Site Search:
 
Get TEFL Certified & Start Your Adventure Today!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Semi-literate teachers
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... , 10, 11, 12  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> General Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Glenski



Joined: 15 Jan 2003
Posts: 12844
Location: Hokkaido, JAPAN

PostPosted: Mon Apr 16, 2007 12:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Spell checks weed out typos, not the most serious kind of spelling mistake which involves using the spelling of a completely different but similar sounding word.
They don't even catch those sometimes. I recall the first time I typed "fro" instead of "for", and since it was a real word, my spell checker ignored it. It took my careful eye to see that the word was wrong.

(Now, I suppose we are going to enter the world of grammar checker... a HUGE can of worms in my book.)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rusmeister



Joined: 15 Jun 2006
Posts: 867
Location: Russia

PostPosted: Mon Apr 16, 2007 5:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Stephen Jones wrote:
Quote:
The real question here is why anyone would need to know these rules to begin with, especially if natives get by just fine without knowing them at any level.
You don't get by without knowing the rules of phonics at any level. They are drilled into you from Grade 1, unless you were lucky enough to work them out for yourself.

'Beginning' has double 'n' to let you know the vowel before is short, not long as in 'shining', just as we have the doubled consonant in 'winner' to distinguish it from 'whiner'.

Technology has not improved spelling; in fact quite the opposite. There are more spelling mistakes slipping through now than before, because you still need to make the right choice when you misspell the word, and if you have no idea how to spell it in the first place you will make the wrong choice (there is actually a technical term for the phenomenon; it is called the 'Cupertino effect' from the number of times the word 'Cupertino' turns up in EU documents because it has been chosen instead of the correct word from the list offered by the word spell checker.

Spell checks weed out typos, not the most serious kind of spelling mistake which involves using the spelling of a completely different but similar sounding word.
Quote:
Even if I were to hire a teacher, spelling would again be very low on the list compared to other teaching skills and knowledge.
Apply to where I am now with spelling mistakes on the CV and it goes straight into the bin; where I worked before you would need a some pretty good mitigating factors to avoid the reject pile.
Quote:
CEOs, Lawyers, Doctors, Presidents - take any occupation and I'll show you people in it making 6-figure incomes who can't spell worth a darn and the rest making the usual mistakes.
I would rather not get my prescriptions written by a dyslexic doctor, just as I would rather not have them read by a dyslexic pharmacist, and lawyers who can't spell probably have very efficient legal secretaries to check things for them, but to say a disability is not important because you can find people who have succeeded in spite of it, is not very convincing. And for an English teacher spelling is part of his core competence.


Thanks, Stephen.
From your earlier posts I had thought you might have been championing ignorance, like some others here seem to be. I'm a little relieved that that seems to not be the case here.
I still find it flabbergasting to find that a number of 'teachers' hold that some of the basics of standardized communication - grammar and spelling - are unimportant. But I'm already not debating with those folks, any more than I would debate with flat earthers. It ought to be self-evident. But then, it seems that common sense is now a little-valued trait. (The Russian term - "zdravy smysl'' (healthy thought) is clearer than the English 'common sense'.) There surely is such a thing as unhealthy thought.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Henry_Cowell



Joined: 27 May 2005
Posts: 3352
Location: Berkeley

PostPosted: Mon Apr 16, 2007 9:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

globalnomad2 wrote:
Henry, if I worked as a writer on a magazine, and studied print journalism, I suppose I know what proofreading is.

Then I've done a bit more of the stuff than you have. Reviewing a text for minor errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation is not proofreading, althought that's a common misinterpretation of the word's meaning.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Stephen Jones



Joined: 21 Feb 2003
Posts: 4124

PostPosted: Mon Apr 16, 2007 9:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
globalnomad2 wrote:
Henry, if I worked as a writer on a magazine, and studied print journalism, I suppose I know what proofreading is.
What you forgot to do with this sentence?

But, joking apart, I think it is now Henry's turn to tell us what proofreading is, and globalnomad2 to agree or disagree.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Stephen Jones



Joined: 21 Feb 2003
Posts: 4124

PostPosted: Mon Apr 16, 2007 9:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
the basics of standardized communication - grammar and spelling - are unimportant.
And back we go again to the beginning!

The thread was originally about mistakes in spelling and punctuation. Native speakers rarely make grammar mistakes (though global nomad seems to have let one slip in one sentence); what they often do is use an inappropriate register, or dialects other than Standard English. When people say another native speaker is making a mistake of grammar they are probably either confusing register or social dialect with syntax, or, as is most often the case, simply showing their own gross ignorance of the English language, its structure, lexis and history.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Henry_Cowell



Joined: 27 May 2005
Posts: 3352
Location: Berkeley

PostPosted: Mon Apr 16, 2007 10:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Steps in editing:
    1. developmental editing
    Ensuring that early draft of text is appropriate to its audience and stated goals. Providing advice and suggestions for topic coherence, organization, tone, and level. Fixing structural and organizational problems. Adding and/or deleting text, examples, exercises, and illustrations as necessary.

    2. copyediting
    In the author's original manuscript, marking and correcting errors in grammar, usage, diction, logic, capitalization, hyphenation, punctuation, treatment of numbers and numerals, use of fonts, abbreviations and acronyms, and so on. Ensuring consistency throughout entire manuscript by making decisions about treatment of words, terminology, capitalization, numbers, punctuation, and so on through creation of a stylesheet.

    3. proofreading
    Checking the typeset text (the proof) against the copyedited manuscript and stylesheet to ensure that all authorized changes have been made correctly, that no new errors have been introduced, that formatting has been preserved, and/or that file conversion from electronic format has created no new errors. Correcting any significant errors that were not corrected in copyediting. Fixing alignment, pagination, line and paragraph breaks, incorrect fonts, and other formatting and typographical issues. (Proofreading is not done by the original author unless the publisher is very, very cheap.)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ariadne



Joined: 16 Jul 2004
Posts: 960

PostPosted: Tue Apr 17, 2007 5:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Stephen..

I think I will continue to use 'bad grammar' to describe things that you would identify as 'inappropriate register'. For example, my students have a hard time using the simple past. Although 'bad grammar' may not be precise, the students have some idea what I'm talking about, and it corresponds with how their textbooks refer to 'grammar'.


Henry..

As with the word grammar, I often use the word proofreading imprecisely. 'Read and correct' is what I mean when I ask someone to 'proofread' something for me or when I 'proofread' work for someone else. I also call all facial tissues Kleenex.

.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dmb



Joined: 12 Feb 2003
Posts: 8397

PostPosted: Tue Apr 17, 2007 6:52 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
has created no new errors.


Henry, if new errors do appear is stage 4 called re-proofreading?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
SueH



Joined: 01 Feb 2003
Posts: 1022
Location: Northern Italy

PostPosted: Tue Apr 17, 2007 8:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

dmb wrote:
Quote:
has created no new errors.


Henry, if new errors do appear is stage 4 called re-proofreading?


It probably calls for some reproving somewhere along the line..
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Stephen Jones



Joined: 21 Feb 2003
Posts: 4124

PostPosted: Tue Apr 17, 2007 9:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
think I will continue to use 'bad grammar' to describe things that you would identify as 'inappropriate register'. For example, my students have a hard time using the simple past. Although 'bad grammar' may not be precise, the students have some idea what I'm talking about, and it corresponds with how their textbooks refer to 'grammar'.
Are your students native English speakers or second language learners? If the latter I doubt if there difficulties in the simple past are going to those of the wrong register. The wrong register would be for example to refer to the members of a female basketball team as 'nappy-headed hos' in a thesis on sports medicine, or to write "I don't think nuffin of the sort" in a 'viva voce', or to write 'that ain't right' when dealing with a philosophical argument.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
zorro (3)



Joined: 19 Dec 2006
Posts: 202

PostPosted: Tue Apr 17, 2007 12:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Which teachers are saying that spelling and grammar are not important for teaching English?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
globalnomad2



Joined: 23 Jul 2005
Posts: 562

PostPosted: Tue Apr 17, 2007 1:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Henry...my original use of "proofread" in this thread was in a generic sense. Here's the Dictionary.com definition:

proof�read /ˈprufˌrid/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[proof-reed] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation verb, -read /-ˌrɛd/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[-red] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation, -read�ing.
�verb (used with object) 1. to read (printers' proofs, copy, etc.) in order to detect and mark errors to be corrected.
�verb (used without object) 2. to read printers' proofs, copy, etc., to detect and mark errors, esp. as an employee of a typesetting firm, newspaper office, or publishing house.

And here is Merriam-Webster's:

proofread
One entry found for proofread.


Main Entry: proof�read
Pronunciation: 'pr�f-"rEd
Function: transitive verb
Inflected Form(s): proof�read /-"red/; -read�ing
Etymology: back-formation from proofreader
: to read and mark corrections in (as a proof )



You mean you've never told EFL writing students to proofread their essays? Give me a break.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
furiousmilksheikali



Joined: 31 Jul 2006
Posts: 1660
Location: In a coffee shop, splitting a 30,000 yen tab with Sekiguchi.

PostPosted: Tue Apr 17, 2007 1:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm guessing that the original etymology of the word comes from the original meaning of the word "proof" being "to test whether something is correct" rather than its common modern usage of "to demonstrate that something is correct".

The expression "the exception that proves the rule" although sounding contradictory is due to the fact that proof meant "test" at some stage. "The proof of the pudding is in the eating" is another example and in that context the word "proofreading" would also make sense. in which case it doesn't seem unreasonable for laymen to talk of an author proofreading his own work.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Henry_Cowell



Joined: 27 May 2005
Posts: 3352
Location: Berkeley

PostPosted: Tue Apr 17, 2007 3:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

furiousmilksheikali wrote:
I'm guessing that the original etymology of the word comes from the original meaning of the word "proof" being "to test whether something is correct" rather than its common modern usage of "to demonstrate that something is correct".

No. In the context of typesetting and printing (you remember printing, don't you?), there are different types of proof. Galley proof. Page proof. You check the printer's proof against the original manuscript that the printer received for typesetting.

Interesting that globalnomad's definitions all refer to this "proof." If you're not checking and correcting proof, you're not proofreading.

Simple, no? I don't tell students to "proofread." I tell them to check their work one final time for errors to make it clean. That's also simple.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
thrifty



Joined: 25 Apr 2006
Posts: 1665
Location: chip van

PostPosted: Tue Apr 17, 2007 4:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hurrah! He is back.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> General Discussion All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... , 10, 11, 12  Next
Page 11 of 12

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

Teaching Jobs in China
Teaching Jobs in China