that the supposed medication did nothing for the presence of antibodies. He was also supposed to return for testing in a month. He didn't do that either. The clinic never followed up on it, and the FAO never mentioned it.

YOUR MILEAGE MAY VARY


Sounds about right though, judging how things have been going so far. Honestly, I don't think I ever had hepatitis- no symptoms, nothing. Probably my immune system knocked it out off the bat. I have an 83 year old aunt who's had the antibodies for for hep c for 40 years and is in perfect health. I still have the regrettable suspect tattoo of course.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> China (Job-related Posts Only) All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

Teaching Jobs in China
Teaching Jobs in China