Site Search:
 
Get TEFL Certified & Start Your Adventure Today!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

After The Election
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 12, 13, 14, 15  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> General Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
distiller



Joined: 31 May 2004
Posts: 249

PostPosted: Thu Nov 18, 2004 2:22 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Raven,

Once again you misunderstand the process. The republican pollwatchers in Ohio were challenged in court and unfortunately won. This does not give them power over someone's vote. What they were allowed to do is challenge a person's right to vote for various reasons. Those people still cast "provisional" ballots which after being verified are included or excluded from the count. Now how many people were intimidated by this or if there were other irregularities is uncertain. The real point though is whether or not there was systematic voter fraud and if it played a crucial role in the election. Currently, while there are some interesting as well as unsupported ideas on this subject, the arab conspiracy among the latter, but there is no hard evidence, yet. It doesn't mean it's not there. I for one think we have got to have a paper trail for every vote and that electronic voting machines pose a very real threat. At least that way there would be one less way of commiting election fraud.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
justcolleen



Joined: 07 Jan 2004
Posts: 654
Location: Egypt, baby!

PostPosted: Thu Nov 18, 2004 2:26 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

XXX wrote:

lunatics
lay off the crack pipe
you stalinist wackos


Speaking of name calling.

You know, XXX, you and I disagree on a lot of points. That said, I can assure you I am much more willing to listen to whatever someone has to say, as long as they approach the conversation appropriately.

Stop calling names, and I will most certainly pay attention to every word you write.

Please. I'm asking you.

XXX wrote:
At the poll I voted at there were both.


Thank you for taking your opinions to the polls. I certainly appreciate (and I think this will be the last of my "pp" repertoire) it.

Hugs,

Colleen
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
extoere



Joined: 23 Feb 2004
Posts: 543

PostPosted: Thu Nov 18, 2004 2:37 am    Post subject: After the Election Reply with quote

Loon: "Rape?" In yer dreams, kid; in yer wildest fantasies! Stick to the Plaza where you can proselytize to a crowd matching the talents of your embouchure! And pick up a few pesos doing it ..... At least there your mouth is full of ----- it's mainly protein, isn't it?

Tart of Darkness: Hell, there was also a conference on breast feeding. Does that also make you salivate? A "cleansing" at the CIA is long overdue. Clean out all those worthless Ph.Ds in linguistics! What's in store? I dunno, but I got a feeling yer not gonna be able to resist the temptation of tellin' us .... And Rice becoming Sec of State ---- fan-friggin'-tastic! Where does it hurt ya, baby?

JustColleen: Monitors are sorely needed. I know for an absolute fact that illegal Mexicans vote in southern California. And yes, I know them personally. It's got to stop. Any illegal voting, either on the Left or Right is an outrage to an orderly Constitutional process. And I think you'd probably agree.

cheers,
ex
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
justcolleen



Joined: 07 Jan 2004
Posts: 654
Location: Egypt, baby!

PostPosted: Thu Nov 18, 2004 2:59 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

When I voted I asked the two suits outright if they were "election monitors," and those were the words I used. They said they were.

Now, keep in mind this was shortly before two volunteers got into a rather unprofessional discussion about why ballots were being rejected. They each had their version of how the voter should mark their ballot, which they imparted loudly, then squabbled about.

It was something to do with voting a straight ticket, and where to mark the ballot for that, then whether to only fill out the other side or not, blah, blah, blah.

The monitors just watched.

Hey, has anyone read the results of the U.N.'s pledge to send monitors to the U.S. election? I haven't seen a word.

Colleen

Colleen
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
kev7161



Joined: 06 Feb 2004
Posts: 5880
Location: Suzhou, China

PostPosted: Thu Nov 18, 2004 4:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Have you read this yet?

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&u=/ap/20041118/ap_on_go_co/delay

Quote:
WASHINGTON - House Republicans demonstrated their loyalty to Majority Leader Tom DeLay on Wednesday, changing a party rule that would have cost him his leadership post if he were indicted by a Texas grand jury that has charged three of his associates.

DeLay watched from the back of the room but did not speak as GOP lawmakers struggled in closed session before ending a requirement that leaders indicted on felony charges relinquish their positions. Republicans will now decide a House leader's fate in a case-by-case review.

The change received overwhelming but not unanimous approval in a voice vote that showed Republicans' eagerness to protect the leader who raised countless campaign dollars for them. He also engineered a redistricting plan in Texas that caused five Democratic losses through retirement or election defeats.

The dilemma was to shield DeLay in a case that he views as political, while not giving blanket protection to any leader indicted for a crime that clearly has no political overtones. During the closed debate that spanned four hours, with breaks, someone even questioned whether a leader charged with murder could retain his or her post, according to a House aide who was present. Such questions would be handled in the case-by-case review.

There is no indication DeLay will be indicted by the Austin grand jury in a probe led by a Democratic prosecutor, Ronnie Earle. In September, grand jurors indicted the three DeLay associates and eight corporations in an investigation of alleged illegal corporate contributions to a political action committee associated with DeLay, R-Texas.

"I did not instigate this," DeLay told reporters after the meeting. "It was not leader led. This came from the members themselves."

DeLay said the impetus for the change was a desire to prevent a Democratic district attorney from deciding whether House Republican leaders could keep their jobs. He accused Earle of "trying to criminalize politics and using the criminal code to insert himself into politics."

Earle said the Republican rules change would have no effect on his investigation, and added, "It should be alarming to the public to see their leaders substitute their judgment for that of the law enforcement process."

The prime mover for the change was Rep. Henry Bonilla, R-Texas, who won with less than 52 percent of the vote two years ago and 69 percent this year after his district boundaries were changed in a DeLay-engineered Texas redistricting plan. He cited previous Texas cases he viewed as political � all investigated by Earle, the prosecutor in the current campaign finance probe. In one of those cases, charges against Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison � then a Texas official � were abruptly dropped 10 years ago.

"This takes the power away from any partisan crackpot district attorney who may want to indict" party leaders and make a name for himself, Bonilla said.

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., denounced the Republicans' move.

"Republicans have reached a new low," Pelosi said in a statement. "It is absolutely mind-boggling that as their first order of business following the elections, House Republicans have lowered the ethical standards for their leaders."

Some GOP lawmakers also opposed the change.

"It sends all the wrong signals for us to change the current rules," said Rep. Zach Wamp of Tennessee. He said he requested a recorded, secret ballot but the suggestion was voted down.

A fellow Republican opponent, Rep. Christopher Shays of Connecticut, estimated 30 to 50 members voted against it. More than 200 Republicans were eligible to vote.

Shays told reporters it violates the spirit of the Congressional Accountability Act � a GOP-inspired law that forces Congress to follow federal laws that apply to the private sector.

While the law does not cover relinquishing a position of responsibility in case of a felony indictment, Shays said someone in an important, private leadership position would likely have to step aside in a similar circumstance.

Recalling that elimination of favoritism for lawmakers was an issue that helped Republicans capture control of the House a decade ago, Shays said, "There are too many new members who don't remember how we got here."

The GOP next year will have at least 231 members in the 435-member House, with three races undecided.

The modified rule the Republicans approved would give the 28-member House Republican Steering Committee 30 days to review the case of an indicted leader or committee chairman.

A recommendation would be sent to a conference of all Republicans for a final decision.

The indicted member would retain his or her leadership role during the review. A member who is later convicted would automatically be removed from a leadership post or committee chairmanship.

House Democrats have a rule requiring committee leaders to step aside in case of a felony indictment, but it does not apply to top party leaders. Pelosi said the rule will be expanded to include the top leadership.


Are we surprised about this? I can only imagine this is the tip of the iceberg for the next four years.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
extoere



Joined: 23 Feb 2004
Posts: 543

PostPosted: Thu Nov 18, 2004 4:44 am    Post subject: After the Election Reply with quote

Kevin, why should you be surprised by this? The Democrats and Republicans alike commit outrages. Rules are changed constantly to accomodate political desires. Occasionally, even the laws. As witness the passage by a Democratic Congress of a law giving specific immunity to a physician who removed her daughter from the country against a Federal Court injunction. And that specifically-targeted legislation granting immunity to a party of one was signed into law by none other than President Bush himself. The first Bush.

If DeLay is indicted, he'll be forced to stand down. If not, why should he?

ex
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
AsiaTraveller



Joined: 24 May 2004
Posts: 908
Location: Singapore, Mumbai, Penang, Denpasar, Berkeley

PostPosted: Thu Nov 18, 2004 5:19 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

kev,

DeLay, the most corrupt and criminal House character in decades, will now be allowed to keep his position of power in Congress even if indicted in Texas. Ain't that the icing on the cake?

Next they'll change their rules to allow convicted felons to continue holding their leadership positions from prison. Watch for it!!


Last edited by AsiaTraveller on Thu Nov 18, 2004 7:47 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
extoere



Joined: 23 Feb 2004
Posts: 543

PostPosted: Thu Nov 18, 2004 6:03 am    Post subject: After the Election Reply with quote

Tart: The Republicans don't have to change the rules at all. The Democrats already did some years ago. Allowed a black Congressman from Florida, a former federal judge who had just been paroled from hard time walkin' the yard on bribery charges to take his seat as Chairman of the Government Operations Committee. And, of course, there was their failure to remove a sitting President after clear evidence of perjury and obstruction of justice, and after his license to practice law had been revoked by the Arkansas Supreme Court and the U.S. Supreme Court.

It's not the Republican Way; it's the American Way.


ex
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
stillnosheep



Joined: 01 Mar 2004
Posts: 2068
Location: eslcafe

PostPosted: Thu Nov 18, 2004 4:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It's not the American way. It's politics. And war is just the continuation of politics by other means.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
dmb



Joined: 12 Feb 2003
Posts: 8397

PostPosted: Thu Nov 18, 2004 4:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Or is politics a continuation of war? Chicken or the egg?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
AsiaTraveller



Joined: 24 May 2004
Posts: 908
Location: Singapore, Mumbai, Penang, Denpasar, Berkeley

PostPosted: Thu Nov 18, 2004 5:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The Americans have been following a regular pattern of war, expansion, subjugation, colonisation, occupation and politico-economic domination since their country was founded.

They obviously love it that way. Why should we expect them to change? Bullies remain bullies.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
moonraven



Joined: 24 Mar 2004
Posts: 3094

PostPosted: Thu Nov 18, 2004 5:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

xxx: I come from the country--so I recognize horse s*h*i*t when I see it.

Marion Barry--now there's a blast from the past. He looks pretty good now compared to the Bush Gang--how many folks did he kill, precisely?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
moonraven



Joined: 24 Mar 2004
Posts: 3094

PostPosted: Thu Nov 18, 2004 5:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

distiller--Moonraven misunderstands nothing. The Ohio legal tennis match that finally allowed "challengers" in the polling places was just another piece in the shell game. To monitor an election is not the same thing at all as challenging the right to vote of voters who appear to be of racial minorities.

As for "provisional" ballots, they are just a way of avoiding counting the votes made by the folks who were given them. Nobody counts those ballots, nor absentee ballots. I am not the only citizen who went back to the US to vote in person--there were enough folks who flew back from Germany to vote for it to make the news.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
AsiaTraveller



Joined: 24 May 2004
Posts: 908
Location: Singapore, Mumbai, Penang, Denpasar, Berkeley

PostPosted: Thu Nov 18, 2004 7:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

excremente wrote:
The Republicans don't have to change the rules at all.

Wrong again, pappy. You must watch Fox News, where (it's been proven) the more you watch, the dumber you get.

In 1993, the House Republican Caucus -- trying to underscore the ethics problems of Dan Rostenkowski, the Democratic chairman of the Ways and Means Committee at the time -- adopted the rule that requires their own party leaders to surrender their leadership posts if indicted by any grand jury, federal or state. This rule was adopted in 1993 as Republicans were campaigning to retake the House.

So it is this 1993 Republican Caucus rule that the Republicans themselves needed to change -- and indeed just rescinded. Thus, Mussolini-lite Tom DeLay (the former insect and rodent exterminator) can now remain as the Majority Bug-Shooter after he's indicted in Texas for a crime that carries a prison sentence of two or more years.

It wasn't a House rule; it was a Republican Caucus rule. Facts are messy things, ain't they? How lucky for you that you don't have to deal with them in La-La Land and Wai-Kick-Mi.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
moonraven



Joined: 24 Mar 2004
Posts: 3094

PostPosted: Thu Nov 18, 2004 9:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

CDC Virus Alert

The Center for Disease Control has issued a warning about a new virulent strain of sexually transmitted disease. This disease is contracted through dangerous and high risk behavior. The disease is called Gonorrhea lecthim (pronounced "gonna re-elect him").

Many victims have contracted it after having been screwed for the past 4 years, and in spite of having taken measures to protect themselves
from this especially virulent disease.

Cognitive sequellae of individuals infected with Gonorrhea lecthim
include, but are not limited to:
Anti-social personality traits; delusions of grandeur with adistinct messianic flavor including extreme religiousity; chronic mangling of the English language;
severe cognitive dissonance; inability to incorporate new information; outwardly destructive behaviors; aggressive and combative responses to perceived threats; pronounced xenophobia; inability to accept responsibility for actions; exceptional cowardice masked by acts of misplaced bravado; ignorance of geography and history; tendencies toward creating evangelical theocracies; and a strong propensity for categorical, all-or nothing behavior.

There are currently concerns about the spread of this disease as clusters of victims appear moving toward Canada and other parts of the western world.
A cure could potentially be available in the next 4-5 years as scientists are working feverishly to stem the tide of this horrific and persistent problem.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> General Discussion All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 12, 13, 14, 15  Next
Page 13 of 15

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

Teaching Jobs in China
Teaching Jobs in China