| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
matttheboy

Joined: 01 Jul 2003 Posts: 854 Location: Valparaiso, Chile
|
Posted: Thu Dec 16, 2004 3:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
| distiller wrote: |
| I also agree with the previous poster, no not THAT one the other one, that the ability to learn languages is not a sign of intelligence. Some of the most ridiculously stupid people I've ever met have been able to pick up languages in a heartbeat while many intelligent people I know find it difficult. Personally, I like foreign languages and speak several but it has always been a struggle, although it gets easier with time and the more languages you pick up. That's why hard work is also key to language learning. |
Indeed; just look at the amount of intelectually challenged footy players that end being fluent in the language of the country they play in...Paul Ince with near perfect Italian?? And now Jonathan Woodgate apparently picking up Spanish so quickly he's able to join in the changing room banter (well i guess he's not got much else to do at the moment...). |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
moonraven
Joined: 24 Mar 2004 Posts: 3094
|
Posted: Thu Dec 16, 2004 5:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
SS:
Maybe this time you can try understanding MY point?
My original comment indicated that Latin had not been all THAT useful. Note the qualifier--in caps this time and in the original post.
By that I was saying that its usefullness was limited--and in comparison to French, Spanish (the language in which I do most of my writing and teaching), Italian, Portugese, German and English (my first language)--it has been. For ME. If you--who has never studied the language--believe that it is more useful than others, you are welcome to your opinion. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
thelmadatter
Joined: 31 Mar 2003 Posts: 1212 Location: in el Distrito Federal x fin!
|
Posted: Thu Dec 16, 2004 6:16 pm Post subject: language family |
|
|
whoa.... none of the Germanic languages (including English) are "derived" from Latin. The Latin and Germanic families do have a common ancester "Indo-European"(western Indo-European at that) but they are cousins. Linguistic families are based on history (however, the Holy Roman Empire was not Roman but in fact Germanic) and grammatical similarity... vocabulary has nothing to do with it. In fact, over 60% of English vocabulary is borrowed from other languages (mostly Latin and Greek).
English is no more derived from Latin as it is from Sanskrit (another ancient Indo-European language).
Latin may not be useful for communicative purposes any longer (although it was for a LONG time even after the fall of Rome) but its study can be useful for things like understanding the English system of using Latin and Greek roots to create new words. There are two inroads grammatically that Latin made into English 1) plural "s" and 2) use of infinitive in place of or along with a gerund ("I like to fish." and "I like fishing.") Both if these are the result of huge French influence and academic attempts up to about Shakespeare's time to "improve the language." At that time, English was a little backwater nation - considered completely uncultured even by the English themselves. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
moonraven
Joined: 24 Mar 2004 Posts: 3094
|
Posted: Thu Dec 16, 2004 6:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thelma, calm down! No more fancy footwork to cover up your lack of reading skills, please.
Nobody said that German was "derived" from Latin. However, the sentence structure in written German was taken from Latin during the period of the Holy Roman Empire, when Latin was the language of writing. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ShapeSphere
Joined: 16 Oct 2004 Posts: 386
|
Posted: Fri Dec 17, 2004 3:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| you are welcome to your opinion |
Thanks moonraven, you're a star.
You should only come out at night.
Getting back to education, I am amazed that you would find a language not all THAT useful. Most people would give their all for a decent education. Any learning should be viewed in a positive light.
sensu lato |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
moonraven
Joined: 24 Mar 2004 Posts: 3094
|
Posted: Fri Dec 17, 2004 5:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
SS:
Missed the point again, didya. Could only respond with insults and disingenous comments about how I disdain education, huh.
I have never poo-pooed education, having been a professional educator since 1968, so turn your insulting propaganda elsewhere.
I probably have found and still find more uses for Latin than 99.9% of the folks on this forum--as my previous posts indicate--but I still don't find it all THAT useful. Nor do I find Gaelic all THAT useful--probably you didn't take me on about that because you didn't know I was referring to the Irish language.
With my morning coffee and picadita I was reading an interesting article in Letras Libres about the redemption of the poet Ezra Pound--now there was a guy with an affinity for languages: Greek, Latin, Chinese, and a host of others. He was an extraordinarily skilled translator--and he wrote poems in many languages. He found them to be very useful when he had to spend 16 years locked up in a dementia facility. Did some of his best writing there. (It was that or a firing squad--which would you choose?) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ShapeSphere
Joined: 16 Oct 2004 Posts: 386
|
Posted: Sat Dec 18, 2004 2:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
Moonraven,
So glad you have remained civilised and rational in this debate.
| Quote: |
| Missed the point again, didya. Could only respond with insults and disingenous comments about how I disdain education, huh. |
Actually I understand your point but have different opinions and views, which I wish to discuss or examine. If you find that insulting, then I have to seriously question your reasoning.
| Quote: |
| I have never poo-pooed education, having been a professional educator since 1968, so turn your insulting propaganda elsewhere. |
!? This reveals more about your intellect & personality than you could possibly ever imagine.
| Quote: |
| I probably have found and still find more uses for Latin than 99.9% of the folks on this forum--as my previous posts indicate--but I still don't find it all THAT useful. Nor do I find Gaelic all THAT useful--probably you didn't take me on about that because you didn't know I was referring to the Irish language. |
Again you are adept at astonishing assumptions. (Apologies for the alliteration). I am well aware of Gaelic - but will confess that it's probably not THAT useful. Hence the reason for my silence indicated tacit acceptance.
(By the way there is Irish, Manx & Scottish Gaelic - but you know this of course. You know everything.)
| Quote: |
| (It was that or a firing squad--which would you choose?) |
Ooh. Tricky one. Let me get back to you. (NB: Use a dictionary to understand 'irony'.)
We could spend the rest of our lives having this conversation, and it wouldn't solve anything. Please try to understand my views before one of us dies.
It's amazing how some people on this site confuse differing opinions and ideas as being offensive or insulting. Moonraven - you sound like George W. Bush.
You have been a 'professional educator' since 1968 - but I wish at some point in that illustrious past you had been a 'listener'. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
moonraven
Joined: 24 Mar 2004 Posts: 3094
|
Posted: Sat Dec 18, 2004 6:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| SS: I didn't notice that you had any views. And as for this "conversation", it is over. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ShapeSphere
Joined: 16 Oct 2004 Posts: 386
|
Posted: Sun Dec 19, 2004 4:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I agree with the second part. Best to agree to disagree. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|