|
Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Glenski

Joined: 15 Jan 2003 Posts: 12844 Location: Hokkaido, JAPAN
|
Posted: Mon Apr 16, 2007 12:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| Spell checks weed out typos, not the most serious kind of spelling mistake which involves using the spelling of a completely different but similar sounding word. |
They don't even catch those sometimes. I recall the first time I typed "fro" instead of "for", and since it was a real word, my spell checker ignored it. It took my careful eye to see that the word was wrong.
(Now, I suppose we are going to enter the world of grammar checker... a HUGE can of worms in my book.) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rusmeister
Joined: 15 Jun 2006 Posts: 867 Location: Russia
|
Posted: Mon Apr 16, 2007 5:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Stephen Jones wrote: |
| Quote: |
| The real question here is why anyone would need to know these rules to begin with, especially if natives get by just fine without knowing them at any level. |
You don't get by without knowing the rules of phonics at any level. They are drilled into you from Grade 1, unless you were lucky enough to work them out for yourself.
'Beginning' has double 'n' to let you know the vowel before is short, not long as in 'shining', just as we have the doubled consonant in 'winner' to distinguish it from 'whiner'.
Technology has not improved spelling; in fact quite the opposite. There are more spelling mistakes slipping through now than before, because you still need to make the right choice when you misspell the word, and if you have no idea how to spell it in the first place you will make the wrong choice (there is actually a technical term for the phenomenon; it is called the 'Cupertino effect' from the number of times the word 'Cupertino' turns up in EU documents because it has been chosen instead of the correct word from the list offered by the word spell checker.
Spell checks weed out typos, not the most serious kind of spelling mistake which involves using the spelling of a completely different but similar sounding word.
| Quote: |
| Even if I were to hire a teacher, spelling would again be very low on the list compared to other teaching skills and knowledge. |
Apply to where I am now with spelling mistakes on the CV and it goes straight into the bin; where I worked before you would need a some pretty good mitigating factors to avoid the reject pile.
| Quote: |
| CEOs, Lawyers, Doctors, Presidents - take any occupation and I'll show you people in it making 6-figure incomes who can't spell worth a darn and the rest making the usual mistakes. |
I would rather not get my prescriptions written by a dyslexic doctor, just as I would rather not have them read by a dyslexic pharmacist, and lawyers who can't spell probably have very efficient legal secretaries to check things for them, but to say a disability is not important because you can find people who have succeeded in spite of it, is not very convincing. And for an English teacher spelling is part of his core competence. |
Thanks, Stephen.
From your earlier posts I had thought you might have been championing ignorance, like some others here seem to be. I'm a little relieved that that seems to not be the case here.
I still find it flabbergasting to find that a number of 'teachers' hold that some of the basics of standardized communication - grammar and spelling - are unimportant. But I'm already not debating with those folks, any more than I would debate with flat earthers. It ought to be self-evident. But then, it seems that common sense is now a little-valued trait. (The Russian term - "zdravy smysl'' (healthy thought) is clearer than the English 'common sense'.) There surely is such a thing as unhealthy thought. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Henry_Cowell

Joined: 27 May 2005 Posts: 3352 Location: Berkeley
|
Posted: Mon Apr 16, 2007 9:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| globalnomad2 wrote: |
| Henry, if I worked as a writer on a magazine, and studied print journalism, I suppose I know what proofreading is. |
Then I've done a bit more of the stuff than you have. Reviewing a text for minor errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation is not proofreading, althought that's a common misinterpretation of the word's meaning. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Stephen Jones
Joined: 21 Feb 2003 Posts: 4124
|
Posted: Mon Apr 16, 2007 9:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
globalnomad2 wrote:
Henry, if I worked as a writer on a magazine, and studied print journalism, I suppose I know what proofreading is. |
What you forgot to do with this sentence?
But, joking apart, I think it is now Henry's turn to tell us what proofreading is, and globalnomad2 to agree or disagree. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Stephen Jones
Joined: 21 Feb 2003 Posts: 4124
|
Posted: Mon Apr 16, 2007 9:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| the basics of standardized communication - grammar and spelling - are unimportant. |
And back we go again to the beginning!
The thread was originally about mistakes in spelling and punctuation. Native speakers rarely make grammar mistakes (though global nomad seems to have let one slip in one sentence); what they often do is use an inappropriate register, or dialects other than Standard English. When people say another native speaker is making a mistake of grammar they are probably either confusing register or social dialect with syntax, or, as is most often the case, simply showing their own gross ignorance of the English language, its structure, lexis and history. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Henry_Cowell

Joined: 27 May 2005 Posts: 3352 Location: Berkeley
|
Posted: Mon Apr 16, 2007 10:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Steps in editing:1. developmental editing
Ensuring that early draft of text is appropriate to its audience and stated goals. Providing advice and suggestions for topic coherence, organization, tone, and level. Fixing structural and organizational problems. Adding and/or deleting text, examples, exercises, and illustrations as necessary.
2. copyediting
In the author's original manuscript, marking and correcting errors in grammar, usage, diction, logic, capitalization, hyphenation, punctuation, treatment of numbers and numerals, use of fonts, abbreviations and acronyms, and so on. Ensuring consistency throughout entire manuscript by making decisions about treatment of words, terminology, capitalization, numbers, punctuation, and so on through creation of a stylesheet.
3. proofreading
Checking the typeset text (the proof) against the copyedited manuscript and stylesheet to ensure that all authorized changes have been made correctly, that no new errors have been introduced, that formatting has been preserved, and/or that file conversion from electronic format has created no new errors. Correcting any significant errors that were not corrected in copyediting. Fixing alignment, pagination, line and paragraph breaks, incorrect fonts, and other formatting and typographical issues. (Proofreading is not done by the original author unless the publisher is very, very cheap.) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ariadne
Joined: 16 Jul 2004 Posts: 960
|
Posted: Tue Apr 17, 2007 5:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
Stephen..
I think I will continue to use 'bad grammar' to describe things that you would identify as 'inappropriate register'. For example, my students have a hard time using the simple past. Although 'bad grammar' may not be precise, the students have some idea what I'm talking about, and it corresponds with how their textbooks refer to 'grammar'.
Henry..
As with the word grammar, I often use the word proofreading imprecisely. 'Read and correct' is what I mean when I ask someone to 'proofread' something for me or when I 'proofread' work for someone else. I also call all facial tissues Kleenex.
. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dmb

Joined: 12 Feb 2003 Posts: 8397
|
Posted: Tue Apr 17, 2007 6:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| has created no new errors. |
Henry, if new errors do appear is stage 4 called re-proofreading? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SueH
Joined: 01 Feb 2003 Posts: 1022 Location: Northern Italy
|
Posted: Tue Apr 17, 2007 8:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
| dmb wrote: |
| Quote: |
| has created no new errors. |
Henry, if new errors do appear is stage 4 called re-proofreading? |
It probably calls for some reproving somewhere along the line.. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Stephen Jones
Joined: 21 Feb 2003 Posts: 4124
|
Posted: Tue Apr 17, 2007 9:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| think I will continue to use 'bad grammar' to describe things that you would identify as 'inappropriate register'. For example, my students have a hard time using the simple past. Although 'bad grammar' may not be precise, the students have some idea what I'm talking about, and it corresponds with how their textbooks refer to 'grammar'. |
Are your students native English speakers or second language learners? If the latter I doubt if there difficulties in the simple past are going to those of the wrong register. The wrong register would be for example to refer to the members of a female basketball team as 'nappy-headed hos' in a thesis on sports medicine, or to write "I don't think nuffin of the sort" in a 'viva voce', or to write 'that ain't right' when dealing with a philosophical argument. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
zorro (3)
Joined: 19 Dec 2006 Posts: 202
|
Posted: Tue Apr 17, 2007 12:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Which teachers are saying that spelling and grammar are not important for teaching English? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
globalnomad2

Joined: 23 Jul 2005 Posts: 562
|
Posted: Tue Apr 17, 2007 1:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Henry...my original use of "proofread" in this thread was in a generic sense. Here's the Dictionary.com definition:
proof�read /ˈprufˌrid/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[proof-reed] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation verb, -read /-ˌrɛd/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[-red] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation, -read�ing.
�verb (used with object) 1. to read (printers' proofs, copy, etc.) in order to detect and mark errors to be corrected.
�verb (used without object) 2. to read printers' proofs, copy, etc., to detect and mark errors, esp. as an employee of a typesetting firm, newspaper office, or publishing house.
And here is Merriam-Webster's:
proofread
One entry found for proofread.
Main Entry: proof�read
Pronunciation: 'pr�f-"rEd
Function: transitive verb
Inflected Form(s): proof�read /-"red/; -read�ing
Etymology: back-formation from proofreader
: to read and mark corrections in (as a proof )
You mean you've never told EFL writing students to proofread their essays? Give me a break. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
furiousmilksheikali

Joined: 31 Jul 2006 Posts: 1660 Location: In a coffee shop, splitting a 30,000 yen tab with Sekiguchi.
|
Posted: Tue Apr 17, 2007 1:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm guessing that the original etymology of the word comes from the original meaning of the word "proof" being "to test whether something is correct" rather than its common modern usage of "to demonstrate that something is correct".
The expression "the exception that proves the rule" although sounding contradictory is due to the fact that proof meant "test" at some stage. "The proof of the pudding is in the eating" is another example and in that context the word "proofreading" would also make sense. in which case it doesn't seem unreasonable for laymen to talk of an author proofreading his own work. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Henry_Cowell

Joined: 27 May 2005 Posts: 3352 Location: Berkeley
|
Posted: Tue Apr 17, 2007 3:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| furiousmilksheikali wrote: |
| I'm guessing that the original etymology of the word comes from the original meaning of the word "proof" being "to test whether something is correct" rather than its common modern usage of "to demonstrate that something is correct". |
No. In the context of typesetting and printing (you remember printing, don't you?), there are different types of proof. Galley proof. Page proof. You check the printer's proof against the original manuscript that the printer received for typesetting.
Interesting that globalnomad's definitions all refer to this "proof." If you're not checking and correcting proof, you're not proofreading.
Simple, no? I don't tell students to "proofread." I tell them to check their work one final time for errors to make it clean. That's also simple. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
thrifty
Joined: 25 Apr 2006 Posts: 1665 Location: chip van
|
Posted: Tue Apr 17, 2007 4:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Hurrah! He is back. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling. Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|