| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
johnslat

Joined: 21 Jan 2003 Posts: 13859 Location: Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA
|
Posted: Mon Oct 15, 2012 9:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Dear johntpartee,
OMG, you' re right. He's hardly au courant, residing as he does in 1917 most of the time.
Regards,
John |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
coledavis
Joined: 21 Jun 2003 Posts: 1838
|
Posted: Tue Oct 16, 2012 3:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Hi Johnslat. An apostrophe can be used to clarify. In the case of 1920s, I personally wouldn't use it, but many do putting one in after a number. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sashadroogie

Joined: 17 Apr 2007 Posts: 11061 Location: Moskva, The Workers' Paradise
|
Posted: Tue Oct 16, 2012 4:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
Dear Johnslat
The crux of the biscuit is the apostrophe... My point is that yet again there seems to be confusion with what is simply 'house style' and a 'mistake'. For all the references that you find saying that 1920's is 'wrong', I'll show you ones that claim it is optional, or even 'US usage'.
I'm also not convinced by this line of argument that apostrophes are used only to denote possession or contractions, but never plurals. Even according to the house style guide you have given, apostrophes can sometimes denote plurals, where there isn't a natural plural form - there are no if's or but's about it, so mind your p's and q's when addressing a great Vozhd like me
Hic!'
Best wishes
Sasha |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
artemisia

Joined: 04 Nov 2008 Posts: 875 Location: the world
|
Posted: Tue Oct 16, 2012 5:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
I think we�ll all be minding our �p�s and q�s� for some time to come! Well, maybe not Johnslat...
| coledavis wrote: |
The cat's cries woke up the other animals, as did the dog's.
Variations: cats', dogs' and dogs without apostrophe. |
But how can it be: �The cat's cries woke up the other animals, as did the dogs�. What am I missing?
Maybe (but it would be unnecessary): "The cat�s cries woke up the other animals, as they did the dogs". |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
coledavis
Joined: 21 Jun 2003 Posts: 1838
|
Posted: Tue Oct 16, 2012 5:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
| It means that they were woken by the cries of the cats and also by the dogs in general (yelping, snuffling and defecating). |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sashadroogie

Joined: 17 Apr 2007 Posts: 11061 Location: Moskva, The Workers' Paradise
|
Posted: Tue Oct 16, 2012 5:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Could be just that the dogs (not their cries) woke the other animals... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
coledavis
Joined: 21 Jun 2003 Posts: 1838
|
Posted: Tue Oct 16, 2012 5:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I don't agree with the principle that because there is a weakness in the system - i.e. an apparent rule about not having apostrophes with plurals and then breaking it in cases of potential ambiguity - that therefore the whole system should be scrapped. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
coledavis
Joined: 21 Jun 2003 Posts: 1838
|
Posted: Tue Oct 16, 2012 5:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Sashadroogie wrote: |
| Could be just that the dogs (not their cries) woke the other animals... |
Ah, crossed in the post. Yes, that is what I intended. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sashadroogie

Joined: 17 Apr 2007 Posts: 11061 Location: Moskva, The Workers' Paradise
|
Posted: Tue Oct 16, 2012 5:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
| The system works!! Long live the system! Long live the Glorious Apostrophe! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
artemisia

Joined: 04 Nov 2008 Posts: 875 Location: the world
|
Posted: Tue Oct 16, 2012 5:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
| My thoughts, too! Thanks for the clarification (and also the great alternative examples to "cries", coledavis!). |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Barbaros
Joined: 18 Aug 2012 Posts: 58 Location: North of France
|
Posted: Tue Oct 16, 2012 8:49 am Post subject: Re: Death, Death, Apostrophe ! |
|
|
It seems you belong to the old system of education of the 50s and 60s, where in your generation there were less literate than their modern day counterparts.
You are like Malcolm Muggeridge who thinks in his old age that the world is in a terminal decline and that we are going to hell in a handcart!  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
coledavis
Joined: 21 Jun 2003 Posts: 1838
|
Posted: Tue Oct 16, 2012 10:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
"the world is in a terminal decline and that we are going to hell in a handcart!"
While I don't agree with JohnSlat and Scot47 on the subject of the apostrophe and neither did I agree with much of what Mr Muggeridge had to say, I think this statement about the world is about spot on. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sashadroogie

Joined: 17 Apr 2007 Posts: 11061 Location: Moskva, The Workers' Paradise
|
Posted: Tue Oct 16, 2012 10:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Don't worry Cole. All will be renewed in the coming Communist utopia that will arise from the wreckage of this fallen world. All you need is to have a little Socialist ardour and a steadfast belief in apostrophisation. Oh, Lenin, grant that we will all see the day! Glory to you, our beloved Motherland, though we suffer for you! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rawera
Joined: 21 Aug 2012 Posts: 38
|
Posted: Tue Oct 16, 2012 1:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| O apostrophe, you would be missed. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
scot47

Joined: 10 Jan 2003 Posts: 15343
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|